跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.81) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/21 13:01
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:平泰瑋
研究生(外文):Tai-Wei Ping
論文名稱:低位直腸癌病人行肛門括約肌保留手術後生活品質之探討
論文名稱(外文):Quality of life after surgery of sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer
指導教授:戴玉慈戴玉慈引用關係
口試委員:梁金銅張晉豪
口試日期:2017-03-10
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:護理學研究所
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:護理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:中文
論文頁數:138
中文關鍵詞:低位直腸癌肛門括約肌保留手術腹部會陰切除術生活品質家庭功能
外文關鍵詞:low rectal cancersphincter-preserving surgeryabdominoperineal resectionquality of lifefamily function
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:739
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
由於基因遺傳及飲食西化等因素,近年來罹患結腸直腸癌的病人日漸增加,其中腫瘤生長部位又以低位腸道之癌症(乙狀結腸與直腸交接處以及直腸部位)所佔比例最多。尤其針對低位直腸癌病人,除了需要面對罹癌本身的心理衝擊外,尚需面對因手術後所造成排便、排尿或性功能等之障礙而導致生活上的許多不便及衝擊,使得這類病人的生活品質受到嚴重影響。為降低手術後的衝擊,手術式經歷重大變化,從腹部會陰切除術切除直腸及肛門,留置永久性造口,改成肛門括約肌保留手術,但兩類手術對病人短期和長期的生活品質影響為何,未有定論。本研究目的是探討罹患低位直腸癌行肛門括約肌保留手術病人:(一)術後出院六個月內及術後出院日滿六個月以上之腸道功能障礙及健康相關生活品質之差異;(二)手術後腸道功能障礙嚴重度及家庭功能與整體生活品質之相關性;(三)與行腹部會陰切除術病人整體生活品質之比較。
本研究採立意取樣,以橫斷式及描述性相關性設計,使用結構式問卷於北部某醫學中心之門診進行收案,本研究共收案低位直腸癌行肛門括約肌保留手術之病人78位及腹部會陰切除術之病人10位。研究工具包含:個案人口學基本資料、EORTC QLQ-C30及EORTC QLQ-CR29、直腸癌低前位切除綜合症評分量表(LARS Score)及家庭關懷度指數(Family APGAR Index)。研究結果以T test、one-way ANOVA及複迴歸等統計方式進行資料分析。
本研究結果發現低位直腸癌行肛門括約肌保留手術之病人其術後腸道功能障礙嚴重度及家庭功能可預測整體生活品質。病人之家庭功能越好者,整體生活品質也越好;而病人術後腸道功能障礙越嚴重者,其整體生活品質則越差。另外,本研究也發現,比較術後出院日滿六個月以上之行肛門括約肌保留手術及行腹部會陰切除術的病人之整體生活品質,結果有顯著差異,行肛門括約肌保留手術之病人整體生活品質較差。但肛門括約肌保留手術者進一步依術式差異分為低前位切除及全直腸繫膜切除兩組,比較其生活品質,結果發現低位直腸癌行全直腸繫膜切除術者之整體生活品質皆比行低前位切除術者及行腹部會陰切除術者差,而行低前位切除術者與行腹部會陰切除者間無顯著差異。
根據本研究結果得到低位直腸癌經歷有或無肛門括約肌保留術式後生活品質差異,及術後腸道功能障礙嚴重度以及家庭功能程度與病人之生活品質關係的知識,可協助醫療專業人員視不同腸道功能障礙嚴重度及家庭功能之病人,計劃給予不一樣的介入及幫助,以及考量病人之家庭,並強化其功能,協助病人及家屬適應抗癌生活,提升整體生活品質。
Owing to hereditary factors and Westernized cuisine, the number of patients suffer from colorectal cancer has increased in recent years. Most tumors develop in the lower regions of the intestinal tract (in the junction between the sigmoid colon and the rectum and in the rectum). It is especially difficult for these patients with low rectal cancer to return to the same quality of life they had previously. Besides the psychological impact, the patients undergo the surgery may leave them with dysfunction of defecation, urination and sexual function. These problems cause them inconvenience and impact their quality of live significantly. To reduce this impact, the type of surgery has changed greatly. Abdominoperineal resection (APR) would leave a permanent stoma. This is changed to sphincter-preserving surgery (SPS) that would preserve sphincters. However, the short-term and the long-term impact of the above two surgeries on the patient’s quality of life have not come to a conclusion yet. The purposes of this study are 1) compare the bowel dysfunction and health-related quality of life between patients who have undergone SPS less than six months and more than six months; 2) examine the influence of the degree of bowel dysfunction after SPS and family function on the overall quality of life; and 3) compare the overall quality of life between patients who have undergone SPS and APR.
This study adopts purposive sampling and uses cross-sectional, descriptive and correlational study design examining cases from outpatients at a Medical Center in Northern Taiwan with data collection by using structured questionnaires. Participants are patients with lower rectal cancer. 78 of them had undergone sphincter-preserving surgery, and 10 of them had undergone abdominoperineal resection. The measurement tools include the basic case demographic information, EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-CR29, the low anterior resection syndrome score (LARS score), and the family APGAR index. The results were analyzed by t-tests, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), multiple regression, and other methods.
The results show that the overall quality of life of patients who have undergone sphincter-preserving surgery can be predicated by family function and the degree of bowel dysfunction after surgery. The patient’s quality of life increased along with the better family function, and decreased along with the higher degree of bowel dysfunction. Moreover, this study also found a significant difference between the quality of life in patients who have undergone SPS and APR over six months. The patients who have undergone SPS have the lower quality of life. We further divided patients who underwent SPS into two groups according to their type of surgery: total mesorectal excision (TME) and low anterior resection (LAR) and analyze the difference between TME, LAR, and abdominoperineal resection (APR). The results show that the overall quality of life of patients who have undergone TME have the lower quality of life than that of LAR and APR. There is no significant difference between LAR and APR.
The results of this study provide insight into the quality of life of patients who have undergone sphincter-preserving surgery or not for lower rectal cancer, as well as drawing a relationship between the quality of life, the degree of bowel dysfunction and family function. It would help healthcare professionals to plan the unique interventions according to the different degree of bowel dysfunction and family function, and strengthen family function to help patients and their family to adapt to their new way of life and raise their quality of life.
目錄
口試委員審定書 i
致謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
Abstract v
目錄 vii
圖目錄 x
表目錄 x
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機及重要性 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 名詞定義 4
第二章 文獻查證 5
第一節 直腸癌之概論 5
第二節 低位直腸癌之治療 9
第三節 癌症病人之生活品質及相關影響因素 12
第四節 家庭功能的測量 16
第五節 肛門括約肌保留手術後之生活品質及相關影響因素 18
第六節 肛門括約肌保留手術後之功能障礙嚴重度的測量 22
第七節 肛門括約肌保留手術後之生活品質的測量 24
第三章 研究方法 26
第一節 研究架構 26
第二節 研究假設 27
第三節 研究設計 27
第四節 研究對象與研究場所 28
第五節 研究工具 30
第六節 研究步驟 39
第七節 資料處理與統計分析方法 41
第八節 研究對象權益之維護與倫理考量 42
第四章 研究結果 43
第一節 低位直腸癌病人社會人口學特質與疾病治療狀況分析 43
第二節 低位直腸癌行肛門括約肌保留手術病人健康相關生活品質問卷評分結果分析 51
第三節 低位直腸癌行肛門括約肌保留手術病人健康相關生活品質與各自變項之相關檢定 60
第四節 時間因素對低位直腸癌行肛門括約肌保留手術病人術後腸道症狀及健康相關生活品質之影響 79
第五節 直腸癌低前位切除綜合症嚴重度與健康相關生活品質之相關分析 85
第六節 低位直腸癌行肛門括約肌保留手術病人之家庭功能與健康相關生活品質之相關分析 85
第七節 低位直腸癌行肛門括約肌保留手術病人健康相關生活品質之預測因子多變項分析 87
第八節 低位直腸癌行肛門括約肌保留手術病人與行腹部會陰切除術病人健康相關生活品質之比較 89
第五章 討論 96
第一節 低位直腸癌病人社會人口學特質與疾病治療狀況 96
第二節 低位直腸癌行肛門括約肌保留手術病人健康相關生活品質之概況 97
第三節 低位直腸癌行肛門括約肌保留手術病人社會人口學特質及疾病治療狀況與健康相關生活品質之相關性 100
第四節 時間因素對低位直腸癌行肛門括約肌保留手術病人術後腸道症狀及健康相關生活品質之影響 102
第五節 直腸癌低前位切除綜合症嚴重度與健康相關生活品質之相關分析 105
第六節 低位直腸癌行肛門括約肌保留手術病人之家庭功能與健康相關生活品質之相關分析 107
第七節 低位直腸癌行肛門括約肌保留手術病人健康相關生活品質之預測因子多變項分析 108
第八節 低位直腸癌行肛門括約肌保留手術病人與行腹部會陰切除術病人健康相關生活品質之差異 109
第六章 結論與建議 112
第一節 結論 112
第二節 護理臨床實務運用 114
第三節 研究限制及建議 116
參考資料 117
中文參考資料 117
英文參考資料 118
附錄一 研究工具同意書1 126
附錄二 研究工具同意書2 127
附錄三 研究工具同意書3 128
附錄四 研究倫理委員會同意書 129
附錄五 研究問卷 132
附錄六 研究問卷 133
附錄七 研究問卷 135
附錄八 研究問卷 137
附錄九 研究問卷 138

圖目錄
圖3-1-1 研究架構 26
圖3-6-1 研究步驟 40

表目錄
表2-1-1 直腸癌的分期 8
表3-5-1 EORTC QLQ-C30問卷內容 31
表3-5-2 EORTC QLQ-CR29問卷內容 34
表4-1-1-1 直腸癌病人之基本人口學資料與疾病特性 (N=88) 47
表4-1-1-2 直腸癌病人之基本人口學資料與疾病特性(續) (N=88) 48
表4-1-2-1 LARS Score直腸癌低前位切除綜合症評分量表之各題選項頻率與計分統計(SPS group N=78) 49
表4-1-2-2 個案依LARS Score直腸癌低前位切除綜合症量表評分之嚴重度分布 (SPS group N=78) 49
表4-1-3-1 Family APGAR Index家庭關懷度指數之各題選項頻率與計分統計 (SPS group N=78) 50
表4-1-3-2 個案依Family APGAR Index家庭關懷度指數得分之等級分佈 (SPS group N=78) 50
表4-2-1-1 低位直腸癌病人生活品質核心問卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)各題項之描述性統計分析 (SPS group N=78) 54
表4-2-1-2 低位直腸癌病人生活品質核心問卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)各題項之描述性統計分析(續) (SPS group N=78) 55
表4-2-2 低位直腸癌病人生活品質核心問卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)各題組/單題之計分以百分換算的結果 (SPS group N=78) 56
表4-2-3-1 低位直腸癌病人結腸直腸癌特殊性生活品質問卷(EORTC QLQ-CR29)各題項之描述性統計分析 (SPS group N=78) 57
表4-2-3-2 低位直腸癌病人結腸直腸癌特殊性生活品質問卷(EORTC QLQ-CR29)各題項之描述性統計分析(續)(SPS group N=78) 58
表4-2-4 低位直腸癌病人結腸直腸癌特殊性生活品質問卷(EORTC QLQ-CR29)各題組/單題之計分以百分換算的結果 (SPS group N=78) 59
表4-3-1-1 低位直腸癌病人各項社會人口學及疾病治療特性變項與生活品質核心問卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)計分的關係分析 (SPS group N=78) 63
表4-3-1-2 低位直腸癌病人各項社會人口學及疾病治療特性變項與生活品質核心問卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)計分的關係分析(續)(SPS group N=78) 64
表4-3-1-3 低位直腸癌病人各項社會人口學及疾病治療特性變項與生活品質核心問卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)計分的關係分析(續)(SPS group N=78) 65
表4-3-1-4 低位直腸癌病人各項社會人口學及疾病治療特性變項與生活品質核心問卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)計分的關係分析(續)(SPS group N=78) 66
表4-3-1-5 低位直腸癌病人各項社會人口學及疾病治療特性變項與生活品質核心問卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)計分的關係分析(續)(SPS group N=78) 67
表4-3-1-6 低位直腸癌病人各項社會人口學及疾病治療特性變項與生活品質核心問卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)計分的關係分析(續)(SPS group N=78) 68
表4-3-2-1 低位直腸癌病人各項社會人口學及疾病治療特性變項與結腸直腸癌特殊性生活品質問卷(EORTC QLQ-CR29)計分的關係分析 69
表4-3-2-2 低位直腸癌病人各項社會人口學及疾病治療特性變項與結腸直腸癌特殊性生活品質問卷(EORTC QLQ-CR29)計分的關係分析(續) 70
表4-3-2-3 低位直腸癌病人各項社會人口學及疾病治療特性變項與結腸直腸癌特殊性生活品質問卷(EORTC QLQ-CR29)計分的關係分析(續) 71
表4-3-2-4 低位直腸癌病人各項社會人口學及疾病治療特性變項與結腸直腸癌特殊性生活品質問卷(EORTC QLQ-CR29)計分的關係分析(續) 72
表4-3-2-5 低位直腸癌病人各項社會人口學及疾病治療特性變項與結腸直腸癌特殊性生活品質問卷(EORTC QLQ-CR29)計分的關係分析(續) 73
表4-3-2-6 低位直腸癌病人各項社會人口學及疾病治療特性變項與結腸直腸癌特殊性生活品質問卷(EORTC QLQ-CR29)計分的關係分析(續) 74
表4-3-2-7 低位直腸癌病人各項社會人口學及疾病治療特性變項與結腸直腸癌特殊性生活品質問卷(EORTC QLQ-CR29)計分的關係分析(續) 75
表4-3-2-8 低位直腸癌病人各項社會人口學及疾病治療特性變項與結腸直腸癌特殊性生活品質問卷(EORTC QLQ-CR29)計分的關係分析(續) 76
表4-3-2-9 低位直腸癌病人各項社會人口學及疾病治療特性變項與結腸直腸癌特殊性生活品質問卷(EORTC QLQ-CR29)計分的關係分析(續) 77
表4-3-2-10 低位直腸癌病人各項社會人口學及疾病治療特性變項與結腸直腸癌特殊性生活品質問卷(EORTC QLQ-CR29)計分的關係分析(續) 78
表4-4-1 肛門括約肌保留術後≦6M與術後>6M~48M在生活品質核心問卷(EORTC QLQ C30)差異之one-way ANOVA檢定 81
表4-4-2-1 肛門括約肌保留術後≦6M與術後>6M~48M在結腸直腸癌特殊性生活品質問卷(EORTC QLQ CR29)差異之one-way ANOVA檢定 82
表4-4-2-2 肛門括約肌保留術後≦6M與術後>6M~48M在結腸直腸癌特殊性生活品質問卷(EORTC QLQ CR29)差異之one-way ANOVA檢定(續) 83
表4-5-1 直腸癌低前位切除綜合症(LARS)及家庭功能與整體生活品質之相關分析 (SPS group N=78) 86
表4-5-2 不同腸道功能障礙等級與整體生活品質之one way ANOVA單變項檢定分析 (N=78) 86
表4-7-1 影響低位直腸癌行肛門括約肌保留手術後整體生活品質之變項複迴歸分析 (SPS group N=78) 88
表4-8-1 術後出院6個月以上至48個月之行肛門括約肌保留術跟行腹部會陰切除術在生活品質核心問卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)差異之T檢定 92
表4-8-2 術後出院6個月以上至48個月之行肛門括約肌保留術跟行腹部會陰切除術在結腸直腸癌特殊性生活品質問卷(EORTC QLQ-CR29)差異之T檢定 93
表4-8-3 術後出院6個月以上至48個月之肛門括約肌保留術依術式不同與腹部會陰切除術其術後在生活品質核心問卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)差異之One-way ANOVA分析 94
表4-8-4 術後出院6個月以上至48個月之肛門括約肌保留術依術式不同與腹部會陰切除術其術後在結腸直腸癌特殊性生活品質問卷(EORTC QLQ-CR29)差異之One-way ANOVA分析 95
中文參考資料

衛生福利部統計處(2016年8月5日).104年主要死因統計結果分析.取自http://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/np-1714-113.html
衛生福利部國民健康署(2017年5月4日).103年癌症登記報告.取自
http://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/List.aspx?nodeid=119
季瑋珠、楊志新、許駿、賴佳君(2002).癌症病人特定疾病EORTC生活品質量表簡介.臺灣醫學,6(2),220-227。
姚開屏(2002a).健康相關生活品質概念與測量原理之簡介.台灣醫學,6(2),183-192。
姚開屏(2002b).台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展與應用.台灣醫學,6(3),193-200。
胡文郁、戴玉慈、陳慶餘、陳月枝(2003).生活品質之概念分析-於探討癌末病人健康相關生活品質之應用.安寧療護雜誌,8(1),45-60。
梁金銅(2002).直腸癌自律神經保留手術的解剖學基礎.臨床醫學,50(1),40-44。
梁金銅(2006).大腸直腸癌.臺灣醫學,10(4),488-492。
梁金銅(2013).預防勝於治療-談大腸直腸癌.聲洋防癌之聲,(140),11-15。
梁金銅、張金堅(1997).低位直腸癌的根治手術與機能保留.當代醫學,24(2),98-102。
陳永成、徐澄清、徐世鴻、林家青(1980).家庭關懷度指數之初步研究.Acta Paediatrica Sinica,21(3),210-217。

英文參考資料

Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., . . . de Haes, J. C. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the national cancer institute, 85(5), 365-376.
Akhondi-Meybodi, M., Akhondi-Meybodi, S., Vakili, M., & Javaheri, Z. (2016). Quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer in Iran. Arab Journal of Gastroenterology, 17(3), 127-130.
Arora, N. K., Finney Rutten, L. J., Gustafson, D. H., Moser, R., & Hawkins, R. P. (2007). Perceived helpfulness and impact of social support provided by family, friends, and health care providers to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Psycho‐Oncology, 16(5), 474-486.
Arraras, J. I., Suárez, J., Arias-de-la-Vega, F., Vera, R., Ibáñez, B., Asin, G., . . . Hernández, I. (2013). Quality of life assessment by applying EORTC questionnaires to rectal cancer patients after surgery and neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment. Rev Esp Enferm Dig, 105(5), 255-261.
Baider, L., Ever-Hadani, P., Goldzweig, G., Wygoda, M. R., & Peretz, T. (2003). Is perceived family support a relevant variable in psychological distress?: A sample of prostate and breast cancer couples. Journal of psychosomatic research, 55(5), 453-460.
Bosset, J.-F., Calais, G., Mineur, L., Maingon, P., Radosevic-Jelic, L., Daban, A., . . . Collette, L. (2005). Enhanced Tumorocidal Effect of Chemotherapy With Preoperative Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer: Preliminary Results—EORTC 22921. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23(24), 5620-5627. doi:10.1200/jco.2005.02.113
Bosset, J.-F., Collette, L., Calais, G., Mineur, L., Maingon, P., Radosevic-Jelic, L., . . . Ollier, J.-C. (2006). Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 355(11), 1114-1123.
Camilleri‐Brennan, J., & Steele, R. (2001). Prospective analysis of quality of life and survival following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. British Journal of Surgery, 88(12), 1617-1622.
Cammà, C., Giunta, M., Fiorica, F., Pagliaro, L., Craxì, A., & Cottone, M. (2000). Preoperative radiotherapy for resectable rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Jama, 284(8), 1008-1015.
Campbell, A. (1981). The sense of well-being in America: Recent patterns and trends. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Carlsen, E., Schlichting, E., Guldvog, I., Johnson, E., & Heald, R. J. (1998). Effect of the introduction of total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. British Journal of Surgery, 85(4), 526-529. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00601.x
Cornish, J. A., Tilney, H. S., Heriot, A. G., Lavery, I. C., Fazio, V. W., & Tekkis, P. P. (2007). A meta-analysis of quality of life for abdominoperineal excision of rectum versus anterior resection for rectal cancer. Annals of surgical oncology, 14(7), 2056-2068.
Edge, S. B., & Compton, C. C. (2010). The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM. Annals of surgical oncology, 17(6), 1471-1474. doi:10.1245/s10434-010-0985-4
Emmertsen, K. J., & Laurberg, S. (2012). Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Annals of surgery, 255(5), 922-928.
Emmertsen, K. J., & Laurberg, S. (2013). Impact of bowel dysfunction on quality of life after sphincter‐preserving resection for rectal cancer. British Journal of Surgery, 100(10), 1377-1387.
Engel, J., Kerr, J., Schlesinger-Raab, A., Eckel, R., Sauer, H., & Hölzel, D. (2003). Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study. Annals of surgery, 238(2), 203-213.
Esther Kim, J.-E., Dodd, M. J., Aouizerat, B. E., Jahan, T., & Miaskowski, C. (2009). A Review of the Prevalence and Impact of Multiple Symptoms in Oncology Patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 37(4), 715-736. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.04.018
Fayers, P. M., Aaronson, N. K., Bjordal, K., Grønvold, M., Curran, D., & Bottomley, A. (2001). on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. The EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd Edition). Published by: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
Fayers, P., Bottomley, A., & Group, E. Q. o. L. (2002). Quality of life research within the EORTC—the EORTC QLQ-C30. European Journal of Cancer, 38, 125-133.
Ferrans, C. E. (1990). Quality of life: Conceptual issues. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 6(4), 248-254. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-2081(90)90026-2
Ferrans, C. E., & Powers, M. J. (1985). Quality of life index: development and psychometric properties. Advances in nursing science, 8(1), 15-24.
Ferrans, C. E., & Powers, M. J. (1992). Psychometric assessment of the quality of life index. Research in Nursing & Health, 15(1), 29-38. doi:10.1002/nur.4770150106
Ferrans, C. E., Zerwic, J. J., Wilbur, J. E., & Larson, J. L. (2005). Conceptual model of health‐related quality of life. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37(4), 336-342.
Fobair, P. A., & Zabora, J. R. (1995). Family functioning as a resource variable in psychosocial cancer research: issues and measures. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 13(1-2), 97-114.
Frick, E., Tyroller, M., & Panzer, M. (2007). Anxiety, depression and quality of life of cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy: a cross-sectional study in a community hospital outpatient centre. European journal of cancer care, 16(2), 130-136. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2006.00720.x
Given, B. A., Given, C. W., & Kozachik, S. (2001). Family support in advanced cancer. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 51(4), 213-231.
Gujral, S., Conroy, T., Fleissner, C., Sezer, O., King, P., Avery, K., . . . Blazeby, J. (2007). Assessing quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer: an update of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire. European Journal of Cancer, 43(10), 1564-1573.
Guren, M., Eriksen, M., Wiig, J., Carlsen, E., Nesbakken, A., Sigurdsson, H., . . . Tveit, K. (2005). Quality of life and functional outcome following anterior or abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO), 31(7), 735-742.
Gurjar, S. V., & Jones, O. M. (2011). Physiology: evacuation, pelvic floor and continence mechanisms. Surgery (Oxford), 29(8), 358-361. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2011.05.010
Haas, B. K. (1999). A multidisciplinary concept analysis of quality of life. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 21(6), 728-742.
Haggar, F. A., & Boushey, R. P. (2009). Colorectal cancer epidemiology: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 22(04), 191-197.
Hann, D., Baker, F., Denniston, M., Gesme, D., Reding, D., Flynn, T., . . . Kieltyka, R. L. (2002). The influence of social support on depressive symptoms in cancer patients: age and gender differences. Journal of psychosomatic research, 52(5), 279-283.
Havenga, K., Maas, C., DeRuiter, M., Welvaart, K., & Trimbos, J. (2000). Avoiding long-term disturbance to bladder and sexual function in pelvic surgery, particularly with rectal cancer. Paper presented at the Seminars in surgical oncology.
Hayne, D., Brown, R. S. D., McCormack, M., Quinn, M. J., Payne, H. A., & Babb, P. (2001). Current Trends in Colorectal Cancer: Site, Incidence, Mortality and Survival in England and Wales. Clinical Oncology, 13(6), 448-452. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/clon.2001.9311
Hou, X.-t., Pang, D., Lu, Q., Yang, P., Jin, S.-l., Zhou, Y.-j., & Tian, S.-h. (2015). Validation of the Chinese version of the low anterior resection syndrome score for measuring bowel dysfunction after sphincter-preserving surgery among rectal cancer patients. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 19(5), 495-501.
Jemal, A., Clegg, L. X., Ward, E., Ries, L. A., Wu, X., Jamison, P. M., . . . Edwards, B. K. (2004). Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2001, with a special feature regarding survival. Cancer, 101(1), 3-27.
Juul, T., Ahlberg, M., Biondo, S., Emmertsen, K. J., Espin, E., Jimenez, L. M., . . . Trenti, L. (2014). International validation of the low anterior resection syndrome score. Annals of surgery, 259(4), 728-734.
Juul, T., Ahlberg, M., Biondo, S., Espin, E., Jimenez, L. M., Matzel, K. E., . . . Zhang, W. (2014). Low anterior resection syndrome and quality of life: an international multicenter study. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 57(5), 585-591.
Kasparek, M. S., Hassan, I., Cima, R. R., Larson, D. R., Gullerud, R. E., & Wolff, B. G. (2011). Quality of life after coloanal anastomosis and abdominoperineal resection for distal rectal cancers: sphincter preservation vs quality of life. Colorectal Dis, 13(8), 872-877. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02347.x
Kinoshita, Y., Chishaki, A., Kawamoto, R., Manabe, T., Ueki, T., Hirata, K., . . . Mibu, R. (2015). A longitudinal study of gender differences in quality of life among Japanese patients with lower rectal cancer treated with sphincter-saving surgery: a 1-year follow-up. World journal of surgical oncology, 13(1), 91.
Kinoshita, Y., Nokes, K., Kawamoto, R., Kanaoka, M., Miyazono, M., Nakao, H., . . . Mibu, R. (2015). Health‐related quality of life in patients with lower rectal cancer after sphincter‐saving surgery: a prospective 6‐month follow‐up study. European journal of cancer care.
Knowles, G., Haigh, R., McLean, C., Phillips, H. A., Dunlop, M. G., & Din, F. V. (2013). Long term effect of surgery and radiotherapy for colorectal cancer on defecatory function and quality of life. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 17(5), 570-577.
Ko, C., & Chaudhry, S. (2002). The Need for a Multidisciplinary Approach to Cancer Care. Journal of Surgical Research, 105(1), 53-57. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jsre.2002.6449
Koller, M., Aaronson, N. K., Blazeby, J., Bottomley, A., Dewolf, L., Fayers, P., . . . West, K. (2007). Translation procedures for standardised quality of life questionnaires: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) approach. European Journal of Cancer, 43(12), 1810-1820.
Kyngäs, H., Mikkonen, R., Nousiainen, E. M., Rytilahti, M., Seppänen, P., Vaattovaara, R., & Jämsä, T. (2001). Coping with the onset of cancer: coping strategies and resources of young people with cancer. European journal of cancer care, 10(1), 6-11.
Landers, M., McCarthy, G., & Savage, E. (2012). Bowel symptom experiences and management following sphincter saving surgery for rectal cancer: A qualitative perspective. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 16(3), 293-300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2011.07.002
Lange, M., Den Dulk, M., Bossema, E., Maas, C., Peeters, K., Rutten, H., . . . Van De Velde, C. (2007). Risk factors for faecal incontinence after rectal cancer treatment. British Journal of Surgery, 94(10), 1278-1284.
Li, X., Song, X., Chen, Z., Li, M., Lu, L., Xu, Y., . . . Xu, K. (2014). Quality of life in rectal cancer patients after radical surgery: a survey of Chinese patients. World journal of surgical oncology, 12(1), 161.
Mahon, S. M. (2009). Prevention and screening of gastrointestinal cancers. Paper presented at the Seminars in Oncology Nursing.
Maslyankov, S., Penchev, D., Todorov, G., & Vladov, N. (2015). A meta-analysis of quality of life, estimated by questionnaires of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) after Rectal Cancer Surgery. Chirurgia (Bucur), 110(4), 356-361.
Merckaert, I., Libert, Y., Messin, S., Milani, M., Slachmuylder, J.-L., & Razavi, D. (2010). Cancer patients'' desire for psychological support: prevalence and implications for screening patients'' psychological needs. Psycho-Oncology, 19(2), 141-149. doi:10.1002/pon.1568
Murata, A., Brown, C. J., Raval, M., & Phang, P. T. (2008). Impact of short-course radiotherapy and low anterior resection on quality of life and bowel function in primary rectal cancer. The American Journal of Surgery, 195(5), 611-615.
Nair, C. K., George, P., Rethnamma, K., Bhargavan, R., Rahman, S. A., Mathew, A., . . . Ahamed, M. (2014). Factors affecting health related quality of life of rectal cancer patients undergoing surgery. Indian journal of surgical oncology, 5(4), 266-273.
Northouse, L. L., Caffey, M., Deichelbohrer, L., Schmidt, L., Guziatek-Trojniak, L., West, S., . . . Mood, D. (1999). The quality of life of African American women with breast cancer.
Parker, P. A., Baile, W. F., Moor, C. d., & Cohen, L. (2003). Psychosocial and demographic predictors of quality of life in a large sample of cancer patients. Psycho‐Oncology, 12(2), 183-193.
Peng, J., Shi, D., Goodman, K. A., Goldstein, D., Xiao, C., Guan, Z., & Cai, S. (2011). Early results of quality of life for curatively treated rectal cancers in Chinese patients with EORTC QLQ-CR29. Radiation Oncology, 6(1), 93.
Premkumar, K. (2012). Anatomy and Physiology: The Massage Connection. ( 3rd ed., pp. 478-479 ). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Reilly, C. M., Bruner, D. W., Mitchell, S. A., Minasian, L. M., Basch, E., Dueck, A. C., . . . Reeve, B. B. (2013). A literature synthesis of symptom prevalence and severity in persons receiving active cancer treatment. Supportive care in cancer, 21(6), 1525-1550. doi:10.1007/s00520-012-1688-0
Rose, J. H. (1990). Social support and cancer: Adult patients'' desire for support from family, friends, and health professionals. American journal of community psychology, 18(3), 439-464.
Rullier, E., & Sebag-Montefiore, D. (2006). Sphincter saving is the primary objective for local treatment of cancer of the lower rectum. The Lancet Oncology, 7(9), 775-777. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70863-4
Russell, L., Gough, K., Drosdowsky, A., Schofield, P., Aranda, S., Butow, P. N., . . . Jefford, M. (2015). Psychological distress, quality of life, symptoms and unmet needs of colorectal cancer survivors near the end of treatment. Journal of cancer survivorship, 9(3), 462-470. doi:10.1007/s11764-014-0422-y
Ryan, H., Schofield, P., Cockburn, J., Butow, P., Tattersall, M., Turner, J., . . . Bowman, D. (2005). How to recognize and manage psychological distress in cancer patients. European journal of cancer care, 14(1), 7-15. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00482.x
Salerno, G., Sinnatamby, C., Branagan, G., Daniels, I., Heald, R., & Moran, B. (2006). Defining the rectum: surgically, radiologically and anatomically. Colorectal Disease, 8(s3), 5-9.
Schmidt, C. E., Bestmann, B., Küchler, T., Longo, W. E., Rohde, V., & Kremer, B. (2005). Gender differences in quality of life of patients with rectal cancer. A five-year prospective study. World journal of surgery, 29(12), 1630-1641.
Schmidt, C. E., Bestmann, B., Kuchler, T., Longo, W. E., & Kremer, B. (2005). Impact of age on quality of life in patients with rectal cancer. World journal of surgery, 29(2), 190-197.
Shelton, B. K. (2002). Introduction to colorectal cancer. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 18, 2-12. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/sonu.2002.33074
Sideris, L., Zenasni, F., Vernerey, D., Dauchy, S., Lasser, P., Pignon, J.-P., . . . Pocard, M. (2005). Quality of life of patients operated on for low rectal cancer: impact of the type of surgery and patients’ characteristics. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 48(12), 2180-2191.
Skinner, H., Steinhauer, P., & Sitarenios, G. (2000). Family Assessment Measure (FAM) and process model of family functioning. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 190-210.
Smilkstein, G. (1978). The Family APGAR: A proposal for family function test and its use by physicians. The Journal of family practice.
Smilkstein, G. (1984). The physician and family function assessment. Family Systems Medicine, 2(3), 263.
Smilkstein, G., Ashworth, C., & Montano, D. (1982). Validity and reliability of the family APGAR as a test of family function. The Journal of family practice.
Spiegel, D., & Giese-Davis, J. (2003). Depression and cancer: mechanisms and disease progression. Biological Psychiatry, 54(3), 269-282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00566-3
Sprangers, M., Cull, A., Groenvold, M., Bjordal, K., Blazeby, J., & Aaronson, N. K. (1998). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer approach to developing questionnaire modules: an update and overview. Quality of Life Research, 7(4), 291-300.
The WHOQOL Group. (1995). The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41(10), 1403-1409.
Valentini, V., Beets-Tan, R., Borras, J. M., Krivokapic, Z., Leer, J. W., Påhlman, L., . . . Verfaillie, C. (2008). Evidence and research in rectal cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 87(3), 449-474.
Wan, C., Meng, Q., Yang, Z., Tu, X., Feng, C., Tang, X., & Zhang, C. (2008). Validation of the simplified Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-C30 from the measurements of five types of inpatients with cancer. Annals of oncology, 19(12), 2053-2060.
Whistance, R., Conroy, T., Chie, W., Costantini, A., Sezer, O., Koller, M., . . . Ben-Josef, E. (2009). Clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 45(17), 3017-3026.
Wilson, T. R., Alexander, D. J., & Kind, P. (2006). Measurement of health-related quality of life in the early follow-up of colon and rectal cancer. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 49(11), 1692-1702.
Wong, R. K. S., Berry, S., Spithoff, K., Simunovic, M., Chan, K., Agboola, O., & Dingle, B. (2010). Preoperative or Postoperative Therapy for Stage II or III Rectal Cancer: An Updated Practice Guideline. Clinical Oncology, 22(4), 265-271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2010.03.002
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top