臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近年來因低溫物流技術進步，農業電商成為關注焦點。本文旨在探討農產品網頁上的產品圖片搭配包裝應以何種呈現方式才能提高消費者的購買意願及產品態度。本研究以2（圖像完整性：完整與不完整）×3（包裝材質：軟性、半軟性、硬性）的實驗設計進行假設檢定，六種情況可分為「完整＋軟性」、「完整＋半軟性」、「完整＋硬性」、「不完整＋軟性」、「不完整＋半軟性」、「完整＋硬性」。
研究結果顯示，圖像完整性與包裝材質對產品態度有顯著的影響：在圖像不完整時，半軟性的效果最佳，軟性與硬性材質無明顯差異；在圖像完整下，軟性及硬性材質效果優於半軟性。而圖像完整性與包裝材質的交互作用對購買意願無顯著的影響，但其形態（pattern）與產品態度一致。

As the growing of technology of low-temperature logistics, fresh produce e-commerce rise. This present study was designed to demonstrate how product image and its packaging influence consumers’ purchasing intention and their product attitude. This study conducted a 2(image ambiguity vs. image unambiguity) x 3(packaging materials: rigid vs. semi-flexible vs. flexible) experiment to test hypothesis.
The results showed that ANOVA on the seven scales of product attitude discovered statistically significant effect. When the product image is ambiguity, packaging with semi-flexible material performs better than flexible and rigid materials, and there is no difference between them. In another case, flexible and rigid materials were more favorable when the product image is unambiguity. However, the experiment yielded no significant effects, but this followed the same pattern as that depicted for product attitude above.

目錄
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第二章 文獻回顧 3
第一節 圖像完整性 3
第二節 包裝 4
第三章 研究方法 10
第一節 研究架構與假設 10
第二節 研究設計 12
第三節 研究變數 13
第四節 前測 14
第五節 實驗刺激物與實驗流程 17
第六節 資料處理與分析方法 21
第四章 實驗結果與分析 22
第一節　樣本分布 22
第二節 信度分析 24
第三節 操弄檢定 25
第四節 假說檢定 27
第五節　其他發現 31

第五章　結論與建議 35
第一節 研究結論 35
第二節 學術意涵 38
第三節 管理意涵 39
第四節 研究限制 39
第五節 未來研究建議 40
參考文獻 41
附錄一 前測問卷 41
附錄二 正式問卷 48

Ampuero, O. and N. Vila (2006). Consumer perceptions of product packaging. Journal of consumer marketing 23(2): 100-112.

Barros-Velazquez, J. (2015). Antimicrobial food packaging, Academic Press.

Baumgartner, H., et al. (1992). Autobiographical memories, affect, and consumer information processing. Journal of Consumer Psychology 1(1): 53-82.

Becker, L., et al. (2011). Tough package, strong taste: The influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations. Food Quality and Preference 22(1): 17-23.

Bottani, E., et al. (2011). A survey on packaging materials and technologies for commercial food products. International Journal of Food Engineering 7(1): 12.

Campbell, M. C. and R. C. Goodstein (2001). The moderating effect of perceived risk on consumers' evaluations of product incongruity: Preference for the norm. Journal of consumer Research 28(3): 439-449.

Cardello, A. V. (1994). Consumer expectations and their role in food acceptance. Measurement of food preferences, Springer: 253-297.

Dodds, W. B., et al. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of marketing research: 307-319.

Fiske, S. T. (1982). Schema-triggered affect: Applications to social perception. Affect and cognition: 17th Annual Carnegie Mellon symposium on cognition, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Giovannetti, V. and M. D. D. V. Giovannetti (1995). El mundo del envase: manual para el diseno y produccion de envases y embalajes, Gustavo Gili.

Kotler, P. and K. L. Keller (2006). Marketing management 12e. New Jersey.

Koutsimanis, G. and Getter, K. and Behe, B. and Harte, J. and Almenar, E. (2012). Influences of packaging attributes on consumer purchase decisions for fresh produce. Appetite 59(2): 270-280.

Kreitler, H. and S. Kreitler (1972). The model of cognitive orientation: Towards a theory of human behaviour. British Journal of Psychology 63(1): 9-30.

Krishna, A. and M. Morrin (2008). Does touch affect taste? The perceptual transfer of product container haptic cues. Journal of consumer research 34(6): 807-818.

Lien, N.-H. and M.-H. Chiang (2016), Purchase Intention- Image Ambiguity and Packaging Materials, working paper, Department of Business Administration, National Taiwan University

Mandler, G. (1982). The structure of value: Accounting for taste. Center for Human Information Processing Report 101.

Meyers-Levy, J. and A. M. Tybout (1989). Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of consumer Research 16(1): 39-54.

Nunnally, J. and I. Bernstein (1967). Psychology theory, New York: McGraw Hill.

Peracchio, L. A. and J. Meyers-Levy (1994). How ambiguous cropped objects in ad photos can affect product evaluations. Journal of consumer Research 21(1): 190-204.

Peters‐Texeira, A. and N. Badrie (2005). Consumers’ perception of food packaging in Trinidad, West Indies and its related impact on food choices. International Journal of Consumer Studies 29(6): 508-514.

Peters, M. (1994). Good packaging gets through to the fickle buyer. Marketing 20(8). Piqueras-Fiszman, B. and C. Spence (2012). The influence of the feel of product packaging on the perception of the oral-somatosensory texture of food. Food Quality and Preference 26(1): 67-73.

Ragaert, P. and Verbeke, W. and Devlieghere, F. and Debevere, J. (2004). Consumer perception and choice of minimally processed vegetables and packaged fruits. Food Quality and Preference 15(3): 259-270.

Siegrist, M. and Cousin, M. and Kastenholz, H. and Wiek, A. (2007). Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: The influence of affect and trust. Appetite 49(2): 459-466.

Underwood, R. L. and Klein, N. M. and Burke, R. R. (2001). Packaging communication: attentional effects of product imagery. Journal of product ＆ brand management 10(7): 403-422.

Velasco, C. and Salgado-Montejo, A. and Marmolejo-Ramos, F. and Spence, C. (2014). Predictive packaging design: Tasting shapes, typefaces, names, and sounds. Food Quality and Preference 34: 88-95.

Woodside, A. G. (1990). Measuring advertising effectiveness in destination marketing strategies. Journal of Travel Research 29(2): 3-8.

「八大電商破天荒聯手，為小農開拓新希望」 何秀玲/報導2016/ 05/ 03 19:55
https://video.udn.com/news/483727

「臺灣農產品電子商務發展現況及施政展望」105年1月(第283期)
文‧圖 / 行政院農委會國際處劉婉君
http://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=2504086