臺灣處於西北太平洋地區颱風主要侵襲的路徑上，很容易受到天然災害的影響，特別是極端颱風的衝擊。有些衝擊或災害很難去避免，所能做的就是學習如何復原。本研究對象為莫拉克颱風安遷救助戶，藉由探討社會資本與災後復原影響因素，希望能提升災後復原的效率。社會資本有許多定義，可看作為實現情感為目的，透過社會網絡的力量來達到。資料來源為國家災害防救科技中心所進行的莫拉克颱風社會衝擊與復原調查，本研究使用第一期的調查資料來進行分析。分析方法為使用Tobit迴歸、截斷迴歸模型來作分析。
研究結果發現，(1)受災次數惡化復原，顯示高脆弱度區域與災民更不易復原。(2)親友提供人力及物資資源，有助於加速復原。(3)住在親友提供住處的災民，會延長復原時間。(4)政府與民間團體提供心理協助，會延長災民復原時間。(5)政府與民間團體提供物資、安家，親友提供心理安慰、金錢協助抒解重災區域與災民，但未能全面加速復原。(6)避難所的環境使得災民不易復原。(7)宗教可加速復原。

Some impact or disasters are very difficult to avoid, we can do is learn how to recover. In this study the Case of Typhoon Morakot's Victims, by exploring social capital and the impact of the restoration after consideration, we hope can raise the efficiency of recovery. This study uses survey data of National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction (NCDR)proceed the Social Impacts and Recovery Survey of Typhoon Morakot. This study uses the first term survey data of Social Impacts and Recovery Survey of Typhoon Morakot. The analysis methods to use the Tobit regression model, truncated regression model and fixed-effect regression mode. Each regression model outcome compared to fixed-effect regression model outcome.
The empirical results found that relatives, friends, government and non-governmental organization provides many sides to help victims, but can’t significant achieve the full and accelerated recovery.

目錄
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究範疇 4
第三節 研究目的 5
第二章 文獻回顧 6
第一節 災後復原研究 6
第二節 回復力/韌性 10
第三節 社會資本 16
第四節 小結 18
第三章 研究方法 19
第一節 研究架構 19
第二節 實證資料 21
第三節 分析方法 32
第四章 實證結果 37
第一節 Tobit迴歸模型結果 38
第二節 截斷迴歸模型結果 43
第三節 小結 48
第五章 結論與建議 49
第一節 結論 49
第二節 政策建議 51
第三節 研究限制及未來研究建議 52
參考文獻 53
附錄 58

1.Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24 (3), 347–364.
2.Abramson, D. M., Stehling-Ariza, T., Park, Y. S., Walsh, L., and Culp, D. (2010). Measuring individual disaster recovery: A socioecological framework. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 4(S1), S46-S54.
3.Aldrich, D. P. and Meyer, M. A. (2015). Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 254-269.
4.Bourdieu, P. (1985). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). New York, NY: Greenwood.
5.Berke, Philip R., Jack Kartez, and Dennis Wenger. (1993). Recovery after disaster: achieving sustainable development, mitigation and equity. Disasters 17.2, 93-109.
6.Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
7.Cutter, Susan L.; Burton, Christopher G.; and Emrich, Christopher T. (2010). Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management: Vol. 7: Iss. 1, Article 51. doi:10.2202/1547-7355.1732
8.Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3): 253-267.
9.Fingleton, B., Garretsen, H., ＆ Martin, R. (2012). Recessionary shocks and regional employment: evidence on the resilience of UK regions. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 109-133.
10.Gallopín, G. C. (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 16(3): 293-303.
11.Hanifan, L. J. (1916). The rural school community center. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67, 130-138. doi:10.1177/000271621606700118.
12.Hahn, W. (1967). Stability of motion. Springer, Berlin.
13.Holling, C.S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23.
14.Holling, C. S. (1996). Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. Engineering within Ecological Constraints, 31(1996), 32.
15.Jha, A. K., Barenstein, J. D., Phelps, P. M., Pittet, D., Sena, S. (2010). Safer homes, stronger communities : a handbook for reconstructing after natural disasters. World Bank Publication.
16.Korten, D. C. (1980). Community organization and rural development: a learning process approach. Public Administration Review, 480-511.
17.Kawachi, I., Kim, D., Coutts, A. and Subramanian, S. V. (2004). Commentary: reconciling the three accounts of social capital. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33, 682-690. doi:10.1093/ije/dyh177.
18.Lietaer, B. (2004). Complementary currencies in Japan today: history, originality and relevance. International Journal of Community Currency Research, 8, 1-23.
19.Lin, K. H. E., Lee, H. C. and Lin, T. H. (2017). How does resilience matter? An empirical verification of the relationships between resilience and vulnerability. Natural Hazards, 1-22.
20.Mayunga, J. S. (2007). Understanding and applying the concept of community disaster resilience: a capital-based approach. Summer Academy for Social Vulnerability and Resilience Building, 1, 16.
21.Pimm, S.L. (1984). The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature, 307 (26), 321–326.
22.Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.Peacock, W. G., Brody, S. D., Seitz, W. A., Merrell, W. J., Vedlitz, A., Zahran, S., Harriss, R. C. and Stickney, R. (2010). Advancing resilience of coastal localities: developing, implementing, and sustaining the use of coastal resilience indicators: a final report hazard reduction and recovery center. Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center.
24.Prayag, G. and Orchiston, C. (2015). Earthquake impacts, organizational resilience and recovery of the accommodation/food services sector in Canterbury, New Zealand: a comparative assessment. Auckland, New Zealand: 13th Asia Pacific Council on Hotel Restaurant and Institutional Education Conference (APCHRIE), 10-13 Jun 2015.
25.Szreter, S. and Woolcock, M. (2004). Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33, 650-667. doi:10.1093/ije/dyh013.
26.Sherrieb, K., Norris, F. H., and Galea, S. (2010). Measuring capacities for community resilience. Social indicators research, 99(2), 227-247.
27.Shin, K. J., Nakakido, R., Horie, S. and Managi, S. (2016). The effects of community attachment and information seeking on displaced disaster victims’ decision making. PLoS ONE, 11(3): e0151928. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151928.
28.Sapeciay, Z., Wilkinson, S. and Costello, S. B. (2017). Building organisational resilience for the construction industry: New Zealand practitioners’ perspective. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 8(1), 98-108.
29.U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2011). National Preparedness Goal.
30.Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), Article 5.
31.Yoon, D. K., Kang, J. E. and Brody, S. D. (2016). A measurement of community disaster resilience in Korea. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 59(3), 436-460.
32.Zolli, A. and Healy, A. M. (2012). Resilience : why things bounce back. HighBridge Audio, United States, Unabridged edition, July 10, 2012.
33. 劉彩卿、陳欽賢 (2012)，「STATA基礎操作與統計模型應用」，台北：雙葉書廊。

參考資料來源
1.交通部中央氣象局
http://www.cwb.gov.tw/V7/observe/rainfall/define.htm
2.台灣氣候變遷調適科技知識平台(查詢時間：2017年5月15日)
http://taiccat.ncu.edu.tw/page4/super_pages.php?ID=page401
3.國家教育研究院雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網(查詢時間：2017年7月5日)
http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1242802/
4.學術調查研究資料庫：莫拉克颱風社會衝擊與復原調查
https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/search/generalret/key1:莫拉克/gp1:0
5.行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會http://morakotdatabase.nstm.gov.tw/88flood.www.gov.tw/index-2.html
6.STATA公司網站
http://www.stata.com/
7. 中華民國紅十字會總會 (2015)：莫拉克風災六週年報告。