(3.235.108.188) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/02/28 00:46
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:林櫻蘭
研究生(外文):Ying-Lan Lin
論文名稱:領導者人格特質與領導美學實踐關係之研究: 以台灣庭園景觀工程專業為例
論文名稱(外文):Leaders'' Personality Traits, Aesthetic Leadership and Management Performance: A Case study of Garden and Landscape Project in Taiwan
指導教授:李清潭李清潭引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chin-Tarn Lee
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中山大學
系所名稱:高階經營碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:中文
論文頁數:144
中文關鍵詞:美學領導領導人格特質庭園景觀工程
外文關鍵詞:Aesthetic leadership (AL)leadershipGarden and Landscape Project Constructionpersonality traits
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:250
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:74
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
誠然,領導能力是成功組織背後的重要關鍵力量,無量團隊或是企業要永續經營,則須借助領導之力,以規劃未來發展的遠景,透過組織的提升與變革,朝向共同的目標邁進。因此,我們可以理解領導力是組織群體的核心價值。而且,尋找下一個優質領導者,更是組織經營、發展與延續的核心任務之一。
  本研究在探討領導者的人格特質與美學領導實踐兩者之影響。作用上,領導是一種指引、教導,本質更是一種參與、投入,乃至於一種影響。基於這樣的假設,企業最高領導者之人格特質對其企業經營領導風格之影響,是否為組織成功之關鍵力量呢?尤其,在主觀意識相當強烈的美學領導和其概念,究竟對於組織營運的實踐有哪種程度的影響呢?似乎存在著相當大的實證研究之空間,因而,本研究企圖以台灣庭園景觀工程專業為例,進行實證探討。
  基於前述背景與目的,本研究將以尊重受訪者主觀意見的深度訪談方式進行研究。方法上,本研究將採用半結構式設計訪談,進而分析研究專業的中小企業最高主管受其人格特質、美學素養影響與形成之領導風格實踐的關係。
It is true that leadership is an important key force behind successful organization, and the contingent team or business is going to be sustainable, with the power of leadership to plan for the future of development, through organizational upgrading and change, towards a common goal. Therefore, we can understand that leadership is the core value of the organizational group. And, to find the next high-quality leader, is the organization of business, development and continuation of one of the core tasks.
This study explores the influence of leaders'' personality traits and aesthetic leadership practices. Role, leadership is a guide, teaching, the essence is a kind of participation, investment, and even an impact. Based on the assumption that the influence of the personality of the highest leaders of the firm on the leadership style of its business is a key force for the success of the organization? In particular, in the subjective sense of a very strong aesthetic leadership and its concept, what is the effect on the practice of organizational operations? There seems to be a considerable empirical study of space, therefore, this study attempts to Taiwan garden landscape engineering industry as an example, to conduct empirical research.
Based on the foregoing background and purpose, this study will be conducted in the form of in-depth interviews with respondents'' subjective opinions. Method, this study will use semi-structured design interviews, and then analyze the professional management of small and medium-sized enterprises in the top management by their personality traits, aesthetic qualities and the formation of the leadership style of the relationship between practice.
論文審定書 .......................................................... i
誌 謝 .............................................................. ii
摘 要 ............................................................. iii
Abstract ........................................................... iv
目 錄 ............................................................... v
第一章 緒論 ........................................................ 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 ............................................. 2
第二節 研究目的 ................................................... 5
第三節 研究對象與範圍 ............................................. 6
第四節 研究流程 ................................................... 7
第二章 文獻探討 ................................................... 17
第一節 領導定義 .................................................. 18
第二節 領導理論 .................................................. 24
第三節 人格特質 .................................................. 28
第四節 美學領導理論 .............................................. 31
第五節 美學領導與個人人格特質之關係 .............................. 43
第六節 美學領導與美學實踐之關係 .................................. 47
第七節 小結 ...................................................... 51
第三章 研究方法 ................................................... 63
第一節 研究架構 .................................................. 64
第二節 研究設計 .................................................. 66
第四章 資料分析 ................................................... 77
第一節 個案資料 .................................................. 78
第二節 訪談資料彙總整理 .......................................... 81
第三節 資料分析 .................................................. 89
第四節 深度訪談小結 ............................................. 103
第五章 結論與建議 ................................................ 124
第一節 結論 ..................................................... 124
第二節 建議 ..................................................... 126
參考文獻 .......................................................... 129
一、中文
Gavin Keeney《On the Nature of Things: Contemporary American Ladscape
Architecture》譯者孫晶責任編輯:劉靜 2007《第二自然-當代美國景觀》,中
國電力出版社。
Peter G. Northouse 著,吳昆壽譯《領導才能:理論與實務》,華騰文化股份有限
公司。
Wenche E. Dramstad James D. O1son Rechard T.T. Forman 譯者張俊彥、洪佳君、曾
心嫻2006《景觀建築及土地使用計畫之景觀生態原則》,地景企業股份有限
公司
中原《美國CIA 識人術:九型人格解密人性》,人類智庫出版。
李乾朗(2005)《19 世紀台灣建築》,玉山社出版事業股份有限公司。
姚政仲《國際室內設計展》經濟部內政部文建會共同主辦。
夏學理、談琲、王怡瑜、范瓊方( 2008)《文化藝術與心靈管理》,五南圖書出版公
司。
盛治仁《生活美學理念推廣系列叢書景觀》行政院文建會漢寶德主編。
黃希庭《人格心理學》,浙江教育出版社
楊瑪利、藍麗娟、陳應欽(2007)《新.東京美學經濟》,天下遠見出版股份有限公
司。
二、英文
Brady, F. N. & Hart, D. W. (2006). An aesthetic theory of conflict in administrative
ethics. Administration & Society, 38, 113-134.
Cowan, D. A. (2007). Artistic undertones of humanistic leadership education, Journal of
Management Education, 31, 156-180.
Crow, G. M. & Grogan, M. (2005). The development of leadership thought and practice
in the United States. In F. W. English (Ed.), The Sage handbook of educational
leadership: Advances in theory, research, and practice (pp. 363-370). Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dantley, M. E. (2005). Moral leadership: shifting the management paradigm. In F. W.
English (Ed.), The Sage handbook of educational leadership: Advances in theory,
research, and practice (pp. 34-46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
De Ciantis, C. (1995). Using an art technique to facilitate leadership development.
Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
Duke, D. L. (1986). The aesthetics of leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly,
22, 7-27.
English, F. W. (2008). Anatomy of professional practice: Promising research
perspectives on educational leadership. Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield.
Goleman, D., Boyzatkis, R. & McKee, A. (2001). Primal leadership: The hidden driver
of great performance. Harvard Business Review, 42-51.
Greene, M. (2001). Variations on a blue guitar: The Lincoln Center Institute lectures on
aesthetic education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Griffiths, J. & Mack, K. (2007). Going to sea: Co-creating the aesthetic dimension of
shipboard organizational life. Culture & Organization, 13(4), 267-281.
Hansen, H., Ropo, A. & Sauer, E. (2007). Aesthetic leadership. The Leadership
Quarterly, 18, 544-560.
Hofstadter, A. & Kuhns, R., Eds. (1964). Philosophies of art and beauty: Selected
readings in aesthetics from Plato to Heidegger. Chicago, IL: The University of
Chicago Press.
Hurley, J.C. (2002). Art and human potential. Principal Leadership, 3 (4), 24-7.
Jennings, P. A. & Greenberg, M.T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and
emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of
Educational Research, (79), 491-525.
Kant, I. (1791/1987). Critique of judgment. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2006). Using the arts to promote creativity in leaders: A multiple
case study of three executive institutes. Journal of Research on Leadership
Education. http://www.ucea.org/JRLE/issue.php
Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2008). Can the arts assist in developing the creativity of
educational leaders? The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving
(formerly the Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving). Special Issue on
Creativity in Schools and Classrooms.
Kelehear, Z. (2008). Instructional leadership, connoisseurship and critique: Using an
artsbased approach to extend conversations about teaching. International Journal of
Leadership in Education, 11(3), 239-256.
Ladkin, D. (2006). The enchantment of the charismatic leader: Charisma reconsidered
as aesthetic encounter. Leadership, 2, 165-179.
Ladkin, D. (2008). Leading beautifully: How mastery, congruence and purpose create
the aesthetic of embodied leadership practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 31-41.
London, M. & Maurer, T. J. (2004). Leadership development: A diagnostic model for
continuous learning in dynamic organizations. In J. Antonakis, A. T. Cianciolo &
R. J. Sternberg (Eds). The nature of leadership (p. 222-246). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Maxcy, S. (2006). The metaphysical sources of a pragmatic artistic leadership. In E. A.
Samier & R. J. Bates (Eds). The aesthetic dimensions of educational administration
and leadership (pp. 3-17). London: Routledge.
Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P. & Caruso, D. R. (2004). Emotional intelligence: Theory,
findings and implications. Psychological Inquiry, 15(3), 197-215.
McDowelle, J.O.& Buckner, K.G.(2002). Leading with emotion; Reaching balance
ineducational decision-making. New York: Roman and Littlefield Education.
McEwan, E.(2003). Seven steps to effective instructional leadership. Thousand Oaks,
CA; Corwin Press.
Merritt, S. & DeGraff, J.(1996). The revisionary visionary: Leadership and the
aesthetics of adaptability. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 30(4) 69-85.
Millstein, M., & Kruger, J.A. (1997) Improving educational administration preparation
programmer: What we have learned over the past decade. Peabody Journal of
Education, 72(2), 110-116.
Murphy, J. (2006). Preparing school leaders: Defining a research and action agenda.
Lanham. MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Nissley, N., Taylor, S. & Butler, O. (2002). Tuning-in to organizational song as aesthetic
discourse, Culture and Organization. 8(1), 51-68.
Palus, C.J. & Horth, D.M. (1996). Leading creatively: The art of making sense, Journal
of Aesthetic Education, 30(4), 53-68.
Palus, C.J. & Horth, D.M. (2002). The leader’s edge: Six creative competencies for
navigating comples challenges. San Francisco, CA: A joint publication of Jossey
Bass and Center for Creative Leadership.
Pounder, D., Reitzug, U. & Young, M. (2002) Preparing school leaders for school
improvement, social justice and community. In J. Murphy (Ed). The educational
leadership challenge; Redefining leadership for the 21st centure: Part 1. One
hundred-first yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education.
Chicage, 1L: The University of Chicago Press.
Rodgers, C.R. (2002). Seeing student learning. Harvard Educational Review. 72(2) 230-
253.
Samier, E.A. & Bates, R.J. (2006). Foundations and history of the social aesthetic. In
E.A. Samier & R.J. Bates (Eds). The aesthetic dimensions of educational
administration & leadership (pp. 3-17). London : Routledge.
Smith, R.A. (1996). Leadership as aesthetic process. Journal of Aesthetic Education,
30(4), 39-53.
Smith, R.A. (2005). Aesthetic education: Questions and issues, Arts Education Policy
Review, 106(3), 19-34.
Smith, R.A.(2008). Educational aessthefics and policy. Arts Education Policy Review,
109(6), 3-12.
Stein, H.F. (2003). The inner world of workplaces; Accessing this world through poetry,
Narrative literature, music, and visual art. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice
and Research, 55(2), 84-93.
Strati, A. (1992). Aesthetic understanding of organizational life. Academy of
Management Review, 17(3), 568-581.
Sullivan, G. (2005). Art Practice as research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Taylor, S. & Hansen, H. (2005). Finding form: Looking at the Field of organizational
aesthetics. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6). 1211-1231.
Taylor, S.S. (2002). Overcoming aesthetic muteness: Researching organizational
members’ aesthetic experience. Human Relatiorns, 5597), 821-840.
Weggeman, M., Lammer, l. & Akkermans. H. (2007). Aesthetics of design. Journal of
Organizational Change Management, 22(3) 346-358.
Weick, K.E. (2007). Drop Your Tools: On reconflguring management education. Journal
Of Management Education, 31,5-16.
Welsch, W. (1996). Aestheticization processes: Phenomena, distinctions and prospects.
Theory, Culture & Society, 13(1), 1-24.
White, D.A. (1996). ‘ It’s working beautifullyl ‘Philosophical reflections on aesthetics
and organization theory. Organization, 3(2). 195-208.
Witz, A., Warhurst, C., & Nickson, D. (2003). The labour of aesthetics and the
aesthetics of organization. Organization, 10(33), 33-54.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔