本文旨在探討創業與經濟成長的實證關係，依據Romer (1990)內生經濟成長模型與Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson (2005)的研究，制度透過知識外溢管道影響經濟成長，顯示當制度愈完善時，經濟成長率會增加。本文採用全球創業觀察報告的資料，共計45個國家，2001年至2015年跨國實證資料，並使用制度作為門檻變數進行門檻迴歸分析，探討創業與經濟成長的非線性關係。門檻迴歸以全球競爭力指數-制度部分(GCII)當作制度的代表變數，實證結果可得出一個門檻值(GCII=4.093)，以此門檻值將資料區分成低制度完善程度(GCII≤4.093)與高制度完善程度(GCII>4.093)，低制度完善程度國家創業率與經濟成長無顯著關係，高制度完善程度國家創業率上升對經濟成長具有正面影響。除此之外，本文將資料依高/低制度完善程度分割後進行兩階段動差法分析，實證結果發現高制度完善程度國家創業率上升對經濟成長具有正面影響。

The paper presents the relationship of entrepreneurship and economic growth. Based on Romer (1990) Endogenous growth models and Acemoglu et al. (2005), the institution affects economic growth through the knowledge spillovers. When the institution is more perfect, economic growth will increase. Data from 45 countries for the years 2001 and 2015, as collected by Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) research, aim to empirically investigate the nonlinear relationship of entrepreneurship and economic growth by threshold regression. Threshold regression with the global competitiveness index-the institution (GCII) as threshold variable proves there is a threshold which GCII is equal to 4.093, and distinguishes countries into low(GCII≤4.093) and high(GCII>4.093) level of institution development by the threshold. The relationship of entrepreneurship and economic growth is with no significance in countries in low level, and is positive with significance in countries in high level. In addition, two-step system GMM with data distinguished into low and high level proves that the entrepreneurship rate significantly and positively impacts on economic growth rate in high level.

摘要………………………………………………………………………………………………………………i
致謝………………………………………………………………………………………………………………iii
第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究動機………………………………………………………………………………1
第二節 章節安排………………………………………………………………………………2
第二章 文獻回顧……………………………………………………………………………………………3
第一節 經濟成長………………………………………………………………………………3
第二節 創業………………………………………………………………………………………6
第三章 理論分析……………………………………………………………………………………………8
第一節 理論結構……………………………………………………………………………8
一、影響經濟成長之管道………………………………………………………………8
(一)技術管道…………………………………………………………………………9
(二)制度管道…………………………………………………………………………9
二、創業對於影響經濟成長之管道………………………………………………10
(一)新進廠商………………………………………………………………………10
(二)新事物…………………………………………………………………………11
第二節 理論模型……………………………………………………………………………12
第四章 實證分析…………………………………………………………………………………………15
第一節 變數…………………………………………………………………………………15
第二節 實證模型……………………………………………………………………………18
一、成長模型………………………………………………………………………………18
二、門檻模型………………………………………………………………………………20
第三節 實證結果……………………………………………………………………………22
第五章 結論…………………………………………………………………………………………………28
第一節 研究發現……………………………………………………………………………28
第二節 研究限制與展望…………………………………………………………………30
參考文獻………………………………………………………………………………………………………32

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handbook of economic growth, 1, 385-472.
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2013). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business.
Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(434), 444-455.
Arellano, Manuel, & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51.
Barro, Robert, & Lee, J.-W. (2013). A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World, 1950-2010. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 184-198.
Bassanini, A., Scarpetta, S., & Hemmings, P. (2001). Economic growth: the role of policies and institutions. Panel data evidence from OECD countries (No. 283). OECD Economics Department Working Papers.
Blanchflower, D. G. (2000). Self-employment in OECD countries. Labour economics, 7(5), 471-505.
Blundell, Richard, & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.
Braunerhjelm, P. (2010). Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth-past experience, current knowledge and policy implications CESIS Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation(No. 224), 1-79.
Braunerhjelm, P., & Henrekson, M. (2013). Entrepreneurship, institutions, and economic dynamism: lessons from a comparison of the United States and Sweden Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(1), 107-130.
Carlsson, B. (2002). Institutions, entrepreneurship, and growth: Biomedicine and polymers in Sweden and Ohio. Small Business Economics, 19(2), 105-121.
Carree, M., Van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Wennekers, S. (2007). The relationship between economic development and business ownership revisited. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19(3), 281-291.
Colander, D., & Su, H.-C. (2015). Making sense of economists' positive-normative distinction. Journal of Economic Methodology, 22(2), 157-170.
Dar, A., & Amirkhalkhali, S. (2003). On the impact of trade openness on growth: further evidence from OECD countries. Applied Economics, 35(16), 1761-1766.
Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. A. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of management, 29(3), 333-349.
Feenstra, C, R., Inklaar, R., & Timmer, M. P. (2015). The Next Generation of the Penn World Table. American Economic Review, 105(10), 3150-3182.
Galindo, M.-Á., & Méndez, M. T. (2014). Entrepreneurship, economic growth, and innovation: Are feedback effects at work? Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 825–829.
Hall, J. C., & Sobel, R. S. (2008). Institutions, Entrepreneurship, and Regional Differences in Economic Growth. Southern Journal of Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 69-96.
Hansen, B. E. (1999). Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93(2), 345–368.
Harrison, A. (1996). Openness and growth: A time-series, cross-country analysis for developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 48(2), 419-447.
Hayek, F. A. (1989). The pretence of knowledge. The American Economic Review, 79(6), 3-7.
Hayek, F. A. (2014). The road to serfdom: Text and documents: The definitive edition (Vol. 2). Routledge.
Kahneman, D. (2012). Schnelles Denken, langsames Denken. Siedler Verlag.
Kanbur, R., & Zhang, X. (2005). Fifty years of regional inequality in China: a journey through central planning, reform, and openness. Review of development Economics, 9(1), 87-106.
Leamer, E. E. (1983). Let's take the con out of econometrics. The American Economic Review, 73(1), 31-43.
Leontief, W. (1971). Theoretical Assumptions and Non-Observed Facts. American Econommic Review, 61(1), 1-7.
Little, R. J., & Rubin, D. B. (1989). The analysis of social science data with missing values. Sociological Methods & Research, 18(2-3), 292-326.
Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of monetary economics, 22(1), 3-42.
Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 49(6), 1417-1426.
Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037.
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71-S102.
Romer, P. M. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. The journal of economic perspectives, 8(1), 3-22.
Roodman, D. (2009). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 71(1), 135-158.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper and Brothers.
Sternberg, R., & Wennekers, S. (2005). Determinants and effects of new business creation using global entrepreneurship monitor data. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 193-203.
Valliere, D., & Peterson, R. (2009). Entrepreneurship and economic growth: Evidence from emerging and developed countries. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 21(5-6), 459-480.
Van Stel, A., Carree, M., & Thurik, R. (2005). The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 311-321.
Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth. Small Business Economics, 13(1), 27–56.
Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Autio, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth : Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 335-350.