臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

政府要追尋城市繁榮，又要提供公共利益，是一件困難的任務，一定要謀求解決財政問題的辦法。將公共部門和私營部門結合在一起，可以互相彌補不足之處，解決複雜的公共問題。為解決閒置空間與青年創業的問題，臺中市政府勞工局推出「摘星青年 築夢臺中」創業補助計畫，協助一○八名青年創業，提供創業空間、創業資金、創業輔導。本研究主要目的是說明摘星計畫的公私協力與執行成效，以及摘星青年的創業成效、摘星基地的空間活化成效。研究結果顯示，有許多政府部門與民間組織參與摘星計畫，摘星計畫的公私協力情形相當複雜，甚至形成一層又一層的委託關係。臺中市政府和摘星青年形成一種互利互惠的關係，公私協力的關係包含組織間關係、合作、契約治理。摘星計畫的推行，不但活化閒置空間，也幫助青年創業，逐漸形成文化創意產業聚落。摘星青年經過兩年的創業考驗，營收由虧轉盈，朝向穩健經營。最後，提出摘星計畫的修正建議，以及摘星基地的活化建議。

It’s a difficult task for government to pursue the prosperity of the city and provide public interest. We must seek a solution to solve financial problem. To combine the public and private sectors together, we can make up for deficiencies each other, to solve some complex public problems. To solve the problems of unused space and youth entrepreneurship, the Labor Affairs Bureau in Taichung to implement youth entrepreneurship policy. To help 108 young people become entrepreneurs, the government in Taichung City provide business space, venture capital, business counseling. The purpose of this study is to explain the public-private partnerships of youth entrepreneurship policy, and the implementation effectiveness of youth entrepreneurship policy, and the entrepreneurial effectiveness of young people, and the regeneration effect of unused space in three bases. The research results show that there are many government departments and civil organizations participate in youth entrepreneurship policy, it is quite complex for public-private partnerships in the youth entrepreneurship policy, and even form a complex relationship between the commission. Taichung city government and entrepreneurs to form some mutually beneficial relationship. The relationship between public-private partnerships includes inter-organizational relations, cooperation, and contract management. To implementation this policy, not only regeneration of unused space, but also help young people become entrepreneurs, and form an settlement of cultural and creative industries. Entrepreneurs after two years of entrepreneurial test, revenue from deficit to profit, towards a stable business. Finally, the researcher made some improvement suggestions for youth entrepreneurship policy, and made some regeneration suggestions for unused space in three bases.

目 次

第一章 緒論 …………......………………………………………………….………. 1
第一節 研究動機 ……………...………………………………………….……… 1
第二節 研究價值 ………...……………………………………………….……… 3
第三節 研究目的 …...…………………………………………………….……… 3
第四節 研究問題 ………...……………………………………………….……… 4
第二章 文獻探討 ……………...…………………………………………….…….... 5
第一節 文獻檢閱 ……………………………………………………….…….….. 5
第二節 公私協力理論 ……...……………………………………………….…… 6
第三章 青年創業政策 ………………....……………………………...………..…. 11
第一節 創業資源 ………....……………………………………………….……. 11
第二節 推出青年創業政策的原因 …….………………………………………. 14
第三節 臺中市政府青年創業政策 ….…………………………………………. 15
第四節 摘星青年築夢臺中創業補助計畫 …………..………………………… 18
第四章 研究方法 ………………...……………………………………………..…. 25
第一節 研究取向 …………………………………………………………..…… 25
第二節 研究工具 ………………………………………………………..……… 26
第三節 資料蒐集 …………………………………………………….…………. 27
第四節 資料分析 …………………………………………………….…………. 28
第五章 次級資料分析 …..………………………………………………………… 29
第一節 摘星計畫的公私協力 ….............………………………………………. 29
第二節 摘星計畫的執行成效 ………….………………………….…………… 46
第三節 摘星計畫的缺失 …………….......……………………………..………. 59
第六章 結論 ………..……………………………………………………………… 65
第一節 研究發現 ……….…………………………………………………….… 65
第二節 研究建議 …….…………………………………………………………. 68
參考書目 ………………………………………………………………….…………..71
附 錄 ...……………………………………………………………………………... 75
新聞文本 ..……………………………………………………………..….………. 75

表 次

表2-1 公私協力的概念化構面 ……………………………………...…………….. 9
表3-1 中央政府推出的創業貸款 ………………..……………………….……… 12
表3-2 地方政府推出的創業貸款 ………………......…………………….……… 12
表3-3 臺中市政府推出的青年創業政策 …………………………………..……. 17
表3-4 摘星基地比較表 …………….……………………………………….……. 24
表4-1 研究途徑 …………………….……………………………………….……. 25
表4-2 新聞文本編碼 ……………….…………………………………………….. 28
表5-1 摘星基地的公私協力 ………………….………………………………….. 40
表5-2 創業措施的公私協力 ……………………………………….………..…… 45

圖 次

圖2-1 私人和公共責任的規模與範圍 ………….…………………………………. 10

參考書目

一、中文部分

（一）專書

王郁寧（2005）。《舊針線新創意──（仙鹿巷壹號）布工房打造婦女農村新經濟》。台北：財團法人婦女權益促進發展基金會。
吳英明（1996）。《公私部門協力關係之研究：公私部門聯合開發與都市發展》。高雄：麗文。
鍾秋香、廖國秀（2005）。《黃昏的朝露──青春不老隊釀漬傳奇》。台北：財團法人婦女權益促進發展基金會。

（二）期刊論文

邱啟新（2015）。〈綠色堡壘：台北新圓環之綠活論述、自然再現與偽公共空間〉。《建築學報》，第91期，頁99-118。
黃蘭燕（2016）。〈一個文化治理的角度－大溪木藝生態博物館的籌備與誕生〉。《博物館學季刊》，第30卷第3期，頁81-99。
嚴祥鸞（2006）。〈“姐妹牽手來創業”套書讀後─談政府婦女創業政策〉。《婦研縱橫》，第77期，頁78-86。

二、西文部分

（一）專書

Osborne, S. P. (2000). Public-Private Partnerships: Theory and Practice in International Perspective (1st Ed.). London: Routledge.
Rosenau, P. V. (Ed.) (2000). Public–Private Policy Partnerships. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Savas, E. S. (2000). Privatization and Public–Private Partnerships. New York: Chatham House.
Wettenhall, R. (2005). The Public–Private Interface: Surveying the History. In The Challenge of Public–Private Partnerships: Learning from International Experience, 22–43. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

（二）期刊論文

Anderson, S. (2012). Public, private, neither, both? Publicness theory and the analysis of healthcare organisations. Social Science & Medicine, 74(3): 313-322.
Forrer, J., J. E. Kee, K. E. Newcomer, & E. Boyer (2010). Public-private partnerships and the public accountability question. Public Administration Review, 70(3): 475-484.
Harvey, D. (1989). From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 71(1): 3-17.
Hodge, G. A. (2004). The risky business of public-private partnerships. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(4): 37-49.
Hodge, G. A., & C. Greve (2007). Public-private partnerships: An international performance review. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 545-558.
Kernaghan, K. (1993). Partnerships and public administration: conceptual and practical considerations. Canadian Public Administration, 36(1): 57-76.
Linder, S. H. (1999). Coming to Terms with the Public–Private Partnership: A Grammar of Multiple Meanings. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(1): 35–51.
Mahoney, J.T., A. M. McGahan, & C. N. Pitelis (2009). The interdependence of private and public interests. Organization Science, 20(6): 1034-1052.
Maynard, A. (1986). Public and private sector interactions: an economic perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 22(11): 1161-1166.
Roehrich, J. K., M. A. Lewis, & G. George (2014). Are public-private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review. Social Science & Medicine, 113: 110-119.
Van Ham, H., & J. Koppenjan (2001). Building Public–Private Partnerships: Assessing and Managing Risks in Port Development. Public Management Review, 3(4): 593–616.
Wettenhall, R. (2003). The Rhetoric and Reality of Public–private Partnerships. Public Organization Review: A Global Journal, 3(1): 77–107.
Zheng, J., J. K. Roehrich, & M. A. Lewis (2008). The dynamics of contractual and relational governance: evidence from long-term public-private procurement arrangements. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14(1): 43-54.

（三）未發表論文

HM Treasury (1998). Partnerships for Prosperity: the Private Finance Initiative. HM Treasury, London.
Lewis, M.K. (2002). Risk Management in Public-Private Partnerships. Working Paper, School of International Business, University of South Australia.
Partnerships British Columbia (2003). An Introduction to Public Private Partnerships. Update June 2003. Partnerships British Columbia.

（四）電子資源

Engel, E., R. Fischer, & A. Galetovic (2008). Public-private partnerships: when and how. Retrieved 6 July 2017, from http://www.econ.uchile.cl/uploads/publicacion/c9b9ea69d84d4c93714c2d3b2d5982a5ca0a67d7.pdf.