跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.84) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/10 23:30
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:楊培君
研究生(外文):Pei-Chun Yang
論文名稱:企業人事結構調整速度之探討-基於代理理論與管家理論之視角
論文名稱(外文):Business Employment Adjustment Speed: Based on Agency Theory and Stewardship Theory Perspectives
指導教授:陳明園陳明園引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ming-Yuan Chen
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中央大學
系所名稱:人力資源管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:中文
論文頁數:42
中文關鍵詞:代理理論管家理論人事結構調整速度
外文關鍵詞:Agency TheoryStewardship TheoryEmployment Adjustment Speed
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:818
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:199
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
  本研究主要以代理理論及管家理論之觀點,探討企業經理人之公司治理理論取向對企業人事結構調整速度之影響。綜合參考過去學者針對二理論之預測行為差異,提出以研發支出比例、非系統風險、現金持有量、發放股利比例以及外部董事比例等五個變項之標準化數值運算結果,建立代理理論與管家理論取向之區辨指標,觀察兩種治理理論取向之企業,在人事結構調整速度上之差異。研究樣本包括2009年至2015年之台灣上市櫃電子產業公司,共294間企業,2058個觀察樣本。實證結果發現,企業人事結構調整速度確實因企業治理理論取向不同而有所差異,且當治理理念愈趨近於管家理論時,企業人事結構調整速度愈快,進一步將組織人事結構調整情形區分為增員與裁員二種,結果發現當組織人力過剩需減少工作人數時,此趨勢更加突顯,然而在勞動人數不足時,增員速度並無因治理理念取向的不同而有明顯差異;而在區辨二者理論取向之五個細項指標中,也顯示研發支出比例愈高、現金持有量愈低、非系統性風險愈高,及外部董事比例愈高,組織人事調整速度愈快,發放股利比例變項則與企業人事結構調整速度未呈系統性之關聯。
This study attempts to investigate whether the corporate governance theories beliefs owned by business executives have impact on the speed of business employment adjustment. Based on the difference of forecasting behavior between agency theory and stewardship theory perspectives, this paper establishes a business discriminative index of agency theory and stewardship theory orientation by five standardized variables including the proportion of research and development expenditure, nonsystematic risk index, cash holdings, dividends to earnings ratio, and the proportion of outside directors, then try to find out the relevance between the orientation index and the speed of company employment adjustment. Collecting data from listed electronic companies at stock exchange market and over-the-counter market in Taiwan from 2009 to 2015, including 294 firms and 2058 observations. The empirical results indicate that the speed of company employment adjustment varies with different corporate governance theory orientation, and when the orientation index gets more close to stewardship theory, the business employment adjusts faster. Furthermore, dividing the employment adjustment situation into staffing and layoff, the results show that layoff speed also faster when the orientation index gets more close to stewardship theory. However, the staffing speed doesn’t vary due to different orientation index. Besides, the higher proportion of R&D expenditure, the higher nonsystematic risk index, the lower cash holdings, and the higher proportion of outside directors, the business employment adjusts faster, yet dividends to earnings ratio isn’t significant related to the speed of company employment adjustment.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 本文架構5
第二章 文獻探討與研究假說 6
第一節 組織人力需求與結構調整 6
第二節 企業治理理論與人事結構調整速度 8
第三章 研究方法 12
第一節 管家理論與代理理論取向之指標建立 12
第二節 研究樣本 16
第三節 實證模型 17
第四節 研究工具 19
第四章 實證結果分析 20
第一節 樣本敘述性統計資料 20
第二節 研究假設驗證 21
第五章 結論 25
第一節 實證結果討論 25
第二節 管理意涵 27
第三節 研究限制與建議 28
中文文獻
EMBA雜誌編輯部(2001)。當你不得不裁員時。EMBA雜誌,181。
尹德瀚(2009年2月18日)七種裁員替代蠢案 一味摳省損失更大。中國時報。取自:http://forums.chinatimes.com/report/980318/employee-content-98021801.htm
台灣積體電路製造公司官方網站。取自:http://www.tsmc.com.tw/chinese/default.htm
朱益賢、蘇龍昇(2010)。企業實施無薪假之規範與措施。台灣勞工季刊,頁108-115。
李馨蘋、鄭誌偉(2008)。從管理者薪酬與機構法人持股之觀點看企業創新投資之影響因素。東吳經濟商學學報,62,頁47-68。
段樵、伍鳳儀、劉常勇與于宗先(2003)。中小企業之經營與政府政策:大中華管理學術。香港:香港中文大學。
連育德(譯)(2015)。Google超級用人學:讓人才創意不絕、企業不斷成長的創新工作守則(原作者:Laszlo Bock)。臺北市:天下文化。(原著出版年:2015)
陳明園、石雅慧(2004)。高階經理人薪酬-代理理論與競賽理論之實證研究。臺大管理論叢,15(1),頁131-166。
萬希(2007)。企業裁員管理。經營管理者,2,頁100-103。
蔡秀涓(2006)。虛幻或實存?組織信任概念與影響原因回顧暨展望。公共行政學報,21,頁163-178。
謝劍平(2014)。財務管理原理。臺北市:智勝文化事業有限股份公司。
英文文獻
Abe, M. (2002). Corporate governance structure and employment adjustment in Japan: An empirical analysis using corporate finance data. Industrial Relations, 41(4), 683-702.
Breton-Miller, I. L., & Miller, D. (2011). Stewardship of agency? A social embeddedness reconciliation of conduct and performance in public family businesses. Organization Science, 22(3), 704-721.
Bushee, B. J. (1998). The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review, 73(3), 305-333.
Cascio, W. F. (1993). Downsizing: What do we know? What have we learned? Academy of Management Executive, 7(1), 95-104.
Daft, R. L. (2012). Understanding the theory and design of organizations. South-Western Cengage Learning.
Dalton, D. R., & Daily, C. M. (2001). Direct stock compensation: An invitation to a conspicuous conflict of interest? Business Ethic Quarterly, 11(1), 89-108.
Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269-290.
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20-47.
Deangelo, H., & Rice, E. M. (1983). Antitakeover charter amendments and stockholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 11, 329-360.
DeWitt, R. L. (1993). The structural consequences of downsizing. Organization Science, 4, 30-40.
Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49-65.
Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239-263.
Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1999). Intellectual capital: Realizing your company's true value by finding its hidden roots. New York: Harper Business.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325.
Gandolfi, F. (2008). Reflecting on downsizing: What have managers learned? S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 73(2), 46-55.
Grant Robert M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
Greenhalgh, L., Lawrence, A. T., & Sutton, R. I. (1988). Determinants of work force reduction strategies in declining organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 13(2), 241-254.
Grossman, W. (2010). The influence of board monitoring, executive incentives, and corporate strategy on employment stability. Employ Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 22(1), 45-64.
Hui, C., Lee, C., & Rousseau, D. M. (2004). Psychological contract and organizational citizenship behavior in China: Investigating generalizability and instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 311-321.
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
Kaplan, S. N., & Reishus, D. (1990). Outside directorships and corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 389-410.
Lee, P. M. (1997). A comparative analysis of layoff announcements and stock price reactions in the United States and Japan. Strategic Management Journal, 18(11), 879-894.
Liu, T., & Spector, L. C. (2005). Dynamic employment adjustments over business cycles. Empirical Economics, 30(1), 151-169. doi: 10.1007
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
McKinley, W., Zhao, J., & Rust, K. G. (2000). A sociocognitive interpretation of organizational Downsizing. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 227-243.
Miller, D., Breton-Miller, I. L., & Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship vs. Stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51-78. doi: 10.1111
Miller, M. H. & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. The Journal of Business, 34(4), 411-433.
Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2014). Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Preffer, J. (1994). Competitive advantage through people. California Management Review, 36(2), 9-28.
Sougiannis, T. (1994). The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D. The Accounting Review, 69(1), 44-68.
Sutton, R. I., & D'Aunno, T. (1989). Decreasing organizational size: Untangling the effects of money and People. The Academy of Management Review, 14(2), 194-212.
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing culture contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
Uchitelle, L. (2007). The disposable American: Layoffs and their consequences: New York: Vintage.
Wright, P. M., Smart, D. L., & McMahan, G. C. (1995). Matches between human resources and strategy among NCAA basketball teams. Academy of Management Journal, 38(4), 1052-1074.
Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43-58.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top