臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

在人口過剩及都市化程度增長下，開發都市新管理法門之需求日益漸增，智慧城市也漸成為二十一世紀政府所尋求的解決法門。然而，由於科學文獻仍對智慧城市下全面定義有所困難；智慧城市之具體操作、效率評估、及其現象之其它結構性知識的研究，也落後於其實質使用率。儘管如此，政府、企業與公眾團體，仍對智慧城市一詞下之企劃投以大量資源。 當大多文獻皆著重於智慧城市之技術層面，有些研究已指出公民參與對於企畫成功之至高重要性。為追續這些研究，此論文旨在使用Rowe-Frewer公眾參與效率評估架構，檢驗公民於特拉維夫、里約熱內盧、及桑坦德之12個智慧城市企畫的參與成效。 此研究於Rowe-Frewer標準下，為定性評估提出一套子標準，並根據智慧城市公開企劃之可得數據，在公民參與方面，審視其設計與實施，及其成果表現及趨勢。得到的評估結果，支持Rowe-Frewer架構對智慧城市企畫以公民參與為導向之適切性的假定，並或能為智慧城市企劃的未來發展和設計，提供有益之依據。

Following the growing need to develop new approaches to city management under conditions of overpopulation and increasing urbanization, the Smart Cities are becoming a go-to solution for governments in 21st century. However, the scientific literature struggles to pin down a comprehensive definition of what Smart City is, and because of this – specifics of its operation, efficiency evaluation and other structured knowledge of the phenomenon lags behind the adoption rates. Despite that, governments, companies and communities dedicate huge resources to initiatives under Smart City umbrella.
While most of the literature focuses on technological aspect of smart cities, some researches have pointed out the highest importance of Citizen Engagement to the success of the initiative. To follow up these findings this research aims to utilize Rowe-Frewer public engagement efficiency evaluation framework in order to examine efficiency of citizen engagement in 12 Smart City initiatives in Tel Aviv, Rio de Janeiro, and Santander. This research proposes a set of sub-criteria for qualitative evaluation under Rowe-Frewer criteria and inspects the performance of the investigated initiatives and trends in Smart City project design and implementation with respect to citizen engagement based on publically accessible data about the projects. The received evaluation results support the assumption of applicableness of Rowe-Frewer framework to citizen engagement oriented Smart City projects and may provide a valuable background for future development and design of Smart City initiatives.

Abstract .....................................i
Acknowledgement ....................................ii
Table of Contents ...........................iii
List of Tables ....................................iv
List of Figures .....................................v
Chapter 1. Introduction .............................1
1.1 Background .....................................1
1.1.1 The Role of the City .....................1
1.1.2 Problems Generated by Cities .............2
1.1.2 Definitions of Smart Cities .............2
1.1.3 Factors of Smart City Success .............3
1.1.4 Efficiency of Citizen Engagement Methods .....4
1.2 Research Objective .............................5
1.3 Significance of the Study .....................5
1.4 Research Design .............................7
Chapter 2. Literature Review ....................10
Chapter 3. Evaluation Procedure ....................13
Chapter 4. Case Studies and Evaluation ............21
4.1 Tel Aviv, Israel ............................21
4.1.1 Introduction ............................21
3.1.2 Citizen Engagement Initiatives ............22
4.2 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ....................34
4.2.1 Introduction ............................34
4.2.2 Citizen Engagement Initiatives ............35
4.3 Santander, Spain ............................49
4.3.1 Introduction. ............................49
4.3.2 Citizen Engagement Initiatives ............50
Chapter 5. Analysis Results ....................63
5.1 Rowe-Frewer Criteria Evaluations ............63
5.2 Identified Trends ............................78
5.3 Rowe-Frewer Framework in Application to Smart City Projects ....................................79
Chapter 6. Conclusions ............................81
Chapter 7. References ............................82

Accenture. "Rio de Janeiro answers the call to high performance with fater delivery of municipal services." 2012.
Albino, V., U. Berardi, and R. M. Dangelico. Smart Cities: definitions, dimentions, and performance. 2013.
Al-Hader, M., and Rodzi A. "The smart city infrastructure development and monitoring." Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, No 4(2), 2009: 87-94.
Aronoff, M., and V. Gunter. "A pound of cure: Facilitating participatory processes in technological hazard disputes." Society and Natural Resources 7(3), 1994: 235-252.
Batty, M. "Smart Cities of the Futire." The European Physical Journal Special Topics 214(1), 2012: 481-518.
Bayo, J. G. International Case Studies of Smart Cities, Santander, Spain. Inter-American Development Bank, 2016.
Belanche, D., L. V. Casalo, and C. Orus. "City attachment and use of urban services: Benefits for smart cities. ." Cities Vol. 50. , 2015: 75-81.
Berube, A. Global Metro Monitor . 2015. https://www.brookings.edu/research/global-metro-monitor/.
Borja, J. Counterpoint: Intelligent cities and innovative cities. 2007.
Bradbury, J. A. "Risk communication in environmental restoration programs." Risk Analysis 14(3), 1994: 357-363.
Bulkeley, H., and M. Bestil. "Rethinking Sustainable Cities: Multilevel governance and the 'urban' politics of climate change." Environmental Politics 14, 2005: 42-63.
Cairney, T., and G. Speak. Developing a 'Smart City': Understanding Information. 2000.
Capra, C. F. The Smart City and its Citizens. 2014.
Central Bureau of Statistics, State of Israel. "List of localities, in Alphabetical Order." 2014. http://www.cbs.gov.il/ishuvim/reshimalefishem.pdf.
Centre for the Future State. An Upside Down View of Governance. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, 2010.
Chakraborty, S., and R. Stratton. "An integrated regional approach to risk management of industrial-systems." Nuclear Safety 34 (1), 1993: 1-8.
Chess, C., K. L. Salomone, and B. J. Hance. "Improving risk communication in government: Reserch priorities." Risk Analysis 15(2), 1995: 127-135.
City Coulcil of Santander. 2010. http://www.planestrategicosantander.com/documentos.php.
CNMCDATA. 2017. http://data.cnmc.es/datagraph/jsp/inf_men.jsp.
Cohen, B. "What Exactly is a Smart City?" Co. Exist 19, 2012.
Competitions. July 5, 2017. http://www.santandercitybrain.com/concursos.
Crosby, N., J. M. Kelly, and P. Schaefer. "Citizens panels: A new approach to citizen participation." Public Administration Review 46, 1986: 170-178.
Crowfoot, J. E., and J. M. Wondolleck. Environment disputes: Community involvement in conflict resolution. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1990.
Dirks, S., and M. Keeling. A Vision of Smarter Cities: How Cities Can Lead the Way into a Prosperous and Sustainable Future. Sommers, NY: IBM, Global Business Services., 2009.
Dobbs, R. Urban World: Mapping the Economic Power of Cities. 2011.
Eger, J. M. "Smart growth, smart cities, and the crisis at the pump a worldwide phenomenon." I-Ways, 32(1), 2009: 47-53.
European Pariament. Mapping Smart Cities in the EU. Brussels: European Parliament, Directorate General of internal policies. 2014.
Eurostat. 2017. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do.
FGV. FGV Stugy. Half of the population is included in the digital world. 2012. www.smabc.org.br/smabc/blog.asp?id_CON=29729&id_SUB=97.
Fiorino, D. J. "Citizen Participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms." Science, Technology, & Human Values 15(2), 1990: 226-243.
Fox, J. Tel Aviv's Digi-Tel: an e-government app and smart card, all in one. 2015. http://citiscope.org/story/2015/tel-avivs-digitel-e-government-app-and-smart-card-all-one.
Freudenberg, W. R., and D. Olsen. "Public interest and political abuse: Public participation in social impact assessment." Journal of the Community Development Society 14, 1983: 67-82.
Golding, D., S. Krimsky, and A. Plough. "Evaluating risk communication: Narrative vs technical presentations of information about radon." Risk Analysis 12(1), 1992: 27-35.
Google Inc. City Pulse. 2017. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.eu.smartsantander.participatorysensing&hl=es.
Granickas, K. Understanding the Impact of Releasing and Re-using Open Data. 2013.
Griffith, J. C. "Smart governance for smart growth: The need for regional governments." Georgia State University Law Review 17(4), 2001: 1019-1062.
Harms, J. R. "Critical Success Factors for a Smart City Strategy." 25th Twente Student Conference on IT. Enschede, the Netherlands, 2016.
IHS Technology. Smart Cities to Rise Fourfold in Number from 2013 to 2025. 2014. https://technology.ihs.com/507030/smart-cities-to-rise-fourfold-in-number-from-2013-to-2025.
Interned World Stats. 2017. http://www.internetworldstats.com/europa.htm#es.
Janssen, M, Y. Charalabidis, and A. Zuiderwijk. "Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government." Information Systems Management vol.29(4), 2012: 258-268.
Jansson, K. "Optimal public transport price and service frequency." Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 27, January 1993: 33-50.
Jasseur, J. "Smart cities and urban networks. Interconnecting Smart Objects with IP: The Next Internet." 360- 377. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2010.
Klauenberg, B. J., and E. K. Vermulen. "Role of risk communication in closing military waste sites." Risk Analysis 14(3), 1994: 351-356.
Kogan, N. Exploratory reserch on success factors and challenges of Smart City Projects. 2014.
Latinno. Ágora Rio Challenge. 2017. https://latinno.wzb.eu/en/case/3218/ .
Lynn, F. M., and G. J. Busenberg. "Citizen advisory committees and environmental-policy: What we know, what’s left to discover." Risk Analysis 15(2), 1995: 147-162.
Marceau, J. "Introduction: Innovation in the city and innovative cities." Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, October 2008: 136-145.
Michell, N. New app allows citizens to participate in city development. June 12, 2013. https://cities-today.com/new-app-allows-citizens-to-participate-in-city-development/?rtype=1.
Middendorf, G., and L. Busch. "Inquiry for the public good: Democratic participation in agricultural reserch." Agriculture and Human Values 14, 1997: 45-57.
Milian, M. Tel Aviv After Silicon Valley. 2012. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-11-21/tel-aviv-picked-as-top-place-forstartups-after-silicon-valley.
Mohring, H. "Optimization and scale economies in urban bus transportation." American Economic Review, 62(4), 1972: 592-604.
Mooij, J. "Smart governance? Politics in the policy process in Andhra Pradesh. ." ODI Working Papers, India, 2003: 228.
Morcillo, F. "El ciudadano comprometido, clave para el diseño de la Smart City y modelos de negocios. Thinking about Smart Cities.[blog] 8." 2013. https://smartcitymb3.wordpress.com/2013/09/08/el-ciudadano-comprometido-faithful-citizenship-clave-para-el-diseno-de-la-smartcity-y-modelos-de-negocios/.
Nam, T., and C. Hafedh. Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework. 2012.
Nam, T., and T. A. Pardo. "Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions." 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. 2011. 282-291.
Nelking, D., and M. Pollak. "Public participation in technological decisions: Reality or grand illusion?" Technology Review 9, 1979: 55-64.
Ng, K. L., and D. M. Hamby. "Fundamentals for establishing a risk communication program." Health Physics 73(3), 1997: 473-482.
Ng, K. L., and M. Hamby. "Fundamentals for establishing a risk communication program." Health Physics 73(3), 1997: 473-482.
Odendaal, N. "Information and communication technology and local governance: Understanding the difference between cities in developed and emerging economies." Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 27(6), 2003: 585-607.
PCTCan. 2017. http://www.pctcan.es/comercializacion/empresas-del-parque/.
PGOU Santander. Actividades Económicas de Santander. 2012. http://portal.ayto-santander.es/pgou/a_inf_1/1_anexo1_parte_1.pdf.
R., Giffinger, and Gudrum P. Smart Cities: Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities. 2010.
Renn, O., T. Webler, H. Rakel, P. Dienel, and B. Johnson. "Public-participation in decision-making: A 3-step procedure." Policy Sciences 26(3), 1993: 189-214.
Rowe, G., and L. J. Frewer. "A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms." Schience, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 30 No. 2, Spring 2005: 251-290.
Rowe, G., and L. J. Frewer. "Evaluating Public Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda." Science, Technology and Human Values 29(4), 2004: 512-563.
Rowe, G., and L. J. Frewer. "Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation." Science, Technology and Human Values 25(1), 2000: 3-29.
Rowe, G., T. Horlick-Jones, J. Walls, W. Poortinga, and Pidgeon N. F. "Analysis of a normative framework for evaluating public engagement exercises: reliability, validity and limitations." Public Understnding of Science, 2008: 419-441.
Santander City Brain - About Us. July 5, 2017. http://www.santandercitybrain.com/page/aboutus.
"Santander Smart City - Plan Director de Innovación." n.d. http://portal.ayto--santander.es/documentos/plan_director_innovacion.pdf.
"Santander Smart City Strategic Plan." n.d. http://portal.ayto--santander.es/portal/page/portal/inet_santander/%5Bhtdocs%5D/pdf_contenidos_diversos/2.%20Plan%20Estrategico_Sant_Smart_City.pdf.
Schreiner, C. International Case Studies of Smart Cities, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Inter-American Development Bank, 2016.
Smith, L. F., C. Y. Nell, and M. V. Prystupa. "The converging dynamics of interest representation in resources management." Environmental Management 21(2), 1997: 139-146.
State Meteorological Agency. 2017. www.aemet.es.
Swallow, S. K., J. J. Opaluch, and T. F. Weaver. "Siting noxious facilities: An approach that integrates technical, economic, and political considerations." Land Economics 68(3), 1992: 283-301.
The World Bank. Briefs for policymakers. 2011. https://blogs.worldbank.org/publicsphere/briefs-policymakers.
Toch, E., and E. Feder. International Case Studies of Smart Cities, Tel Aviv, Israel. Inter-American Development Bank, 2016.
Transparent Santander. July 8, 2017. http://transparencia.santander.es/.
United Nations. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision. 2014.
Vaughan, E. "Individual and cultural-differences in adaptation to environmental risks. ." American Psychologist 48(6), 1993: 673-680.
Webber, E.P., and A. Khademian. Wicked Problems, Knowledge Challenges, and Collaborative Capacity Builders in Network Settings. 2008.
Webler, T. “Right” discourse in citizen participation: An evaluative yardstick. In Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse, edited by O.Renn, T.Webler, and P.Wiedemann. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 1995.
Wiedemann, P. M., and S. Femers. "Public participation in waste management decisionmaking: Analysis and management conflicts." Journal of Hazardous Materials 33(3), 1993: 355-368.
Williams, M. "Open data or closed doors? Supporting reserch in cities." CentreForCities. 2013. http://www.centreforcities.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/13-12-10-Open-data-or-closed-doors1.pdf.
Yin, R. K. Case study reserch: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1984.
Zygiaris, S. "Smart City Reference Model: Assisting Planners to Conceptualize the Building of Smart City Innovation Ecosystems." Journal of the Knowledge Economy 2(2), 2012.