跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.172) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/03/17 00:34
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:管晧安
研究生(外文):Hao-An Kuan
論文名稱:免費增值模式之個案研究
論文名稱(外文):Cases studies on freemium model
指導教授:吳學良吳學良引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hsueh-Liang Wu
口試日期:2017-07-14
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:國際企業學研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:中文
論文頁數:64
中文關鍵詞:免費增值音樂串流雲端服務產業商業模式創業
外文關鍵詞:freemiumstreaming musiccloudbusiness modelstart-up
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:642
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
隨著科技進步,產品或服務放大規模時之邊際成本越來越低,採用免費增值(Freemium)商業模式的企業愈趨普遍,從雲端服務軟體到音樂平台,陸續出現像是Dropbox、Spotify這樣的成功案例,但也有更多陷入不斷燒錢,卻始終無法轉虧為盈的泥沼中的創業家。本研究透過深入檢視企業如何利用免費增值模式來迅速擴大用戶規模、甚至獲利,並採用多個案研究法,從中歸納出免費增值模式之共通性,再與失敗案例做比較,歸納出以下幾個發現:
(1)免費增值模式的動機分成外在市場競爭的壓力,及企業想要快速集眾的內在需求;(2)免費增值模式普遍有大量用戶基礎、低轉換率、及以月費為主要收費方式的特色;(3) 免費增值之成功案例最主要的經營策略包含能快速集眾、提高轉換率。
本文最後將重要發現歸納成免費增值模式的三個發展階段並對未來研究方向提供一些建議。
As the big success of Dropbox and Spotify thrills the market, the future of freemium model seems so promising that no one really try to figuring it out how it operates before entering. Entrepreneur just thrive to join the world made of free and try to apply freemium as their business model but end up into a costly trap. Although the marginal cost sharply reducing due to fast developing technology, star-ups still can’t conquer the threat of new “Free” world.
Through collecting and deeply study of successful businesses who mastered with freemium model case by case and comparing with the failure cases as contrary, this paper sum up with three important points as follows:
(1) There are two different motivates for using freemium model. First, forced by the competitive market to go with freemium. Second, the inner motivates of enterprise to go viral and be big.
(2) There are three characteristics of freemium model which are low conversion rate, millions of users, and fixed monthly fee.
(3) The main significant strategies include gathering users as fast as possible and elevating conversion rate.
The paper concludes these key findings into a three-stage-developing-model for freemium model and suggest some directions for future research.
誌謝 II
中文摘要 III
英文摘要 IV
目錄 V
表目錄 VIII
圖目錄 IX
第一章、 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究課題與目的 2
1.3 研究流程與架構 2
第二章、 文獻探討 4
2.1 商業模式 4
2.2免費的定義與分類 5
2.1.1 免費增值的出現 8
2.1.2 免費增值模式的特色 9
第三章、 研究方法 12
3.1 多個案研究法 12
3.2 個案選擇 13
第四章、 個案分析 14
4.1 音樂串流產業 14
4.1.1 Spotify 17
4.1.2 Apple Music 20
4.1.3 Pandora Radio 22
4.1.4 iHeartRadio 25
4.1.5 SoundCloud 27
4.6 Tidal 29
4.2 雲端空間服務產業 29
4.2.1 Dropbox 33
4.2.2 Box 36
4.2.3 Google雲端硬碟 37
4.2.4 One Drive 38
4.3 其他產業 38
4.3.1 LinkedIn 38
4.3.2 Evernote 39
4.3.3 Slack 40
4.3.4 Flickr 41
4.3.5 Everpix 42
第五章、 結果與討論 44
5.1採用免費增值模式的動機 44
5.1.1外在動機:免費市場的競爭 44
5.1.2 內在動機:快速集眾 45
5.2 免費增值模式的特色 46
5.2.1 低轉換率 46
5.2.2 大量用戶 47
5.2.3 收取固定費用 48
5.3 免費增值的經營策略 48
5.3.1 快速集眾 48
5.3.2 提高轉換率 52
5.3.3 其他經營策略 55
5.3.4 獲利 56
第六章、 結論 58
6.1研究發現綜整 58
6.1.1 免費增值前的準備 58
6.1.2免增值模式的三個發展階段 59
6.2 產業的應用 60
6.3 研究限制及對未來研究之建議 61
參考文獻 63
Anderson, C. 2009. Free: The future of a radical price: Random House.
Anderson, C. 2013. Free: How today''s smartest businesses profit by giving something for nothing: Random House.
Byrne, D. 2017. How music works: Three Rivers Press.
Chrisman, E. 2017. Spotify''s Losses More Than Double To $581M, Revenues Rise to $3B.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4): 532-550.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50(1): 25-32.
Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. 2006. Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard business review, 84(10): 92.
Heinze, J. 2017. The ascendance of hyper-casual part two: What defines the genre?: pocketgamer.biz.
Holm, A. B., & Günzel-Jensen, F. 2017. Succeeding with freemium: Strategies for implementation. Journal of Business Strategy, 38(2): 16-24.
INGHAM, T. 2016. SPOTIFY REVENUES TOPPED $2BN LAST YEAR AS LOSSES HIT $194M. Music Buesiness Worldwide.
INGHAM, T. 2017. SPOTIFY REVENUES TOPPED $3BN IN 2016, WITH LOSSES ABOVE $330M – REPORT: Music Business Worldwide.
Kumar, V. 2014. Making ''Freemium'' Work: Many Start-ups Fail to Recognize the Challenges of This Popular Business Model. Harvard Business Review, 92(5): 27-29.
Needleman, S. E., & Loten, A. 2012. When freemium fails. The Wall Street Journal.
Odlyzko, A. 2003. The case against micropayments. Paper presented at the Computer Aided Verification.
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. 2010. Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers: John Wiley & Sons.
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. 2005. Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the association for Information Systems, 16(1): 1.
Pujol, N. 2010. Freemium: Attributes of an Emerging Business Model. SSRN eLibrary.
Ries, E. 2011. The lean startup: How today''s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses: Crown Books.
RightScale. 2016. RightScale 2016 State of the Cloud Report: 40.
Sanchez, D. A. 2017. Failure, or Opportunity? Just 3% of Apple Users Are Subscribed to Apple Music: Digital Music News.
Seufert, E. B. 2014. Freemium Economics: Leveraging Analytics and User Segmentation to Drive Revenue: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
Wagner, T. M., Benlian, A., & Hess, T. 2014. Converting freemium customers from free to premium--the role of the perceived premium fit in the case of music as a service. Electronic Markets, 24(4): 259.
Weber, H. 2015. LinkedIn now has 400M users, but only 25% of them use it monthly: venturebeat.
Yin, R. K. 2013. Case study research: Design and methods: Sage publications.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊