臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

為了改善農業耕地規模過小及農業勞動人口老化等問題，行政院農業委員會於98年5月27日起擴大推動「小地主大佃農」政策及相關配套措施。藉由政府農地地租補貼的措施，小地主大佃農農戶利潤效率如何呢？會因為政府的補貼措施而使農戶利潤無效率嗎？最適的政府補貼地租金額為何呢？為本文研究之重點。
本研究以隨機性邊界法(stochastic frontier approach, SFA)建立超越對數(translog)利潤函數，探討102-103年大佃農在政府補貼下380戶稻作農戶的利潤效率，研究分析效率與補貼之關係。
實證結果顯示，雖然無效率主要原因是受隨機因素所影響，但有39.9%來自人為因素所影響，且在補貼比例分析中可知，補貼比例越高，其效率則越低，隱含人為管理也是影響無效率重要之因素。農戶社經變數之分析結果為，以小規模之農戶、務農時間短、教育程度高且有辦理貸款之農民及適當的補貼比例，會有較好的利潤效率。
根據本研究實證結果，提出政府對於農業稻作政策的建議：
1. 對於地租補貼宜訂定適當的退場機制，藉由逐漸減少地租補貼直至退場，讓農戶能作長期規劃及調整，或是加入嚴格的資格限制，來促使改善農戶在人為管理及技術上的缺失。
2. 應擬定適宜之天然災害損失補助規範，以及加強農戶面臨災害之因應措施，對於天災予以保障，使稻作生產損失降低，提升稻農利潤效率。

In order to increase the farming acreage and improve the aging of agricultural labor. On May 27, 2009, the Executive Yuan Agriculture Committee propose “Small Landlords, Big Tenants” and related supporting measures. However, with the government rent subsidies, small landlords and tenant farmers have better profit efficiency? Will the farmer's profits be ineffective because of the government subsidies?
Using the stochastic frontier approach (SFA) to establish the translog profit function to explores the profit efficiency of the farmers with the government subsidy in 2013-2014. According to the efficiency value, we also analyze its relationship with the proportion of subsidies, and find out the optimal proportion of government rent subsidy with profit efficiency.
The empirical results show that although the main reason for inefficiency is affected by random factors, but 39.9% from the human factors, and in the subsidy ratio analysis shows that the higher proportion of subsidies for farmers, the worse efficiency will be. It impacts that the human management is also an important factor affecting inefficiency. The results of the analysis of household social variables, the small-scale, short farming time, high education, having a loan and with the appropriate proportion of subsidies, will be a better profit efficiency.
Finally, we propose two suggestions. First, the government should develop an exit mechanism about the rent subsidy by gradually reducing the rent subsidies until exit or add strict qualification restrictions. So that farmers can make long-term planning and adjustment to improve the farmers in the human management and technical deficiencies. Second, the government should be prepared the response to natural disasters, for the protection of natural disasters. So as to reduce the loss of rice production and improve the profit efficiency of rice farmers.

目錄
摘要 i
目錄 iv
表目錄 v
圖目錄 vi
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 7
第三節 研究方法 7
第四節 研究步驟 8
第二章 文獻回顧 9
第一節 效率評估基本概念 9
第二節 邊界模型 11
第三節 稻作相關文獻 18
第三章 研究方法與實證模型建立 22
第一節 隨機邊界模型 22
第二節 資料來源與變數定義 26
第三節　實證模型 32
第四章 實證結果分析 34
第一節 隨機邊界利潤函數之估計結果 34
第二節 無效率因子之估計結果 36
第三節 利潤效率與補貼比例實證結果 38
第五章 結論與建議 43
第一節 結論 43
第二節 建議 44
參考文獻 46
表目錄
表2- 1 SFA法與DEA法之比較 15
表2- 2林聖超(2006)變數之處理 20
表2- 3楊憲明、盧永祥、戴孟宜(2013)變數之處理 20
表3- 1變數之敘述統計 30
表3- 2經營者社經變數之敘述統計 31
表4- 1利潤函數之估計結果 35
表4- 2無效率因子之估計結果 37
表4- 3利潤效率值 38
表4- 4補貼比例值 40
表4- 5補貼比例區別之效率比較 41














圖目錄
圖1- 1小地主大佃農政策實施成效 2
圖1- 2本研究流程圖 8
圖2-1 Farrell生產效率 10
圖4- 1利潤效率別之次數分配圖 39
圖4- 2利潤效率次數分配圖 39
圖4- 3補貼比例別之次數分配圖 42
圖4- 4補貼比例之次數分配表 42

參考文獻
一、中文部分
方松海、王为农， (2009)。成本快速上升背景下的农业补贴政策研究。管理世界(9)，91-108。
王姣、肖海峰，(2007)。我国良种补贴, 农机补贴和减免农业税政策效果分析。农业经济问题(2)，24-28。
王美惠，(2002)。臺灣銀行業經濟效率與規模經濟分析: 參數法與無參數法之比較: Tamkang University, College of Management, Department of Management Sciences and Decision Making.
朱蘭芬、萬鍾汶、陳吉仲，(2008)。台灣農業生技廠商利潤效率之實證分析。第九屆全國實證經濟學論文研討會。台北：台灣大學。
呂惠蓉、盧清城、李元和，(2012)。臺灣稻作生產效率變化之比較研究。商學學報20，29-56。
吳東嶽，(2010)。臺灣稻作記帳農戶生產效率之分析–三階段 DEA 應用。臺灣大學農業經濟學研究所學位論文，1-110。
吴连翠、陆文聪，(2011)。基于农户模型的粮食补贴政策绩效模擬研究。中国农业大学学报，16(5)，171-178。
林聖超，(2006) 。一般稻農與契作稻農之利潤效率分析比較。臺灣大學農業經濟學研究所學位論文， 1-72。
邱永和、胡均立、曹嘉麟，(2003) 。台灣生物科技廠商之成本效率分析。農業與經濟(31)，55-78。
陈波、王雅鹏，(2006)。湖北省粮食补贴方式改革的调查分析。经济问题(3)，50-52。
施孟隆、黃炳文、彭克仲、林思如，(2004) 。台灣 21 縣市農業生產力之研究。生物與休閒事業研究2(1)， 45-66。
洪業程、李元和、盧清城，(2012) 。亞洲主要國家稻米生產效率及生產力之研究。全球管理與經濟8(1)，1-23。
赵瑞芹、孟全省， (2012)。直接补贴政策对粮食产量的影响效果分析——以山东省为例。农业经济(5)，20-21。
孫遜，(2004) 。資料包絡分析法: 理論與應用。初版, 台北: 揚智文化。
曹志义、张铁军，(2006)。农机购置补贴与农户增收效果分析。农机化研究(12)，66-69。
許智富、曾國雄，(2002) 。台灣農業生產力之評估分析─ DEA 評估法的應用。台灣土地金融季刊，139-157。
陳世芳，(2013) 。臺中地區稻作大佃農擴大經營規模效益之研究。臺中區農業改良場特刊(117)，236-249。
陳杏，(2008)。台灣地區稻米生產技術效率與生產力評估。
傅祖壇、詹滿色，(1990)。台灣記帳農戶之隨機性生產邊界及技術效率分析。台灣土地金融季刊，27(3 )，125-142。
傅祖壇、孔維新，(2006)。台灣地區切花類產銷班生產效率之研究─ 農業服務性組織之效率評估模式提出。農業與經濟(36)，1-35。
黃炳文，(2014)。強化專業稻作戶生產成本調查之研究。行政院農委會農糧署103年度科技計畫研究報告，103農科－5.1.1－糧－Z1(2)，台中：中興大學。
黃台心，(1997)。臺灣地區本國銀行成本效率之實證研究－一隨機邊界模型之應用。
黃台心，(1999)。由利潤函數衡量我國銀行廠商之經濟效率－參數計量法的應用。經濟論文，27(2)，283-309。
黃鏡如、傅祖壇、黃美瑛，(2008)。績效評估: 效率與生產力之理論與應用。台北：新陸出版。
鲁礼新，(2006) 。农业补贴政策的预期绩效分析: 渑池县农户调查，改革与战略(8), 68-71。
楊明憲、盧永祥、戴孟宜，(2013)。糧商參與稻米產銷專業區營運之利潤效率分 析。農業經濟叢刊，18(2)，43-71。
戴登燦，(2009)。小地主大佃農。臺中區農情月刊(123)，2-2。
廖安定，(2009)。規劃推動小地主大佃農政策。酪農天地86，46。




















二、英文部分
Abdulai, A., & Huffman, W. E. (1998). An examination of profit inefficiency of rice farmers in Northern Ghana: Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
Afriat, S. N. (1972). Efficiency estimation of production functions. International Economic Review, 568-598.
Aigner, D., Lovell, C. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of econometrics, 6(1), 21-37.
Aigner, D. J., & Chu, S.-F. (1968). On estimating the industry production function. The American Economic Review, 58(4), 826-839.
Ali, M., & Flinn, J. C. (1989). Profit efficiency among Basmati rice producers in Pakistan Punjab. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(2), 303-310.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1992). Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India International Applications of Productivity and Efficiency Analysis (pp. 149-165): Springer.
Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical economics, 20(2), 325-332.
Berger, A. N., Hancock, D., & Humphrey, D. B. (1993). Bank efficiency derived from the profit function. Journal of Banking & Finance, 17(2), 317-347.
Broek, J. v. d., Forsund, F. R., Hjalmarsson, L., & Meeusen, W. (1980). On the estimation of deterministic and stochastic frontier production functions: A comparison. Journal of econometrics, 13(1), 117-138.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), 429-444.
Coelli, T. J., & Battese, G. E. (1996). Identification of factors which influence the technical inefficiency of Indian farmers. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 40(2), 103-128.
F?rsund, F. R., Lovell, C. K., & Schmidt, P. (1980). A survey of frontier production functions and of their relationship to efficiency measurement. Journal of econometrics, 13(1), 5-25.
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253-290.
Ferrier, G. D., & Lovell, C. K. (1990). Measuring cost efficiency in banking: econometric and linear programming evidence. Journal of econometrics, 46(1), 229-245.
Giannakas, K., Schoney, R., & Tzouvelekas, V. (2001). Technical efficiency, technological change and output growth of wheat farms in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 49(2), 135-152.
Guyomard, H., Latruffe, L., & Le Mouël, C. (2006). Technical efficiency, technical progress and productivity change in French agriculture: Do subsidies and farms’ size matter? Paper presented at the 96th EAAE Seminar.
Jondrow, J., Lovell, C. K., Materov, I. S., & Schmidt, P. (1982). On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of econometrics, 19(2-3), 233-238.
Kazukauskas, A., Newman, C., & Sauer, J. (2010). CAP reform and its impact on structural change and productivity growth: a cross country analysis. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 114th European Association of Agricultural Economists Seminar on Structural Change in Agriculture (EAAE’10).
Kumbhakar, S. C. (1987). The specification of technical and allocative inefficiency in stochastic production and profit frontiers. Journal of econometrics, 34(3), 335-348.
Kumbhakar, S. C. (1989). Estimation of technical efficiency using flexible functional form and panel data. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 7(2), 253-258.
Kumbhakar, S. C. (1991). The measurement and decomposition of cost-inefficiency: The translog cost system. Oxford Economic Papers, 43(4), 667-683.
Latruffe, L., Bravo-Ureta, B., Moreira, V., Desjeux, Y., & Dupraz, P. (2011, August). Productivity and subsidies in European Union countries: An analysis for dairy farms using input distance frontiers. In EAAE 2011 International Congress.
Latruffe, L., Guyomard, H., & Le Mouël, C. (2009). The role of public subsidies on farms’ managerial efficiency: An application of a five-stage approach to France. SMART-LERECO Working Paper(09-05).
Martin, J. P., & Page, J. M. (1983). The impact of subsidies on X-efficiency in LDC industry: theory and an empirical test. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 608-617.
Mary, S. (2013). Assessing the impacts of pillar 1 and 2 subsidies on TFP in French crop farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(1), 133-144.
Meeusen, W., & Van den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 435-444.
Minviel, J. J., & Latruffe, L. (2017). Effect of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency: a meta-analysis of empirical results. Applied Economics, 49(2), 213-226.
Nivievskyi, O. (2009). Price support, efficiency and technology change of Ukrainian dairy farms: Spatial dependence in the components of productivity growth. Paper presented at the Contributed paper at the IAAE 2009 Conference, Beijing, China. Available at Web site: http://purl. umn. edu/51403 (accessed June 7, 2011).
Pitt, M. M., & Lee, L.-F. (1981). The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry. Journal of development economics, 9(1), 43-64.
Rahman, S. (2003). Profit efficiency among Bangladeshi rice farmers. Food Policy, 28(5), 487-503.
Rezitis, A. N., Tsiboukas, K., & Tsoukalas, S. (2003). Technical Efficiency of Agricultural Producers Participating in Farm Credit Programs: The Case of Greece. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
Richmond, J. (1974). Estimating the efficiency of production. International Economic Review, 515-521.
Rizov, M., Pokrivcak, J., & Ciaian, P. (2013). CAP subsidies and productivity of the EU farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(3), 537-557.
Sabir, M., & Ahmed, Q. M. (2008). Economic reforms and total factor productivity growth in Pakistan: an empirical analysis. Business Review, 3(1), 53-68.
Serra, T., Zilberman, D., & Gil, J. M. (2008). Farms’ technical inefficiencies in the presence of government programs. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 52(1), 57-76.
Schmidt, P., & Lovell, C. K. (1979). Estimating technical and allocative inefficiency relative to stochastic production and cost frontiers. Journal of econometrics, 9(3), 343-366.
Schmidt, P., & Sickles, R. C. (1984). Production frontiers and panel data. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2(4), 367-374.
Tan, Y., Guan, J., & Karimi, H. R. (2013). The Impact of the subsidy policy on total factor productivity: an empirical analysis of China's cotton production. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013.
Xu, X., & Jeffrey, S. R. (1998). Efficiency and technical progress in traditional and modern agriculture: evidence from rice production in China. Agricultural economics, 18(2), 157-165.
Zhu, X., & Lansink, A. O. (2010). Impact of CAP subsidies on technical efficiency of crop farms in Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(3), 545-564.
Zhu, X., Demeter, R. M., & Lansink, A. O. (2012). Technical efficiency and productivity differentials of dairy farms in three EU countries: the role of CAP subsidies. Agricultural Economics Review, 13(1), 66.