跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.170) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/03 14:29
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:李易軒
研究生(外文):Yi-Xuan Li
論文名稱:行動支付的投資具有先驅優勢嗎?-以台灣市場為例
論文名稱(外文):Is There Any First-mover Advantage in Investing Mobile Payment? -Examples of Taiwan Market
指導教授:欒錦榮欒錦榮引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chin-Jung Luan
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:國際企業學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
論文頁數:46
中文關鍵詞:行動支付金融科技產品創新先驅優勢多角化
外文關鍵詞:mobile paymentfintechproduct innovationfirst-mover advantagediversification
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:876
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:14
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
  在全球行動支付快速發展下,台灣不只電子業本身開始投資行動支付,金融業者也跟上腳步,發展金融科技,甚至百貨業者也參予其中,各家業者期望發展行動支付能為公司績效帶來效益。故本研究欲探討企業是否投資行動支付與企業投資行動支付早晚對公司績效之影響,同時加入多角化作為調節變數,以觀察加入多角化的因素對公司績效之影響。
  本研究以台灣上市公司為研究樣本,資料來源取自台灣經濟新報資料庫(Taiwan Economic Journal)。研究期間為2011年到2015年,共計2470個樣本作為觀察值。並以Panel Data模型分析,再使用Hausman test驗證顯示各模型適用於隨機效果模型為實證分析的依據。
  研究結果顯示,企業投資行動支付與公司績效的關係為不顯著,且企業愈早投資行動支付對於公司績效有負向顯著影響,此外,金融業投資相關多角化行動支付,對公司績效影響並不顯著。
  因此,公司必須要有創新才能保持其競爭優勢,然而,創新對公司來說需耗費研發成本,設備等資源,又或因市場不確定性因素與技術不確定性因素而導致公司失去其競爭優勢,故本研究實證發現,公司在投資行動支付時,可將公司定位於後進者,藉由模仿等方式來搶佔市場。
  With the emergence of applications embedded with smartphones, mobile payment has been trendy to many countries, and has attracted a lot of firms to enter, including banks, information technology companies, game firms, and so on.
  The purpose of this study, which employed diversification as the moderator, is to investigate whether there is any first-mover advantage in this wave.
  The data of this paper has been collected by TEJ (Taiwan Economic Journal) Databank and the investigation period is from 2011 to 2015.
  The sample is composed of the entrants (publicly listed firms) in this field of mobile payment and their competitors with the same industries.
  In this study, we use Hausman test to identify the fitness of models and panel regression to test the hypotheses proposed in this study.
  The results show that the impact of the entrants’ investment in mobile payment is not significant related to their performance.
  And, interestingly, the earlier the firms invest in mobile payment, the worse their performance is.
  Furthermore, banks investing in mobile payment as related diversification do not enjoy better performance than firms not related to banking industry.
  The study provides empirical evidence to the practitioners in mobile payment business and also suggest late comers may grasp more advantage in certain innovative industries.
第一章 緒論......................................................1
第一節 研究背景..................................................1
第二節 研究動機與目的.............................................4
第三節 研究範圍與限..............................................5
第四節 研究方法與流程.............................................6
第二章 文獻回顧...................................................7
第一節 行動支付..................................................7
第二節 金融科技..................................................10
第三節 產品創新..................................................12
第四節 先進者優勢.................................................14
第五節 多角化....................................................16
第三章 研究方法...................................................19
第一節 研究架構..................................................19
第二節 資料來源與樣本.............................................20
第三節 變數衡量..................................................21
第四節 資料分析方法..............................................25
第四章 實證結果與討論..............................................27
第一節 樣本描述..................................................27
第二節 相關係數分析...............................................28
第三節 Panel Data模型分析與假說檢定................................31
第四節 實證結果與分析討論..........................................35
第五章 結論與建議..................................................37
第一節 研究結論..................................................37
第二節 理論貢獻..................................................39
第三節 管理意涵..................................................39
第四節 研究限制與未來建議..........................................40
參考文獻..........................................................41
網路資料
1. 《IDC全球智慧型手機出貨量排行出爐!》
http://www.bnext.com.tw/article/view/id/40477
2. 《新金融:行動支付市場趨勢與商機》
http://www.cnra.org.tw/edm/20150917.pdf
3. 《2014年台灣民眾之智慧化生活有感調查》
http://www.find.org.tw/market_info.aspx?n_ID=8438
4. 《資策會MIC調查:台灣民眾使用行動支付採用率不到5%》
http://www.ithome.com.tw/article/94369
5. 《支付卡發展史》
https://www.nccc.com.tw/wps/wcm/connect/zh/home/KnowledgeSharing/PaymentCardKnowledge

中文文獻
1.鄭詠怡 (2010)。《行動付款機制之發展現況與機會》。國立交通大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
2.葉展皓 (2014)。《行動支付機制之研究》。國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程EMBA學位論文。
3.江濡伃 (2013)。《行動支付服務的三篇研究:策略、商業模式與成功因素》。國立成功大學電信管理研究所博碩士論文。
4.鄭苑瓊 (2008)。《科技化創新金融服務規範研析-以行動支付和第三方支付為例》, 科技法律透析, p. 15-38.
5.蔡福隆、張偉郎 (2016)。《金融科技之發展趨勢與因應》, 亞洲金融季報2016春季號, p. 37-43.
6.吳孟道 (2016)。《金融科技創新的趨勢與挑戰》, 台灣經濟研究月刊39卷1期, p. 35-42
7.葉賀勤 (2012)。《以科技接受模型探討消費者之網路銀行使用意圖》。國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
8.方至民(2000),企業競爭優勢,台北;前程企管
9.林惠文(2001),<國際化與多角化策略對財務績效之影響-本國銀行業比較分析>,《商管科技季刊》,第二卷,第四期,377-397。
10. 林綜傑(2005),多角化因素與金控因素於銀行之績效評估,國立屏東科技大學企業管理研究所。
11. 閻大同(2004 ),「DRAM 產業的競爭策略分析-以力晶半導體為例」,中原大學工 業工程學系碩士論文

英文文獻
Aaker, David A. (1984), Strategic Market Management, 1st ed, New York: Wiley.

Ajzen, Icek and Martin Fishbein (1980), Understanding Attitude and Predicting Social Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall.

Baird, I.S. and Howard, T. (1985), “Toward a contingency model of strategic risk taking,” The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 10, No.2, pp. 230-243.

Bettis, R.A.and V,Mahajan, (1985), “ Risk / Return Performance of Diversified
Firms. ” ,Management Science , Vol. 31, pp.785-799.

Booz, Allen and Hamilton (1982) ,”New Product Management for the 1980’s”,New York : Booz, Allen and Hamilton, Inc.

Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantages. Journal of Management 17 (1): 99-120.

Brain, J. S. (1956). Barriers to Competition. Havard University Press.

Boulding, W., and Christen, M. 2003. Sustainable pioneering advantage?Profit implications of market entry order. Management Science. 22(3):371-392.

Bohlmann, J. D., P. N. Golder, and D. Mitra (2002), “Deconstructing the Pioneer’s Advantage: Examining Vintage Effects and Consumer Valuations of Quality and Variety,” Management Science, 48(9), pp. 1175-1195.

Chaney, P. K. and Devinney, T. M. (1992),”New product innovations and stock price performance,”Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol.19,No.5,pp 677-695.

Clayton M. Christensen (1995). Explaining the attacker’s advantage:Techological paradigms,organizational dynamics, and the value network.

Cox, Donald F. (1967). “Risk Handling In Consumer Behavior – an Intensive Study Of Two Cases”, in Cox(Ed.), Risk-Taking and Information-Handle in Consumer Behavior, Boston: Harvard University Press. PP: 34-81.

Cunningham, S. M. (1967). “The Major Dimension of Perceived Risk”, in Donald F. Cox, ed., Risk-Taking and Information-Handling in Consumer Behavior, Boston: Harvard University Press. P. 82-108

Cunningham, S. M. (1967). “The Major Dimension of Perceived Risk”, in Donald F. Cox, ed., Risk-Taking and Information-Handling in Consumer Behavior, Boston: Harvard University Press. P. 82-108

Cooper, R. G. (1984), “The performance impact of product innovation strategies,”Eourpean Journal of Marketing,Vol.18,No.5,pp 5-54.

Demsetz, Harold.(1983). The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm, Journal of Law and Economics,26(2),pp.375-390.

Damanpour, F. and Evan, W. M. (1984), ”Organization innovation and performance:TheProblem of Organizational lag,” Adminstrative Science Vol.23,NO.3,pp 114-132.

Durant, R., and Coeurderoy, R. (2001). Age, order of entry, strategic orientation, and organizational performance. Journal of Business Venturing. 16(5):471-494.

Dowling, Grahame R. and Richard Staelin (1994), “A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-Handling Activity,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1),p.119-134.

Guasch, J. L., and A. Weiss. (1980). Adverse Selection By Markets and The Advantage of Being Late. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94,May, 453-466.

Huff, L. C., and Robinson, W. T. (1994). The impact of leadtime and years of competitive rivalry on pioneer market share advantages. Management Science.40(10):1370-1377.

Jensen, M. C.and R. Buback. (1983). The market for corporate control : the scientific evidence.Journal of Financial Economics,11(3),pp.5-50.

Kuczmarski, T. D. (1992),”Managing New Product : The Power Of Innovation, 2rd.”, Prentic-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J. pp61-65.

Klepper, S., and Simons, K. L. (2000). Dominance by birthright: entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U.S. television receiver industry. Strategic Management Journal. 21(10-11):997-1016.

Lane, W. J. and S. N. Wiggins. (1981). Quality Uncertainty, Repeat Purchases and First Entrant Advantages. Working Paper, Texas A & M University.

Lambkin, M. (1998). Order of entry and performance in new markets. Strategic Management Journal. 9:127-140

Lieberman, M. B., and Montgomery, D.B. (1998). First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal. 9:41-58.

Mansfield, E., M. Schwartz, & S. Wagner. (1981). Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study. Economic Journal,December, 907-918.

Makadok, R. (1998). Can first-mover advantages be sustained in an industry with low barriers to entry/imitation? Strategic Management Journal. 19(7):683-696.

Polasik, M., Piotrowski, D.(2016). Payment Innovations In Poland:The Role Of Payment Services In The Strategies Of Commercial Banks.

Rochford and Linda (1991), “Generating and Screening New Product Ideas”,Industrial Marketing Management, pp.287-296.

Romijn, H., and M. Albaladejo. (2002). Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in Southeast England. Research Policy 31: 1053-1067.

Schumpeter, J. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

Sommer, D. W., (1996), The Impact of Firm Risk on Property-Liability Insurance Prices,Journal of Risk and Insurance, 63: 501-514.

Schmalensee, R. (1982). Product Differentiation Advantage of Pioneering Brands.American Economic Review, 72, 349-365.

Tallman, S. and J. Li., (1996), ” Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms.” , Academy of Management Journal, Vol.39,No.1,pp.179-196.

Varadarajan, P. R., Peterson, R.A. and Kerin, R.A. (1992). First-mover advantage: a synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. Journal of Marketing. 56(4):33-52.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top