臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究探討正面到中立心情移動或穩重中立心情與直接或非直接偏誤修正提醒如何影響消費者對產品的評價；其中直接偏誤提醒為一句修正指導語，而非直接提醒為促發文章。
本研究假設當心情由正面移動到中立的消費者看到修正指導語時（實驗中為看到效用或享樂產品），消費者會進行與心情移動反向的產品評估修正；看到促發文章時，只會對效用產品進行修正，對享樂產品則不會。而心情穩定且中立的消費者則對兩種產品都不會進行修正。
本研究結果顯示心情穩定的消費者，無論是否看到修正指導語或促發文章都沒有對效用或享樂產品進行偏誤修正；而心情由正面移動到中立的消費者中，看到促發文章者在評估效用產品時，有對產品進行偏誤修正，但看到修正指導語者則沒有對產品進行偏誤修正。

This paper examines consumer mood bias correction following a happy-to-neutral mood shift and steady neutral mood state when people are reminded of mood bias either directly through correction instruction or indirectly through a bias-priming article. This paper proposes that consumers in a happy-to-neutral mood shift, exposed to the correction instruction and who are viewing either utilitarian or hedonic target products will correct in the opposite direction of the perceived mood shift. It is also proposed that participants exposed to the bias-priming article but under the same conditions will only correct when viewing utilitarian target product but not hedonic. Participants in steady neutral mood states are not expected to correct for either target product. The results of the two main studies in this paper supported that participants in steady neutral mood conditions did not correct for perceived mood bias for either utilitarian or hedonic target product following either type of reminder. It was also found that participants in happy-to-neutral mood states viewing utilitarian target products corrected their product judgments when they were exposed to the bias-priming article. However, no significant amount of correction or main effect by mood shift was found for participants exposed to correction instruction.

CHINESE ABSTRACT i
ENGLISH ABSTRACT ii
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background and Introduction 1
1.2 Research Purpose 4
1.3 Research Contribution to Previous Research 6
1.3.1 Mood Manipulation 6
1.3.2 Products with Clear Utilitarian or Hedonic Product Orientation 6
1.3.3 Target Ad Products 7
1.3.4 Correction Instruction and Bias-Priming Article 7
1.3.5 Recruitment Method 7
2. LITERATURE REVIEW 9
2.1 Mood and Judgment 9
2.1.1 Associated Network Model 10
2.1.2 Feeling-As-Information Model 10
2.1.3 Comprehensive models – ELM and AIM 12
2.2 Bias Correction Models 14
2.2.1 Set / Reset Model 14
2.2.2 Inclusion / Exclusion Model 15
2.2.3 Flexible Correction Model (FCM) 16
2.3 Utilitarianism and Hedonism 18
3. STUDY FRAMEWORK AND HYPOTHESES 20
3.1 Study Framework 20
3.2 Hypotheses 22
4. STUDY 1 28
4.1 Pretest 28
4.1.1 Purpose 28
4.1.2 Participants and Design 28
4.1.3 Pretest Results 29
4.2 Main Experiment 35
4.2.1 Participants 35
4.2.2 Procedure 35
4.2.3 Independent Variables 39
4.2.4 Dependent Variables 41
4.3 Results 45
4.3.1 Reliability Checks 45
4.3.2 Manipulation Checks 46
4.3.3 Hypotheses Checks 61
4.4 Study 1 Discussion 68
5. STUDY 2 71
5.1 Pretest 71
5.2 Main Experiment 71
5.2.1 Participants 71
5.2.2 Procedure 72
5.2.3 Independent Variables 76
5.2.4 Dependent Variables 76
5.3 Results 77
5.3.1 Reliability Checks 77
5.3.2 Manipulation Checks 78
5.3.3 Hypotheses Checks 94
5.4 Study 2 Discussion 101
6. CONCLUSION 102
6.1 Research Conclusion 102
6.2 Managerial Implications 105
6.3 Research Contribution 108
6.4 Limitations 109
7.2 Future Research 111


REFERENCES 113
APPENDIX: QUESTIONNAIRES 119

Adaval, Rashmi (2001), “Sometimes It Just Feels Right: The Differential Weighting of Affect-Consistent and Affect-Inconsistent Product Information,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (June), 1-17.
Bagozzi, Richard P. and Robert E. Burnkrant (1979), “Attitude Organization and the Attitude-Behavior Relationship,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 (June), 913-29.
Batra, Rajeev and Olli T. Ahtola (1990), “Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Sources of Consumer Attitudes,” Marketing Letters, 2, 159-170.
Bazerman, Max H., Ann E. Tenbrunsel, and Kimberly Wade-Benzoni (1998), “Negotiating with Yourself and Losing: Understanding and Managing Competing Internal Preferences,” Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), 225-41.
Bower, Gordon H. (1981), “Mood and Memory,” American Psychologist, 36, 129-148.
Dhar, R. and Klaus Wertenbroch (2000), “Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods,” Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 60-71.
Eagly, Alice H. and Shelly Chaiken (1993), The Psychology of Attitudes, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Ellsworth, Phoebe C. and Craig A. Smith (1988), “Shades of joy: Patterns of appraisal differentiating pleasing emotions,” Cognition and Emotion, 2, 301-331.
Forgas, Joseph P. (1991), “Affective Influences on Partner Choice: Role of Mood in Social Decisions,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61 (November), 708-720.
______ (1993), “One Making Sense of Odd Couples: Mood Effects on the Perception of Mismatched Relationships,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulleting, 19, 59-70.
______ (1995), “Mood and Judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM),” Psychology Bulletin, 117, 39-66.
______ (1998), “On feeling good and getting your way: Mood effects on negotiator cognition and bargaining strategies,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 (3), 565-577.
Forgas, Joseph P. and Jennifer M. George, (2001), “Affective influences on judgments and behavior in organizations: An information processing perspective,” Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 86 (1), 3-34.
Hirschman, Elizabeth C. and Morris B. Holbrook (1982), “Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts Methods, and Propositions,” Journal of Marketing, 46 (Summer), 92-101.
Hirt, Edward R., Erin E. Devers, and Sean M. McCrea (2008), “I want to be creative: Exploring the role of hedonic contingency theory in the positive mood-cognitive flexibility link,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 214-230.
Kempf, Deanna S. (1999), “Attitude formation from product trial: Distinct roles of cognition and affect for hedonic and functional products,” Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 35-50
Lin, P. Y. (2011), “Correction for Positive Mood Bias in Product Judgment: Hedonic vs. Utilitarian based Product Attitude,” unpublished master thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Lu, Y. C. (2012), “Correction for Negative Mood Bias in Product Judgment: Hedonic vs. Utilitarian based Product Attitude,” unpublished master thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Manis, Melvin and Joan R. Paskewitz (1984), “Specificity and contrast effects: Judgments of psychopathology,” Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 20, 217-230.
Mano, Haim and Richard L. Oliver (1993), “Assessing the Dimensionality and Structure of the Consumption Experience: Evaluation, Feeling, and Satisfaction,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (December), 451-66
Martin, Leonard L. (1986), “Set/reset: Use and disuse of concepts in impression formation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 493-504.
Martin, Leonard L. and John J. Seta (1983), “Perceptions of unity and distinctiveness as determinants of attraction,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 755-764.
Martin, Leonard L., John J. Seta, and Rick A. Crelia (1990), “Assimilation and contrast as a function of people’s willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 27-37.
Osgood, Charles E., George J. Suci, and Percy H. Tannenbaum (1957), The Measurement of Meaning, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Petty, Richard E., John T. Cacioppo and Jeff A. Kasmer (1988), “The role of affect in the Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion,” in L. Donohuew, H. Sypher, and E. T. Higgins (Eds), Communication, Social Cognition, and Affect (pp. 117-146).
Petty, Richard E. and Duane T. Wegener (1993), “Flexible Correction Process in Social Judgment: Correcting for Context-Induced Contrast,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29(March), 137-165.
Pham, Michel T. (1998), “Representativeness, Relevance and the Use of Feelings in Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (September), 144-60.
Schwarz, Norbert and Herbert Bless (1992), “Scandals and the public''s trust in politicians: Assimilation and contrast effects,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 574-579.
______ (2007), “Mental construal processes: The inclusion/exclusion model,” in D. A. Stapel and J. Suls (Eds.), Assimilation and contrast in social psychology: 119–142. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Schwarz, Norbert and Gerald L. Clore (1983), “Mood, Misattribution, and Judgments of Well Being: Informative and Directive Functions of Affective States,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (September), 513–23.
______ (1988), “How Do I Feel about It? Informative Functions of Affective States,” in Klaus Fiedler and Joseph Forgas (Eds.), Affect, Cognition, and Social Behavior: 44-62. Toronto: Hofgrefe International.
Seta, John J., Lenny Martin, L., and George Capehart (1979), “The effects of contrast and generalization on the attitude similarity-attraction relationship,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 462-467.
Strahilevitz, Michal A. and John G. Myers (1998), “Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You Are Trying to Sell,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (March), 434-436.
Voss, Kevin E., Eric R. Spangenherg, and Bianca Grohmann (2003), “Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude,” Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (August), 310-20.
Wegener, Duane T. (1994), “The flexible correction model: Using naïve theory of bias to correct assessment of targets,” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbia.
Wegener, Duane T., and Richard E. Petty (1995), “Flexible correction processes in social judgment: the role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 36-51.
______ (1997), “The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction,” in M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 141-208. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.