(54.236.58.220) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/02/27 17:57
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:侯ㄧ欣
研究生(外文):Hou, Yi-Hsin
論文名稱:課程推廣的理論建構之探究:以閱讀為例
論文名稱(外文):The constructive theorization of curriculum dissemination: taking reading as example
指導教授:高新建高新建引用關係
指導教授(外文):Gau, Shin-Jiann
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:教育學系
學門:教育學門
學類:綜合教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:中文
論文頁數:353
中文關鍵詞:課程推廣課程理論擴散課程革新課程實施閱讀課程
外文關鍵詞:curriculum disseminationcurriculum theorydiffusioncurriculum innovationcurriculum implementationreading curriculum
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:497
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:119
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
課程推廣研究肇始於1960年代美國大規模介入中小學的課程革新活動,故課程推廣被界定為政府機關對學校教師的介入行動。由於推廣往往伴隨革新之後出現,且需探討那些持續發展一段時間的具體案例,較能追溯其歷史軌跡;因此本研究以閱讀為例,採實證主義的立場,將實施、擴散和制度化理論整合為模式架構,以結構方程模式證澄理論模式與案例樣本資料的配適性。確證推廣理論的模式架構後,再以典型相關和路徑分析,探討理論構念間的相互關係,有助於釐清推廣過程各因素間的錯綜變化(如:擴散角色影響制度化模式),並憑藉迴歸和階層線性模式,分析個人及學校背景變項如何對推廣產生影響(如:校風開放傾向價值型塑的制度化形成)。最後,輔助質性探究的結果補充說明理論模式的脈絡性效果(如:榮譽雖有助於制度化形成,卻可能是走入另一修正的開始)。從模式架構的配適度檢驗、釐清推廣過程各因素間的相互關係、探討背景脈絡的影響,進而回應建構課程推廣理論的研究目的。
本研究以國小教師為研究對象,抽樣範圍取自北部地區、中部地區、南部地區、東部及離島地區,並以都會化程度69.4%為依據,分層抽樣都會區和非都會區學校。採問卷調查和訪問調查作為蒐集資料的方法,經量化和質性技術的分析結果,對照研究目的後,大致歸納結論如下:
一、課程推廣具實施、擴散和制度化等階段,每個階段皆有其相應的任務。實施階段審慎評估忠實觀或調適觀的脈絡性需求後,可搭配自上而下或由下而上的實施方式組合;擴散階段則因應個別的特性與需求(如:創新者具組織因素的採用考量),而使人各安其位、各司其職,充分運用人際網絡將革新導向特定意圖;制度化階段則在人群達致一定默契的基礎下,透過制度模式的運作,使組織成員皆能達到既定推廣目標的行為表現。
二、在推廣的各個階段採行任何決定或行動,皆會牽一髮而動全身。在階段內「實施觀點」與「實施方式」、「擴散角色」與「採用依據」、「制度化模式」與「制度化形成」具正相關;跨階段則「實施方式」與「擴散角色」、「擴散角色」與「制度化模式」、「實施方式」與「制度化模式」具正相關,可見各階段任何決定或行動彼此交互影響。
三、受到個人或學校背景、閱讀發展經驗的脈絡性影響,而使得課程推廣更朝向多元化的進行。不只是各校及個人在實施、擴散和制度化的情形有所差異,中央到學校的行政運作層級之職掌分工逐漸明顯,推廣雖涉「異中求同」卻也兼及「同中求異」的多元發展。
The academic study of curriculum dissemination began from U.S. actively promoting curriculum innovation to primary and high school during 1960 A.D., so that curriculum dissemination just be meant for administrative intervention to school teacher. Because the dissemination almost follow after the innovation, in order to tracing the historical background for investigating that continuing case, the study takes the viewpoint of Positivism to reading curriculum by the way of structural equation model (SEM) for implementation, diffusion and institutionalization. As the data gathering from the sample case of reading curriculum just fit in SEM, then the constructs of SEM could be further analyzed by canonical correlation and path analysis to confirming the interrelationships among the changing process of dissemination, just like that the roles of dissemination affect the mechanism of institutionalization. Analyzing the variables of the individual and school background by stepwise multiple regression and hierarchical linear models (HLM) to realize the contextual effect, such as the open climate of school leading to the moral values into institutionalization, and corresponding to the qualitative inquiry, such as the honor doing favor to institutionalization but causing the curriculum revision, above all we could distinguish the interrelationships between the constructs of SEM and contextual effect, finally reach the goal of constructive theorization of curriculum dissemination.
The study took primary school teacher who came from the north area, the mddle area, the south area, the east and outlying islands of Taiwan as sample. Stratified sampling between metropolitan area and non-metropolitan area, according to the metropolis rate of 69.4%. Data gathering by the way of interview and questionnaire survey, then analyzing outcome from quantitative or qualitative technique could reach the following conclusions corresponding to research goal.
First, the process of dissemination might include the phases of implementation, diffusion and institutionalization, which phases has each tasks to overcome. Considering the contextual need of fidelity perspective or mutual adaptation at the phases of implementation, the model of implementation could be ‘top-down’ or ‘button-up’ with corresponding. At the phases of diffusion, if the innovation within interpersonal network could be lead to the desired goal and made each other do his duties, the administrative intervention should response to individual characteristics and needs, such as the innovator usually taking organizational surroundings into account. At the phases of institutionalization, if the individuals within group reach in sync mind, the individuals within group would perform well for the desired goal of dissemination under the models of institutionalization.
Second, any administrative intervention would lead something changing at each phases of the process of dissemination. Such as the viewpoints of implementation versus the models of implementation, the roles of diffusion versus the considerations of adoption, the models of institutionalization versus the performance of institutionalization all having positive correlation in common at the same phases. Either the models of implementation versus the roles of diffusion, the roles of diffusion versus the models of institutionalization, the models of implementation versus the models of institutionalization having positive correlation across other phases. So that either administrative intervention could make some influence with each other at the process of dissemination.
Third, the curriculum dissemination works for diversified development because the contextual effect of individual, school background or the developing experiences of reading curriculum. Not only the individuals and schools disseminate differently in the aspects of implementation, diffusion and institutionalization, but also from Ministry of Education to schools the administrative job assignment apparently dividing the work. Curriculum dissemination not only let the disagreement becoming consensus but intends to make consensus be pluralistic.
目 次
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 4
第三節 研究目的與待答問題 6
第四節 名詞釋義 6
第五節 研究範圍與限制 8
第二章 課程推廣的理論基礎 9
第一節 課程推廣的學理整合概述 9
第二節 課程實施典範的革新取向 15
第三節 革新擴散理論在課程推廣上的應用 34
第四節 課程革新的制度化探析 54
第三章 閱讀課程推廣的案例闡述 67
第一節 國內教育革新背景對閱讀推廣的蘊義 67
第二節 閱讀課程的意涵、推廣程序與影響因素 75
第三節 國內閱讀課程的推廣概況 86
第四章 研究設計與實施 101
第一節 研究架構與假設 101
第二節 研究對象 102
第三節 研究方法 108
第四節 研究工具 109
第五節 研究構面的信效度處理 112
第六節 資料分析與其方法論 123
第五章 資料分析結果與討論 129
第一節 理論模式的SEM配適分析 129
第二節 理論構念間的典型相關與路徑分析 160
第三節 背景變項預測結果之線性分析 186
第四節 質性資料分析 252
第六章 結論與建議 269
第一節 結論 269
第二節 建議 279
參考文獻 282
附錄一 專家學者名單 303
附錄二 專家效度調查問卷 305
附錄三 專家效度審查意見整理 311
附錄四 閱讀課程推廣的意見調查 319
附錄五 學校閱讀推廣的背景調查 323
附錄六 R語言撰寫的Power計算程式 324
附錄七 訪談大綱 326
附錄八 階層線性分析結果 327
Welch, A. R.、吳姈娟(2009)。澳洲教育。載於楊深坑(主編),比較與國際教育(頁436-481)。臺北市,高等教育。
PISA國家研究中心(2014)。臺灣PISA2012精簡報告。取自
http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/download_tw.htm
天下雜誌教育基金會(2013)。閱讀帶來改變的力量。取自http://reading.cw.com.tw/
王靜如(1997,12月)。改變國小教師自然科教學之研究。論文發表於中華民國科學教育學會、臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所、教育部聯合舉辦之「中華民國第十三屆科學教育學術研討會」,臺北市。
王恭志(2004)。新右派課程政策的評析與啟示。教育研究資訊,12(5),34-56。
王瑞賢(譯)(2006)。B. Berstein著。教育論述之結構化(The Structuring of
Pedagogic Discoursr)。臺北市:巨流。
王志弘(2011)。R. Alford著。好研究怎麼做-從理論、方法、證據構思研究問題
(The craft of inquiry: theories, methods, evidence)。臺北市:群學。
王雅玄、陳幸仁(2012)。教育成就國際評比之後殖民反思-以IEA為例。教育
資料與研究,107,167-193。
王盈勛(2013)。傳播新制度經濟史初探。傳播文化,12,1-15。
王梅玲、曾湘怡(2013)。兒童閱讀教學活動成效評估。國家圖書館館刊,2,83-110。
王保進(2015)。中文視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究(第二版)。臺北市:心理。
田耐青(1991)。中華民國國民小學推廣實施視聽教育現況調查報告。臺北師院
學報,4,229-258。
尹弘飆、李子建(2008)。課程變革:理論與實踐。臺北市:高等教育。
尹弘飚(2009)。論課程變革的制度化-基於新制度主義的分析。高等教育研究,
30(4),75-81。
尹弘飚(2014)。再論課程變革的制度化-概念內涵與分析框架。高等教育研究,
35(4),66-71。
江惜美(1999)。國小語文科必修科目探究。取自
http://www.nknu.edu.tw/~edu/new-eduweb/08Learning/learning%20thesis/learning%20thesis-4/item4-article11.htm
汪靜明(1997,12月)。我國環境教育推廣者之河川環境概念來源與生物歧異度
概念認知之研究。論文發表於中華民國科學教育學會、臺灣師範大學科學教
育研究所、教育部聯合舉辦之「中華民國第十三屆科學教育學術研討會」,
臺北市。
何雅芬(1998)。國民小學課程推廣之研究-臺北縣開放教育個案分析(未出版
之碩士論文)。國立中正大學教育研究所,嘉義縣。
沈坤林(2016)。榮譽後教師如何發展專業閱讀-基於名師工作室合作研修的視
角。浙江教育科學,3,41-43。
李子建、黃顯華(2002)。課程:範式、取向和設計。香港:香港中文大學。
李永烈(2002,11月)。小校推動九年一貫課程的優劣勢與實務策略。論文發表
於國立臺中師範學院進修推廣部、教育部聯合舉辦之「2002九年一貫進修
與推廣教育學術研討會」,臺中市。
李家宜(2004)。 嘉義市健康與體育學習領域課程推動現況與遭遇困境之探討。
教師之友,45(1),40-44。
李俊豪(2010)。解釋學生基測成績差異之個人因素與地區因素。地理學報,60,
67-102。
卯靜儒(2008)。全球化效應下的課程改革-知識社會學的幾點觀察。教育研究
月刊,170,5-14。
卯靜儒(2014)。改革即改變嗎?教育改革理解路徑之探索。教育學刊,42,1-37。卯靜儒(2015)。改革主體的詮釋現象學初探:以學習共同體為例。市北教育學
刊,49,55-78。
阮孝齊(2014)。從教育政策借用觀點論學習共同體之推動策略。臺灣教育評論
月刊,3(5),115-121。
阮孝齊(2015,6月)。從擴散理論探究各縣市學習共同體推動與影響因素之研
究。論文發表於國立暨南國際大學課程教學與科技研究所、師資培育中心舉
辦之「第八屆科技社會中課程與教學變革研討會」,南投縣。
阮孝齊(2016)。我國學習共同體政策擴散之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺
灣師範大學教育研究所,臺北市。
阮孝齊、王麗雲(2017)。縣市教育資源對學習共同體擴散影響之研究。教育研
究集刊,63(1),69-107。
林綺雲(2002)。制度學派的理論反思:臺灣教育組織的變革經驗。社會科學論
叢,40,111-133。
林章榜、蔡菊芬(2006)。高中體育科教師對新課程推動的問題與解決策略。學
校體育,16(1),66-73。
林于弘(2009)。九年一貫國語文課程綱要商榷—以「97課綱」與「92課綱」為
比較對象。取自
http://www.center.kl.edu.tw/v7/edudata/course/4953/20091215-094609_ 87
林巧敏(2009)。推動國中小學童數位閱讀計畫之探討。臺灣圖書館管理季刊,5
(2),49-67。
林明煌(2011)。日本中小學閱讀教育課程改革現況。教育資料集刊,50,69-90。洪蘭(譯)(1999)。R. J. Sternberg & T. I. Lubart著。不同凡想(Deflying the crowd)。
臺北市:遠流。
洪振傑、鍾靜(2004)。數學種子教師推廣工作之初探。國教學報,16,29-71。
洪碧霞、林素微、吳裕益(2011)。臺灣九年級學生閱讀樂趣與策略對PISA
閱讀素養解釋力之探討。課程與教學季刊,14(4),1-24。
侯一欣(2006)。教師接受課程方案的考慮因素-學校課程擴散的觀點(未出版
之碩士論文)。臺北市立大學課程與教學所,臺北市。
侯一欣、張小宛(2009)。社會行動取向自編教材之發展。教科書研究,2(1),
29-54。
侯一欣(2009a)。學校課程推廣應用教育行銷理論之可能性初探。中等教育,60
(4),116-133。
侯ㄧ欣(2009b)。學校課程擴散的時間因素。研習資訊雙月刊,26(3),81-86。
侯一欣、黃純敏(2011,5月)。臺灣與澳大利亞教師評鑑政策之比較研究。論
文發表於國立臺東大學師範學院舉辦之「2011臺灣教育社會學國際學術研
討會-社會變遷與教師地位之轉變」,臺東縣。
侯一欣(2013)。美英兩國課程推廣發展背景之探析:從1960到1980年代。教
育與心理研究,36(1),63-87。
侯一欣、高新建(2014,11月)。縣市推廣課程於學校實施的影響因素:以新
北市品德教育家庭聯絡簿為例。論文發表於國立臺灣師範大學教育學系舉辦
之「教改20年回顧與前瞻」國際學術研討會,臺北市。
侯一欣(2015,6月)。學校課程推廣對教師在職進修的影響。論文發表於2015
大葉大學教育學術研討會,彰化縣。
侯一欣(2016,6月)。國內閱讀推廣的概況分析。論文發表於南榮科技大學舉
辦之「2016南榮通識教育學術研討會」,臺南市。
柯慶輝(2014)。國小教師閱讀教學專業能力指標建構之研究(未出版之博士論
文)。國立嘉義大學教育學系,嘉義市。
徐藝華(1996)。在教育層層桎祰中走出生機-訪臺北縣教育局鄧運林局長。師友,350,6-10。
孟瑛如、陳虹君(2012)。從語文課程綱要探討華語文地區學生的閱讀表現與問
題。特教論壇,12,51-71。
吳清基(1994)。國民小學課程發展的趨勢。載於教育部(主編),我國各級學校
課程改革發展狀況(第七次全國教育會議參考資料叢書)(91-108頁)。臺
北市:教育部。
吳明清(2008)。教育研究-基本觀念與方法之分析。臺北市:五南。
吳明隆、凃金堂(2012)。SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北市:五南。
吳國卿、鄧伯宸(譯)(2013)。D. Acemoglu & J. A. Robinson著。國家為什麼會
失敗:權力、富裕與貧困的根源(Why nations fail: the origins of power,
prosperity, and poverty)。臺北市:衛城。
葉偉文(譯)(2004)。D. Salsburg著。統計改變了世界(The lady tasting tea : how
statistics revolutionized science in the twentieth centyry)。臺北市:天下遠見。
許懿卿(2013)。當「課文本位閱讀理解教學」遇上「學習共同體」。臺灣教育評
論月刊,2(9),38-41。
高新建(1997)。美國國家教育目標的推廣策略及其對我國課程行政的啟示。載
於中華民國課程與教學學會主編,課程改革的國際比較:中日觀點。臺北市:
師大書苑。
高新建(2000)。課程管理。臺北市:師大書苑。
高新建(2007)。課程改革:理念、轉化與省思。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。
高雄市教育局(2012)。高雄市國民小學101至104年度推動兒童閱讀四年計畫。
取自http://163.16.5.173/readerquiz/
胡婉玲(2001)。論歷史制度主義的制度變遷理論。新世紀智庫論壇,16,86-95。
馮琼愛、邱銘心(2011)。臺北市國民小學實施讀報教育研究。圖書與資訊學刊,
76,88-108。
周儒(1996)。民間團體推動環境教育模式之研究(Ⅱ)。行政院國家科學委員會
專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC85-2511-S003-009)。臺北市:臺灣師範大學環
境教育研究所。
周淑卿(1996)。我國國民小學課程自由化政策趨向之研究(未出版之博士論文)。
國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所,臺北市。
周淑卿(2002)。課程政策與教育革新。臺北市:師大書苑。
周文欽(2004)。研究方法:實徵性研究取向。臺北市:心理。
陳兆禎(1997,3月)。藉學校與社區總體營造來推廣兒童文學教育—從臺北市
萬芳國小與萬芳社區說起。論文發表於臺東師範學院語文教育系、兒童讀物
研究中心、兒童文學研究所籌備處聯合舉辦之「兒童文學與教育學術」研討
會,臺東市。
陳美智、楊開雲(2000)。組織真是理性的嗎?一個組織社會學的新制度論觀點。
東海社會科學學報,20,27-59。
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南。
陳惠邦(2004)。行動研究在臺灣教育場域中的發展與反思。載於潘慧玲(主編),
教育研究方法論:觀點與方法(頁433-451)。臺北市:心理。
陳人慧、徐新逸(2005,5月)。從資訊種仔教師的角度探討學校資訊融入教學
推廣成效—臺北市資訊重點發展學校之個案分析。論文發表於國立屏東師範
學院資訊科學所系、行政院國家科學發展基金會聯合舉辦之「2005數位學
習研討會」,屏東縣。
陳利銘、王文科(2006)。制化文本對課程改革的影響:以九年一貫課程為例。
教育理論與實踐學刊,15,1-14。
陳奕奇、劉子銘(2008)。教育成就與城鄉差距:空間群聚之分析。人口學刊,
37,1-43。
陳美如、秦葆琦(2011,11月)。地方-學校課程與教學專業協作建構、實踐與評
估之研究:我所看見的地方與學校課程教學協作紀實-腳踏實地 展望未來。
論文發表於國家教育研究院舉辦之「2011年建構中央-地方-學校課程與教學
推動網絡學術研討會」,臺北市。
陳得文(2012)。外加課程和落實課綱-閱讀推動專案之探究。臺灣教育評論月
刊,1(12),74-76。
陳隆輝、黃琡珺(2015)。公共圖書館推廣服務行銷策略之應用-以閱讀活動為例。
臺北市立圖書館館訊,33(2),17-34。
陳海泓(2015)。CORI融入社會領域教學對國民小學五年級學生閱讀成效的影
響。教育科學研究期刊,60(1),99-129。
陳美如、彭煥勝(2016)。探尋一段臺灣課程發展史──板橋模式的回顧與前瞻。
教科書研究,9(1),1-36。
梁定澎(2012)。資訊管理理論。新北市:前程文化。
唐麗芳(2015)。課程改革中的學校文化。長春市:東北師範大學出版社。
夏雪梅(2014)。課程變革實施過程的研究:學校組織的視角。上海市:上海教
育。
教育部(2000)。全國兒童閱讀計畫。取自http://www.edu.tw
教育部(2001)。教育大辭書,臺北市:文景。
教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。取自
http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_92.php
教育部(2009)。「悅讀101」教育部國民中小學提升閱讀計畫。取自
http://www.edu.tw
教育部(2010)。閱讀理解策略教學手冊。取自
http://140.127.56.86/pair_System/Search_NewsList.aspx
教育部(2011a)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要語文學習領域(國語文)修訂說
明。取自http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php
教育部(2011b)。閱讀理解-文章與試題範例。取自
http://140.127.56.86/pair_System/Search_NewsList.aspx
教育部(2011c)。在職教師閱讀教學增能研習手冊。取自
http://140.127.56.86/pair_System/Search_NewsList.aspx
教育部(2012)。閱讀理解-問思教學手冊。取自
http://140.127.56.86/pair_System/Search_NewsList.aspx
教育部(2014)。提升國民中小學學生閱讀教育實施計畫。取自http://www.edu.tw
新北市教育局(2013)。悅讀新北市-國民中學深耕閱讀與圖書館空間改造計畫。
取自http://se.ntpc.edu.tw/mobile/news_in.aspx?sid=2
溫福星、邱皓政(2012)。多層次模式方法論:階層線性模式的關鍵問題與試解。
新北市:前程文化。
邱皓政(2011a)。量化研究法三:測驗原理與量表發展技術。臺北市:雙葉。
邱皓政(2011b)。結構方程模式。臺北市:雙葉。
游家政(1999)。再造「國民教育九年一貫課程」的圖像─課程綱要的規劃構想
與可能問題。教育資料與研究,26,4-18。
游家政、黃麗芬、許麗萍、曾祥榕(2011)。我國國民中小學課程權限的問題與
改進。教育資料與研究,98,55-78。
孫劍秋、林孟君(2013)。從臺灣中學生PISA閱讀素養的表現談精進學生閱讀
素養的教學策略。中等教育,64(3),35-51。
曾美惠(2006年3月13日)。教部焦點三百推動閱讀失焦。臺灣立報。取自
http://www.lihpao.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-89954
單文經(2002)。現代與後現代課程論爭之平議。師大學報教育類,47(2),
123-142。
單文經(2005)。Rugg及Bruner社會領域課程改革經驗的啟示。教育研究集刊,
51(1),1-30。
單文經(2014)。課程統整改革20年:杜威會怎麼看。載於中國教育學會(主編),
教改20年回顧與前瞻(p.154-202)。臺北市:學富文化。
張善培(1998)。課程實施程度的測量。教育學報,26(1),149-170。
張嘉育(2002)。學校本位課程改革。新北市:冠學文化。
張貴琳、黃秀霜、鄒慧英(2009),從國際比較觀點探討臺灣學生PISA2006閱
讀素養表現特徵。課程與教學季刊,13(1),21-46。
張莉慧(2009)。臺灣推動閱讀之觀察與省思。臺灣圖書館管理季刊,5(4),82-98。
張徳銳(2010)。喚醒沈睡的巨人-論教師領導在我國中小學的發展。臺北市立
教育大學學報,41(2),81-110。
張偉豪(2011)。SEM論文寫作不求人。臺北市:鼎茂。
張素貞、李俊湖、王立杰、陳佩玲、廖慧伶(2014)。精進教學計畫夥伴協作縣
市經驗對推動十二年國民基本教育課程綱要之啟示。教育人力與專業發展,
31(5),73-82。
張俊列(2015)。論課程改革的制度化。現代基礎教育研究,17,111-116。
張輝誠(2015)。推廣學思達教學法的十年策略。中等教育,66(2),6-15。
張芳華(2017)。學校推廣閱讀活動對國小四年級學童課後閱讀參與的影響:以
悅讀101計畫為例。教育研究集刊,63(2),101-133。
黃政傑(1989)。課程改革。臺北市:漢文。
黃政傑(1994)。國中階段課程設計的重要趨勢。載於教育部(主編),我國各級
學校課程改革發展狀況(第七次全國教育會議參考資料叢書)(109-131頁)。
臺北市:教育部。
黃隆民、陳建榮(2002,10月)。法輪功在中小學校園推廣適切性之評析。論文
發表於教育部、嘉義大學教育學院聯合舉辦之「九十一學年度師範學院校教
育學術論文發表會」,嘉義市。
黃政傑(2005)。課程改革新論:教育現場虛實探究。新北市:冠學文化。
黃乃熒、張炳煌(2007)。高中教師對於高中課程學科中心推動新課程策略之意
見的調查研究。師大學報(教育類),52(3),19-42。
黃毅志、陳怡靖(2013)。臺灣各縣市學生大學入學考試表現之比較分析:兼論
臺灣的大學入學教育機會均等性。臺東大學教育學報,24(1),51-88。
黃政傑(2014)。課程設計。臺北市:東華。
黃光國(2003)。社會科學的理路。臺北市:心理。
黃玫溱、林巧敏(2009)。推動閱讀計畫之構想與建議。圖書與資訊學刊,1(3),
48-60。
黃嘉雄(2000)。轉化社會結構的課程理論:課程社會學的觀點。臺北市:師大
書苑。
黃俊英(2001)。行銷學的世界。臺北市:天下文化。
黃旭鈞(2003)。課程領導:理論與實務。臺北市:心理。
黃繼仁(2005)。許瓦布的課程思想。載於黃政傑(主編),課程思想(頁59-102)。
新北市:冠學文化。
黃光雄、蔡清田(2009)。課程發展與設計。臺北市:五南。
黃光雄、楊龍立(2012)。課程發展與設計:理念與實作。臺北市:師大書苑。
黃昭儒(2014)。從大學經典閱讀課程思考國小讀經教育之實行。臺灣教育評論
月刊,3(2),132-134。
國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心(1991)。我國四十年來國民小學重要教學法的
探討及評析。取自:
http://tiec.creatidea.com.tw/Uploads/Publish/Subject/14502.pdf
傅恆德、林文謙(2009,11月)。二十一世紀政治科學研究途徑之展望。論文發
表於玄奘大學舉辦之「2009年臺灣政治學會年會暨動盪年代中的政治學:
理論與實踐」學術研討會,新竹縣。
傅粹馨(2002)。典型相關分析與結構方程模式關係之探究。屏東師院學報,16,
231-262。
齊若蘭(2002)。閱讀 新一代的知識革命。天下雜誌,2002年教育特刊,40-50。
齊若蘭(2002)。日本讓希望起飛。天下雜誌,2002年教育特刊,40-50。
親子天下(2013)。2013國中閱讀教育現況調查報導。取自
https://www.parenting.com.tw/article/5052624-2013
賴宛玲(2009)。南投縣國小高年級學童閱讀習慣、閱讀理解與對參與「希望閱
讀」與「焦點300」閱讀活動態度之研究。社會科教育研究,14,1-30。
潘慧玲(2001,6 月)。學校革新研究的構思與作法。論文發表於臺灣師大教育
學系主辦之「學校革新研討會」,臺北市。
鄭玉卿(2014,11月)。臺灣社會中心教育實驗的歷史省思。論文發表於澳門大
學教育學院舉辦之「通古今之變-教育敘事研究」第八屆兩岸四地教育史論
壇,澳門。
楊龍立(2003)。課程改革模式的統合。臺北市立師範學院學報,34,97-114。
楊思賢、林德成、梁偉倫、羅耀珍(2013)。課程改革與創新。香港:香港大學。
蔡清田(2001)。課程改革實驗:以研究發展為根據的課程改革。臺北市:五南。
蔡清田(2003)。課程政策決定:以國家教育改革法案為依據的課程政策。臺北
市:五南。
蔡進元、陳妙瓊(2003,3月)。「變革的年代,純真的夢想」--校本課程推動在
獅湖。論文發表於東吳大學舉辦之「國小九年一貫課程實施之後:理論與實
務的對話」研討會,臺北市。
蔡進雄(2004)。領導新典範:後英雄式領導的意涵及其對學校行政領導的啟示。
教育政策論壇,7(1),111-130。
蔡清田(2006)。課程創新。臺北市:五南。
蔡清田(2008)。課程學。臺北市:五南。
蔡清田(2016)。50則非知不可的課程學概念。臺北市:五南。
蔡相廷(2010)。歷史制度主義的興起與研究取向-政治學研究途徑的探討。臺
北市立教育大學學報,41(2),39-76。
蔡佩君(譯)(2010)。H. Arendt著。政治的承諾(The Promise of Politics)。臺北
市:左岸文化。
歐用生(2003)。教科書之旅。臺北市:中華民國教材研究發展學會。
謝金城(2003)。推動九年一貫課程的策略性做法—以臺北縣為例。國立編譯館
館刊,31期,67-73。
謝進昌(2015)。有效的中文閱讀理解策略:國內實徵研究之最佳證據整合。教
育科學研究期刊,60(2),33-77。
鄧鈞文(2002)。教科書自由化及其問題分析。課程與教學季刊,6(1),27-42。
簡後聰(2001)。談國民中小學九年一貫課程中的社會學習領域課程。國教新知,
48(1),1-25。
簡良平(2002)。學校課程決定:理論與實證。臺北市:師大書苑。
藍順德(2005)。教科書政策與制度。臺北市:五南。
錢富美(1998)。我國國民中小學課程自由化政策對鄉土教育發展之影響。社會科教育研究,3,163-181。
盧秀琴(1998)。落實情意教學的師資培育課程—知情並重的自然科教學範例與
其在小學推廣之條件研究(I)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報
告(NSC88-2418-H152-003-F19)。臺北市:國立臺北師範學院數學教育系。
戴曉霞(2001)。行銷理念在高等教育課程革新之運用。載於中華民國課程與教
學學會(主編),邁向未來的課程與教學(p.99-116)。臺北市:師大書苑。
戴揚(2007)。新制度主義政治學中的理性選擇理論。取自
www.unirule.org.cn/xiazai/200711/5.pdf
劉彬(1999,3月)。推行綜合藝術教育的策略。論文發表於行政院文化建設委
員會、彰化師範大學美術系、中華民國藝術教育研究發展學會聯合舉辦之
「1999藝術教育國際學術研討會」,臺中國立臺灣美術館。
劉莘(譯)(2003)。W. Kymlicka著。當代政治哲學導論(Contemporary political
philosophy)。臺北市:聯經。
劉曉芬(2006)。歷史制度主義觀點的教育政策分析-以高職轉型綜合高中為例。教育政策論壇,9(2),1-18。
Anderson, S. E., & Stiegelbaue, S. (1994). Institutionalization and renewal in a
restructured secondary school. School Organisation, 3(14), 279-293.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D.A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory method and
practice. Boston, MA.: Addison Wesley.
Anita, I. (2003). A qualitative case study of professional development: Two first-grade
teachers' efforts to implement the innovation of guided reading. Dissertation
Abstracts International, 64(05).
Al-Daami, K., & Wallace, G. (2007). Curriculum reform in a global context: A study of teachers in Jordan. Curriculum Studies, 39(3), 339-360.
Amenta, E. & Ramsey, K. M. (2010). Institutional theory. In Handbook of politics (pp. 15-39). New York, NY.: Springer.
Azano, A. , Missett, T.C. , Callahan, C. M. , Oh, S. , Brunner, M. , Foster, L. H. &
Moon, T.R. (2011). Exploring the relationship between fidelity of
implementation and academic achievement in a third-grade gifted curriculum:
a mixed-methods study. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(5), 693–719.
Agbényiga, D.L. (2011). Organizational culture-performance link in the human services setting. Administration in Social Work, 35, 532-547.
Ayre, C., & Scally, A.J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio:
Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in
Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79-86.
Bhola, H.S. (1977). Diffusion of educational innovation. Morristown & N.J. : General
Learning Press.
Brown, S., & Mclntyre, D. (1982). Costs and rewards of innovation: Taking account
of the teacher’s viewpoint. In Olson, J.(Ed.) , Innovation in the science
curriculum (pp.107-139). New York: Nichols Publishing Company.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.
Bollen, A. & Long, J. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newsbury
Park, CA: Sage.
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American political science review , 84(02), 395-415.
Buston, K., Wight, D., Hart, G., & Scott, S. (2002). Implementation of a teacher-
delivered sex education programme: Obstacles and facilitating factors. Health
Education Research, 17(1), 59-72.
Barab, S.A., & Luehmann, A.L. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum:
Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Wiley Periodicals, Inc, Sci
Ed, 87, 454-467.
Burch, P., & Spillane, J.P. (2003). Elementary school leadership strategies and
subject matter: Reforming mathematics and literacy instruction. The
Elementary School Journal, 103(5), 519-535.
Baert, P. (2005). Philosophy of the social science: Towards pragmatism. New Jersey:
Wiley.
Buller, D.B., Buller, M.K., & Kane, H. (2005). Web-based strategies to disseminate a
sun safety curriculum to public elementary schools and state-licensed child-care
facilities. Health Psychology, 24(5), 470-476.
Bishop, D., Bryant, K.S., Giles, S.M., Hansen, W.B.,& Dusenbury, L. (2006). Simplifying the delivery of a prevention program with web-based enhancements. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 27(4), 433-443.
Buckley, J., & Schneider, M. (2009). Charter schools: Hope or hype? Princeton, New
Jersey : Princeton University Press.
Byrne, B.B. (2010). Structural equation modeling using AMOS: Basic concepts,
applications and programming(2nd ed). New York: Routledge.
Boli, J., Gallo-Cruz, S., & Mathias, M. D. (2010). World society, world-polity theory,
and international relations. The international studies encyclopedia.
Bessems, K.M.H. , Assema, P. , Paulussen, T.W.G.M., & Vries, N.K. (2011).
Evaluation of an adoption strategy for a healthy diet programme for lower
vocational schools. Health Education Research, 26(1), 89-105.
Berkel, C. , Mauricio, A.M. , Schoenfelder, E. & Sandler, I.N. (2011). Putting the
pieces together: An integrated model of program implementation. Prev Sci, 12,
23-33.
Byun, S., Schofer, E. & Kim, K. (2012). Revisiting the role of cultural capital in east
asian educational systems: The case of south Korea. Sociology of Education,
85(3), 219-239.
Brown, C. (2015). Replacing top-down with bottom-up: Reactitioners growing their
own research. Education Today, 64(1), 15-20.
Brownell, M. , Kiely, M.T. , Haager, D. , Boardman, A. , Corbett, N. , Algina, J. ,
Dingle, M.P., & Urbach, J. (2017). Literacy learning cohorts: Content-focused
approach to improving special education teachers’ reading instruction.
Exceptional Children, 83(2), 143-164.
Cooke, M. (2000). The dissemination of a smoking cessation program: Predictors of
program awareness, adoption and maintenance. Health Promotion International,
15(2), 113-123.
Cheung, G. W., Rensvold, R. B.(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing
measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255.
Colbeck, C.L. (2002). Assessing institutionalization of curricular and pedagoglcal
reforms. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 397-421.
Carless, D. (2004). Continuity and ‘teacher-centred’reform: Potential paradoxes in
educational change. Curriculum Perspectives, 24(1) , 42-51.
Cooper, B.S. , Ehrensal, P.A.L. & Bromme, M. (2005). School-Level politics and
professional development : Traps in evaluating the quality of practicing
teachers. Educational Policy, 19(1), 112-125.
Cotton, D.R.E. (2006). Implementing curriculum guidance on environmental
education: The importance of teachers’ beliefs. Curriculum Studies,38(1), 67-83.
Chitnis, K.S. , Thombre, A. , Rogers, E.M. , Singhal, A. & Sengupta, A. (2006).
(DIS)Similar readings: Indian and American audiences’ interpretation of friends.
The International Communication Gazette, 68(2), 131-145.
Cohen‐Vogel, L., & Ingle, W. K. (2007). When neighbours matter most: innovation, diffusion and state policy adoption in tertiary education. Journal of Education Policy, 22(3), 241-262.
Chisholm, L. (2007). Diffusion of the national qualifications framework and outcomes‐based education in southern and eastern Africa. Comparative Education, 43(2), 295-309.
Christensen , R. & Knezek, G. (2008). Self-report measures and findings for
information technology attitudes and competencies. In Knezek, G. (ed).
International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary
education(pp.349-365). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Science+Business
Media.
Creswell, J.W. & Clark, V.L.P. (2007). Designing and conducting: Mixed methods
research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality
and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological
Review, 48(2), 147-160.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). Rhizome a thousand plateaus : Capitalism and
schizophrenia (pp. 3-25). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dow, P. (1991). Schoolhouse Politics: Lessons from the sputnik Era. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Dancy, M., Brewe, E., & Henderson, C. (2007). Modeling success: Building community
for reform. In Hsu, L., Henderson, C. & McCollough, L. (Eds.) American institute of
physics conference proceedings physics education research conference V.951,
(77-80). New York: American Institute of Physics Press.
Dinani, A.E., Nasr, A.R. & Soltani, M.S.K. (2012). A study on strong and weak points
of change process in domains of codification and design, dissemination and
publication of qualitative-descriptive evaluation project in the province of
Isfahan. Journal of Life Science and Biomedicine, 2(2), 11-20.
Eisner, E. W. (ed.) (1971). Confronting curriculum reform. Boston: Little, Brown
and Company.
Ellis, C. & Bochner, A.P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narratives, reflexivity. In
N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of quaitative research (733-768).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Eisner, E. W. (2002). The educational imagination: on the design and evaluation of
school programs. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Engwall, L. (2008). Minerva and the media: Universities protecting and promoting
themselves. In Mazza, C., Quattrone, P. & Riccaboni A. (Eds.). European
universities in transition: Issues, models, and cases (32-48). Northampton, MA:
Edward Elgar Publishing Inc.
Ennett, S.T., Haws, S., Ringwalt, C.L., Vincus, A.A., Hanley,S., Bowling, J.M. &
Rohrbach, L.A. (2011). Evidence-based practice in school substance use
prevention: Fidelity of implementation under real-world conditions. Health
Education Research, 26(2), 361-371.
Eseonu, C. I. & Wyrick, D. A. (2014). A heat transfer model for policy diffusion.
Engineering Management Journal, 26(2), 39-48.
Fullan, M. & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on curriculum and instruction
implementation. Review of Educational Research , 47(1), 335-397.
Fullan, M. (1988). Research into education innovation. In Glatter, R. et al(Eds.),
Understanding school management (195-211). Milton Keynes: Open University
Press.
Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: A Wiley Company.
Farkas, M., Jette, A.M., Tennstedt, S., Haley, S.M. & Quinn, V.(2003). Knowledge
dissemination and utilization in gerontology: An organizing framework. The
Gerontologist, 43(1), 47-56.
Foster, M. (2004). An innovative professional development program for urban
teachers. Professional Development, 85(5), 401-406.
Floyd, B. & Audrey, M.D. (2004). Teacher leaders creating cultures of school
renewal and transformation. The Educational Forum, 68(1), 276-285.
Friesen, S., Martin, J. & George, J. (2007). Winning Ways. Education Canada, 47(2) , 27-29.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed). New York:
Teachers College Press.
Fogarty, B.J. & Pete, B.M. (2007). From staff room to classroom: A guide for
planning and coaching professional development. Chicago: SAGE Publications
Frank, K.A., Zhao, Y., Penuel, W.R., Ellefson, N. & Porter, S. (2011). Focus, fiddle,
and friends: experiences that transform knowledge for the implementation of
innovations. Sociology of Education, 84(2), 137-156.
Füglister, K. (2012). Where does learning take place? The role of intergovernmental cooperation in policy diffusion. European Journal of Political Research, 51(3), 316-349.
Finch, M.A. (2015). The impact of training teachers innovative instructional strategies
in reading comprehension: an action research project. Dissertation Abstracts
International, 77(03).
Goodlad, J.I. (1979). The scope of the curriculum field. In Goodlad, J.I. (ed.).
Curriculum inquiry: The study of curriculum practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Glatthorn, A. (1987). Curriculum leadership. Glenview, Illinois, London: Scott,
Foresman and Company.
Gillborn, D., Nixon, J. & Rudduck, J. (1993). Dimensions of discipline: rethinking
practice in secondary schools. London:HMSO.
Green, B. (2003). Curriculum inquiry in Austrelia: Toward a local genealogy of the curriculum field .In Pinar, W. F. (Ed.). International handbook of curriculum research, 123-141.
Guild, D. (2006). What is distinctive about the knowledge economy? Implications for
education. In H. Lander, P. Brown, J. Dillabough & A. H. Halsey (Eds.),
Education , globalization and social change (pp.355-366). Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Gingiss, P.M., Gray, R.C.& Boerm, M. (2006). Bridge-it: a system for predicting
implementation fidelity for school-based tobacco prevention programs. Prev
Sci,7 ,197-207.
Goertz, G. (2006). Social science concepts: a user’s guide. New Jersey, N.J.:
Princeton University Press.
Guthrie, J. T., McRae, A. & Klauda, S.L. (2007). Contributions of concept-oriented
reading instruction to knowledge about interventions for motivations in reading.
Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 237-250.
Glatthorn, A., Boschee, F. & Whitehead, B.M. (2009). Curriculum leadership:
Strategies for development and implementation. London: SAGE Publication Inc.
Gigante, N.A. & Firestone, W.A. (2008). Administrative support and teacher
leadership in schools implementing reform. Journal of Educational
Administration, 46(3), 302-331.
Graham, S. & Hebert, M.A. (2011). Writing to read: a meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review, 81(4), 710-785.
Gilardi, F. (2012). Transnational diffusion: Norms, ideas, and policies. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse & B. Simmons (eds.), Handbook of international relations. (2nd ed). London: Sage.
Gercia, E.K. (2014). The diffusion of a teaching practice: How secondary teachers
describe adopting process drama to teach reading comprehension. Dissertation
Abstracts International, 75(09).
Havelock , R.G. (1971). Planning for innovation through the dissemination and
utilization of knowledge. Ann Arbor: Center for research on utilization of
scientific knowledge.
Havelock, R.G. (1978). The utilisation of educational research and development. In
Harris,A., Lawn,M. & Prescott,W. (Eds.), Curriculum innovation (312-328).
New York : Wiley.
Hargreaves, A. (1989). Curriculum and assessment reform. Milton Keynes: Open
University Press.
Hall, P.A., & Taylor, R.C.R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms.
Political Studies, 44, 936-957.
Hargreaves, A. & Fink, D. (2000). The three dimensions of reform. Educational
leadership, 57(7), 30-33.
Hannaway, J. & Woodroffe, N. (2003). Policy instruments in education. Review of
Research in Education, 27, 1-24.
Hamilton, L.(2003). Assessment as a policy tool. Review of Research in Education, 27, 1-24.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006).
Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey : Prentice-Hall.
Hoe, S. L. (2008). Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modeling
technique. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 3(1), 76-83.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., Mullen, M. R.(2008). Structural equation modeling:
Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business
Research Methods,6(1),53-60.
Harreveld, B. , Baker, K. & Isdale, L. (2008). Teachers’ work in reading literacy across the curriculum in the senior phase of learning. The Curriculum Journal, 19(2), 105-118.
Henningham, B.H., & Walker, S. (2009). A qualitative study of teacher’s perceptions
of an intervention to prevent conduct problems in Jamaican pre-schools. Child
Care Health and Development, 35(5), 632-642.
Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data
analysis (7th Ed.). Upper Saddle: Prentice-Hall.
Hopson, L.M. & Steiker, L.K.H. (2010). The effectiveness of adapted versions of an
evidence-based prevention program in reducing alcohol use among alternative
school students. Children & Schools, 32(2), 81-91.
Hecht, M.L.M ,Colby, M. & Miler-Day, M. (2010). The dissemination of keepin’ it
REAL through D.A.R.E. America: A lesson in disseminating health messages.
Health Communication, 25, 585-586.
Horowitz, M. C. (2010). The diffusion of military power: Causes and consequences
for international politics. Princeton University Press.
Haelermans, C. (2010). Innovative power of Dutch secondary education. Innovation: management, policy & practice, 12(2), 154-165.
Honig, M. & Venkateswaran, N. (2012). School-central office relationships in
evidence use: understanding evidence use as a systems problem. American
Journal of Education, 118(2), 199-222.
Immergut, E. M. (1998). The theoretical core of the new institutionalism. Politics
and Society,26(1), 5-34.
Jakobi, A. P. (2009). International organizations and lifelong learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S. & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or digital
natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university. Computer &
Education, 54, 722-732.
Jakobi, A. P. (2012). International organisations and policy diffusion: The global norm
of lifelong learning. Journal of International Relations and Development, 15(1),
31-64.
Janelle, D.G., Hespanha, S.R., Goodchild, F. & Goodchild, M.F. (2009). Workshops
and national dissemination of geographic analysis in the social sciences: The
CSISS experience in the USA. Journal of Geography in Higher Education,
33(1), 88-103.
Krieger, R.H. & Krieger, R.R. (1986). Educational taxonomies: Help for planning the
marketing curriculum. In Guiltinan,J.& Achabal, D. (Eds.), 1986 AMA winter
educators' conference : marketing education : knowledge development,
dissemination, and utilization(90-94). Chicago:Illinois.
Krasner, S. D. (1988). Sovereignty: An institutional perspective. Comparative
Political Studies, 21(1), 66-94.
Kotler, P.& Fox, K. (1995). Strategic marketing for educational institutions.
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey :Prentice-Hall.
Kliebard, H. M. (2002). Changing course: American curriculum reform in the 20th
century. New York: Teachers College Press.
Kerr, S. T. (2004). Toward a sociology of educational technology. In D. H. Jonassen
(Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology
(pp. 113-142). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kelley, A.V. (2004). The curriculum: theory and practice (5th ed). London: SAGE
Publications.
Kaplan, D. (2009). Structural equation modeling: foundations and entensions(2nd ed).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kalichman, S.C. , Hudd, K. & DiBerto, G. (2010). Operational fidelity to an evidence-
based HIV prevention intervention for people living with HIV/AIDS. J Primary
Prevent, 31, 235-245.
Kalichman, S.C. , Hudd, K. & DiBerto, G. (2010). Operational fidelity to an evidence-
based HIV prevention intervention for people living with HIV/AIDS. J Primary
Prevent, 31, 235-245.
Koski, C. (2010). Greening America's skylines: The diffusion of low‐salience policies. Policy studies journal, 38(1), 93-117.
Kao, D.J., Hudmon, K.S. & Corelli, R.L. (2011). Evaluation of a required senior research project in a doctor of pharmacy curriculum. Amer J Pharm Ed., 75(1), 5. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3049664/
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Kane, G. C., Johnson, J. & Majchrzak, A. (2014). Emergent life cycle: the tension between knowledge change and knowledge retention in open online coproduction communutues. Management Science, 60(12), 3026-3048.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 564-575.
Lo, Y.C. (2007). The micro-politics of curriculum leadership. Curriculum Perspectives, 27(1), 26-39.
Leander, K.M. & Osborne, M.D. (2008). Complex positioning: teachers as agents of
curricular and pedagogical reform. Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 23-46.
Marsh, C. & Huberman, M. (1984). Disseminating curricula: a look from the top
down. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(1),53-66.
Miles, M. B., Ekholm, M., & Vanderberghe, R. (1987). Lasting school improvement:
Exploring the process of institutionalization (ISIP Vol. 5). Leuven/Amersfoort:
Acco.
Mulaik, S.A., James, L.R.,, Van Altine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S. & Stilwell,C.D.
(1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models.
Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430-445.
McBeath, C.(1995). Overcoming barriers to effective curriculum change: a case study
in dissemination practice. Retrieved from: http://www.clare-mcbeath.id.au/pubs/
bris95.html
MacCallum, R.C., Browne, M.W. & Sugawara, H.M. (1996). Power analysis and
determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological
Methods, 1(2). 130-149
MacCallum, R. C. & Hong, S.(1997). Power analysis in covariance structure
modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 193-210.
Markee, N. (1997). Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge: University Press.
McTaggart, R. (1997). Participatory action research. New York: State University of
New York Press.
Martinez, M. H. (2002). The characteristics of innovations: Elementary school
principals' and teachers' perceptions of early intervention reading programs.
Dissertation Abstracts International, 63(10).
McDonald, R.P. & Ho, M.R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural
equation analysis. Psychological Methods, 7, 64-82.
Moolenaar, N.M., Daly, A.J. & Sleegers, P.J.C. (2010). Occupying the principal
position: examining relationships between transformational leadership, social
network position, and schools’ innovative climate. Educational Administration
Quarterly, 46(5), 623-670.
Merchant, G. (2010). 3D virtual worlds as environments for literacy learning.
Educational Research, 52(2), 135-150.
Murray, C. S., Coleman, M. A., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., & Roberts, G. (2012).
Designing and delivering intensive interventions: A teacher’s toolkit. Portsmouth
, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
Magrini, J.M. (2015). Phenomenology and curriculum implementation: discerning a
living curriculum through the analysis of Ted Aoki’s situational praxis. J.
Curriculum Studies, 47(2), 274-299.
Musingarabwi, S. & Blignaut, S. (2015). Theorizing the implementation of the
HIV/AIDS curriculum in Zimbabwe. J. Curriculum Studies, 47(1), 122-140.
McNutta, J.G., Justicea, J.B., Melitskib, J.M., Ahnc, M.J., Siddiquid, S.R., Cartera,
D,T & Klinea, A.D. (2016). The diffusion of civic technology and open
government in the United States. Information Polity, 21 , 153-170.
Nippold, M. A., Duthie, J. K., & Larson, J. (2005). Free time preferences of older
children and young adolescents. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in
Schools, 36, 93–102.
Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative
approaches (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Nirula, L. (2008). Designing constraint informed handheld -supported literacy
innovations for struggling readers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 69(12). Neal, J.W., Neal, Z.P., Atkins, M.S., Henry, D.B. & Frazier, S.L. (2011). Channels of
change: contrasting network mechanisms in the use of interventions. Am J
Community Psychol, 47, 277-286.
Nikolaeva, R. & Bicho, M. (2011). The role of institutional and reputational factors in
the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards. J. of
the Acad. Mark. Sci., 39, 136-157.
Ng’ambi, D. & Bozalek, V. (2013). Leveraging informal leadership in higher
education institutions: A case of diffusion of emerging technologies in a southern
context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 940-950.
Olson, J. (1982). Classroom knowledge and curriculum change: an introduction. In
Olson, J. (Ed.), Innovation in the science curriculum (pp.3-33). New York:
Nichols Publishing Company.
Olson, A.L., Woodhead, J., Berkow, R., Kaufman, N.M. & Marshall, S.G. (2000). A
national general pediatric clerkship curriculum: the process of development and
implementation. Pediatrics, 106(1), 216-222.
Ow, T.T. & Morris, J.G. (2010). An experimental study of executive decision-making
with implications for decision support. Journal of Organizational Computing
and Electronic Commerce, 20, 370-397.
Ozer, E.J., Wanis, M.G. & Bazell, N. (2010). Diffusion of school-based prevention
programs in two urban districts: adaptations, rationales, and suggestions for
change. Prev Sci, 11, 42-55.
OECD (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do. Student
performance in reading, mathematics and science (Volume I). OECD
Publishing. Retrieved from:http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/48852548.pdf
Ollila, S. & Elmquist, M. (2011). Managing open innovation: exploring challenges at
the interfaces of an open innovation arena. Managing Open Innovation, 20(4),
273-282.
Oliva, P. (2012). Developing the curriculum(6th ed ). New York: Addison Wesley
Longman.
Paulussen, T., Kok, G., Schaalma, H. & Parcel, G.S. (1995). Diffusion of AIDS
curricula among Dutch secondary school teachers. Health Education Quarterly,
22(2), 227-243.
Popkewitz, T.S. (2000). Globalization/regionalization, knowledge, and the educational practices: Some notes on comparative strategies of educational research. In T.S. Popkewitz(Ed.). Educational knowledge: Changing relationships between the
state, civil society, and the educational community. New York: SUNY Press.
Pedder, D. & MacBeath, J. (2008). Organisational learning approaches to school
leadership and management: teachers’ values and perceptions of practice. School
Effectiveness and School Improvement,19(2), 207-224.
Powell, W. W. & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby & K. Sahlin(Eds.). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp.276- 298). London: SAGE Publications.
Pierson, P., & Skocpol, T. (2002). Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science. Political science: The state of the discipline, 3, 693-721.
Pettigrew, J. (2012). Adapting school-based substance use prevention curriculum
through cultural grounding: a review and exemplar of adaptation processes for
rural schools. Am J Community Psychol, 51, 190-205.
Pryor, J. , Akyeampong, K. , Westbrook, J. & Lussier, K. (2012). Rethinking teacher
preparation and professional development in Africa: an analysis of the
curriculum of teacher education in the teaching of early reading and mathematics. The Curriculum Journal, 23(4), 409-502.
Powell, W. W., & Bromley, P. (2013). New institutionalism in the analysis of
complex organizations. Retrieved April 25, 2016, from
http://patriciabromley.com/PowellBromleyEncyclopedia.pdf
Pilten, G. (2016). A phenomenological study of teacher perceptions of the
applicability of differentiated reading instruction designs in Turkey.
Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 16(4), 1419-1451.
Rudduck, J. (1976). Dissemination of innovation: The humanities curriculum project.
London: Evans/Methuen Educational.
Rudduck, J. & Kelly, P. (1976). The dissemination of curriculum development. New Jersey: NFER publishing Company Ltd.
Rogers, E.M. & Marcus, J.E. (1983). Advances in diffusion theory. In Paisley, W.J. &
Butler, M.(Eds.), Knowledge utilization systems in education(251-257). Beverly
Hills : SAGE Publications.
Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3th ed). New York: The Free Press.
Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed). New York: The Free Press.
Rogers, E.M. (2001). The department of communication at Michigan State University
as a seed institution for communication study. Communication Studies, 52(3),
234-248.
Rogers, E.M. (2002a). The nature of technology transfer. Science Communication,
23(3), 323-341.
Rogers, E.M. (2002b). Diffusion theory. Retrieved October 18, 2015, from
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3404000269.html
Rogers, E.M. (2002c). Funding international communication research. Journal of
Applied Communication Research, 30(4), 341-349.
Rogers, E.M. & Seidel, N. (2002). Diffusion of news of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Prometheus, 20(3), 209-219.
Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations(5th ed). New York: The Free Press.
Rogers, E.M. (2004). A prospective and retrospective look at the diffusion model.
Journal of Health Communication, 9, 13-19.
Rogers, E.M., Singhal, A. & Thombre, A. (2004). Indian audience interpretations of
health-related content in the bold and the beautiful. The International Journal for
Communication Studies, 66(5). 437-458.
Rogers, E.M. (2005). Book review: Thomas E. Backer, Ed.(2003). Evaluating
community collaborations. New York: Springer. Journal of Health
Communication, 10, 373-374.
Renzulli, L. A., & Roscigno, V. J. (2005). Charter school policy, implementation, and
diffusion across the United States. Sociology of Education, 78(4), 344-366.
Ramirez, H.A. (2005). Diffusion of instructional innovations in schools: The case of
knowledge for teaching reading to English language learners. Dissertation
Abstracts International, 66(01).
Rhodes, R. A. (2006). Policy network analysis. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. Goodin (Eds.), The oxford handbook of public policy (pp.425–447). New York: Oxford University Press.
Resh, N. & Kramarski, B. (2007). Teachers’ beliefs and pedagogical practice: Do they
fit requirements as teaching literacy. Educational Practice and Theory, 29(2),
27-48.
Ritchie, S.M., Tobin, K., Roth, W.M. & Carambo, C. (2007). Transforming an
academy through the enactment of collective curriculum leadership. Curriculum
Studies, 39(2), 151-175.
Rooney, J. (2008). What do we believe?. Educational leadership, 65(5), 88-90.
Robinson, M. (2008). Digital nature and digital nurture: libraries, learning and the
digital native. Library Management, 29(1/2), 67-76.
Ravitch, D. (2011). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.
Raman, R. & Nedungadi, P. (2012). Modelling diffusion of a personalized learning framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(4), 585-600.
Schaffarzick, J. & Sykes, G. (1979). Value conflicts and curriculum issues: Lessons
from research and experience. Berkeley: Mccutchan Pub Corp.
Schubert, W.H. (1986). Curriculum: perspective, paradigm and possibility. New
York: Macmillan Publishing com.
Snyder, J. , Bolin, F. & Zumwalt, K. (1992). Curriculum implementation. In Jackson,
P.W. (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp.402-435). N.Y.: Macmillan
Publishing Company.
Smith, P. (2001). Cultural theory: an introduction. Malden: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
Surry, D. W., & Ely, D. P. (2001). Adoption, diffusion, implementation, and
institutionalization of educational technology. Retrieved from:
http://www.usouthal.edu/coe/bset/surry/papers/adoption/chap.htm
Scheyett, A. (2004). The research to teaching initiative: infusing faculty research into
the MSW curriculum. Social Work Education, 23(3), 341-346.
Smith, T.M. & Rowley, K.J. (2005). Enhancing commitment or tightening control:
The function of teacher professional development in an era of accountability.
Educational Policy, 19(1), 126-154.
Sireci, S. G. (2006). Content validity. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.) Encyclopedia of
measurement and statistics (pp.181-183). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in
structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Difference, 42,
893-898.
Swing, S.R. (2007). The ACGME outcome project: retrospective and prospective.
Med Teach, 29(7), 648-654. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18236251.
Schechter, C. (2008). Organizational learning mechanisms: the meaning, measure ,and
implications for school improvement. Educational Administration Quarterly,
44(2), 155-186.
Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (Eds.). (2008). The global diffusion of markets and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Samuelson, J .(2009). Toward sustainable change. BizEd, 8(4), 30-36.
Stein, B.D., Kataoka, S.H., Hamilton, A.B., Schultz, D., Ryan, G., Vona, P. & Wong,
M. (2010). School personnel perspectives on their school’s implementation of a
school-based suicide prevention program. The Journal of Behavioral Health
Services & Research, 37(3), 338-349.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation
modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stambaugh, J.E. & Trank, C.Q. (2010). Not so simple: integrating new research into
textbooks. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(4), 663-681.
Shatzer, M., Wolf, G.A., Hravnak, M., Haugh, A., Kikutu, J. & Hoffmann, R.L. (2010). A curriculum designed to decrease barriers related to scholarly writing by staff nurses. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 40(9), 392-398.
Sensenig, V. J. (2012). The World Bank and educational reform in Indonesia. Education strategy in the developing world: Revising the World Bank's education policy (International perspectives on education and society, Volume 16), 395-421.
Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2012). Policy diffusion: seven lessons for scholars and practitioners. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 788-796.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (2005). The logic of social research. Chicago: The University of
Chicago Press.
Schwarz, A., Schwarz, C. & Rizzuto, T. (2008). Examining the ‘Urban Legend’ of common method bias: nine common errors and their impact. In Proceedings of the 41st annual Hawaii international conference on system science, 441.
Saikawa, E. (2013). Policy Diffusion of Emission standards is there a race to the top?. World Politics, 65(01), 1-33.
Samuels, B. (2015). Practical control in the classroom. Education Today, 65(1), 12-16.
Superfinea, A.C. , Marshallb, A.M. & Kelsoc, C. (2015). Fidelity of implementation:
bringing written curriculum materials into the equation. The Curriculum Journal,
26(1), 164-191.
Tyler, R.W. (1967). Changing concepts of educational evaluation. In Tyler, R.W. ,
Gagne’, R.M. & Scriven, M. (Eds.) Perspectives of curriculum evaluation
(pp.13-18). Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.
Torres, C. (2002). Globalization, education, and citizenship: Solidarity versus
markets? American Educational Research Journal, 39, 363-378.
Torkzadeh, G. , Koufteros, X. & Pflughoeft, K. (2003). Comfirmatory analysis of
computer self-efficacy. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(2), 263-275.
Tamir, P. (2004). Curriculum implementation revisited. J. Curriculum Studies, 36(3),
281-294.
Tolbert, C. J., Mossberger, K., & McNeal, R. (2008). Institutions, policy innovation, and e‐government in the American States. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 549-563.
Tront, J.G., McMartin, F.P. & Muramatsu, B. (2011, October). Work in progress- improving the dissemination of CCLI(TUES) educational innovations. Paper presented at the 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, South Dakota.
Vacca, R.T. & Vacca, J.A.L. (2005). Content area reading: literacy and learning
across the curriculum. Retrieved from: http://www.ablongman.com/html/
productinfo/vacca8e/images/0205410316_preface.pdf
White, R.V. (1988). The ELT Curriculum: Design, innovation and management. New
York: Basil Blackwell.
Winn, W. (2002). Current trends in educational technology research: The study of
learning environments. Educational Psychology Review,14(3),331-351.
Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J.T., Tonks, S. & Perencevich, K.C. (2004). Children’s
motivation for reading: domain specificity and instructional influences. The
Journal of Educational Research, 97(6), 299-310.
Wiecha, J.L., Ayadi, A.M., Fuemmeler, B.F., Carter, J.E., Handler, S., Johnson, S.,
Strunk, N., Ramirez, D. & Gortmaker, S.L. (2004). Diffusion of an integrated
health education program in an urban school system: planet health. Jourrnal of
Pediatric Psychology, 29(6), 467-474.
Weyland, K. (2005). Theories of policy diffusion - Lessons from Latin American pension reform. World Politics, 57(2),262-295.
Wernet, S.P. & Singleton, J.L. (2010). Institutionalization of gerontological curricular
change in schools of social work. GerontologyεGeriatrics Education, 31, 19-36.
Wikhamn, B.R. & Wikhamn, W. (2011). Open innovation climate measure: the
introduction of a validated scale. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(4),
284-295.
Wilson, F.R., Pan, W., & Schumsky, D.A. (2012). Recalculation of the critical values
for Lawshe’s content validity ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling
and Development, 45(3), 197-210. doi:10.1177/0748175612440286
Williams, J.C. (2014). Recent official policy and concepts of reading comprehension
and inference: the case of England’s primary curriculum. Literacy, 48(2), 95-102.
Wikipedia. (2015). Retrieved October 17, 2015, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Georg_Simmel#Works
Young, J. H. (1990). Curriculum implementation: an organizational perspective.
Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 5(2), 132-149.
Zhang, Y., & Yang, K. (2008). What drives charter school diffusion at the local level: educational needs or political and institutional forces?. Policy studies journal, 36(4), 571-591.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 王恭志(2004)。新右派課程政策的評析與啟示。教育研究資訊,12(5),34-56。
2. 王梅玲、曾湘怡(2013)。兒童閱讀教學活動成效評估。國家圖書館館刊,2,83-110。
3. 李俊豪(2010)。解釋學生基測成績差異之個人因素與地區因素。地理學報,60,
4. 卯靜儒(2014)。改革即改變嗎?教育改革理解路徑之探索。教育學刊,42,1-37。卯靜儒(2015)。改革主體的詮釋現象學初探:以學習共同體為例。市北教育學
5. 林巧敏(2009)。推動國中小學童數位閱讀計畫之探討。臺灣圖書館管理季刊,5
6. 林明煌(2011)。日本中小學閱讀教育課程改革現況。教育資料集刊,50,69-90。洪蘭(譯)(1999)。R. J. Sternberg & T. I. Lubart著。不同凡想(Deflying the crowd)。
7. 洪振傑、鍾靜(2004)。數學種子教師推廣工作之初探。國教學報,16,29-71。
8. 侯一欣、張小宛(2009)。社會行動取向自編教材之發展。教科書研究,2(1),
9. 胡婉玲(2001)。論歷史制度主義的制度變遷理論。新世紀智庫論壇,16,86-95。
10. 馮琼愛、邱銘心(2011)。臺北市國民小學實施讀報教育研究。圖書與資訊學刊,
11. 陳奕奇、劉子銘(2008)。教育成就與城鄉差距:空間群聚之分析。人口學刊,
12. 單文經(2005)。Rugg及Bruner社會領域課程改革經驗的啟示。教育研究集刊,
13. 張莉慧(2009)。臺灣推動閱讀之觀察與省思。臺灣圖書館管理季刊,5(4),82-98。
14. 黃玫溱、林巧敏(2009)。推動閱讀計畫之構想與建議。圖書與資訊學刊,1(3),
15. 傅粹馨(2002)。典型相關分析與結構方程模式關係之探究。屏東師院學報,16,
 
無相關點閱論文
 
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔