跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.85) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/21 17:47
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:黃建朋
研究生(外文):Chien-Peng Huang
論文名稱:蜂群健康之量化評估
論文名稱(外文):Quantifying evaluation for the health of honey bee colony
指導教授:江昭皚江昭皚引用關係
指導教授(外文):Joe-Air Jiang
口試日期:2017-06-28
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:生物產業機電工程學研究所
學門:工程學門
學類:機械工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:英文
論文頁數:64
中文關鍵詞:蜂群健康自動化監測蜂蟹螨防治評估
外文關鍵詞:health evaluation of honey bee colonyautomated monitoreffectiveness of mite control
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:338
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
蜜蜂是自然界中極為重要的授粉者,在各種農作物品種中約有三分之一仰賴蜜蜂授粉。自2006年,全球蜂群因不明原因數量銳減,導致嚴重的農業與經濟損失,此現象正式被命名為蜂群崩潰症候群,這樣的背景凸顯了瞭解蜂群健康狀況與量化蜂群健康狀況的重要性。另外,由於外勤蜂負責主要的資源採集,其活動力與狀態和蜂群健康有相當程度的關聯性,因此,本研究針對外勤蜂出入巢活動進行紀錄並量化其行為進行蜂群健康指標之評估。
本研究基於已開發之蜂群行為監測系統(Bee Counter)進行資料收集,系統記錄每分鐘外勤蜂出入巢頻率及巢內外溫濕度等環境參數,實驗設計搭配傳統蜂蟹蟎防治監測方法進行比較與驗證,本研究蒐集兩次為期三週蜂蟹蟎防治實驗之監測資料。傳統評估蜂蟹蟎方法由秤重推估蜂勢消長,而本研究利用外勤蜂損耗率進行評估蜂勢之依據,評估內容包含外勤蜂損耗率在時域與頻域之波形狀況,並比較傳統的蜂勢評估結果與本研究方法之間的差異和相似之處。
本研究建立一自動化監測蜂群健康指標評估方法,與已開發之蜂群行為監測系統(Bee Counter)進行結合,能更有效地監測蜂群並予以量化資訊,提供養蜂人與相關研究人員客觀的蜂群行為數據,以利養蜂人員採取適當的飼養措施,相關研究人員亦能不再受限於傳統人力監測並提出更多實驗設計與想法。
Honey bees play an extremely important role as pollinators for various kinds of agricultural crops, and about one-third of daily food relies on honey bees’ pollination. Bee population has decreased significantly since 2006 when Colony Collapse Disorder(CCD) broke out. It leads to dramatic losses not only in the agricultural industry but also in the economy as a whole all over the world. This scenario highlights the importance of quantifying the honey bees’ behavior and examining the health condition of a honey bee colony. Moreover, previous studies have indicated that forager bees take charge of the bulk of food collection, and that their flight activities influence the health of the bee colony considerably. Therefore, this study focuses on monitoring and recording forager bees’ flight activities and then quantifying the data to evaluate the health condition of a bee colony.
This study utilizes a honey bee monitoring system, called “Bee Counter”, to collect forager bees’ activities of entering and leaving their beehives. The monitoring system records flight activities of forager bees and real-time environmental variables, such as temperature and humidity, at the same time. Two experiments lasting for three weeks are used to examine the effectiveness of mite (Varroa jacobsoni Oudemans) control in four different treatments. A traditional method of mite control is to weight the colony to estimate the number of bees inside the beehive in the beginning and at the end of a period. Then, the growth or decline rate of the colony can be calculated. In contrast, the method proposed by this study analyzes the waveform of the residual rate of forager bees in the time domain and frequency domain to effectively evaluate the health situation of honey bee colony. The study also provides the comparison of the results of the two monitoring methods.
In sum, this study proposes a quantitative health index for a honey bee colony. Combining with the developed honey bee monitoring system, Bee Counter, it would provide a better and effective monitoring method for every beekeeper. As a result, beekeepers can take a proper measure in advance to prevent dramatic losses of the colony, and scientists can improve experimental designs which were restricted when using traditional monitoring methods.
致謝 i
中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii
Table of Contents v
List of Illustrations vii
List of Tables xii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Motivation and Purpose 4
1.3 Thesis Organization 6
Chapter 2 Literature Review 7
2.1 Quantified flight behavior of honey bee colony 7
2.2 Overview of Honey Bee Monitoring System and Applications 9
2.2.1 Human monitoring method 9
2.2.2 Auxiliary machine for monitoring system 12
2.2.3 Image process monitoring method 14
Chapter 3. Method 17
3.1 Monitoring system 17
3.2 Data collection 19
3.3 Analysis 22
3.3.1 Flight frequencies of forager bees 22
3.3.2 Number of flight frequencies of forager bees 24
3.3.3 Residual rate of forager bees’ flight activities 26
3.3.4 Residual rate in the time domain 27
3.3.5 Residual rate in the frequency domain 29
Chapter 4 Results and Discussions 31
4.1 Traditional methods of examining the effectiveness of mite control 31
4.2 Flight frequency of forager bees 34
4.3 Consistency of daily residual rate 44
4.4 Comparison of daily residual rate 52
4.5 Dominant frequency in the flight activity 56
Chapter 5 Conclusion 59
Reference 61
Abbott, W. S. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of economic entomology. 18(2): 265-267.
Abou-Shaara, H. F. 2014. The foraging behaviour of honey bees, Apis mellifera: a review. Veterinarni Medicina. 59(1).
Abrol, D. P. 2013. Foraging in honeybees Apis cerana indica F. and A. dorsata F.(Hymenoptera: Apidae)-activity and weather conditions. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science. 72(5): 395.
Alqarni, A. S. 2006. Tolerance of summer temperature in imported and indigenous honeybee, Apis mellifera L. races in Central Saudi Arabia. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 13(2): 123-127.
Betti, M. I., Wahl, L. M., and Zamir, M. 2014. Effects of infection on honey bee population dynamics: a model. PloS one. 9(10): e110237.
Brown, K. M. 2013. Mathematical models of honey bee populations: Rapid Population Decline. PhD dissertation. Fredericksburg, Virginia.: Thesis Univ. of Mary Washington.
Campbell, J. M., Dahn, D. C., and Ryan, D. A. 2005. Capacitance-based sensor for monitoring bees passing through a tunnel. Measurement Science and Technology. 16(12): 2503.
Campbell, J., Mummert, L., and Sukthankar, R. 2008. Video monitoring of honey bee colonies at the hive entrance. Visual observation & analysis of animal & insect behavior, ICPR. 8: 1-4.
Chen, C., Yang, E. C., Jiang, J. A., and Lin, T. T. 2012. An imaging system for monitoring the in-and-out activity of honey bees. Computers and electronics in agriculture. 89: 100-109.
Fabergé, A. C. 1943. Apparatus for recording the number of bees leaving and entering a hive. Journal of Scientific Instruments. 20(2): 28.
Gary, N. E. 1967. A method for evaluating honey bee flight activity at the hive entrance. Journal of Economic Entomology. 60(1): 102-105.
Harbo, J. R. 1993. Effect of brood rearing on honey consumption and the survival of worker honey bees. Journal of Apicultural Research. 32(1): 11-17.
Henry, M., Beguin, M., Requier, F., Rollin, O., Odoux, J. F., Aupinel, P., Aptel, J., Tchamitchian, S., and Decourtye, A. 2012. A common pesticide decreases foraging success and survival in honey bees. Science. 336(6079): 348-350.
Jiang, J. A., Wang, C. H., Chen, C. H., Liao, M. S., Su, Y. L., Chen, W. S., Huang, C. P., Chuang, C. L. 2016. A WSN-based automatic monitoring system for the foraging behavior of honey bees and environmental factors of beehives. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 123: 304-318.
Joshi, N. C., and Joshi, P. C. 2010. Foraging behaviour of Apis spp. on apple flowers in a subtropical environment. New York Science Journal. 3(3): 71-76.
Khoury, D. S., Barron, A. B., and Myerscough, M. R. 2013. Modelling food and population dynamics in honey bee colonies. PloS one. 8(5): e59084.
Khoury, D. S., Myerscough, M. R., and Barron, A. B. 2011. A quantitative model of honey bee colony population dynamics. PloS one. 6(4): e18491.
Kremen, C., Williams, N. M., and Thorp, R. W. 2002. Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 99(26): 16812-16816.
Maitra, P., Schneider, S. and Shin, M. C. 2009. Robust bee tracking with adaptive appearance template and geometry-constrained resampling. IEEE WACV Paper: 1-6. Utah, USA: WACV.
Osborne, J. L., Clark, S. J., Morris, R. J., Williams, I. H., Riley, J. R., Smith, A. D., Reynolds, D.R., and Edwards, A. S. 1999. A landscape‐scale study of bumble bee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radar. Journal of Applied Ecology. 36(4): 519-533.
Oskay, D. 2007. Plasticity in flight muscle development and honey bee division of labor. ProQuest.
Reyes-Carrillo, J. L., Eischen, F. A., Cano-Rios, P., Rodriguez-Martinez, R., and Nava Camberos, U. 2007. Pollen collection and honey bee forager distribution in cantaloupe. Acta zoológica Mexicana. 23(1): 29-36.
Russell, S., Barron, A. B., and Harris, D. 2013. Dynamic modelling of honey bee (Apis mellifera) colony growth and failure. Ecological Modelling. 265: 158-169.
Russell, S., Barron, A. B., and Harris, D. 2013. Dynamic modelling of honey bee (Apis mellifera) colony growth and failure. Ecological Modelling. 265: 158-169.
Semkiw, P., Skubida, P., and Pohorecka, K. 2013. The amitraz strips efficacy in control of Varroa destructor after many years application of amitraz in apiaries. Journal of Apicultural Science. 57(1): 107-121.
Shaw, J. A., Nugent, P. W., Johnson, J., Bromenshenk, J. J., Henderson, C. B., and Debnam, S. 2011. Long-wave infrared imaging for non-invasive beehive population assessment. Optics express. 19(1): 399-408.
Smith, K. M., Loh, E. H., Rostal, M. K., Zambrana-Torrelio, C. M., Mendiola, L., and Daszak, P. 2013. Pathogens, pests, and economics: drivers of honey bee colony declines and losses. EcoHealth. 10(4): 434-445.
Woyciechowski, M., and Moroń, D. 2009. Life expectancy and onset of foraging in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Insectes sociaux. 56(2): 193-201.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top