跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.84) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/04 12:13
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:魏婉婷
研究生(外文):Wan-Ting Wei
論文名稱:券商盈餘預測修正行為之研究-以臺灣五十指數成分股為例
論文名稱(外文):A Study on the Behavior of Broker''s Earnings Forecast Correction : Evidence from the Constituents of the FTSE TWSE Taiwan 50 Index
指導教授:黃志祥黃志祥引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chi-Hsiang Huang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立虎尾科技大學
系所名稱:財務金融系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:中文
論文頁數:59
中文關鍵詞:券商盈餘預測修正臺灣五十指數成分股盈餘預測偏誤
外文關鍵詞:Brokerage earnings forecast correctionTaiwan 50 index constituent stocksEarnings forecast bias
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:94
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究主要在探討券商盈餘預測修正相關行為。以臺灣證券交易所臺灣五十指數成分股公司為研究對象,從2003年6月1日至2015年12月31之每月月底資料,共計12年又7個月。
實證結果顯示與券商盈餘預測修正行為,呈現正向關係的變數有公司規模、淨值股價比、市場風險、落後一期的盈餘預測修正值;而呈現反向關係的變數有權益風險溢酬;以產業類別來看,有不同影響結果分別有全部變數對金融類股無顯著影響、公司規模和股價淨值對傳產類股無顯著影響外,其餘結果皆相同。在前一期非預期性的事件,對電子類股與傳產類股有短期正向影響,但其波動性大小不同,傳產類股大於電子類股;在長期持久性的事件,對各產業類股皆有長期正向影響,但其波動性大小不同,最大為金融類股,依序為傳產類股、電子類股。另外券商是否有盈餘預測偏誤的行為,發現除了2003年度未達顯著水準外,各年度與產業分類,皆有顯著的盈餘預測樂觀的偏誤現象,但產業類別的樂觀偏誤大小不同,最大為金融類股,依序為電子類股、傳產類股,並且在2014年與2015年盈餘預測樂觀行為發佈後的一週與兩週內,券商有顯著的反向操作行為,證實券商有其他經濟誘因而產生利益衝突的現象。
This study was to investigate the brokerage earnings forecast related corrective actions. FTSE TWSE Taiwan 50 Index constituent stocks as the object of study, from June 1, 2003 to December 31, 2015, monthly information at the end of a total of 12 years and 7 months.
The empirical results show that the variables that present the positive relationship are the firm size, the net price ratio, the market risk, the surplus forecast correction value. The variables with the reverse relationship are the risk premium. In terms of industry categories, there are all the variables that have different effects on the financial category have no significant impact, the production category has no significant impact on the size of the company and the net price of the stock, the remaining results are the same.
In the previous issue of unanticipated events, there was a short-term positive impact on the electronic category and production category, but the volatility of different sizes, the production category more than electronic category; In the long-term persistent events, there are long-term positive effects on all categories, but the volatility of different sizes, the largest financial category, followed by the production category, electronic category. Whether the broker has the behavior of the earnings forecast bias, and found that in addition to 2003 did not reach a significant level, the annual and industrial categories, there are significant earnings forecast optimistic bias phenomenon, but the industry categories of optimistic bias different size, the largest financial category followed by electronic category, production category. Furthermore, in 2014 and 2015 earnings forecast optimism after the release of first week and second week, the broker has a significant reverse operation, confirmed that the broker has other economic incentives and the phenomenon of conflict of interest.
目錄
中文摘要.................................................i
英文摘要................................................ii
誌謝..................................................iii
目錄...................................................iv
表目錄.................................................vi
圖目錄................................................vii
第一章 緒論.............................................1
1.1 研究背景與動機.......................................1
1.2 研究目的.............................................3
1.3 研究範圍.............................................3
1.4 研究架構與流程.......................................4
第二章 文獻探討..........................................6
2.1分析師盈餘預測相關文獻.................................6
2.2盈餘對股價的關聯性相關文獻..............................9
2.3權益風險溢酬相關文獻..................................10
2.4分析師盈餘預測偏誤相關文獻.............................12
第三章 研究方法.........................................14
3.1樣本說明與資料來源....................................14
3.1.1資料來源...........................................14
3.1.2 資料篩選..........................................15
3.2相關變數的定義與衡量..................................15
3.2.1分析師盈餘預測修正值(REV)...........................16
3.2.2權益風險溢酬(equity risk premium,ERP)..............16
3.2.3公司規模(SIZE).....................................17
3.2.4淨值市價比(book-to-market ratio,BM)................17
3.2.5市場風險(BETA).....................................17
3.2.6落後一期的券商每月盈餘預測之修正值(REVt-1))...........18
3.3研究模型.............................................18
3.4單根檢定.............................................19
3.4.1 ADF單根檢定法(Augmented Dickey-Fuller test).......19
3.4.2 PP單根檢定法(Phillips-Perron test)................20
3.5相關性分析...........................................21
3.6 ARCH效果檢定........................................21
3.7 GARCH模型..........................................23
3.8分析師預測態度評估指標................................24
3.9自營部門買賣金額與次數實證假設.........................25
第四章 實證結果與分析....................................27
4.1單根檢定.............................................27
4.2敘述性統計量.........................................27
4.3相關係數矩陣.........................................30
4.4同質異質檢定.........................................31
4.5 GARCH(1,1)模型.....................................34
4.6券商分析師發佈預測偏誤之實證結果.......................37
4.6.1 全部樣本的預測偏誤驗實證結果.......................37
4.6.2 不同產業類別的預測偏誤驗實證結果...................40
4.6.3 券商分析師預測偏誤之實證結果小結...................41
4.7 券商分析師發佈顯著盈餘偏誤預測後券商自營部門股票買賣超行為之實證結果................................................42
4.7.1 全部樣本的買賣金額與次數檢驗結果...................42
4.7.2 不同產業類別之買賣金額與次數檢驗結果................45
4.7.3 券商自營部門股票買賣行為之實證結果小結..............45
第五章結論與建議.........................................46
5.1結論................................................46
5.2建議................................................49
參考文獻................................................50
英文論文大綱............................................54
簡歷(CV)...............................................59
[1]黃瓊慧、廖秀梅、廖益興,2004,股價是否充分反應當期盈餘對未來盈餘之意涵-以台灣上市公司之季盈餘序列遵循 AR(1)模式為例,當代會計第五卷 第一期
[2]葉金成、李冠豪,2001,盈餘與股價因果關係之實證研究,當代會計第二卷第一期
[3]許秀賓,1993,財務分析師預測優越性決定因素,會計評論第27期
[4]李益收,2001,股價異常報酬與分析師盈餘預測修正、可操控應計項目及會計資訊之關連,國立中央大學財務管理研究所未出版之碩士論文
[5]Givoly, D., & Lakonishok, J. (1979). The information content of financial analysts’ forecasts of earnings. Journal of Accourting and Economics, 1(3), 165-185.
[6]Lys, T., & Sohn, S. (1990). The association between revisions of financial analysts'' earnings forecasts and security-price changes. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 13(4), 341-363.
[7]Beaver, W. H. (2002). Perspectives on recent capital market research.The Accounting Review, 77(2), 453-474.
[8]汪進揚、鄧名堯,2012,資訊揭露對分析師盈餘預測品質影響之研究,證券市場發展季刊
[9]李孟芳,2009,資訊透明度對券商分析師盈餘 預測之影響:一致性 與準確度觀點,中國文化大學會計研究所碩士論文
[10]王明昌、周邦營,2014,公司治理與分析師盈餘預測誤差,建國科大社會人文期刊
[11]Brown, L. D., Hagerman, R. L., Griffin, P. A., & Zmijewski, M. E. (1987). Security analyst superiority relative to univariate time-series models in forecasting quarterly earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 9(1), 61-87.
[12]Kross, W., Ro, B., & Schroeder, D. (1990). Earnings expectations: The analysts'' information advantage. Accounting Review, 461-476.
[13]汪進揚, & 余俊憲. (2005). 財務分析師盈餘預測誤差與預測行為影響因素之研究. 證券市場發展季刊, 16(4), 117-144.
[14]Imhoff, E. A., & Lobo, G. J. (1984). Information content of analysts'' composite forecast revisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 541-554.
[15]Chang, H. L., Chen, Y. S., Su, C. W., & Chang, Y. W. (2008). The relationship between stock price and EPS: Evidence based on Taiwan panel data. Economics Bulletin, 3(30), 1-12.
[16]Beaver, W. H., McAnally, M. L., & Stinson, C. H. (1997). The information content of earnings and prices: A simultaneous equations approach. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 23(1), 53-81.
[17]何俞萱,1999,長時期盈餘與其組成因素和股價之關聯性研究,國立中興大學會計學研究所未出版之碩士論文
[18]范宏書、林彥廷、馬仕學,2014,研發密集公司超額報酬為風險溢酬之額外證據,管理與系統 21卷3期, 453-482
[19]張育瑛,2008,台灣股票市場風險溢酬研究之再發現,國立高雄第一科技大學財務管理研究所未出版之碩士論文
[20]Lev, B., & Sougiannis, T. (1999). Penetrating the book‐to‐market black box: the R&D effect. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 26(3‐4), 419-449.
[21]Treynor, J. L. (1961). Toward a theory of market value of risky assets. Unpublished manuscript, 6.
[22]Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The journal of finance, 19(3), 425-442.
[23]Lintner, J. (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. The review of economics and statistics, 13-37.
[24]Mossin, J. (1966). Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 768-783.
[25]Jensen, M. C., Black, F., & Scholes, M. S. (1972). The capital asset pricing model: Some empirical tests.
[26]Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. D. (1973). Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. The journal of political economy, 607-636.
[27]賴黛玉,2012,分析師盈餘預測修正與權益風險溢酬之關聯性研究,國立雲林科技大學財務金融系碩士班未出版之碩士論文
[28]Banz, R. W. (1981). The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. Journal of financial economics, 9(1), 3-18.
[29]Roll, R. (1981). A possible explanation of the small firm effect. The Journal of Finance, 36(4), 879-888.
[30]Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk. The journal of finance, 49(5), 1541-1578.
[31]Merton, R. C. (1973). An intertemporal capital asset pricing model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 867-887.
[32]Ross, S. A. (1976). The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Journal of economic theory, 13(3), 341-360.
[33]Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross‐section of expected stock returns. the Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465.
[34]Fant, L. F., & Peterson, D. R. (1995). THE EFFECT OF SIZE, BOOK‐TO‐MARKET EQUITY, PRIOR RETURNS, AND BETA ON STOCK RETURNS: JANUARY VERSUS THE REMAINDER OF THE YEAR. Journal of Financial Research, 18(2), 129-142.
[35]Dechow, P. M., Hutton, A. P., & Sloan, R. G. (2000). The relation between analysts'' forecasts of long‐term earnings growth and stock price performance following equity offerings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 17(1), 1-32.
[36]Michaely, R., & Womack, K. L. (1999). Conflict of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations. Review of financial studies, 12(4), 653-686.
[37]Hong, H., & Kubik, J. D. (2003). Analyzing the analysts: Career concerns and biased earnings forecasts. The Journal of Finance, 58(1), 313-351.
[38]Jackson, A. R. (2005). Trade generation, reputation, and sell‐side analysts. The Journal of Finance, 60(2), 673-717.
[39]鄭雅馨,2008,財務分析師對於銀行貸款發行後公司績效之過度預期效果,國立成功大學國際企業研究所所未出版之碩士論文
[40]Easterwood, J. C., & Nutt, S. R. (1999). Inefficiency in analysts'' earnings forecasts: Systematic misreaction or systematic optimism?. The Journal of Finance, 54(5), 1777-1797.
[41]陳啟文,2001,財務分析師盈餘預測行為分析與探討,政治大學財務管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
[42]王韶濱、許明曄,2011,資訊透明度與財務分析師預測行為,當代會計第十二卷第二期
[43]Werner F. M. De Bondt, & Thaler, R. (1990). Do Security Analysts Overreact? The American Economic Review, 80(2), 52-57. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2006542
[44]Zhang, X. F. (2006). Information uncertainty and analyst forecast behavior. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(2), 565-590.
[45]Abarbanell, J. S., & Bushee, B. J. (1997). Fundamental analysis, future earnings, and stock prices. Journal of Accounting Research, 35(1), 1-24.
[46]Granger, C. W., & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of econometrics, 2(2), 111-120.
[47]Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American statistical association, 74(366a), 427-431.
[48]Said, S. E., & Dickey, D. A. (1984). Testing for unit roots in autoregressive-moving average models of unknown order. Biometrika, 71(3), 599-607.
[49]Phillips, P. C., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.
[50]Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of molecular biology, 215(3), 403-410.
[51]Box, G. E., & Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time series analysis: forecasting and control, revised ed. Holden-Day.
[52]楊奕農,2009,時間序列分析: 經濟與財務上之應用 (二版). 臺北市: 雙葉書廊, 169-170。
[53]Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 987-1007.
[54]Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of econometrics, 31(3), 307-327.
[55]Bollerslev, T. (1987). A conditionally heteroskedastic time series model for speculative prices and rates of return. The review of economics and statistics, 542-547.
[56]Najand, M., & Yung, K. (1994). Conditional heteroskedasticity and the weekend effect in S&P 500 index futures. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 21(4), 603-612.
[57]林建甫,1996,非線性模型與台灣總體經濟變數的實證研究,國立臺灣大學經濟學系暨研究所研究計畫。
[58]AFFLECK‐GRAVES, J. O. H. N., Davis, L. R., & Mendenhall, R. R. (1990). Forecasts of earnings per share: Possible sources of analyst superiority and bias. Contemporary Accounting Research, 6(2), 501-517.
電子全文 電子全文(本篇電子全文限研究生所屬學校校內系統及IP範圍內開放)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top