跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.169.3) 您好!臺灣時間:2022/12/05 18:16
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:林廣成
研究生(外文):LIN, KUANG-CHENG
論文名稱:台灣造紙業的效率評估–動態網路SBM DEA
論文名稱(外文):The Efficiency Evaluation of Taiwan Paper Industry - Dynamic Network SBM DEA
指導教授:邱永和邱永和引用關係盧清城盧清城引用關係
指導教授(外文):CHIU, YUNG-HOLU, CHING-CHENG
口試委員:陳玉涓張民忠柯慈儀
口試委員(外文):CHEN, YU-CHUANCHANG, MING-CHUNGKU, TSZ-YI
口試日期:2017-06-18
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東吳大學
系所名稱:EMBA高階經營碩士在職專班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:中文
論文頁數:138
中文關鍵詞:台灣造紙業經營績效效率資料包絡分析動態網路資料包絡分析馬爾奎斯特生產力指數
外文關鍵詞:Paper millEfficiencyPerformanceData Envelopment AnalysisDynamic Network Data Envelopment AnalysisMalmquist Productivity Index
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:290
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:56
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究使用動態網路資料包絡分析法(Dynamic Network Data Envelopment Analysis,DN-DEA),評估台灣八家造紙業者(台紙、士紙、正隆、華紙、寶隆、永豐餘、榮成及廣源)在2008年至2015年之經營績效表現。
研究中主要將兩階段之生產效率階段及市場效率階段視為兩個部門概念,並輔以Malmquist生產力指數評估各DMU在各年度間生產力的變化。本研究在生產效率階段選取員工人數、固定資產及轉投資作為投入項變數,產出項變數為權益法收益,收入作為跨部門Link,在市場效率階段產出項變數為利潤及每股盈餘,股價則作為跨年期之Carryover。經由實證結果歸納如下:
一、各DMU整體效率平均分數表現,以寶隆分數為1最高,排名第1;廣源分數為0.0710最低,排名第八。
二、2008年至2015年在總要素生產力變動,台紙、寶隆、榮成及廣源顯示進步,其中寶隆表現最好。
三、依據BCG矩陣分析,2008年至2015年整體經營績效顯示:A、E及G三家公司屬於明星產業,B、C及F三家公司屬於問題產業,H公司屬於金牛產業,D公司屬於落水狗產業。

The study is using Dynamic Network Data Envelopment Analysis method (DN-DEA) to evaluate the efficiency of eight paper mills in Taiwan during 2008 to 2015. This study mainly analysis are based on two stages of production efficiency and market efficiency as well as Malmquist Productivity Index to measure the performance of each DMU per year. For this study, there are adopted labors, fixed assets and investment as input variables, and output variable is equity income in production efficiency stage, income as a link for cross-stage. In market efficiency stage’s output variables are profit and earnings per share (EPS), stock price as Carry Over in cross-period. After the empirical analysis to summary the results as below listed:
1. The average score for each DMU in overall efficiency, Pao Long International’s score is the highest which is 1, so ranked number 1, and Kuan Yuan Paper is the lowest which score is 0.0710, and ranked eighth.
2. During 2008 to 2015 this period, there are not only Taiwan Pulp and Paper, Pao Long International ,Long Chen Paper and Kuan Yuan Paper shown progress in Total Factor Productivity Index, Pao Long International’s performance is best.
3. According to the BCG matrix analysis during 2008 to 2015, the overall operating performance shown that there are three companies was differentiated to Star firm, which were A、E & G . In addition, B、C & F was differentiated to Question Mark firm. And H was differentiated to Cash Cow firm. And last D was differentiated to Dog firm.

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究架構與流程 4
第二章 文獻回顧 6
第一節 國內相關文獻 6
第二節 國外相關文獻 15
第三章 研究方法 27
第一節 資料包絡分析法 27
第二節 Network DEA模型理論 35
第三節 DN-DEA模型理論 42
第四節 生產力指數模型理論 47
第五節 建構本研究實證模型 56
第四章 實證結果與分析 60
第一節 資料來源與變數說明 60
第二節 敘述統計及相關係數分析 61
第三節 Dynamic Network DEA 實證結果 70
第四節 Malmquist生產力指數實證結果 93
第五節 魏克森等級和檢定 110
第六節 綜合分析 113
第七節 管理意涵 123
第五章 結論 129
研究結論 109

參考文獻 132

一、中文部分
王昱凱(2014)。台灣上市櫃造紙業績效評估模式之建構-二階段資料包絡分析法應用(未出版之碩士論文)。稻江科技暨管理學院境外EMBA企業管理碩士在職專班,嘉義縣。
林承廷(2009)。多角化策略對企業績效影響之研究─以台灣主要紙業公司為例(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學會計學系碩士在職專班,新北市。
林永塗(1993)。台灣上市公司股權結構、企業特性與轉投資之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學企業管理研究所,嘉義縣。
馬明浩(2006)。我國銅版紙產業受傾銷前後經營績效之研究-以資料包絡分析法之應用為基準(未出版之碩士論文)。佛光大學經濟學系,宜蘭縣。
張家溱(2014)。造紙產業多角化經營考量因素-以永豐餘造紙為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄第一科技大學運籌管理研究所,高雄市。
張耀中(2013)。造紙業綠色生產決策模式之探討(未出版之博士論文)。國立中央大學企業管理學系,桃園市。
許運志(2009)。關鍵績效指標(KPI)之建立與推行-在造紙業(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學工業管理研究所碩士在職專班,桃園市。
劉豐泰(2013)。造紙業損耗與存貨控制的新決策模型之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學管理研究所,臺北市。
陳立瑋(2012)。台灣造紙產業發展競爭策略分析-以C公司為例(未出版之碩士論文)。輔仁大學科技管理學程碩士在職專班,新北市。
陳正忠(2006)。台灣地區造紙產業生產效率及生產力分析之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。佛光大學經濟學系,宜蘭縣。
謝其峰(2011)。應用結構-行為-績效模式探討我國造紙製造業─以正隆公司為個案(未出版之碩士論文)。中華大學企業管理學系,新竹市。
蔡東和(2003)。台灣造紙產業經營策略之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學高階主管管理學程碩士班,新竹市。
蔡佺廷(2003)。亞太地區主要紙業公司之生產效率及生產力變動評估(未出版之博士論文)。國立中興大學森林學系,臺中市。
魏意紋(2009)。台灣造紙企業發展策略之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士在職專班,桃園市。。
龔碧雲(2006)。運用財務比率評估企業經營績效─以台灣造紙產業為例未出版之碩士論文)。開南大學企業管理學系碩士班,桃園市。
二、英文部分
Alfredsson, E. , Månsson, J. & P. Vikström (2016). Internalising External Environmental Effects in Efficiency Analysis: The Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry 2000–2007. Economic Analysis and Policy, Volume 51, September 2016, 22-31.
Andersen, P. & N.C. Petersen (1993). A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, Vol.39, No.10, 1261-1264.
Banker, R. D. , A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper (1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, Vol. 30, No.9, 1078-1092.
Barr, A.J. & J.H. Goodnight (1970), ”Statistical Analysis System,” SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA
Buyukkamaci, N. & E. Koken (2010). Economic Evaluation of Alternative Wastewater Treatment Plant Options for Pulp and Paper Industry. Science of The Total Environment, Volume 408, Issue 24, 6070-6078.
Carlsson, D. , S. D'Amours, A. Martel & M. Rönnqvist (2009). Supply Chain Planning Models in the Pulp and Paper Industry. INFOR 47.3: 167-183.
Charnes, A. , W. W. Cooper & E. Rhodes (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 2, No.6, 429-444.
Charnes, A. , W. W. Cooper & E. Rhodes (1979).Short Communication: Measuring Efficiency of Decision-Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 3, No.4, 339.
Chirayil, A. (2008). Economic Reform and Productivity Growth in Indian Paper and Paper Products Industry: A Nonparametric Analysis. IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc.
Doonan, J. , P. Lanoie & B. Laplante (2005). Determinants of Environmental Performance in the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry: An Assessment from Inside the Industry. Ecological Economics, Volume 55, Issue 1, 73-84.
Escuín, D. , L. Polo & D. Ciprés (2017). On the Comparison of Inventory Replenishment Policies with Time-Varying Stochastic Demand for the Paper Industry. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics Vol. 309, 424-434.
Fare, R. , S. Grosskopf , M. Norris & Z. Zhang (1994). Productivity Growth Technical Progress and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries. The American Economic Review, Vol. 84,66-83.
Fare, R. , S. Grosskopf & G. Whittaker (2007). Network Data Envelopment Analysis. Modeling Data Irregularities and Structural Complexities in Data Envelopment Analysis, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC., 209-240.
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol.120 (3), 253-281.
Figueira, G. , P. Amorim ,L. Guimarães , M. Amorim-Lopes , F. Neves-Moreira
& B. Almada-Lobo (2015). A Decision Support System for the Operational Production Planning and Scheduling of an Integrated Pulp and Paper Mill. Computers & Chemical Engineering, Volume 77, 85-104.
Fleisher, B. M. , K. Dong & Y. Liu (1996). Education, Enterprise Organization, and Productivity in the Chinese Paper Industry. Economic Development and Cultural Change44.3 : 571.
Fogelholm, J. & F. Bescherer (2006). Productivity and Performance Improvement in Paper Mills: Procedural Framework of Actual Implementations. Performance Improvement45.10 : 15-20,48.
Ghosal,V. & U. Nair-Reichert (2009). Investments in Modernization, Innovation and Gains in Productivity: Evidence from Firms in the Global Paper Industry. Research Policy, Volume 38, Issue 3, 536-547.
Hailu, A. & T. S. Veeman (2000). Output Scale, Technical Change, and Productivity in the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry. Canadian Journal of Forest Research30.7 : 1041-1050.
Hämäläinen, E. , O. P. Hilmola & L. Hetemäki (2015). Fluctuating Demand and its Impacts to a Paper Producer: Customer Analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 42, Issue 13, 5779-5788.
Hseu, J. S. & J. K. Shang (2005). Productivity Changes of Pulp and Paper Industry in OECD Countries, 1991–2000: a Non-Parametric Malmquist Approach. Forest Policy and Economics, Volume 7, Issue 3, 411-422.
Hilmola, O. P. , E. Hämäläinen & M. Hujala (2014). Paper Mill's Distribution Efficiency to Emerging East European Markets. Industrial Management & Data Systems114.8 : 1168-1144.
Karikallio, H. , P. Mäki-Fränti & N. Suhonen (2011). Competition in the Global Pulp and Paper Industries – An Evaluation Based on three Approaches. Journal of Forest Economics, Volume 17, Issue 1, 91-104.
Kong, L. , A. Hasanbeigi , L. Price & H. Liu (2015). Energy Conservation and CO2 Mitigation Potentials in the Chinese Pulp and Paper Industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online.
Li, B. , G. Zhang , M. Ye , J. Du & X. Xiang (2016). Network Optimization and Performance Evaluation of the Water-Use System in China's Straw Pulp and Paper Industry: a Case Study. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 18.1, 257-268.1.
Lin, H. C. , D.Y. L. Chan , W. C. Lin, C. H. Hsu & G.B. Hong (2014). Status of Energy Conservation in Taiwan's Pulp and Paper. Energy, Volume 73, 680-685.
Liu, J. , S. Liu & W.M. Lu (2010). DEA and Ranking with the Network-Based Approach: A Case of R&D Performance. Omega, Vol.38, No.6, 453–464.
Li, Y. , Y. Chen , L. Liang & J. Xie (2012). DEA Models for Extended Two-Stage Network Structures. Omega, Vol. 40, No. 5, 611–618.
Ram, M. & A. Kumar (2015). Paper Mill Plant Performance Evaluation with Power Supply in Standby Mode. The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 32.4 : 414-400.
Stenqvist, C.(2015). Trends in Energy Performance of the Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry: 1984-2011. Energy Efficiency 8.1, 1-17.
Tone, K. (2001). A Slacks-Based Measure of Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 130, No. 3, pp.498-509.
Tone, K. (2002). A Slacks-Based Measure of Super-efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 143, pp.32-41.
Tone, K. & M. Tsutsui (2009). Network DEA: A Slacks Based Measurement Approach. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 197, 243-252.
Tone, K. & M. Tsutsui (2014). Dynamic DEA with Network Structure: A Slacks-Based Measure Approach. Omega, Vol. 42, No. 1, 124-131.
Wagner, M. , V. P. Nguyen , T. Azomahou & W. Wehrmeyer (2002). The Relationship Between the Environmental and Economic Performance of Firms: an Empirical Analysis of the European Paper Industry. Corporate Social - Responsibility and Environmental Management9.3 : 133.
Waitt, G. (1994). Global Competition and the Nature of Trade in the European Community's Pulp and Paper Industry. Economic Geography70.1: 60.
Whitston, K. (1997). Productivity and Performance in the Paper Industry: Labour, Capital and Technology in Britain and America. Business History Review71.4 : 632-633.
Yu, C. , L. Shi , Y. Wang , Y. Chang & B. Cheng (2016). The Eco-Efficiency of Pulp and Paper Industry in China: an Assessment Based on Slacks-Based Measure and Malmquist–Luenberger Index. Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 127, 511-521.
Yu, M.M. (2008). Assessing the Technical Efficiency, Service Effectiveness, and Technical Effectiveness of the World’s Railways Through NDEA Analysis,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 42, No. 10, 1283–1294.
三、參考網頁
1.http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/ccd=aI9ipv/webmge?switchlang=en(臺灣碩博士論文加值系統)
2.http://www.library.scu.edu.tw(東吳大學圖書館)
3.http://www.twse.com.tw (臺灣證券交易所)
4.http://mops.twse.com.tw/mops/web/index (公開資訊觀測站)



QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊