臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

綠能是未來的趨勢，無論是美國、歐盟、英國等先進國家，都投資巨大金額來推動綠能發展。而如果台灣可以有效的發展太陽能產業，對於節能減碳的目標更是邁進了一大步。
本研究是探討使用太陽能節能玻璃與隔熱玻璃於帷幕大樓時對於室內環境與舒適度之影響，並對室內空調進行節能分析研究。研究結果顯示，太陽能節能玻璃屋在密閉的環境下，維持室內環境舒適度之能力優於隔熱玻璃屋，且太陽能節能玻璃具有良好的隔熱性以及保溫性，所以在空調試驗之節能效益皆優於隔熱玻璃，其暖氣空調試驗於2017/1/30日間之節能效益可以達41%，於2017/1/15至2017/1/16夜間之節能效益可以達47.1%，而冷氣加通風扇試驗於2017/05/07日間之節能效益可以達71.3%。由於太陽能節能玻璃除了節能的效果外還有發電功效，從105年12月累積到106年5月之發電量為377.6kWh，而太陽能節能玻璃屋之總耗電量為1210.4kWh，所以6個月下來之耗電量只需要832.8kWh，隔熱玻璃屋之總耗電量為2044.2kWh，所以太陽能節能玻璃屋相較於隔熱玻璃屋可以省下1211.4kWh之耗電量。
而由模擬軟體結果顯示，裝設太陽能節能玻璃於帷幕大樓一整年在台北、杜拜、倫敦與新加坡之耗電量都是可以低於裝設隔熱玻璃。計算於台北之經濟效益與環境評估得知裝設太陽能節能玻璃之回收年限需要10.4或7.9年，而所節省的碳排放量相當於1.28座大安森林公園的減碳效果，故太陽能節能玻璃為優良之節能建材。

Green energy is the trend in the future. The advanced countries in America and Europe such as the United States and the United Kingdom have invested a huge amount to promote green energy development. If solar energy industry could develop effectively and continuously in Taiwan, the goal towards energy saving and carbon reduction could be a big step closer.
This study is to explore the impact of using different glass in glass curtain buildings regarding indoor environment and comfort, and conduct air-conditioning energy-saving analysis. The results show that, in a closed environment, the ability of the HISG house to maintain the indoor environment comfort is better than that of the insulating glass house. And since HISG has higher performance on heat insulation and thermal insulation, the energy efficiency results of the air-conditioning test derived from the HISG installed house are better than those of the house equipped with insulating glass. The heating air-conditioning energy-saving efficiency can reach 41% during the day on January 30, 2017 and can reach 47.1% at night from January 15, 2017 to January 16, 2017. Additionally, the energy-saving efficiency measured from using both air conditioners and fans can reach 71.3% during the day on May 7, 2017. HISG has not only the function of energy saving but also that of power generation. From December 2016 to May 2017, the accumulated power generated from the HISG house reached a capacity of 377.6kWh. The total power consumption of the HISG house was 1210.4kWh. By deducting the total power consumption from the power generation, we can see that there was the need for 832.8kWh. On the other hand, the total power consumption of the insulating glass house was 2044.2kWh. Comparing the numbers of additional power required by two houses, we concluded that the HISG house can save a capacity of 1211.4kWh. Consequently, HISG can be considered one of the excellent green building materials.
The results of the simulation software show that the installation of solar energy-saving glass in the curtain building throughout the year in Taipei, Dubai, London and Singapore, the power consumption can be lower than the installation of insulated glass. Taipei's economic and environmental assessment of the calculation that the installation of solar energy glass recycling time required 10.4 or 7.9 years, and the savings of carbon emissions is equivalent to 1.28 Da'an Forest Park carbon reduction effect. Consequently, HISG can be considered one of the excellent green building materials.

摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 IV
總目錄 V
表目錄 VIII
圖目錄 X
第1章 緒論 1
1.1研究動機 1
1.2研究目的 2
1.3研究方法 3
1.4研究流程 4
第2章 文獻回顧 5
2.1建築環境相關理論 5
2.1.1建築熱環境 5
2.1.2熱傳 7
2.1.3建築光環境 10
2.2環境舒適度 13
2.2.1舒適度指數 13
2.3建物一體太陽光電 16
2.4節能玻璃相關理論 17
2.4.1節能玻璃種類 17
2.5太陽能節能玻璃 19
第3章 試驗計畫 27
3.1試驗流程 29
3.2試驗儀器與設備 30
3.3空調節能試驗 47
3.3.1空調節能試驗-暖氣空調節能試驗 47
3.3.2空調節能試驗-空調節能試驗(冷氣+通風扇) 48
3.3.3空調節能試驗-綜合空調節能試驗 49
3.4密閉試驗 51
3.4.1溫濕度對室內舒適度之監測試驗-密閉試驗 51
3.5發電量監測試驗 52
3.6室內光環境試驗 53
3.6.1照明度試驗 53
3.7室內熱環境試驗 54
3.7.1輻射熱隔絕試驗 54
3.7.2熱顯像試驗 55
3.8軟體模擬試驗 57
第4章 試驗結果與討論 58
4.1節能試驗結果與分析 58
4.1.1暖氣空調節能試驗-日間 58
4.1.2暖氣空調節能試驗-夜間 63
4.1.3空調節能試驗-日間(冷氣+通風扇) 68
4.1.4空調節能試驗-夜間(冷氣+通風扇) 71
4.1.5綜合空調節能試驗 72
4.2密閉試驗結果與分析 78
4.2.1溫濕度對室內舒適度之監測試驗結果與分析 79
4.3發電量監測試驗結果與分析 80
4.3.1電力平衡圖結果與分析 84
4.4室內光環境試驗結果與分析 85
4.5室內熱環境試驗結果與分析 87
4.6軟體模擬試驗結果與分析 90
4.6.1耗能模擬分析 90
4.6.2發電模擬分析 94
4.6.3帷幕大樓耗能與發電模擬分析 96
4.6.4經濟效益與環境評估 105
第5章 結論與建議 108
5.1結論 108
5.2建議 110
參考文獻 111
附錄 113

[1] Meir IA, Garb Y, Jiao D, Cicelsky A. Post occupancy evaluation: an inevitable step toward sustainability. Adv Build Energy Res, Earthscans Journals. Santamouris: aber 2009.
[2] European Commission
HORIZON 2020 Work Programme 2014–2015. 10 Secure, Clean and Efficient Energy (European Commission Decision C (2013) 8631 of 10 December 2013)
[線上]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2014_2015/main/h2020-wp1415-energy_en.pdf
[3] European Union
Energy in Figures – Pocketbook 2013
[線上]. Available: http://doi.org/10.2832/19314
[4] European Commission
Action Plan for Energy Efficiency: Realising the Potential. COM(2006) 545 Final. [線上]. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2006:0545:FIN:EN:PDF
[5] 業歆, 建築熱環境, 淑馨出本社, 1997.
[6] 徐科峰, 建築環境學, 機械工業出版社, 2003.
[7] 周鼎金, 建築物理, 裕祥出版社, 1999.
[8] 陳啟中, 建築物理概論, 詹氏書局, 1996.
[9] 5點法之平均照度算出法, CNS5065.
[10] “各種場所照度標準(包含CNS國家標準),” TMC, [線上]. Available: http://www.tmc.com/ninshow.asp?RecordNo=37.
[11] P. Fanger, Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering, McGraw-Hill, 1970.
[12] 舒適度指數, 中央氣象局.
[13] ASHRAE Standard 55, 美國冷凍空調協會.
[14] A. Henemann
BIPV:Built-in solar energy
Renewable Energy Focus, 9 (14) (2008), pp. 16–19 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1471-0846(08)70179-3
[15] Akash Kumar Shukla, K. Sudhakar, Prashant Baredar
Recent advancement in BIPV product technologies: A review
Energy and Buildings, Volume 140, 1 April 2017, Pages 188-195
[16] “複層玻璃,” 祥義玻璃股份有限公司, [線上]. Available: http://www.shineglas.com/tw/chan-pin-jie-shao/52-fu-ceng-bo-li.html.
[17] “Low-E玻璃,” 全光武玻璃科技有限公司, [線上]. Available: http://coating-glass.com.tw/buss.php?no=7.
[18] “雙中空懸膜節能玻璃,” 育璽實業有限公司, [線上]. Available: http://www.yushigroup.com/products_01.php.
[19] 沈銘祥, 太陽能節能玻璃應用於實體建築之發電與節能研究, 國立台灣科技大學營建工程系碩士論文, 2011.
[20] 陳學勳, 太陽能節能玻璃應用於室內節能與環境舒適度之研究, 國立台灣科技大學營建工程系碩士論文, 2012.
[21] 劉志鵬, 劉建築師的綠房子.