(3.235.236.13) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/05/15 03:05
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

: 
twitterline
研究生:乜虹尹
研究生(外文):NIEH,HUNG-YIN
論文名稱:家族企業繼承對策略變革之影響-以臺灣上市公司為例
論文名稱(外文):The Influence of Family Business Inheritance on the Strategic Change - A Case Study of Taiwanese Listed Company
指導教授:許文宗許文宗引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hsu,Wen-Tsung
口試委員:孫梅瑞陳宥杉
口試委員(外文):Sun,Mei-juiChen,Yu-Shan
口試日期:2017-05-05
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:銘傳大學
系所名稱:國際企業學系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:中文
論文頁數:77
中文關鍵詞:家族企業繼承策略變革
外文關鍵詞:Family businessInheritanceStrategic change
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:253
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:90
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
在資訊爆炸的網路世代中,快速的環境變遷已成為這個世代的家常便飯,企業都需要變革以適時因應瞬息萬變的外在環境,而如今,隨著第一代創辦人年事漸高,家族企業接班繼承人對於外部環境變遷之應對能力則日益重要,然而除了企業內部之運作,外部董事與機構持股亦是重要的外部監督機制,故本研究將探討家族企業繼承對策略變革程度之影響,並加入外部董事比率以及機構持股比率作為干擾變數。而本研究以台灣上市公司為研究對象,蒐集2010至2014年共266家上市家族企業之數據。最終,實證結果顯示家族企業之外部繼承對策略變革程度有較高之影響;而相較於內部專業經理人,家族成員繼承對策略變革程度有較高之影響。
In the network generation of information explosion, rapid environmental change has become the commonplace, companies need to change in response to the ever-changing external environment in a timely manner. Nowadays, with the advancing year of the founder of first generation, the coping skill of heirs of family business to this changing external environment is getting more important. However, in addition to the internal operation of the enterprise, the external directors and institutional shareholdings are also the important external supervisory mechanisms. Therefore, this study will explore the influence of family business inheritance on the degree of strategic change, and adding the external director ratio and the institutional shareholding ratio as the moderating variable. And Taiwan listed companies are used as the research object in this study, which totally collected 266 listed family business data from 2010 to 2014. At the end, the empirical results show that the external inheritance of the family business has a higher impact on the degree of strategic change. And compared with the internal professional managers, the family members’ inheritance has a higher impact on the degree of strategic change.
目 錄 I
圖目錄 IV
表目錄 V
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究範圍 4
第四節 研究步驟 5
第貳章 文獻探討 6
第一節 策略變革 6
一、策略變革之定義 6
二、策略變革之重要性 8
三、策略變革對績效之影響 9
第二節 家族企業繼承 10
一、家族企業定義與概述 10
二、家族企業特色 12
三、家族企業之繼承 14
四、家族企業內外部成員繼承之不同 15
五、家族企業繼承者對策略變革之影響 18
第三節 外部董事 19
一、外部董事之定義與概述 19
二、外部董事之功能 20
三、外部董事對策略變革之影響 21
第四節 機構持股 22
一、機構持股之定義 22
二、機構持股對企業之影響 23
三、機構持股對策略變革之影響 24
第参章 研究設計與方法 26
第一節 研究架構 26
第二節 研究假設 27
一、家族企業繼承與策略變革程度之關係 27
二、外部董事比率的調節效果 29
三、機構持股比率的調節效果 30
第三節 資料處理與方法 31
一、樣本與資料來源 31
第四節 變數之操作型定義 32
一、自變數 32
(一)家族企業繼承 32
二、應變數 33
(一)策略變革程度 33
三、干擾變數 34
(一) 外部董事比率 34
(二) 機構持股比率 34
四、控制變數 35
(一) 集團 35
(二) 企業規模 35
(三) 企業成立時間 35
(四) 市場不確定性 36
(五) 繼承前企業績效 36
(六) 前CEO留任董事會 36
(七) 高階管理團隊變動率 36
(八) 家族成員變動率 37
第五節 資料分析方法 38
一、相關分析及共線性診斷 38
二、迴歸分析 38
第肆章 實證結果分析 39
第一節 敘述性統計 39
第二節 相關性分析與共線性診斷 40
第三節 假設驗證與分析 44
一、家族企業繼承與策略變革程度 48
二、調節變數與策略變革程度 48
(一) 外部董事比率之調節效果 48
(二) 機構持股比率之調節效果 49
第伍章 結論與建議 52
第一節 研究結論 52
第二節 理論貢獻 53
第三節 管理意涵 54
第四節 研究限制與建議 54
參考文獻 55
一、中文文獻 55
二、英文文獻 57
一、 中文文獻

1.朱燕群,(2008)。關於家族企業財務管理的研究,山西經濟管理幹部學院報,第十六卷第二期,53-56。
2.吳冠徹,(2014)。二代接班啟動企業二次成長,先探投資周刊,第一八零七期,35-37。
3.吳思華,(1996)。策略九說,台北:臉譜出版。
4.吳思華,(2003)。策略九說(3版),台北:臉譜出版。
5.吳沛珊,(1998)。家族企業中企業主對專業經理人的信任評估及行為導向-從家族企業組織結構特徵的觀點探討,中原大學企業管理研究所
碩士論文
6.李春安、葉淑敏,(1999)。所有權結構改變與績效改善關聯性之研究─以台灣企業自願性再造為例,中國財務學會1999年會暨財務金融
學術論文研討會論文集,894-925。
7.李禮仲、鄧哲偉,(2002)。家族企業也可有燦爛的明天,國政評論,台北: 財團法人國家政策研究基金會。
8.林建山,(1991)。台灣企業管理:觀念、經驗與現實,台北:環球經濟社。
9.施佩雯,(2009)。集團企業家族持股、董事會組成與企業績效之關聯性-配對法之應用,東海大學會計系碩士論文。
10.范松清,(2007)。誰說富不過三代:打造百年老店經營八鑰。新北市:創見文化出版社。
11.范揚松,(1987)。家族企業的病理分析,現代管理月刊,第一百二十六期,16-3。
12.徐聯恩,(1998)。「企業變革架構」,中華管理評論,第1 卷第1 期, 1-7。
13.張小鳳,(2009)。家族主義認同與接班行為-個人生涯選擇模式的觀點,國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
14.張明峰,(1991)。股權結構對公司績效影響之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
15.張慧芳,(1995)。領導者與部屬間信任格局的決定要素與行為效果之探討,台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
16.許士軍、陳光中,(1989)。台灣家族企業發展與家族結構關係,行政院國家科學會專題研究。
17.陳兆慶,(1998)。企業續承計畫與組織特性管理績效關係之研究,國立中央大學人力資源所碩士論文。
18.陳冠政,(2011),台灣家族集團企業接班人培育模式-一項國際理論與台灣經驗的比較,收錄於王振寰、溫肇東主編,家族企業還重要嗎。
台北市:巨流圖書出版,153-187。
19.陳泰和,(2001)。台灣家族企業接班人選擇因素之研究-一以交易成本、信賴機制、網絡關係之觀點探討。國立台灣大學國際企業學研究所
碩士論文。
20.黃光國,(1984)。談家族企業的組織型態,中國論壇,第13 期,7。
21.黃裕光,(1993)。我國上市公司董事會特性與經營績效之研究,台灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。
22.黃湘綺,(1995)。家族企業與盈餘操縱現象的關連性研究,國際中正大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
23.黃鈺光,(1993)。我國上市公司董事會特性與經營績效之研究,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
24.楊復輝,(1990)。企業轉型與企業文化重塑,中小企業發展,第33 期,25-28。
25.葉匡時、操禮芹,(1996)。家族企業接班過程之網絡分析,管理科學學報,第十三卷第二期,197-225。
26.葉銀華,(1999)。家族控股集團、核心企業與報酬互動之研究-台灣與香港證券市場之比較,臺大管理論叢,第十八卷第二期,61-86。
27.鄭伯壎,(1991)。家族主義與領導行為,收錄於楊中方、高尚仁(合編),中國人、中國心-人格與社會篇。台北市,巨流圖書出版,
366-407。
28.嚴奇峰,(1994)。台灣家族企業組織成長問題之研究-社會文化基礎與自發性 規模抑制現象,企業經營策略與經營績效學術研討會論文,
中山企研所。
29.嚴奇峰,(1994)。台灣傳統家族企業極端共存組織現象之探討-系統隱態觀點,管理評論,第十三卷第一期,1-22。

二、 英文文獻
1.Ajinkya, B., S. Bhojraj, and P. Sengupta, (2003). The Governance Role of Institutional Investors and
Outsider Directors on the Properties of Management Earnings Forecasts, Working Paper, University of
Florida, Connell University, and University of Maryland.
2.Aldrich, H., & Auster, E. R, (1986). Even Dwarfs Started Small: Liabilities Ofage and Size and Their
Strategic Implications, Research in Organizational Behavior, 8(1986), 165-186.
3.Anderson, R. & D. Reeb, (2003). Founding-family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P
500, The Journal of Finance, 58, 1301-28.
4.Barker V. L., and Mone M. A., (1994). Retrenchment: Cause of Turnaround or Consequence of Decline?
Strategic Management Journal, 15, 395-405.
5.Barnes, L. B. and Hershon, S. A., (1976). Transferring Power in the Family Business, Harvard Business
Review, 54(4), 105-114.
6.Barney, J., (1986). Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy, Management
Science, 42(10), 1231-1241.
7.Barney, J., (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1),
99-120.
8.Barnhart, W. and S. Rosenstein, (1998). Board Compensation, Managerial Ownership, and Firm Performance:
An Empirical Analysis, The Financial Review, l33, 1-16
9.Barroso, C., Villegas, M. M., and Pérez‐Calero, L., (2011). Board Influence on a Firm's
Internationalization, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(4), 351-367.
10.Bartunek, J. M, (1984). Changing Interpretive Schemes and Organizational Restructuring: The Example of
a Religious Order, Administrative Science Quarterly, l3, 355-372.
11.Baysinger, B. and Hoskisson, R. E., (1990). The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic
Control: Effects on Corporate Strategy, Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 72-87.
12.Beasley, M. S., (1996). An Empirical Analysis of the Relation Between the Board of Director Composition
and Financial Statement Fraud, The Accounting Review, 71, 443-465.
13.Bennedsen, M., Nielsen, K. M., Pérez-González, F., and Wolfenzon, D., (2007). Inside The Family Firm:
The Role of Families in Succession Decisions and Performance, The Quarterly Journal of Economics,
122(2), 647-691.
14.Bhide, A., (1994). Efficient Markets, Deficient Governance: U.S. Securities Regulations Protect
Investors and Enhance Market Liquidity. But Do They Alienate Managers and Shareholders? Harvard
Business Review, 72, 128-140.
15.Blettner, D. P., Chaddad, F. R., and Bettis, R. A., (2012). The CEO Performance Effect: Statistical
Issues and a Complex Fit Perspective, Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 986-999.
16.Borokhovich, K. A, Parrino, R., and Trapani, T., (1996). Outside directors and CEO selection, Journal
of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 337-355.
17.Borokhovich, K., K. Brunarski, and R. Parrino, (2000). Variation in the Monitoring Incentives of
Outside Blockholders, Working Paper, Cleveland State University, Miami University, and University of
Texas.
18.Brickley, J., R. Lease, and C. Smith, (1988). Ownership Structure and Voting on Antitakeover
Amendments, Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 267-291.
19.Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., and Wan, J. C. C., (2003). Turnaround in East Asian Firms: Evidence from
Ethnic Overseas Chinese Communities, Strategic Management Journal, 24 (6), 519-540.
20.Bushee, B., (1998). The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopia Rand Investment Behavior, The
Accounting Review, 73, 305-333.
21.Byars, L., & Rue, L. W. (2000). Management: Skills and Application. Swindon: Bertram Books Limited.
22.Carney, M., (1998). A Management Capacity Constraint? Obstacles to the Development of Overseas Chinese
Family Business, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 15(2), 137-162.
23.Carpenter, M. A., (2000). The Price of Change: The Role of CEO Compensation in Strategic Variation and
Deviation from Industry Strategy Norms, Journal of Management, 26(6), 1179-1198.
24.Chandler, A. D., (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise,
US: MIT Press.
25.Chatterjee, S. and Harrison, J. S., (2001). Corporate governance, In Hitt, M. A., Freeman, R. E. and
Harrison, J. S. (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
26.Chen, M. J., (1988). Competitive Strategic Interaction: A Study of Competitive Actions and Responses,
Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland at College Park.
27.Child, J. (1972). Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice.
Sociology, 6(1), 1-22.
28.Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P., (2005).Trends and Directions in the Development of a
Management Theory of the Family Firm, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 555-575.
29.Churchill, N. C., (1987). Non-market Based Transfers of Wealth and Power: A Research Framework for
Family Businesses, American Journal of Small Business Management, 1(3), 51-64.
30.Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H, (2000). The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian
Corporations, Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1), 81-112.
31.Claver, E., Rienda, L., and Quer, D., (2009). Family Firms’ International Commitment: The Influence of
Family-Related Factors, Family Business Review, 22(2), 125-135.
32.Daily, C. and D. Dalton, (1994). Bankruptcy and Corporate Governance: The Impact of Board Composition
and Structure, Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1603-1617.
33.Daily, C. and Schwenk, C., (1996). Chief Executive Officers, Top Management Teams, and Boards of
Directors: Congruent or Countervailing Forces? Journal of Management, 22, 185-208.
34.Dalton, D., Daily, C., Ellstrand, A., and Johnson, J., (1998). Meta-analytic Reviews of Board
Composition, Leadership Structure, and Financial Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 19 (3),
269-290.
35.Davis, P., (1983). Realizing the Potential of the Family Business, Organizational Dynamics, 12(1),
47-56.
36.Demsetz, H, (1983). The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm, The Journal of Law and
Economics, 26(2), 375-390.
37.Donnelley, R. G, (1964). The family business, Harvard Business Review, 42(4), 93-105.
38.Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M. C., (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control, Journal of Law & Economics,
26, 301-25.
39.Finkelstein, S. and Hambrick, D. C., (1990). Top Management Team Tenure and Organizational Outcomes,
Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 484-503.
40.Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D., and Cannella, C. A. A. Jr., (2009). Strategic Leadership: Theory and
Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards, New York: Oxford University Press.
41.Firstenberg, P. B. and Malkiel, B. G., (1980). Why Corporate Boards Need Independent Directors?
Management Review, 4, 26-38.
42.Fombrun, C. J., & Ginsberg, A, (1990). Shifting Gears: Enabling Change in Corporate Aggressiveness,
Strategic Management Journal, 11(4), 297-308.
43.Fondas, N., & Wiersema, M, (1997). Changing of the Guard: The Influence of CEO Socialization on
Strategic Change, Journal of Management Studies, 34(4), 561-584.
44.Fosberg, R. H, (1989). Outside Directors and Managerial Monitoring, Akron Business and Economic Review,
20(2), 24.
45.Geletkanycz, M. A. and Hambrick, D. C., (1997). The External Ties of Top Executives: Implications for
Strategic Choice and Performance, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 654-681.
46.Ghemawat, P., (1991). Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy, New York: Free Press.
47.Gillan, S. and L. Starks, (2001). Institutional Investors, Corporate Ownership, and Corporate
Governance: Global Perspectives, Working Paper, TIAA-CREF Institute and University of Texas at Austin.
48.Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Nunez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J., (2007).
Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil
Mills, Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106-137.
49.Goodstein, J., & Boeker, W, (1991). Turbulence at the Top: A new Perspective on Governance Structure
Changes and Strategic Change, Academy of Management Journal, 34(2), 306-330.
50.Grove, A. S, (1996). Only the Paranoid Survive: How to Exploit the Crisis Points that Challenge Every
Company and Career, Broadway Business.
51.Habbershon, T. G., Williams, M. L., & MacMillan, I., (2003). A Unified System Perspective of Family
Firm Performance, Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 451-465.
52.Hambrick, D. C. and Mason, P. A., (1984). Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top
Managers, Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
53.Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M. A., and Fredrickson, J. W., (1993). Top Executive Commitment to the
Status Quo: Some Tests of Its Determinants, Strategic Management Journal, 14(6), 401-418.
54.Hamilton, G. G., & Kao, C. S, (1990). The Institutional Foundations of Chinese Business in the Family
Firm in Taiwan, Institute of Governmental Affairs, University of California, Davis, Research Program in
East Asian Business and Development.
55.Hamilton, G. G., (1997). Organization and Market Processes in Taiwan’s Capitalist Economy. In M. Orru,
N. W. Biggart, & G. G. Hamilton (Eds.), The Economic Organization of East Asian Capitalism. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage, 237-293
56.Handler, W. C., (1989). Methodological Issues and Considerations in Studying Family Businesses, Family
Business Review, 2(3), 257-276.
57.Hannan, M. T. and Freeman, J., (1984). Structural Inertia and Organizational Change, American
Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164.
58.Hart, B. H., (1991). Strategy (2nd Ed.), New York: Praeger.
59.Havement, H. A., (1992). Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Organizational Change and Performance Under
Conditions of Fundamental Environmental Transformation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 48-75.
60.Haynes, K. T. and Hillman, A., (2010). The Effect of Board Capital and CEO Power on Strategic Change,
Strategic Management Journal, 31(9), 1145-1163.
61.Henderson, A. D., Miller, D. and Hambrick, D. C., (2006). How Quickly Do Ceos Become Obsolete? Industry
Dynamism, CEO Tenure, and Company Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 27(5), 447-460.
62.Herrmann, P. and Datta, D. K., (2005). Relationships between Top Management Team Characteristics and
International Diversification: An Empirical Investigation, British Journal of Management, 16(1), 69-78.
63.Hill, C. W. L. and Rothaermel, F. T., (2003). The Performance of Incumbent Firms in the Face of Radical
Technological Innovation, Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 257-274.
64.Hillman, A. J. and Dalziel, T., (2003). Boards of Directors and Firmctors Performance: Integrating
Agency and Resource, Perspectives: Dependence Perspectives.
65.Hitt, M. A., Robert, E. H., and Hicheon, K., (1997). International Diversification: Effects on
Innovation and Firm Performance in Product-Diversified Firms, Academy of Management Journal, 40(4),
767-98.
66.Hofer, C. W. and Schendel, D., (1978). Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts, WestSt. Paul: Mn.
67.Jensen, M. C. and Mecking, W. H., (1976). Theory of the Firm: Mangerial Behavior, Agency Costs and
Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360
68.Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., and Ellstrand, A. E., (1996). Boards of Directors: A Review and Research
Agenda, Journal of Management, 22(3), 409-438.
69.Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K, and Hill, A. D., (2013). Board Composition beyond Independence: Social
Capital, Human Capital, and Demographics, Journal of Management, 39(1), 232-262.
70.Kaplan, S., (1994). Top Executive Rewards and Firm Performance, Political Economy, 102, 510-546.
71.Kesner, (1987). Directors’ Stock Ownership and Organizational Performance:An Investigation of Fortune
500 companies, Journal of Management, 1 (3), 499-507.
72.Kim, B., Burns, M. L., and Prescott, J. E., (2009). The Strategic Role of The Board: The Impact of
Board Structure on Top Management Team Strategic Action Capability, Corporate Governance: An
International Review, 17(6), 728-743.
73.Kor, Y. Y., (2006). Direct and Interaction Effects of Top Management Team and Board Compositions on R&D
Investment Strategy, Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1081-1110.
74.Lant J., and White, J., (1992). The Role of Managerial Learning and Interpretation in Strategic
Persistence and Reorientation: An Empirical Exploration, Strategic Management Journal, 13, 485-508.
75.Lant, T. K., Milliken, F. J., and Barta, B., (1992). The Role of Managerial Learning and Interpretation
in Strategic Persistence and Reorientation: An Empirical Exploration, Strategic Management Journal,
13(8), 585-608.
76.Litz, R. A, (1995). The Family Business: Toward Definitional Clarity, Family Business Review, 8(2),
71-81.
77.Miller, D., (1991). Stale in the Saddle: CEO Tenure and the Match Between Organization and Environment,
Management Science, 37(1), 34-52.
78.Miller, D. and Le Breton-Miller, I., (2006). Family Governance and Firm Performance: Agency,
Stewardship, and Capabilities, Family Business Review, 19(1), 73-87.
79.Miller, D., & Le-Breton-Miller, I., (2005). Managing for the Long Run: Lessons in Competitive Advantage
from Great Family Businesses. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
80.Mok, H. M., Lam, K., & Cheung, I, (1992). Family Control and Return Covariation in Hong Kong's Common
Stocks, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 19(2), 277-293.
81.Murphy, Kevin, and Karen Van Nuys, (1994). State Pension Funds and Shareholder Inactivism, Working
Paper, Harvard University.
82.Nelson, R., & Winter, S, (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of the Firm, Belknap, Harvard.
83.Parrino, R., R. Sias, and L. Starks, (2003). Voting with Their Feet:Institutional Investors and CEO
Turnover, Journal of Financial Economics, 68, 3-46.
84.Pass, C., (2004). Corporate Governance and the Role of Non-executive Directors in Large UK Companies:
An Empirical Study, Corporate Governance, 4 (2), 52-63.
85.Pearce, J. A. and Zahra, S. A., (1992). Board Composition from a Strategic Contingency Perspective,
Journal of Management Studies, 29(4), 411-438.
86.Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R., (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence
Perspective, New York: Harper and Row.
87.Pound, John, (1988). Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight, Journal of Financial
Economics, 20, 237-265.
88.Poza, E., (2004). Family Business, Mason: Thomson South-Western.
89.Pozen, R., (1994). Institutional Investors: The Reluctant Activists, Harvard Business Review, 72,
140-149.
90.Quinn, J. B, (1980). Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism, Irwin Professional Publishing.
91.Rajagopalan, H. and Spreitzer, G., (1997). Toward A Theory of Strategic Change: A Multilens Perspective
and Integrative Framework, Academy of Management Review, 22, 48-79.
92.Redding, S. G, (1996). Weak Organizations and Strong Linkages: Managerial Ideology and Chinese Family
Business Networks, Asian Business Networks, 27412.
93.Robbins, S. R., & Duncan, R. B, (1988). The Role of the CEO and Top Management in the Creation and
Implementation of Strategic Vision, The Executive Effect: Concepts and Methods for Studying Top
Managers, 2, 205-233.
94.Rosenblatt, P.C., L. deMik., R.M. Anderson and P.A. Johnson, (1985). The Family in Business:
Understanding and Dealing with the Challenges Entrepreneurial Families Face. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
95.Rosenstein, S., and Wyatt, J., (1990). Outside Directors, Board Independence, and Shareholder Wealth,
Journal of Financial Economics, 26, 175-191.
96.Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W, (1982). The Organization of Societal Sectors, Publisher not identified.
97.Shiller, R. J., and J. Pound, (1989). Survey Evidence on Diffusion of Interest and Information Among
Investor, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations, 12 (1), 44-66.
98.Shivdasani, A., & Yermack, D, (1999). CEO Involvement in the Selection of New Board Members: An
Empirical Analysis, The Journal of Finance, 54(5), 1829-1853.
99.Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny, (1986). Large Shareholders and Corporate Control, Journal of Political
Economy, 94, 461-48.
100.Singh, J. V., House, R. J., and Johnson D., (1986). Organizational Change and Organizational Mortality,
Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(4), 587-611.
101.Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A., (2003). Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resource, Management, and
Wealth Creation in Family Firms, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(3), 339-358.
102.Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., and Gannon, M., (1992). The Dynamics of Competitive Strategy, Los Angeles,
CA: Sage.
103.Tang, J., Crossan, M., and Rowe, W. G., (2011). Dominant CEO, Deviant Strategy, and Extreme
Performance: The Moderating Role of a Powerful Board, Journal of Management Studies, 48(7), 1479-1503.
104.Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P, (1986). Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments,
Administrative Science Quarterly, 73, 439-465.
105.Vance, S. C., (1983). Corporate Leadership: Boards, and Strategy, New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
106.Villalonga, B. and Amit R., (2006). How Do Family Ownership, Management, and Control Affect Firm Value?
Journal of Financial Economics, 80, 385-417.
107.Walker, E. and F. Lefort, (1999). Pension Reform and Capital Markets: Are There Any (Hard) Links?
Working Paper, Universided Catolica de Chile.
108.Weisbach, M. S., (1988). Outside Directors and CEO Turnover, Journal of Financial Economics, 20,431-460.
109.Westphal, J. D. and Bednar, M. K., (2005). Pluralistic Ignorance in Corporate Boards and Firms
Strategic Persistence in Response to Low Firm Performance, Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2),
262-298.
110.Whitley, R. D, (1990). Eastern Asian Enterprise Structures and the Comparative Analysis of Forms of
Business Organization, Organization Studies, 11(1), 047-74.
111.Wiersema, M. F. and Bantel, K. A., (1992). Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic
Change, Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91-121.
112.Winter, R., (1977). State Law, Shareholder Protection, and the Theory of the Corporation, Journal of
Legal Studies, 6(1), 251-292.
113.Yeh, Y. H., Lee, T. S., and Woidtke, T., (2001). Family Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence from
Taiwan, International Review of Finance, 2(1‐2), 21-48
114.Young, M. N., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., and Chan E. S., (2001). The Resource Dependence, Service and
Control Functions of Boards of Directors in Hong Kong and Taiwanese Firms, Asia Pacific Journal of
Management,18 (2), 223-244.
115.Zajac, E. J., & Kraatz, M. S, (1993). A Diametric Forces Model of Strategic Change: Assessing the
Antecedents and Consequences of Restructuring in the Higher Education Industry, Strategic Management
Journal, 14(S1), 83-102.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關點閱論文