跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.27.215) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/04/20 09:41
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:鄭夙涵
研究生(外文):Cheng, Su-Han
論文名稱:台灣家長選擇私立雙語小學之心理歷程:以計畫行為理論分析
論文名稱(外文):Using Theory of Planned Behavior to analyze parents' rationales for choosing bilingual schools
指導教授:邱美秀邱美秀引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chiu, Mei-SHiu
口試委員:詹志禹張景媛
口試委員(外文):Chan, Chih-YuChang, Ching-Yuan
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立政治大學
系所名稱:教育學系
學門:教育學門
學類:綜合教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:中文
論文頁數:95
中文關鍵詞:雙語小學計畫行為理論家長心理私立雙語小學
外文關鍵詞:Bilingual schoolsTheory of planned behavior
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:230
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
在全球化之今日,英語之重要性已不可同日而語,而伴隨著教育改革及教育選擇權之開放,私立雙語小學也漸漸成為家長之選擇之一,越來越多的家長放棄學區學校,開始作出私立雙語小學之選擇。為探究家長為其子女選擇私立雙語小學就讀之因,本研究先以Ajzen之計畫行為理論(Theory of Planned Behavior)為基底,根據本研究之目的,做出些微修改後擬定訪談搞,以半結構訪談方式面對面與選擇私立雙語小學家長進行晤談,之後,再以樣板式分析方法進行分析。分析之結果除了計畫行為理論之中之態度、主觀規範與行為控制知覺之外,研究者認為根據本研究之目的,應再增列學習關鍵期,故研究之結果以四大方向呈現。(一)態度:在態度方面以家長之擔憂與私立小學之對策、台灣大環境之社會問題以及家長個人之內在因素為三大影響家長選擇私立雙語小學之因,(二)主觀規範:影響家長之重要他人主要分為兩類探討之,分別為專業人士以及身邊有相關經驗之重要他人,(三)行為控制知覺:家長所持之外部資源(主要為經濟能力)與其本身之自我效能,以及(四)童年決定論:家長所關心關鍵學習期之學習議題。最後針對本研究之結果作出討論與建議,希望能透過本研究,提供台灣教育另一參考面向。
Language ability plays an important role in the era of globalization and, instead of the schools in the school district, parents start considering bilingual schools as their educational choice for their children. The aim of this study, therefore, was to identify parental rationales for choosing bilingual schools. A qualitative case study approach was used to gain an understanding of parents’ decision-making process. The research participants were eight Taiwanese parents who made the choices of sending their children into private bilingual primary schools. The parents were interviewed by a semi-structured interview method. The interview transcripts were analyzed using template analysis based on Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behavior. The results of data analysis revealed that parents’ rationales for choosing bilingual schools were categorized in four main dimensions and smaller parts for each: (a) Attitude: the policies of private bilingual primary schools toward the concern of parents, the problems of Taiwan social environment and parents’ intrinsic negative tendency are the three main factors which impact parents’ attitude toward private bilingual primary schools (b) Subjective norms: advice from the experts and significant others (c) Perceived behavioral control: accessible control beliefs (family finance condition) and parents’ self-efficacy (d) Critical learning period: learning issues that concern parents in critical learning period.
中文摘要 …………………………………………………………… 4
英文摘要 ……………………………………………………………… 5
目次 …………………………………………………………………………… 2-3
表次 …………………………………………………………………………………… 3
第一章 緒論 ……………………………………………………………… 6-8
第一節 研究背景 ……………………………………………………………… 6
第二節 研究目的與問題 ………………………………………………… 6-7
第三節 名詞釋義 ……………………………………………………… 7-8
第二章 文獻探討 ……………………………………………… 9-26
第一節 教育選擇權相關理論與研究 ……………………………… 9-10
第二節 台灣一般公立小學與私立小學之比較探討 …………… 10-11
第三節 四類私立小學之比較 ………………………………………… 11-17
第四節 計畫行為理論 …………………………………………………… 17-18
第五節 同儕效應相關研究 ………………………………………… 18-20
第六節 童年學習與未來成就之相關研究 ………………………… 20-22
第七節 語言學習關鍵期假說相關研究 …………………………… 22-24
第八節 決策之心理歷程分析方法–樣板式分析法 ………………… 24
第九節 選擇私立小學之家長相關研究 ……………………… 24-26
第三章 研究方法 ………………………………………………………… 27-29
第一節 研究對象 ……………………………………………………………… 27
第二節 研究工具 ………………………………………………………… 27-28
第三節 資料分析-樣板式分析法 …………………………………… 28-29
第四節 初步資料析………………………………………………………… 29
第四章 研究結果 ………………………………………………………… 30-72
第一節 態度 ………………………………………………………………… 30-61
第二節 主觀規範 …………………………………………………………… 61-69
第三節 行為控制知覺 ………………………………………………… 69-72
第五章 總結、討論、與建議 ………………………………………… 73-84
第一節 結果與內部推論 ………………………………………………… 73-81
第二節 研究建議 ………………………………………………………… 81-83
第三節 研究限制 ………………………………………………………… 83-84
參考文獻
王天苗(民92)。學前融合教育實施的問題和對策–以台北市國小附幼為例。國
立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系特殊教育研究學刊,25,1-25。
王炎川(民96)。台灣另類學校家長教育選擇權意識發展之研究-以宜蘭慈新華
德福學校為例。國立政治大學教育碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
吳清山、江愛華、張世平、黃旭均、張正霖、鄭望崢 (民87 )。家長教育權選擇之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(民94)。質性分析方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究期刊,3(2),122-136。
秦夢群(民86 )。教育行政-實務部分。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。
張孟華、吳麗君(民102)。 對台灣宗教學校期許,2(8),31-34。
陳向明(民91)。社會科學質的研究。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。
陳昺麟(民100)。社會科學質化研究之紮根理論實施程序及實例之介紹。勤益學報,19(12),327-342。
黃建忠 (民93 )。家長教育選擇權的理念與省思。學校行政,31,257-265。
黃哲豪(民102)。私立雙語小學家長選校考量因素與滿意度之研究-以台中某私立雙語
小學為例。國立臺中教育大學教育學系課程與教學碩士在學專班論文,未出版,台
中市。
萬文隆(民93)。深度訪談在質性研究中的應用。生活科技教育月刊,37(4),
17-23。
賴思宇 (民102)。從「行李」成為「人」台灣籍加拿大僑生的求學體驗與成長歷程。國立政治大學教育所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
聯合國世界人權宣言(1948)。取自http://www.scu.edu.tw/hr/document_imgs/documents/d1.pdfhttp://www.scu.edu.tw/hr/document_imgs/documents/d1.pdf

Ajzen, I. (1971). Attitudinal vs. normative messages: An investigation of the differential effects f persuasive communications on behavior. Sociometry, 34(2), 269-280.
Arasaratnam, L. A. (2011). Perception and communication in intercultural spaces. Lanham, MA: University Press of America.
Andersen, A. W. (2014). Parent reasons for enrollment at one dual-language Chinese immersion elementary school program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
Baig, F. (2011). Investigating the motivations of parents choosing language immersion education for their child. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa city, Iowa.
Bakken, L., Brown, N., & Downing, B. (2017). Early childhood education: The long-term benefits. Journal of research in childhood education, 31(2), 255-269.
Ball, S. J., Bowe, R. & Gewirtz S. (1995). Circuits of schooling: A sociological exploration of parental choice of school in social class contexts. The Sociological Review, 43(1), 52-78.
Ball, S.J., & Vincent, C. (1998). “I heard it on the Grapevine”: “hot” knowledge and school choice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(3), 377-400.
Barnett, W. S. (1995). Long-term effects on early childhood programs on cognitive and school outcomes. The Future of Children, 5 (3), 25-50.
Barro, R. J. & Lee, J. W. (2013). A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950-2010. Journal of Development Economics, 104(C), 184-198.
Bialystok, E. & Miller, B. (1999). The problem of age in second-language acquisition: Influences from language structure, and task. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 2(2), 127-145.
Bosetti, L. & Pyryt C. M. (2007). Parental motivation in school choice: Seeking the competitive edge. Journal of School Choice, 1(4), 89-108.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York, NY: Pearson Education.
Calvo, F. R. (2007). What do parents think of two-way bilingual education? An analysis of responses. Journal of Latinos and Education, 6(2), 139-150.
Carman, K. G. & Zhang, L. (2012). Classroom peer effects and academic achievement: evidence from a Chinese middle school. China Enconomic Review, 23, 223-237.
Chen, C. S., Lee, S.Y., & Stevenson, H. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 6(3), 170-175.
Cheng, L. (2012). The power of English and the power of Asia: English as lingua franca and in bilingual and multilingual education. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33(4), 327-330.
Claessens, A. & Mimi, E. (2013). How important is where you start? Early mathematics knowledge and later school success. Teachers college record, 115 (6), 1-29.
Coleman. J. S. & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private high schools: The impact of communities. The Wilson Quarterly, 11(5), 41-45.
Collier, V. P. (1987). The effect of age on acquisition of a second language for school. Paper session presented at Office of bilingual education and minority language affairs (ED), Washington, DC.
Cohen-Zada, D. & Sander, W. (2007). Religion, religiosity and private school choice: Implications for estimating the effectiveness of private schools. Journal of Urban Economics, 64(2008), 85-100.
Davis, L., Ajzen, I., Saunders, J. & Williams, T. (2002). The decision of African American students to complete high school: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology. 94(4), 810-819.
Fail, E., Thompson, J. & Walker, G. (2004). Belonging, identity and third culture kids. Life histories of former international school students. Journal of Research in International Education, 3(3), 319-338.
Fan, W. & Williams, C. M. (2010). The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self-efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology, 30(1), 53-74.
Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78-104.
Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2003). An introduction to language. Canada: Wadsworth.
Ganotice, F. A., Bernardo, A. B., & King, R. B. (2012). Testing the factorial invariance of the English and Filipino versions of the inventory of school motivation with bilingual students in the Philippines. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(3), 298-303.
Girardelli, D. & Patel, V. K. (2016). The theory of planned behavior and Chinese ESL students’ in-class participation. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(1), 31-41.
Goldring, E. B. & Philips, K. J. R. (2008). Parent preferences and parent choices: The public- private decision about school choice. Journal of Education Policy, 23(3), 209-230.
Halliday, T. J. (2012). What is a peer? The role of network definitions in estimation of endogenous peer effects. Applied Econmics, 44(3), 1-32.
Heyward, M. (2002). From international to intercultural. Redefining the international school for a globalized world. Journal of Research in International Education, 1(1), 9-32.
Hoxby, C. (2000). Peer effects in the classroom: learning from gender and race variation. NBER working paper series No. 7867, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hu, G. (2002). Recent important developments in secondary English- language teaching in the People’s Republic of China. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 15(1), 30-49.
Hu, G. (2005). English language education in China: Policies, progress, and problems. Language Policy, 4, 5-24.
Ingram, K. L., Cope, J. G., Harju, B. L.& Wuensch, K. L. (2000). Applying to graduate school: A test of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15(2), 215-226.
Joshi, P. (2014). Parent decision-making when selecting schools: The case of Nepal. Prospects, 44(3), 411-428.
Kang, C. H. (2007). Classroom peer effects and academic achievement: Quasi-randomization evidence from South Korea. Journal of Urban Economics. 61(3), 458-495.
Kanno, Y. (2003). Imagined communities, school visions, and the education of bilingual students in Japan. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 2(4), 285-300.
Ladd, H. F. (2002). School vouchers: A critical view. Journal of Economic Perspective, 16(4), 3-24.
Lao, C. (2003). Parents’ attitudes toward Chinese bilingual education and Chinses language use. The Journal of the National Association for Bilingual Education. 28(1), 1-16.
Lavy, V., Weinihardt, F., & Silva, O. (2009). The good, the bad and the average: evidence on the scale and nature of ability peer effects in schools. NBER working paper series No. 15600, National Bureau of Economics Research.
MacFarlane, K. & Woolfson, L. M. (2013). Teacher attitudes and behavior toward the inclusion of children with social, emotional and behavioral difficulties in mainstream schools: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 46-52.
McEwan, P. J. (2003). Peer effects on student achievement: evidence from Chile. Economics of Education Review, 22, 131-141.
Mao, C. J. (2015). Choice as a global language in local practice: A mixed model of school choice in Taiwan. International Educational Journal: Comparative Perspective, 14(2), 101-112.
Goldring, E. & Philips, K. J. R. (2008). Parent preferences and parent choices: The public-private decision about school choice. Journal of Education Policy, 23(3), 1-37.
Poikolainen, J. (2012). A case study of parents’ school choice strategies in a Finnish urban context. European Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 127-144.
Powers, J. M. & Cookson, P. W. (1999). The politics of school choice research: Fact, fiction, and statistics. Educational Policy, 13(1), 104-122.
Potter, D. & Hayden, M. (2004). Parental choice in the Buenos Aires bilingual school market. Journal of Research in International Education, 3(1), 87-111.
Prichard, T. G. (2012). Factors affecting the decision processes regarding Christian parents’ school choice: A grounded theory study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Regent University, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Reinoso, A. O. (2008). Middle-class families and school choice: freedom versus equity in the context of a “local education market”. European Educational Research, 7(2), 176-194.
Rugenmalira, J. M. (2005). Theoretical and practical challenges in a Tanzanian English medium primary school. Africa & Asia, 5, 66-84.
Schneider, M. & Buckley, J. (2002). What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 133-144.
See, B., Huat & Gorard, S. (2015). The role of parents in young people’s education- a critical view of the causal evidence. Oxford Review of Education, 41(3), 346-366.
Snow, C. & Hoefnagel-Hoehla, M. (1982). Critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. Child Development, 49(4), 1114-1128.
Strier, M. & Katz, H. (2015). Trust and parents’ involvement in schools of choices. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 44(3), 369-379.
U. K. National Foundation of Educational Research. (2015). School choice: The parent view survey of parents 2014 (Publication No. 313392). Retrieved from https://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/IMPB01/IMPB01_home.cfm
Villavicencio, A. (2013). “It’s our best choice right now.”: Exploring how charter school parents choose. Education Policy Analysis Archives. 21(81), 1-23.
Waqas, M., Fatima T., Sohail M., Salieen M., & Khan, M. A. (2013). Parental involvement and acdemic achievement: A study on secondary school students of Lahore, Pakistan. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(8), 209-223.
Wells, A. S. & Crain, R. L. (1994). Perpetuation theory and long-term effects of school desegregation. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 531-555.
Yang, S. C. & Lin W. C. (2004). The relationship among creative, critical thinking and thinking styles in Taiwan high school students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(1), 33-45.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top