跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.84) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/09 17:31
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:林敬桓
研究生(外文):Jing-Huan Lin
論文名稱:茶角盲椿象生活史及取食偏好性評估
論文名稱(外文):The life cycle and feeding preference of Helopeltis fasciaticollis Poppius
指導教授:莊益源莊益源引用關係
指導教授(外文):YI-Yuan Chuang
口試委員:唐立正陳文華
口試日期:2017-07-05
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中興大學
系所名稱:昆蟲學系所
學門:生命科學學門
學類:生物學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:中文
論文頁數:53
中文關鍵詞:茶樹茶角盲椿象取食偏好性生活史大花咸豐草兩耳草
外文關鍵詞:TeaHelopeltis fasciaticollis Poppiusfeeding preferencelife cycleBidens pilosaPaspalum conjugatum
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:446
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
茶角盲椿象 (Helopeltis fasciaticollis Poppius) 為茶樹重要害蟲,本試驗以其刺吸茶樹葉片後造成斑痕數及斑痕面積,來評估此蟲在不同生育期可能對茶樹造成損害的差異,結果顯示茶角盲椿象各個生長階段於早上、下午及晚上時段皆有刺吸取食行為,各生長階段以五齡若蟲所造成的危害斑痕數量最多,平均達60.7 ± 26.8 個,與雌成蟲之間無顯著差異;危害斑痕的總面積則以雌成蟲最大,平均為189.5 ± 108.0 mm2,但與五齡若蟲之間無顯著差異。以台茶18號做為對照組,分別測試茶角盲椿象對 8 種茶樹品種的取食偏好性,結果顯示茶角盲椿對所有測試品種皆會取食,但對青心大冇及四季春取食偏好性較低,相對取食斑痕數量的比率分別為 30.4 ± 10.3% 及 17.3 ± 11.1%,相對取食斑痕面積的比率則分別為 25.3 ± 8.7% 及17.9 ± 7.5%,皆與對照組間呈顯著差異,此外台茶 7 號的相對取食斑痕面積比率為 33.5 ± 9.6% ,亦與對照組間呈顯著差異。選取大花咸豐草、小花蔓澤蘭、紫花藿香薊、兩耳草等四種茶園常見雜草,以台茶18號做為對照組,進行茶角盲椿象的取食偏好性試驗,結果顯示,茶角盲椿象對於台茶 18 號的取食偏好性高於其他 4 種雜草,但當去除台茶 18 號的心芽及二片新葉後,則對大花咸豐草的取食偏好性為最高,此外,兩耳草在試驗中皆未發現被茶角盲椿象取食徵狀。分別以台茶 18 號及大花咸豐草新葉部位餵食茶角盲椿象並觀察其生活史,結果顯示茶角盲椿象皆可在兩者上完成生活史,若蟲的發育時間、成蟲壽命及雌成蟲產卵量,在餵食二種植物後均無顯著差異,確認大花咸豐草可為其寄主植物。另以兩耳草餵食茶角盲椿象觀察其生活史,結果顯示各齡期若蟲皆無法成功蛻皮至下一齡期,雌、雄成蟲分別僅能存活 0.9 ± 0.6 及 0.7 ± 0.5 天,且雌成蟲無法於兩耳草上成功產卵,顯示茶角盲椿象無法以兩耳草完成生活史。
The mosquito bug, Helopeltis fasciaticollis Poppius is a major pest of tea (Camellia sinensis L.). This study evaluated the feeding behavior of each stage of H. fasciaticollis. The result showed that each stage of H. fasciaticollis could feed at morning, afternoon, and night. The feeding spots of 5th instar nymph and the feeding areas of female adult were the most than other stages. Compare the feeding preference of H. fasciaticollis to different tea varieties. The result showed that all of the varieties were fed by H. fasciaticollis, but the preference of Chin Shin Dah Pan and Shy Jih Chuen were worse than TTES No. 18. The mean relative feeding spots ratios of H. fasciaticollis females between these two varieties were 30.4 ± 10.3, 17.3 ± 11.1%, respectively. The mean relative feeding areas ratios of H. fasciaticollis females were 25.3 ± 8.7, 17.9 ± 7.5%, respectively. Compare the feeding preference of H. fasciaticollis on TTES No. 18, Bidens pilosa L. var. radiata, Mikania micrantha H.B. & K, Ageratum houstonianum Mill. and Paspalum conjugatum Bergius. The result showed that TTES No. 18 was the most preference plant of H. fasciaticollis females than other weeds. However, when removed the bud and young leaves of TTES No. 18, B. pilosa was the most preference plant of H. fasciaticollis females. When fed with fresh shoot of B. pilosa and P. conjugatum to H. fasciaticollis. The result showed that H. fasciaticollis could complete its life cycle on B. pilosa, but couldn’t complete its life cycle on P. conjugatum.
摘要 i
Abstract ii
目次 iii
表目次 v
圖目次 vi
前言 1
前人研究 3
一、茶樹栽培現況及產業 3
二、茶樹的害蟲 3
三、角盲椿屬 Helopeltis spp. 害蟲 7
四、角盲椿屬 Helopeltis spp. 之寄主植物 7
五、台灣地區角盲椿屬 Helopeltis spp. 昆蟲 9
六、茶角盲椿象分類地位及地理分布 9
七、茶角盲椿象生態與危害情形 10
材料與方法 11
一、茶角盲椿象蟲源及室內繼代飼育 11
二、茶角盲椿象之取食習性探討 12
三、茶角盲椿象對不同品種茶樹之取食偏好性選擇測試 12
四、茶角盲椿象對茶園常見雜草之取食偏好測試 13
五、評估取食不同植物對茶角盲椿象生活史之影響 14
六、茶角盲椿象於兩耳草上取食及發育情形測試 15
七、統計與分析 16
結果 17
一、茶角盲椿象之取食習性分析 17
二、茶角盲椿象對不同品種茶樹之取食偏好性 19
三、測試茶角盲椿象對茶園常見雜草之取食偏好 19
四、餵食不同植物對茶角盲椿象生活史之影響 21
五、茶角盲椿象於兩耳草上取食及發育情形 22
討論 23
一、茶角盲椿象之取食習性探討 23
二、茶角盲椿象對不同品種茶樹之取食偏好性 23
三、茶角盲椿象對茶樹及雜草的取食選擇偏好性 24
四、茶角盲椿象餵食台茶 18 號及大花咸豐草之生活史比較 25
五、評估以兩耳草作為茶園草生栽培草種 26
參考文獻 28
圖表 35
Abraham CC, Nair GM. 1981. Effective management of the tea mosquito bugs for breaking the yield barriers in cashew. Cashew Causerie 3: 6-7.
Ambika B, Abraham CC. 1984. Effect of tropical application of JH analogue on the development and survival of the cashew mirid bug Helopeltis antonii Sign . (Miridae: Heteropetera). Cashew Research and Development. Indian Society for Plantation Crops, CPCRI. Kasargod, India. pp. 111-115.
Banerjee B. 1982. A strategy for the control of Andraca bipunctata Walker on tea. Crop Protection 1: 115-119.
Chang KA. 2000. Life history, intrinsic rate of increase and field population fluctuation on Tetranychus kanzawai Kishida on four cultivars of tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze). NCHU Master Thesis. (in Chinese)
Chen HT. 1986. Studies on the ecology of the Kanzawai mite Tetranychus kanzawai (Kishida) and its predator, Amblysieus longispinosus (Evans) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Taiwan Tea Research Bulletin 5: 83-107. (in Chinese)
Chen HT. 1988. Tea mite biological control in fields. Taiwan Tea Research Bulletin 7: 1-114. (in Chinese)
Chen HT, Liew TL, Kao MC, Hu CC. 1978. Ecological studies on the tea leaf-hopper, Empoasca formosana Paoli and its control. Plant Protection Bulletin 20: 93-105. (in Chinese)
Chen Z, Chen X. 1989. An analysis on the word tea pest fauna. Journal of Tea Science 9: 13-22.
Chiang YH. 1991. Studing and selecting natural cover grasses on slopeland orchards in central Taiwan. NCHU Master Thesis. (in Chinese)
Cranham JE. 1966. Tea pests and their control. Annu Rev Entomol 11: 491–514.
Das GM. 1965. Pest of tea in North-East India and there control. JorhatTocklai Experimantal Station, Tea Research Association. pp 169-173.
Dwomoh EA, Afun JVK, Ackonor JB. 2008. Laboratory studies of the biology of Helopeltis schoutedeni Reuter (Hemiptera: Miridae), a major sucking pest of cashew (Anacardium occidentale Linn.). Journal of Cell and Animal Biology 2: 55-62.
Hazarika LK, Bhuyan M, Hazarika BN. 2009. Insect pests of tea and their management. Annu Rev Entomol 54: 267-284.
Hicks A. 2009. Current status and future development of global tea production and tea products. Au J 12: 251-264.
Hsiao SN. 1977. Bionomics of the camellia scale, Pseudaonidia duplex (Cockerell), in northern parts of Taiwan. I. Life history and mortality factors. Plant Protection Bulletin 19: 65-77. (in Chinese)
Hsiao SN. 1978. Bionomics of the camellia scale, Pseudaonidia duplex (Cockerell) (Homoptera: Diaspididae) in northern parts of Taiwan. II. Natural enemies. Plant Protection Bulletin 20: 210 -223. (in Chinese)
Hsiao SN, Shiau JH. 2004. Monitoring of major tea pests and diseases in eastern part of Taiwan. Taiwan Tea Research Bulletin 23: 91-106. (in Chinese)
Hsu HM. 2006. Implications of the invasiveness of Bidens pilosa L. var. radiata Sch. Bip. by studying its superiority over Bidens bipinnata L. NTU Master Thesis. (in Chinese)
Hu CC, Wang LC. 1965. A study on the annual life-cycles of the tea red spider, Oligonychus coffeae Nietner. Journal of the Agricultural Association of China 50: 1-14. (in Chinese)
Huang H, Ye W, Wei X, Zhang C. 2009. Allelopathic potential of sesquiterpene lactones and phenolic constituents from Mikania micrantha H. B. K. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 36: 867-871.
Huang CC, Tsay JG, Cheng MF. 1996. Preliminary survey on the diseases and insect pests of tea (Camellia sinensis L.) in Chiayi mountain area. Journal of National Chia-Yi Institute of Agriculture 47: 119-127. (in Chinese)
Kalita H, Deka MK, Singh K. 2000. Diet breadth of tea mosquito bug, Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse (Hemiptera: Miridae). Crop Res 19: 122-124.
Kennedy GG. 1984. 2-Tridecanone, tomatoes and Heliothis zea: potential incompatibility of plant antibiosis with insecticidal control. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 35: 305-311.
Kishida Y. 1993. A new species of Mustilia Walker (Bombycidae) from Taiwan. Japan Heterocer 173: 401-403.
Lee SJ, Chen GH, Tzen TC. 2014. Correlation between cultivation altitudes of oolong tea plants and the astringency of their tea infusions. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 63: 107-113.
Li X, Zangerl AR, Schuler MA, Berenbaum MR. 2000. Cross-resistance to α -cypermethrin after xanthotoxin ingestion in Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 93: 18-25.
Liaw TL. 1987. A survey of the annual fluctuation of grub population and its behavior in tea garden. Taiwan Tea Research Bulletin 6: 65-71. (in Chinese)
Lin SH. 1988. Responses of soil-conserving grasses to soil moisture, light intensity and temperatures. Jour Chinese Soil & Water Cons 19: 1-13. (in Chinese)
Lin LL, Tu YT, Tsai YZ, Tu CT. 2007. A study of soil water characteristic curves on tea plantations under different soil conservation practices. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 39: 73-85.
Liu SS. 2009. Study on the weed management and selection of slope orchard – case of slopeland orchard on Shinkang Town, Taichung County. NCHU Master Thesis. pp. 62-66. (in Chinese).
Luo YM, Jin OA. 1985. Notes on two Helopeltis bugs in Hainan Island. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops 6: 119-128. (in Chinese)
Majumder AB, Bera B, Rajan A. 2010. Tea statistics: global scenario. Inc J Tea Sci 8: 121-124.
Miwa Y. 1943. 台灣害蟲名錄。台灣農會。242 pp. (in Japanese)
Mondal TK, Bhattacharya A, Laxmikumaran M, Ahuja PS. 2004. Recent advances of tea (Camellia sinensis) biotechnology. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culrure 76: 195-254.
Muraleedharan N. 1992a. Pest control in Asia. In: Wilson KC, Clifford MN (eds). Tea: cultivation to consumption. London: Chapman and Hall; pp. 375-412.
Muraleedharan N. 1992b. Bioecology and management of tea pests in southern India. J Plantation Crops 20: 1-21.
Pan XN, Qiu JD, Xing FY, Huang YY. 1991. Studies on spacial distribution of infestation by Helopeltis fasciaticollis in cashew plantation and its controls. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops 12: 91-97. (in Chinese)
Pillai GB, Singh V, Dubey OP, Abraham VA. 1984. Seasonal abundance of tea mosquito bug, Helopeltis antonii on cashew in relation to meteorological factors. In: Cashew research and development, Indian Society for Plantation Crops, CPCRI, Kasaragod, India, pp. 103-110.
Rao GN. 1970. Helopeltis: A breakthrough in its control. UPASI Tea Sci Dept Bull 28: 21-24.
Rattan PS. 1992. Pest and disease control in Africa. In: Wilson KC, Clifford MN (eds). Tea: Cultivation to Consumption. London: Chapman & Hall; pp. 331-352.
Roy S, Mukhopadhyay A, Gurusubramanian G. 2009 a. Varietal preference and feeding behaviour of tea mosquito bug (Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse) on tea plants (Camellia sinensis). Academic Journal of Entomology 2: 1-9.
Roy S, Mukhopadhyay A, Gurusubramanian G. 2009 b. Comparative lifecycle pattern of tea mosquito bug Helopeltis theivora (Miridae: Heteroptera) on tea (Camellia sinensis) and weed (Mikania micrantha). Journal of Applied Zoological Researches 20: 111-114.
Roy S, Gurusubramanian G, Mukhopadhyay A. 2010. Neem-based integrated
approaches for the management of tea mosquito bug, Helopeltis theivora
Waterhouse (Miridae: Heteroptera) in tea. Journal of Pest Science 83: 143–148.
Roy S, Muraleedharan N, Mukhapadhyay A, Handique G. 2015. The tea mosquito bug, Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse (Heteroptera: Miridae): its status, biology, ecology and management in tea plantations. International Journal of Pest Management 61: 179-197.
Saha D, Mukhopadhyay A, Bahadur M. 2012. Effect of host plants on fitness traits and detoxifying enzymes activity of Helopeltis theivora , a major sucking insect pest of tea. Phytoparasitica 40: 433-444.
Somchowdhury AK, Samanta AK, Dhar PP. 1993. Approach to integrated control of tea mosquito bug. In: Proceedings of International Symposium of Tea Science and Human Health; Kolkata (India): Tea Research Association 330-338.
Srikumar KK, Bhat PS. 2012. Field survey and comparative biology of tea mosquito
bug (Helopeltis spp.) on cashew (Anacardium occidentale Linn.). Journal of Cell Animal Biology. 6: 200-206.
Srikumar KK, Bhat PS. 2013. Biology of the tea mosquito bug (Helopeltis theivora
Waterhouse) on Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M. King & H. Rob. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. 73: 309-314.
Srikumar KK, Bhat PS, Raviprasad TN, Vanitha K. 2014. Biology, behaviour and functional response of Cydnocoris gilvus Brum. (Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Harpactorinae) a predator of Tea Mosquito Bug (Helopeltis antonii Sign.). Journal of Threatened Taxa 6: 5864-5870.
Stonedahl GM. 1991. The oriental species of Helopeltis (Heteroptera: Miridae): a review of economic literature and guide to identification. Bulletin of Entomological Research 81: 465-490.
Sudhakaran R. 2000. Studies in the tea mosquito bug, Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse (Hemiptera: Miridae) infesting tea in southern India. Ph.D. Thesis, Bharathiar University India.
Sudhakaran R, Muraleedharan N. 2006. Biology of Helopeltis theivora (Hemiptera: Miridae) infesting tea. Entomon 31: 165-180.
Sudhakaran R, Selvasundaram R. 2000. Incidence of tea mosquito bug on Maesa indica. UPASI Tea Res Inst Newslett 8: 3.
Tamaki Y. 1991. Tortricids in tea. pp 541-551. In: Geest LPSVD, Evenhuis HH (eds). Tortricid pests: their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Tseng HK. 1990. Life history and consumption damage of Helopeltis cinchouae Mann., the tea mosquito bug. Taiwan Tea Research Bulletin 9: 71-77. (in Chinese)
Walgama RS, Pallemulla RMDT. 2005. The distribution of shot-hole borer, Xyleborus fornicatus Eichh. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), across tea-growing areas in Sri Lanka: a reassessment. Sri Lanka Journal of Tea Science 70: 105-120.
Wang JW. 1985. A study of the biology character and prevent and elimination of the Helopeltis fasciaticollis Poppius in the tea trees. Natural Science Journal of Hainan University 3: 23-31. (in Chinese)
Wang X, Zeng L, Wang M. 2011. The genus Andraca (Lepidoptera, Endromidae) in China with descriptions of a new species. Zookeys 127: 29-42.
Zeng RS, Zhimou W, Goudong N, Schular MA, Berenbaum MR. 2007. Allelochemical induction of Cytochrome P450 monooxygenases and amelioration of xenobiotic toxicity in Helicoverpa zea. Journal of Chemical Ecology 33: 449-461.
Zwick A, Regier JC, Mitter C, Cummings MP. 2011. Increased gene sampling yields robust support for higher-level clades within Bombycoidea (Lepidoptera). Systematic Entomology 36: 31–43.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top