跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.90) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/14 01:00
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:呂季哲
研究生(外文):Chi-Che Lu
論文名稱:政治關係與文化差異對債務契約條件之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Effect of Political Connection and Culture Difference on Loan Contract
指導教授:陳俊合陳俊合引用關係
口試委員:紀信義陳光政
口試日期:2017-05-24
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中興大學
系所名稱:會計學研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:中文
論文頁數:57
中文關鍵詞:政治關係文化差異債務契約
外文關鍵詞:political connectioncultural differencesloan contract
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:182
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究探討當企業具有政治關係時,是否會對債務契約條件產生影響,並進一步Hofstede所提出之六項國家文化尺度瞭解在不同文化差異下對前述之關係有何影響。而本篇具有政治關係之企業的定義方法乃參考目前研究最為普遍使用Faccio(2006)之定義方法,若企業至少有一位大股東(直接或間接控制表決權至少10%)或董事曾經擔任過政府國家元首、部會首長、國會議員或和政黨有密切關係之政治人物,稱為具有政治關係,以此作為公司政治關係之代理變數。本研究以1996年至2015年全球上市公司作為主要研究對象,實證結果指出具有政治關係之公司對債務契約條件不具顯著影響,其理由有可能係樣本數過少因而不支持假說一所推論;但在加入Hofstede六項國家文化尺度指標後,結果可說明在不同的文化差異下,具有政治關係之企業,對債務契約條件之訂定具有影響。
This study examines whether there will be an impact on the terms of the debt contract when the firm has a political relationship and what are the influences on the aforementioned relationship after understanding the different cultural discrepancies learning from the six national cultural scales proposed by Hofstede. The definition of the enterprise with political relationship is based on the most commonly used method of Faccio (2006). If the enterprise has at least one major shareholder (direct or indirect control at least 10% of the voting rights) or the director has served as the head of nation, the head of the ministry, the member of the congress, or the politician who is closely related to the political party, the enterprise is defined as having political relation, serving as a proxy variable for the political relationship of the company. The main research object of this study is the global public companies from 1996 to 2015. The empirical results show that the companies with political relations have no significant influence on the debt contract conditions. The reason may be overgeneralization that the number of samples is too small to support the hypothesis. However, after joining Hofstede's six national cultural scales, the results suggest that companies with political relationships under different cultural discrepancies have an impact on the terms of the debt contract.
第一章、緒論 1
第一節、研究背景、動機與目的 1
第二節、實證結果 2
第三節、研究貢獻 3
第二章、相關文獻探討 4
第一節、政治關係 4
第二節、債務契約 5
第三節、文化 7
第三章、假說建立 8
第一節、政治關係與債務契約條件 8
第二節、文化差異下政治關係與債務契約條件 10
第四章、實證模型、變數定義及資料來源 13
第一節、變數定義 13
第二節、實證模型 16
第三節、資料來源 18
第五章、實證結果 19
第一節、敘述性統計分析 19
第二節、實證結果與分析 21
第六章、結論與建議 24
第一節、結論 24
第二節、限制與後續研究建議 25
參考文獻 26
中文參考文獻
林宛瑩、許崇源、戚務君與陳宜伶,2009,企業治理與信用風險,台大管理論叢,第19卷第2期:71-98。
姚維仁、金成隆與王肇蘭,2016,銀行債務契約訂定與財稅差異之關聯性,會計評論(未出刊但已被接受)。
唐清泉、羅黨論,2007,政府補貼動機及其效果的實證研究─來自中國上市公司的經驗證據,金融研究,第六期:149-163。

英文參考文獻
Acemoglu, D., Golosov, M., and Tsyvinski, A. 2011.Power fluctuations and political economy.Journal of EconomicTheory, 146(3): 1009-1041.
Adler, N. J. 1983. Cross-cultural management research: The ostrich and the trend. Academy of management Review, 8(2): 226-232.
Adair, W. L., Okumura, T., and Brett, J. M. 2001. Negotiation behavior when cultures collide: the United States and Japan. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3): 371.
Adhikari, A., Derashid, C., and Zhang, H. 2006. Public policy, political connections, and effective tax rates: Longitudinal evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 25(5): 574-595.
Asquith, P., Beatty, A., and Weber, J. 2005. Performance pricing in bank debt contracts. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1): 101-128.
Bae, K. H., and V. K. Goyal. 2009. Creditor rights, enforcement, and bank loans. The Journal of Finance 64: 823-860.
Boubakri, N., Cosset, J. C., and Saffar, W. 2008.Political connections of newly privatized firms. Journal of corporate finance, 14(5): 654-673.
Brett, J. M.,and Okumura, T. 1998. Inter-and intracultural negotiation: US and Japanese negotiators. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5): 495-510.
Bushman, R. M., and WITTENBERG‐MOERMAN, R. E. G. I. N. A. 2012.The role of bank reputation in “certifying” future performance implications of borrowers’ accounting numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(4): 883-930.
Chan, K. H., Lin, K. Z., and Mo, P. L. L. 2006.A political–economic analysis of auditor reporting and auditor switches.Review of Accounting Studies, 11(1): 21-48.
Chaney, P. K., Faccio, M., and Parsley, D. 2011.The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(1): 58-76.
Chen, K. C., Chen, Z., and Wei, K. J. 2009.Legal protection of investors, corporate governance, and the cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance, 15(3): 273-289.
Cheung, H. Y., and Chan, A. W. 2007. How culture affects female inequality across countries: An empirical study. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(2): 157-179.
Christensen, H. B., and Nikolaev, V. V. 2012. Capital versus performance covenants in debt contracts. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(1): 75-116.
Chui, A. C., Lloyd, A. E., and Kwok, C. C. 2002. The determination of capital structure: is national culture a missing piece to the puzzle?. Journal of international business studies, 33(1): 99-127.
Claessens, S., Feijen, E., and Laeven, L. 2008. Political connections and preferential access to finance: The role of campaign contributions. Journal of financial economics, 88(3): 554-580.
Costello, A. M. 2011. The impact of financial reporting quality on debt contracting: Evidence from internal control weakness reports. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(1): 97-136.
DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., and Skinner, D. J. 1994. Accounting choice in troubled companies. Journal of accounting and economics, 17(1): 113-143.
Dennis, S. A., and Mullineaux, D. J. 2000. Syndicated loans.Journal of financial intermediation, 9(4): 404-426.
Dichev, I. D., and Skinner, D. J. 2002.Large–sample evidence on the debt covenant hypothesis. Journal of accounting research, 40(4): 1091-1123.
Drope, J. M., and Hansen, W. L. 2004. Purchasing protection? The effect of political spending on US trade policy. Political Research Quarterly, 57(1): 27-37.
Duchin, R., and Sosyura, D. 2012. The politics of government investment. Journal of Financial Economics, 106(1): 24-48.
Easley, D., Hvidkjaer, S., and O’hara, M. 2002. Is information risk a determinant of asset returns?. The journal of finance, 57(5): 2185-2221.
Easley, D., and O'hara, M. 2004. Information and the cost of capital. The journal of finance, 59(4): 1553-1583.
Faccio, M. 2006. Politically connected firms.American Economic Review 96(1): 369-386.
Faccio, M. 2010. Differences between politically connected and nonconnected firms: A cross‐country analysis. Financial management, 39(3): 905-928.
Faccio, M., Masulis, R. W., and McConnell, J. 2006.Political connections and corporate bailouts. The Journal of Finance, 61(6): 2597-2635.
Faccio, M., and Parsley, D. C. 2009. Sudden deaths: Taking stock of geographic ties. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44(03): 683-718.
Fan, J., Wong, T., and Zhang, T.2007.Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance and post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms.Journal ofFinancialEconomics,84: 330-357.
Fisman, R. 2001. Estimating the value of political connections. The American economic review, 91(4): 1095-1102.
Fraser, D. R., Zhang, H., and Derashid, C. 2006. Capital structure and political patronage: The case of Malaysia. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(4): 1291-1308.
Frye, T., and Shleifer, A. 1997. The invisible hand and the grabbing hand. The American Economic Review. 87 (2): 354-358.
Goldman, E., Rocholl, J., and So, J. 2009. Do politically connected boards affect firm value? The Review of Financial Studies, 22 (6): 2331-2360.
Goodman, K. S. 1994. Reading, writing, and written texts: A transactional sociopsycholinguistic view. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Goss, A., andRoberts, G. S. 2011.The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(7): 1794-1810.
Graham, J. R., Li, S., and Qiu, J. 2008.Corporate misreporting and bank loan contracting. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1): 44-61.
Gray, S. J. 1988. Towards a theory of cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally. Abacus, 24(1): 1-15.
Hambrick, D. C., and Brandon, G. L. 1988. Executive values. Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., and Kitayama, S. 1999. Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?. Psychological review, 106(4): 766.
Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, Sage.
Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations.2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Sage.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., and Minkov, M. 2010. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Revised and expanded. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Hofstede, G. 2011. Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online readings in psychology and culture, 2(1): 8.
Hope, O. K. 2003. Disclosure practices, enforcement of accounting standards, and analysts' forecast accuracy: An international study. Journal of accounting research, 41(2): 235-272.
Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4): 305-360.
Johnson, S., and Mitton, T. 2003. Cronyism and capital controls: evidence from Malaysia. Journal of financial economics, 67(2): 351-382.
Keswani, A., Miguel, A. F., and Ramos, S. B. 2014. Lazy investors, lazy fund managers, lousy performance: National culture and mutual fund management (Doctoral dissertation, Lisbon University Institute).
Khwaja, A. and Mian, A. 2005. Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4): 1371-1411.
Kim, J. B., and Song, B. Y. 2011. Auditor quality and loan syndicate structure. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(4): 71-99.
Porta, R. L., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. 1998.Law and finance. Journal of political economy, 106(6): 1113-1155.
Leuz, C., Nanda, D., and Wysocki, P. D. 2003. Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparison. Journal of financial economics, 69(3): 505-527.
Leuz, C. and Oberholzer-Gee F. 2006. Political relationships, global financing, and corporate transparency: evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(2): 411-439.
Leftwich, R. 1983. Accounting information in private markets: Evidence from private lending agreements. Accounting Review, 23-42.
Li, H., Meng, L., Wang, Q., and Zhang, J. 2008. Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms.Journal of Development Economics, 87(2): 283-299.
Licht, A. N. 2001. The mother of all path dependencies : Toward a cross-cultural theory of corporate governance systems. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 26 (February): 147-205
Luo, D., and Liu, X. 2009. Political connections, industry access restrictions, and firm performance. Journal of Management World 5: 97-106.
Markus, H. R., and Kitayama, S. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological review, 98(2): 224.
Melnik, A., and Plaut, S. 1986. Loan commitment contracts, terms of lending, and credit allocation. The Journal of Finance, 41(2): 425-435.
Mian, A. 2006. Distance constraints: The limits of foreign lending in poor economies. The Journal of Finance, 61(3): 1465-1505.
Minkov, M. 2007. What makes us different and similar: A new interpretation of the world values survey and other cross-cultural data. Sofia, Bulgaria : Klasika y Stil Publishing House.
Nini, G. P. 2004. The role of local banks in promoting external finance: A study of syndicated lending to emerging market borrowers, mimeo.
Petersen, M. A., and Rajan, R. G. 2002. Does distance still matter? The information revolution in small business lending. The Journal of Finance, 57(6): 2533-2570.
Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G. R. 2003. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.
Rajan, R., and Winton, A. 1995.Covenants and collateral as incentives to monitor. The Journal of Finance, 50(4): 1113-1146.
Rajan, R. G., and Zingales, L. 1998. Which capitalism? Lessons form the east Asian crisis. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 11(3): 40-48.
Rocholl, J., Goldman, E., and So, J. 2009. Do politically connected boards affect firm value? Review of Financial Studies 22(6): 2331-2360.
Sengupta, P. 1998. Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt. Accounting review: 459-474.
Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. 1994.Politicians and firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4): 995-1025.
Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. 1998.The grabbing hand: Government pathologies and their cures. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Smith, C. W., and Warner, J. B. 1979. On financial contracting: An analysis of bond covenants. Journal of financial economics, 7(2): 117-161.
Srinidhi, B., Zhang, H., and Zhang, T. 2010. Political connection, transparency and auditor choice: Evidence from family-owned firms in China. In 4th Symposium of China Journal of Accounting Research.
Ting-Toomey, S. 2007. Intercultural conflict training: Theory-practice approaches and research challenges. Journal of intercultural communication research, 36(3): 255-271.
Tu, G., Lin, B., and Liu, F. 2013. Political connections and privatization: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(2): 114-135.
Tylor, E. B. 1871. Primitive culture: researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art, and custom. London, John Murray.
Walker, G. and Reid, T. 2002.Upgrading Corporate Governance in East Asia.Journal of International Banking Law, 17: 59-66.
Zhang, J. 2008. The contracting benefits of accounting conservatism to lenders and borrowers. Journal of Accounting and Economics 45: 27-54.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top