臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

在追求創新與創意的時代中，“創意城市”、“創意人才”、生活風格等不斷受到產業學界重視。創意人才作為創意城市的核心和靈魂，他們有特殊的生活風格和獨特的個性。城市的公共空間是創意人與城市之間重要的連結，與公共空間的互動也是創意人才生活中不可缺少的部分。台北作為‘設計之都’，如何能更好的滿足創意人生活的需要變得更加重要。
本研究主要從設計師的角度，探討創意人才的生活風格及與城市公共空間之互動，透過創意城市、創意人才的生活方式和城市公共空間的文獻整理，再根據對研究目的與方法的探究，本研究採取之主要步驟包括：1. 通過試驗性研究對題目的可行性進行分析，並為後續的問卷設計和受訪者的選擇提供方向；2. 透過位於對台北的5家設計工作室施行問卷，了解26位設計師創意人如何形容其生活與工作，從而描繪出創意人才的生活風格； 3. 根據問卷當中5位設計師的面對面深度訪談，探討創意人生活與城市公共空間的連結，從而分析了解與公共空間的互動對於創意人的意義。
研究結果顯示，創意人才有其獨特的個性與生活風格，他們多變且隨性，喜歡探索與體驗。基於這些特點，他們對與公共空間的互動都有著很多的需求與熱情。通過研究發現，他們認為公共空間是他們生活必要的組成部分，他們在互動中可以舒壓放鬆，獲得靈感，開拓視野，以及提升對生活的熱情。他們喜歡在生活與工作，私人與公共之間尋求平衡。公共空間作為城市中重要的‘硬體資源’，本研究針對如何能更好的改善和滿足創意人的生活，促進創意城市發展提出建議。

In the age of innovation and creativity, the development of creative city, creative class and creative lifestyle have been emphasized. As the core and bloodstream of creative city, creative class has their special characteristic and lifestyle. Public space is the important connection between city and creative class. Moreover, interaction with public space is an indispensable part in their life. As “World Design Capital” city, how to improve and develop the city, in order to retain creative class, has become important for Taipei.
This research focus on the lifestyle of creative class and the impact of their relationship with city’s public space. Based on the literature review of creative city, creative class and public space, this research was divided into 3 steps though the analysis of research objectives and questions: 1. Pilot study is to point out some directions for the design of questionnaire and choosing participants. 2. Questionnaire is to explore the lifestyle of creative class, based on how they describe their life and work. 3. In-depth interview is to investigate the interaction between creative class and city’s public space. Moreover, the impact of public space on creative class would be analyzed.
The result of this research reveals that creative class has their special characteristic and lifestyle, which described by them as changeable and degage, and like to chase after more exploration and experience. Since these characteristic, they need and like to interact with public space. From their description of interaction with public space, research found that public space was an indispensable part in their life. They felt relax and they could release the pressure in public space, meanwhile, they could get inspiration and enthusiastic of life. Diversity of public space broaden their horizon as well. Creative class like to keep the balance of work and live, private and public to some extent. The outcome of this research can offer some suggestions for the development of city public space, so as to meet the demand of creative class.

摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 III
Table of Content IV
Table of Figure VII
CHAPTER1: INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research background 1
1.2 Research motivation 10
1.3 Research questions and objectives 12
CHAPTER2: LITERATURE REVIEW 13
2.1 Building a vibrant creative city 13
2.1.1 Creative city as a creative milieu: “soft” meets “hard” 13
2.1.2 Creative class: “soft” infrastructure of creative city 16
2.1.3 Public space: ‘hard’ infrastructure of creative city 19
2.1.4 Summary 24
2.2 A close look into the creative class 24
2.2.1 Quasi-anonymity lifestyle of creative class 25
2.2.2 The place where would attract creative class 26
2.3 Toward a creative city: the case of Taipei 29
2.3.1 Changing condition of creative class in Taipei 29
2.3.2 The evolution of public space in Taipei 32
CHAPTER3: RESEARCH METHODS 38
3.1 Research Design 38
3.1.1 Research Process 38
3.2 Research Methods 39
3.2.1 Pilot study 39
3.2.2 Questionnaire 44
3.2.3 In-depth interview 45
3.3 Case selection and data analysis 46
3.3.1 Criteria of interviewees selection in Taipei 46
3.3.2 Data analysis method 46
CHAPTER4：FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS 48
4.1 Introduction to participants in the questionnaire and interview 49
4.2 How you describe your lifestyle? 53
4.2.1 Work-life choice 53
4.2.2 Close connection with public space 55
4.2.3 What can public space bring to you? 56
4.2.4 Summary 57
4.3 How does public space immerse into creative class’s life? 58
4.3.1 Details of creative class’s lifestyle 58
4.3.2 Quality of public space: connected with creative class 60
4.3.3 Summary 66
4.4 Intangible impact of public spaces on creative class: lifestyle and individuality 67
4.4.1 Affordable space 68
4.4.2 Creative milieu 70
4.4.3 Urban diversity 72
4.4.4 Summary 74
CHAPTER5：DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 76
5.1 Research Discussion 76
5.1.1 Lifestyle connects to the characteristic of creative class 77
5.1.2 Lifestyle connects to public space 79
5.1.3 Characteristic of creative class connects to public space 80
5.2 Comment of public spaces in Taipei 81
5.3 Research limitation and future directions 82
REFERANCE 83
APPENDIX 88
1. Questionnaire 88
2. In-depth Interview 93
3. Transcript 96

Amin, A. and Roberts, J. (2008) Community, Economic Creativity and Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Asheim, B. T. and Gertler, M. (2005) The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems, in: J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery ＆ R. Nelson (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, pp. 291–317 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Authority, U. R. (2009). URA lifestyle survey.
Banerjee, T. (2001). The future of public space: Beyond invented streets and reinvented places. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(1), 9-24.
Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. and Maskell, P. (2004) Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation, Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), pp. 31–56.
Belussi, F. and Sedita, S. R. (2008) Managing situated creativity in cultural industries, Industry and Innovation, 15(5), pp. 457–458.
Blyton, P., Blunsdon, B., Reed, K., ＆ Dastmalchian, A. (Eds.). (2009). Ways of living: work, community and lifestyle choice. Springer.
Bontje, M., ＆ Musterd, S. (2009). Creative industries, creative class and competitiveness: Expert opinions critically appraised. Geoforum, 40(5), 843-852.
Bronzini, F., Barbini, N., Marinelli, G., Pantaloni, M., ＆ Giordano, E. (2014). Active Ageing and Public Space: The Creative City 3.0. In Ambient Assisted Living (pp. 361-371). Springer International Publishing.
Carr, S. (1992). Public space. Cambridge University Press.
Carmona, M. (2010). Contemporary public space, part two: classification. Journal of Urban Design, 15(2), 157-173.
Calhoun, C. J. (1992). Habermas and the public sphere. MIT press.
Cohendet, P., Grandadam, D., ＆ Simon, L. (2010). The anatomy of the creative city. Industry and innovation, 17(1), 91-111.
Cooke, P. N., ＆ Lazzeretti, L. (Eds.). (2008). Creative cities, cultural clusters and local economic development. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Comunian, R. (2010). Rethinking the creative city: the role of complexity, networks and interactions in the urban creative economy. Urban Studies.
Darchen, S., ＆ Tremblay, D. G. (2011). The attraction/retention of knowledge workers and the creative city paradigm: can we plan for the talents and at what cost? The case of Montreal.
Economics, O. (2012). Global talent 2021. How the new geography of talent will transform human resources strategy.
Eikhof, D. R., ＆ Haunschild, A. (2006). Lifestyle meets market: Bohemian entrepreneurs in creative industries. Creativity and innovation management, 15(3), 234-241.
Feldhusen, J. F. (2005). Giftedness, talent, expertise, and creative achievement. Conceptions of giftedness, 2, 64-79.
Florida, R. (2002a). Bohemia and economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 2(1), 55 71.
Florida, R. (2002b). The rise of the creative class: and how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic.
Florida, R. (2014). The Rise of the Creative Class--Revisited: Revised and Expanded. Basic books.
Florida, R. (2005a). Cities and the creative class. Routledge.
Florida, R. (2005b). The flight of the creative class. New York: Harper Business.
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social text, (25/26), 56-80.
Gawain, S. (2016). Creative Visualization-: Use the Power of Your Imagination to Create What You Want in Your Life. New World Library.
Gehl, J. (2013). Cities for people. Island press.
Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: using public space. Island Press.
Gehl, J., ＆ Gemzøe, L. (2001). New city spaces.
Gehl, J., ＆ Gemzoe, L. (1996). Public spaces-public life.
Grant, J. L. (2014). Seeking talent for Creative cities. London: University of Toronto
Guilford, J. P. (1986). Creative talents: Their nature, uses and development. Bearly limited.
Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT press.
Hall, P. (2000). Creative cities and economic development. Urban studies, 37(4), 639-649.
Hansen, H. K., ＆ Niedomysl, T. (2009). Migration of the creative class: evidence from Sweden. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(2), 191-206.
Hartley, J. (2005) Creative Industries (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing).
Hesmondhalgh, D., ＆ Pratt, A. C. (2005). Cultural industries and cultural policy. International journal of cultural policy, 11(1), 1-13.
Hospers, G. J. (2003). Creative cities: Breeding places in the knowledge economy. Knowledge, Technology ＆ Policy, 16(3), 143-162.
Howkins, J. (2001) The Creative Economy (London: Penguin).
Hoyman, M., ＆ Faricy, C. (2009). It takes a village a test of the creative class, social capital, and human capital theories. Urban Affairs Review, 44(3), 311-333.
IMD. (2015). IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2015.
Iveson, K. (1998). Putting the public back into public space. Urban Policy and Research, 16(1), 21-33.
Kong, L., ＆ O'Connor, J. (Eds.). (2009). Creative economies, creative cities: Asian-European perspectives (Vol. 98). Springer Science ＆ Business Media.
Krätke, S. (2010). ‘Creative Cities’ and the Rise of the Dealer Class: A Critique of Richard Florida's Approach to Urban Theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4), 835-853.
Landry, C. (2012). The creative city: A toolkit for urban innovators. Earthscan.
MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American psychologist, 17(7), 484.
Mehta, V. (2014). Evaluating public space. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 53-88.
Miles, M. (1997). Art, space and the city: public art and urban futures. Psychology Press.
Miles, M. B., ＆ Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Mooney, R. L. (1963). A conceptual model for integrating four approaches to the identification of creative talent. Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development, 331-340.
Mould, O. (2015). Urban subversion and the creative city. Routledge.
Nasar, J. L. (1998). The evaluative image of the city. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Parnes, S. J., ＆ Meadow, A. (1963). Development of individual creative talent. Scientific Creativity: Its recognition and development, 311-320.
Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International journal of urban and regional research, 29(4), 740-770.
Pratt, A. C. (2008). Creative cities: the cultural industries and the creative class. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 90(2), 107-117.
Pratt, A. C. (2006) Advertising and creativity, a governance approach: a case study of creative agencies in London, Environment and Planning A, 38, pp. 1883–1899.
Pratt, A. C. (2004). Creative Clusters: Towards the governance of the creative industries production system? Media international Australia incorporating culture and policy, 112(1), 50-66.
Reese, L. A., Faist, J. M., ＆ Sands, G. (2010). Measuring the creative class: Do we know it when we see it?. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(3), 345-366.
Scott, A. J. (2006) Creative cities: conceptual issues and policy questions, Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(1), pp. 1–17.
Stevenson, D., ＆ Matthews, A. (2013). Culture and the city: Creativity, tourism, leisure. Routledge.
Stolarick, K. and Florida, R. (2006) Creativity, connections and innovation: a study of linkages in the Montreal region, Environment and Planning A, 38, pp. 1799–1817.
Susen, S. (2011). Critical notes on Habermas's theory of the public sphere. Sociological Analysis, 5(1), 37-62.
Talen, E. (2000). Measuring the public realm: A preliminary assessment of the link between public space and sense of community. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 344-360.
Torrance, E. P. (1959). Current research on the nature of creative talent. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6(4), 309.
Wojan, T. R., Lambert, D. M., ＆ McGranahan, D. A. (2007). Emoting with their feet: Bohemian attraction to creative milieu. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(6), 711-736.
Yin, R. K. (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
Zukin, S. (1995) The Cultures of Cities (Oxford: Blackwell).
葛夢堯. (2015). 初探我國創新創業人才流失問題. from:http://portal.stpi.narl.org.tw/index/article/10150;jsessionid=6259247E80B7781610FC43628DBCFAE2 (Accessed date: 2016.11.07)
林欽榮. (2010). 創新區域與創意城市: 產業創新與文化創意做為城市再生的動能. 研考雙月刊, 34(6), 64-74.
林育如, 陳俊良, ＆ 林伯賢. (2016). 台北申辦 WDC 競標書之設計策略探討. 藝術學報, (98), 117-141.
邱淑宜, ＆ 林文一. (2014). 建構創意城市臺北市在政策論述上的迷思與限制. 地理學報, (72), 57-84.
黃麗玲. (2002). 都市更新與都市統理: 台北與香港的比較研究.
康旻杰. (2002). 生活世界的混沌之詩與地方之舞: 閱讀台北城市文化地景. 台北市文化局.
王佳煌. (2010). 文化/創意產業, 創意階級/城市論著的批判性檢視. 思與言: 人文與社會科學雜誌, 48(1), 131-190.
文化部. (2015). 2015年台灣文化創意產業發展年報.
鄭伃晴（2016）. 邁向設計之都: 以台灣台北市之轉型為例
吳瑪悧. (2007). 藝術與公共領域: 藝術進入社區. 台北市: 遠流.