跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.82) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/02/07 03:29
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:王奕翔
研究生(外文):Yi-Hsiang Wang
論文名稱:海港-乾港系統中 出口貨櫃的三階層儲存定價模型
論文名稱(外文):A tri-level storage pricing model for outbound containers in a seaport-dryport system
指導教授:曹譽鐘曹譽鐘引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yu-Chung Tsao
口試委員:喻奉天郭伯勳
口試委員(外文):F. YuPo-Hsun Kuo
口試日期:2017-07-25
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣科技大學
系所名稱:工業管理系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:英文
論文頁數:53
中文關鍵詞:儲存定價無水港乾港海港內陸運輸三階層模型
外文關鍵詞:Storage pricingDry portSeaportOutbound containersInland logisticTrilevel programming
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:149
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
近年來,港口發展十分迅速且競爭激烈,因乾港有著擴大港口腹地並解決港口壅塞的特性,以至於建置乾港成為海運業的一大趨勢。此篇論文提出了一決策在海港-乾港系統出口貨櫃最佳儲存定價之模型,描述一位託運者將欲出口貨物運送經由乾港,而後運送至海港裝船出口。在託運者、乾港與海港三者之間的互動構成了三階層之模式。海港與乾港做出最佳定價決策以最大化各自之利潤,而託運者基於海港與乾港之定價做出最佳運送排程以最小化運送成本。本篇論文使用數據範例展示了求解三階層模型之過程,並探討參數對於託運者之成本,海港與乾港之利潤的影響,得到了一些與既有認知相反的發現。當乾港與海港之間運送頻率增加時,海港之利潤反而會下降;並且當海港提供免費儲存天數下降時,海港之利潤也不增反減。
Being a potential solution for seaport capacity limitation and congestion, dry port becomes more and more popular in the sea transportation industry. This paper presents a model for determining the optimal storage pricing for outbound containers in a seaport-dryport system, which describing one shipper delivers the containers to the dry port and then to the seaport. The interaction among a seaport, dry port and a shipper is modeled as a tri-level program. The seaport and the dry port determine the optimal storage price to maximize their own profit. Based on dry port’s and seaport’s decision, the shipper determines the shipment schedule to minimize its total cost. A numerical example is provided to illustrate the solution procedure and a sensitivity analysis is performed to investigate the effect of parameters on decisions of shipper’s cost, dry port’s and seaport’s profits. Contrary to intuition, the seaport’s profit may decrease with the increase of container delivery frequency from dry port to seaport when the frequency is high and the seaport’s profit may decrease when the free-time limit is too low.
摘要 Ⅰ
ABSTRACT Ⅱ
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Ⅲ
CONTENTS Ⅳ
LIST OF FIGURES Ⅴ
LIST OF TABLES Ⅴ
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Research Objectives 3
1.3 Research Organization 3
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 5
2.1 Storage pricing 5
2.2 Dry port system 9
CHAPTER 3 THE TRILEVEL PROGRAMMING MODEL 12
3.1 Notations and Assumptions 13
3.2 Mathematical Model 16
3.2.1 Dry port model 16
3.2.2 Seaport model 18
3.2.3 Shipper model 21
3.2.4 Trilevel model 22
3.3 Solution Approach 23
3.3.1 Shipper’s best reaction 23
3.3.2 Dry port’s optimal decision 26
3.3.2 Seaport’s optimal decision 28
CHAPTER 4 NUMERICAL ANALYSIS 30
4.1 Numerical Examples 30
4.2 Sensitivity Analysis 36
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION 41
5.1 Conclusions 41
5.2 Future Research 42
REFERENCE 43


LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Container flow from shipper 12
Figure 2. Inventory of containers at seaport and dry port 16
Figure 3. Profit of seaport 29
Figure 4. Graphical description of S_S and P_S 35
Figure 5. Graphical description ofS_D and P_D 35
Figure 6. Graphical description ofN_S and C 35
Figure 7. Impact of parameters on P_S 38
Figure 8. Impact of parameters on P_D 38
Figure 9. Impact of parameters on C 38
Figure 10. Impact of parameters on S_S 39
Figure 11. Impact of parameters on S_D 39
Figure 12. Impact of parameters on N_S 39

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. The input parameters 31
Table 2. Numerical result 31
Table 3. Impact of parameters on P_S 32
Table 4. Impact of parameters on P_D 32
Table 5. Impact of parameters on C 32
Table 6. Impact of parameters on S_S 33
Table 7. Impact of parameters on S_D 33
Table 8. Impact of parameters on N_S 33
Table 9. Impact of key parameters on the decisions and performances 34
Bennathan, E., Walters, A.A., 1979. Port Pricing and Investment Policies for
Development Countries. Oxford University Press for the World Bank, Oxford, New York.
Beresford, A., Pettit, S., Xu, Q., Williams, S., 2012. A study of dry port development in China. Marit. Econ. Logistics 14 (1), 73–98.
Boile, M., Theofanis, S., Baveja, A., Mittal, N., 2008. Regional repositioning of
empty containers: case for inland depots. Transp. Res. Rec. 2066 (1), 31–40.
Choo Chung, K., 1993. Port performance indicators, The World Bank, Transportation,
Water and Urban Development Department, No. PS-6.
CMA-CGM. Terminal storage and demurrage. Retrieved June 29, 2012, from
http://ebusiness.cma-cgm.com, accessed 29 June 2012.
De Castilho, B., Daganzo, C.F., 1991. Optimal pricing policies for temporary storage
atports. Transp. Res. Rec. 1313, 66–74.
Dekker, S., 2005. Port investment – towards an integrated planning of port capacity, The Netherlands TRAIL Research School, Delft, TRAIL Thesis Series,
no.T2005/5.
Frankel, E.G., 1987. Port planning and development. John & Sons, New York.
Goss, R., Stevens, H., 2001. Marginal cost pricing in seaports. Int. J. Marit. Econ. 3, 128–138.
Heggie, I., 1974. Charging for port facilities. J. Transp. Econ. Pol. 8, 3–25.
Holguín-Veras, J., Jara-Díaz, S., 1999. Optimal pricing for priority services and space allocation in container ports. Transp. Res. B 33 (2), 81–106.
Holguín-Veras, J., Jara-Díaz, S., 2006. Preliminary insights into optimal pricing and
space allocation at intermodal terminals with elastic arrivals and capacity
constraint. Netw. Spat. Econ. 6, 25–38.
Huynh, N., 2008. Analysis of container dwell time on marine terminal throughput and
rehandling productivity. J. Int. Logist. Trade 6 (2), 69–89.
Kim, K.H., 1997. Evaluation of the number of rehandles in container yards. Comput. Ind. Eng. 32 (4), 701–711.
Kim, K.H., Kim, H.B., 1999. Segregating space allocation models for container inventories in port container terminals. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 59, 415–423.
Kim, K.H., Kim, K.Y., 2007. Optimal price schedules for storage of inbound containers. Transp. Res. B41, 892–905.
Lee, C.-Y., Yu, M., 2012. Inbound container storage price competition between the container terminal and a remote container yard. Flex. Serv. Manuf. 24, 320–348.
Ng, A.K.Y., Padilha, F., Pallis, A.A., 2013. Institutions, bureaucratic and logistical roles of dry ports: the Brazilian case. J. Transp. Geogr. 27, 46–55.
Qiu, X., Huang, G.Q., 2013. Storage pricing, replenishment, and delivery schedules in
a supply hub in industrial park: a bilevel programming approach. Int. J.
Prod. Res. 51 (23–24), 6950–6971.
Qiu, X., Huang, G.Q., Lam, J.S.L., 2014. A bilevel analytical model for dynamic
storage pricing in a Supply Hub in Industrial Park (SHIP). IEEE Trans. Automat.
Sci. Eng. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2014.2301838.
Roso, V., 2007. Evaluation of the dry port concept from an environmental perspective: a note. Transp. Res. Part D 12 (7), 523–527.
Roso, V., Lumsden, K., 2010. A review of dry ports. Marit. Econ. Logistics 12 (2), 196–213.
Roso, V., Woxenius, J., Lumsden, K., 2009. The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland. J. Transp. Geogr. 17 (5), 338–345.
Saurí, S., Martín, E., 2011. Space allocating strategies for improving import yard performance at marine terminals. Transp. Res. Part E47, 1038–1057.
Saurí, S., Serra, J., Martín, E., 2011. Evaluating pricing strategies for storage in import container terminals. Transp. Res. Rec. 2238, 1–16.
Schmitt, A.J., Snyder, L.V., Shen, Z-J.M., 2010. Inventory systems with stochastic
demand and supply: properties and approximations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 206,
313–328.
Wang, W.F., Yun, W.Y., 2013. Scheduling for inland container truck and train transportation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 143 (2), 349–356.
Xu, Y., 1999. A discrete choice based facility location model for inland container depots (PhD dissertation). West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA.
Zhang, C., Liu, J., Wan, Y., Murty, K., Linn, R., 2003. Storage space allocation in container terminals. Transp. Res. Part B37, 883–903.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top