(3.220.231.235) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/03/09 06:01
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:東上潤
研究生(外文):TOJO JUN
論文名稱:組織自我複製和模仿策略:以美國職業籃球聯賽為例
論文名稱(外文):Self-replication and Imitation Strategy: the Case of National Basketball Association
指導教授:康敏平康敏平引用關係
指導教授(外文):Kang, Min-Ping
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:全球經營與策略研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:中文
論文頁數:38
中文關鍵詞:自我複製策略市場模仿策略NBA
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:154
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:39
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究欲探討組織所作的決策,其複製自身過往成功經驗的程度及模仿當期市場上績效優良之組織的程度,對於績效的影響。本研究以NBA為例,2007-2009賽季的績優球隊作為研究對象,觀察其球隊經理人在2009-2010賽季到2016-2017賽季所作的球隊決策中,其自我複製程度及市場模仿程度對球隊戰績的影響。
本研究以球隊經理人所作的決策中,會較直接影響球隊戰績的決策作為觀察對象,分別是球隊組成、球隊戰術、球隊類型。發現在考慮市場趨勢後, 球隊組成及球隊類型的自我複製程度越高,其球隊績效表現越差,另一方面,球隊戰術及球隊類型的市場模仿程度越高,其球隊績效表現越佳。本研究認為在快速變化的現今環境下,掌握自身的異質性資源無法保證一定能夠維持競爭優勢,而是需要透過從過往成功經驗中汲取正確且有效的異質性資源,並從市場的變化中掌握趨勢,融合自身的獨特異質性資源及模仿市場上表現較佳的要素,以形塑符合市場所需且獨一無二的策略形貌來創造競爭優勢。
摘要.......................................................... I
目錄.......................................................... II
圖目錄........................................................ III
表目錄........................................................ III
第一章 緒論................................................... 1
第一節 研究動機 .............................................. 1
第二節 研究目的 .............................................. 4
第三節 研究對象和期間 ........................................ 5
第四節 名詞定義 .............................................. 5
第五節 研究流程 .............................................. 6
第二章 文獻探討 .............................................. 7
第一節 企業組織過去成功經驗對績效的影響 ...................... 7
第二節 模仿領先者策略對績效的影響 ............................ 8
第三節 美國職業籃球聯賽NBA-自我複製和市場模仿策略 ........... 10
第三章 研究方法 .............................................. 17
第一節 研究設計和架構 ........................................ 18
第二節 研究資料來源 .......................................... 18
第三節 研究樣本選擇 .......................................... 18
第四節 變數設定和操作 ........................................ 19
第五節 研究模型設計 .......................................... 23
第六節 預期研究貢獻 .......................................... 23
第四章 研究結果 .............................................. 24
第一節 敘述性統計 ............................................ 24
第二節 迴歸分析 .............................................. 29
第五章 結論與建議 ............................................ 32
第一節 結論 .................................................. 32
第二節 學術及管理意涵 ........................................ 33
第三節 研究限制及討論 ........................................ 34
參考文獻...................................................... 36

圖目錄
圖1-1 研究流程 ............................................... 6
圖3-1 研究架構圖 ............................................. 18
表目錄
表2-1 假說彙整表 ............................................. 16
表3-1 變數表 ................................................. 22
表4-1敘述性統計-修正前 ....................................... 24
表4-2敘述性統計-修正後 ....................................... 24
表4-3相關分析-修正前 ......................................... 26
表4-4相關分析-修正後 ......................................... 26
表4-5共線性診斷-修正前 ....................................... 27
表4-6共線性診斷-修正前 ....................................... 27
表4-7球隊經理人自我複製程度和市場模仿程度模型迴歸結果表-修正前 29
表4-8球隊經理人自我複製程度和市場模仿程度模型迴歸結果表-修正後 30
Bain, J. S. (1956). Barriers to new competition, their character and consequences in manufacturing industries. Retrieved from
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
Baron, J., & Hershey, J. C. (1988). Outcome bias in decision evaluation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(4), 569.
Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1985). The strategies for taking charge. Leaders, New York: Harper. Row.
Berman, S. L., Down, J., & Hill, C. W. (2002). Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the National Basketball Association. Academy of management Journal, 45(1), 13-31.
Berri, D. J. (1999). Who is' most valuable'? Measuring the player's production of wins in the National Basketball Association. Managerial and decision economics, 411-427.
Carpenter, G. S., & Nakamoto, K. (1990). Competitive strategies for late entry into a market with a dominant brand. Management Science, 36(10), 1268-1278.
Cho, D.-S., Kim, D.-J., & Rhee, D. K. (1998). Latecomer strategies: evidence from the semiconductor industry in Japan and Korea. Organization science, 9(4), 489-505.
Gòmez, M.-Á., Lorenzo, A., Ortega, E., Sampaio, J., & Ibàñez, S.-J. (2009). Game related statistics discriminating between starters and nonstarters players in Women’s National Basketball Association League (WNBA). Journal of sports science & medicine, 8(2), 278.
Gage, J., & Schwartz, P. J. (2007). Best General Managers In Sports. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/2007/03/02/sports-greatest-gms-biz-cz_jg_0302gms.html
Gino, F., & Pisano, G. P. (2011). Why leaders don’t learn from success. Harvard business review, 89(4), 68-74.
Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California management review, 33(3), 114-135.
Hausman, J. A., & Leonard, G. K. (1997). Superstars in the National Basketball Association: Economic value and policy. Journal of Labor Economics, 15(4), 586-624.
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative science quarterly, 9-30.
Hobday, M. (1995). East Asian latecomer firms: learning the technology of electronics. World development, 23(7), 1171-1193.
Hofler, R. A., & Payne, J. E. (2006). Efficiency in the National Basketball Association: a stochastic frontier approach with panel data. Managerial and decision economics, 27(4), 279-285.
Lefgren, L., Platt, B., & Price, J. (2014). Sticking with what (barely) worked: A test of outcome bias. Management Science, 61(5), 1121-1136.
Lewis, M. (2004). Moneyball: The art of winning an unfair game: WW Norton & Company.
Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1988). First‐mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9(S1), 41-58.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2(1), 71-87.
Mathews, J. A. (2002). Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific journal of management, 19(4), 467-488.
Mazzocco, P. J., Alicke, M. D., & Davis, T. L. (2004). On the robustness of outcome bias: No constraint by prior culpability. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26(2-3), 131-146.
Miller, D. (1992). The Icarus paradox: How exceptional companies bring about their own downfall. Business Horizons, 35(1), 24-35.
Miller, D. (1994). What happens after success: The perils of excellence. Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), 325-358.
Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction. Psychological bulletin, 82(2), 213-225.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Technology and competitive advantage. Journal of business strategy, 5(3), 60-78.
Posen, H. E., Lee, J., & Yi, S. (2013). The power of imperfect imitation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(2), 149-164.
Price, J., & Wolfers, J. (2007). Racial discrimination among NBA referees. Retrieved from
Schmalensee, R. (1982). Product differentiation advantages of pioneering brands. The American Economic Review, 72(3), 349-365.
Simmons, R., & Berri, D. J. (2011). Mixing the princes and the paupers: Pay and performance in the National Basketball Association. Labour Economics, 18(3), 381-388.
Taylor, B. A., & Trogdon, J. G. (2002). Losing to win: Tournament incentives in the National Basketball Association. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(1), 23-41.
Trout, J., & Ries, A. (1986). Positioning: The battle for your mind: McGraw-Hill.
Van de Ven, A. H., & Polley, D. (1992). Learning while innovating. Organization science, 3(1), 92-116.
Winter, S. G. (1971). Satisficing, selection, and the innovating remnant. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 85(2), 237-261.
Wong, G. M., & Deubert, C. (2011). National Basketball Association General Managers: An Analysis of the Responsibilities, Qualifications and Characteristics. Vill. Sports & Ent. LJ, 18, 213.
Zak, T. A., Huang, C. J., & Siegfried, J. J. (1979). Production efficiency: the case of professional basketball. Journal of Business, 379-392.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔