跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.85) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/07 16:21
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:張美智
研究生(外文):Chang Mei-Chih
論文名稱:一份想像力量表編製之研究
論文名稱(外文):A Study of Constructing an Imagination Scale
指導教授:林俊彥林俊彥引用關係
指導教授(外文):Lin Chin-Yen
口試委員:饒達欽徐昊杲曾淑惠林晶璟
口試委員(外文):Rao Da-QinXu Hao-GaoTseng Hsu-HuiLin Ching-Ching
口試日期:2017-01-23
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立臺北科技大學
系所名稱:技術及職業教育研究所
學門:教育學門
學類:綜合教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:中文
論文頁數:162
中文關鍵詞:常模超越類比直覺想像力
外文關鍵詞:NormTranscendenceAnalogyIntuitionImagination
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:460
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:47
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
為因應未來世界經濟變革的知識衝擊,想像力能藉由概念聯結以成功轉化知識領域引導創新發展,已經成為未來教育的核心關鍵能力。本研究以過程為觀點建構一份技專校院學生適用的想像力量表與常模。依據創造性認知研究取向的「生產探究模式」為理論基礎。以技專校院317位學生為施測對象採取半結構問卷收集資料。研究首先以紮根理論技術抽取想像力概念主軸並以關鍵事件技術分析想像力概念之權重之後,研究透過紮根理論發現想像力的觀察、分析轉化與推理過程,共獲得想像力過程隱喻的直觀、類比、超越3種主要概念與10個次概念並分析其權重為直覺22.27%、類比26.23%、超越51.5%,之後透過專家效度審查建立量表初稿並進行565位大學生預試項目分析以修訂正式量表。其次,以地區分群比例隨機抽樣作為量表施測,獲得有效樣本2975人,進行信效度分析並以變異數分析比較我國不同性別、年齡、年級、地區於想像力總分的差異,最後建構常模。
研究主要結論如下:本研究建構一份1.信度方面,Cronbach’s α信度0.935、再測信度0.752、內在相關0.497~0.886。2.效度方面,專家效度CVI值0.930、整體因素可解釋變異量69.23%;與想像力特質量表效標達到同時效標的效標關聯效度。3.背景差異方面,男性顯著優於女性、4年級顯著優於3年級、21~29歲組顯著優於18歲以下組別、北中南地區皆顯著優於東部、科學基準組的類比概念呈現顯著差異。最後,依據結論提出相關建議提供想像力教育課程及後續研究之參考。
In response to the impact of the world knowledge economics, Imagination can sucessfully transform the field of innovation development through concept association, and has become a core ability in the future education. The main purpose of this dissertation is to develop an Imagination Scale and its norm as an assessment tool by establishing a process of cognition. The initial study was conducted with Vocational College students, focusing on Geneplore model of creative cognition approach to accomplish the goal. A multi-method research strategy involved the following: First, the Imagination Scale was composed and a semi-structured questionnaire interview was administered to a total of 317 Vocational College students. Utilizing the most appropriate scale structure by performing an exploratory factor analysis of samples collected through Grounded Theory techniques, we extracted the concept of main axis and through Critical Incident techniques, we obtained the weight analysis of the imagination scale of three kinds of imagination process-observation, analysis of conversion, and reasoning, metaphor’s three major concepts (intuition, analogy, transcendence), and ten kinds of sub-concepts. The result of weight analysis is as follows; Intuition (22.27%)、Intuition, Analogy (26.23%)、Transcendence (51.5%). And the scale was developed through expert validity and item analysis on 565 university students was conducted to revise the formal scale. Secondly, By combining the Likerts scale and data analyses region Stratified random cluster sampling, the data of 2975 subjects were collected and reliability-validity scores of different genders, ages, grades and regions were compared and analyzed by variance analysis to provided highly credible model.
In the conclusions, a multi-method researched strategy included a Cronbach’s α, Construct Validity, and different background. Study 1 was conducted with Cronbachs α reliability reached 0.935, re-test reliability 0.752, internal correlate matrix 0.497-0.886. Study 2 by performing a confirmatory factor analysis, proved by experts validity CVI value of 0.930, The total variance explained by factor analysis of variance explained was 69.23%, and criterion-related analysis, imagination qualities scale and scientific criterion group also reached concurrent validity. Study 3 was conducted to compare different background of the subjects, to further examine the relationship between imagination and other factors. Regarding gender differences, males scored higher than females; for various age groups, the twenties age group scored highest; in terms of grade differences, fourth graders scored higher than third graders; participants in the northern and southern regions scored higher than those in the eastern regions. Finally, hopefull, based on the conclusions, the dissertation would contribute to the future research and education curriculum of the imagination.
目次
中文摘要 i
ABSTRACT iii
誌 謝 v
目 錄 vii
表目錄 ix
圖目錄 xii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 8
第三節 研究方法與步驟 8
第四節 研究範圍與限制 13
第五節 名詞釋義 14
第二章 文獻探討 17
第一節 想像力意涵與範圍 17
第二節 想像力過程相關理論 22
第三節 想像力評量相關研究 31
第三章 研究設計與實施 37
第一節 質性主觀探索 37
第二節 預試實施 52
第三節 量化設計與實施 63
第四章 分析與討論 83
第一節 想像力意涵與過程 83
第二節 信度驗證 85
第三節 效度驗證 87
第四節 常模 95
第五節 差異分析 104
第五章 結論與建議 111
第一節 研究發現 111
第二節 結論 114
第三節 建議 117
參考文獻 121
附錄 149
附錄二 專家諮詢會議名單 151
附錄三 預試版想像力量表與指標 152
附錄四 正式版想像力量表 155
附錄五 正式版想像力量表指標 157
附錄六 技職校院地區人數表 158
附錄七 測驗授權同意書 162



表目錄

表1-1 研究摘要表 12
表2-1 想像力生產過程表 20
表2-2 內隱與外顯取向表 24
表2-3 類比分析轉化表 30
表2-4 圖像評量分析表 32
表2-5 領域研究分析表 34
表3-1 紮根理論編碼表 41
表3-2 紮根理論概念主軸表 42
表3-3 三角交叉驗證表 44
表3-4 想像力定義關鍵權重表 44
表3-5 直覺關鍵權重表 45
表3-6 類比關鍵權重表 46
表3-7 超越關鍵權重表 47
表3-8 專家諮詢會議名單 49
表3-9 直覺量表初稿 50
表3-10 類比量表初稿 50
表3-11 超越量表初稿 51
表3-12 直覺概念探索性因素表(刪題前) 53
表3-13 直覺概念探索性因素表(刪題後) 55
表3-14 類比概念探索性因素表(刪題前) 55
表3-15 類比概念探索性因素表(刪題後) 56
表3-16 超越概念探索性因素表(刪題前) 56
表3-17 超越概念探索性因素表(刪題後) 58
表3-18 正式版想像力概念指標表 59
表3-19 正式總量表項目分析表 60
表3-20 直覺項目分析表 62
表3-21 類比項目分析表 62
表3-22 超越項目分析表 63
表3-22 技職校院分區人數比例表 65
表3-23 分層比例隨機抽樣分配表 65
表3-24 抽樣回收比例表 66
表3-25 學校樣本一覽表 67
表3-26 想像力概念表 68
表3-27 量表概念架構表 69
表3-28 直覺主要概念指標表 71
表3-29 直覺次要概念指標表 71
表3-30 類比主要概念指標表 73
表3-31 類比次要概念指標表 74
表3-32 超越主要概念指標表 75
表3-33 超越次要概念指標表 76
表3-34 大專校院學門分類表 78
表4-1 內部相關分析表 86
表4-2 內部相關分析表 87
表4-3 CVI內容效度比較表 88
表4-4 整體量表因素分析表 90
表4-5 直覺因素分析表 91
表4-6 類比因素分析表 92
表4-7 超越因素分析表 93
表4-8 想像力特質效標相關摘要表 94
表4-9 想像力特質總分效標相關摘要表 94
表4-10 學習成績相關摘要表 95
表4-11 全國常模表 96
表4-12 男性常模表 99
表4-13 女性常模表 102
表4-14 性別差異分析表 105
表4-15 背景變項差異分析表 105
表4-16 科學基準組和服務對照組t檢定分析表 108
表4-17 類科比較表 108
表4-18 設計類科獨立樣本t檢定表 109
表5-1 研究結果匯整表 116



圖目錄

圖2-1 產生探究模式想像力結構圖 18
圖2-3 想像力概念範圍示意圖 22
圖3-1 主要概念理論架構圖 26
圖3-2 研究理論架構圖 48
圖3-3 紮根結果概念架構圖 52
圖3-4 研究概念架構圖 64
圖3-5 想像力概念架構圖 68
圖3-6 直覺概念架構圖 70
圖3-7 類比概念架構圖 73
圖3-8 超越概念架構圖 75
中文部分于國華、吳靜吉、樊學良(2012)。文化創意產業的教育創新。教育資料與研究,105,1-38。
中央研究院(2013)。高等教育與科技政策建議書。取自http://www.sinica.edu.tw/advice/advice_edu2.pdf
王木榮、林幸台(1986)。威廉斯創造力測驗修訂研究。特殊教育研究學刊,2,231-250。
王愉敏(2011)。概念結合想像力測驗之編製(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中興大學,臺中市。
朱雅華(2009)。台中市國小學生學業成就、創造力與美感素養之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
何英奇(1987)。大專學生之生命意義感及其相關:意義治療法基本概念之實徵性研究。教育心理學報,20,87-106。doi:10.6251/BEP.19870601.6
何英奇(1990)。生命態度剖面圖之編製:信度與效度之研究。師大學報,35,71-94。
何雍慶、蘇宏仁、賴文儀、林泰安(2008)。消費者轉換行為之研究。遠東學報,25(1),179-190。
余民寧(1997)。有意義的學習:概念構圖之研究。臺北市:商鼎。
余民寧(2002)。教育測驗與評量:成就測驗與教學評量(第二版)。臺北市:心理。
吳坤璋、吳裕益、黃台珠(2005)。科學探究能力測驗的編制與信效度考驗。測驗學刊,52(2),119-148。
吳明隆、涂金堂(2006)。SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北市:五南。
吳明雄、莊修田、陳建宏、許碧珊、饒達欽(2011)。技專校院多專業領域學生創造力研究:歷程探討、指標建構及系統創造力量表編製研究成果報告。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC 99-2511-S-157-002),未出版。
吳慧珉(2009)。視覺監控電腦化實作評量之效度化研究以感覺統合臨床觀察為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
吳靜吉(2002)。華人創造力的發掘與培育。應用心理學研究,15,17-42。
吳靜吉(2012年12月)。從代工到品牌:挑戰真實世界的台灣教育研究。台灣教育研究學會研討會,高雄市。
吳靜吉、李澄賢、林偉文(2008)。台灣創造力教育研究之回顧。教育曙光,55(3),47-59。
吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺(1998)。新編創造思考測驗研究。臺北市:教育部。
呂金河(譯)(2006)。應用多變量分析(原作者:S. Sharma)。臺北市:滄海。(原著出版年:1996)
李明輝(譯)(1985)。康德純粹理性批判理論導讀(原作者:H. M. Baumgarter)。臺北市:聯經。(原著出版年:1975)
李美華(譯)(1998)。社會科學研究法(原作者:E. Babbies)。臺北市:時英。(原著出版年:1988)
杜佳憲(2012)。國小想像力課程實踐之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
周明(2012)。技專院校想像力與科技實作能力培育計劃(總計畫)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC100-2511-S003-061-MY2),未出版。
林仁煥(2008)。由全球化觀點談校長創新卓越領導。學校行政,54,12~32。
林妙華(2003)。資優生過度激動特質與友伴關係(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
林東毅(2011)。探索設計科系學生想像力與課堂表現間關聯之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄第一科技大學,高雄市。
林奕宏(2005)。以徑路搜尋法表徵內隱與外顯知識結構的效度探討(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
林奕維(2013)。自我挑戰機制對於學生之學習成就及學習動機之影響-以「程式設計」混成課程為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義縣。
林家屏(2002)。青少年自我概念與行為困擾之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
林偉文(2013)。未來想像的評量。教育部顧問室未來想像與創意人才培育創意計畫。取自http://hss.edu.tw/wSite/public/Attachment/f1359086075479.pdf
林偉文、朱采翎、王毓苓、朱嘉琪、劉家瑜(2011)。科學教育、科技與設計之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(報告編號:NSC98-2511-S-152-020-MY2),未出版。
林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。臺北市:東華。
林緯倫(2006)。不同創造力運作與認知抑制、工作記憶廣度間關係之探討(未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣大學,臺北市。
林緯倫、連韻文、任純慧(2005)。想到多是想的好的前提嗎?探討發散性思考能力在創意問題解決的角色。中華心理學刊,47(3),211-227。
林靜雯(2000)。由概念改變及心智模式初探多重類比對國小四年級學生電學概念學習之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
邱發忠(2006)。創造力認知運作機制之探究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
邱發忠(2010)。「詞彙概念聯結測驗」─ 創造潛能測量工具的發展。測驗學刊,57(2),295-324。
邱發忠、陳學志、林耀南(2011)。以生產探索模式為基礎之跨領域創造想像實作研究─創造想像力機制暨課程設計及效果評估研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC 98-2511-S-606 -001 -MY2),未出版。
邱發忠、陳學志、林耀南、涂莉苹(2012)。想像力概念之初探。教育心理學報,44(2),389-410。
邱發忠、陳學志、徐芝君、吳相儀、卓淑玲(2008)。內隱與外顯因素對創造作業表現的影響。中華心理學刊,50(2),125-145。
邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計分析(第五版)。臺北市:五南。
邱皓政、歐宗霖(2013)。從心境邁向情境:情境判斷測驗在人事甄選與心理特質評量上的發展與應用。國家菁英季刊, 9(2),109-127。
侯雅齡(2009)。幼兒資優特質與科學創造力的關係:心流經驗之中介效果。特殊教育研究學刊,34(2),101-118。
施俊琦譯(2012)。心理測量:歷史、原理及應用(第五版)( Gregory R. J.原作著)。北京:機械工業。
洪蘭(譯)(1999)。創造力的本質─不同凡想(原作者:R. J. Sternberg & T. I. Lubart)。臺北市:遠流。(原著出版年:1985)
涂翠平、樊富珉(2015)。創造力的領域特殊性:概念和測量。心理學進展,5(11),648-656。
國立編譯館(2000)。教育大詞典。臺北市:文景。
國科會(2009)。想像力與科技實作能力培育計畫。臺北市:國科會。
國家教育研究院(2015)。可驗證性。臺北市:教育大辭書。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1815829/
張雨霖、陳學志、陳瑛霞、邱發忠、林耀南、王蔓甄、林鴻文(2013)。淺談高中職階段未來想像與創意之人才培育。創造學刊,4(1),73-98。
張春興(1991)。張氏心理學辭典(第二版)。臺北市:東華。
張春興、林清山(1989)。教育心理學。臺北市:東華。
張靖卿(2005)。高中學生科學實用智能評量及其與學校表現關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
張馨仁(2001)。資優生過度激動特質之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
教育部(2002)。創造力教育白皮書。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2005)。十二年國教自然與生活科技學習領域「科學素養」的內涵與解析。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2014)。未來想像與創意人才培育三年計畫。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2015)。大專校院學科標準分類。取自http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=1745&Page=22169&Index=11&WID=31d75a44-efff-4c44-a075-15a9eb7aecdf
教育部(2017)。第二期技職教育再造計畫。取自https://www.iaci.nkfust.edu.tw/Industry/CP.aspx?s=130&n=129
梁朝雲(2012)。設計、跨界、想像力─設計教育中促發想像的影響因素、作用機制、教學策略與學習成效-從學習環境探討設計教育中促發想像之因素作用暨想像力評測(II)(總計畫)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC100-2511-S155-005-MY2),未出版。
梁朝雲、李元榮(2010)。想像力研究對資訊傳播學域的啟發。資訊傳播研究,1(1),89-113。
梁朝雲、許育齡(2011)。轉化虛無─試論想像力評測指標。資訊傳播研究,2(1),99-111。
梁朝雲、黃英修、許育齡(2011)。什麼因素促進學生想像。工業設計,39(2),125-134。
梁朝雲、黃英修、許育齡、周文修(2011)。促發想像之環境因素的評測工具。藝術研究學報,4(2),41-59。
梁樹人(2012)。技專院校想像力與科技實作能力培育計劃-運用意象思維與科技設計圖像培育技專院校學生之想像力與科技設計能力。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC100-2511-S132-002-MY2),未出版。
許育齡、梁朝雲(2011)。影響設計領域學習者想像之學習心理因素探析。臺中教育大學學報,25(1),1-19。
許育齡、梁朝雲(2012)。探究想像力的意涵與特徵—探索性與驗證性因素分析之發現。教育心理學報,44(2),349-372。
許育齡、梁朝雲、林志成(2011)。教師發揮教學設計想像力的心理與環境因素探究。當代教育研究,21(2),113-148。doi:10.6151/CERQ.2013.2102.04
許育齡、梁朝雲、許盛貴(2014)。探討內在動機與自我效能為中介預測科學想像力的學習模式。科學教育學刊,22(4),389-412。doi: 10.6173/CJSE.2014.2204.03
許育齡、黃文宗、林立中(2012)。視覺傳達設計學習者發揮想像的內在因素探索與驗證。藝術教育研究,23,41-66。
許芳彬、張雨霖、曾千芝、邱發忠(2014)。想像思考測驗的發展。創造學刊,5(2),49-71。
郭生玉(2004)。教育測驗與評量。臺北市:精華。
陳正昌(2013)。SPSS與統計分析。臺北市,五南。
陳坤淼(2012)。找出美感生活產業的想像力基因-卓越設計與藝術創作產業的想像力內涵、作用機制分析及能力培育-感性體驗的產品設計想像力機制與創造(II)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC100-2511-S239-003-MY2),未出版。
陳坤淼、沈思岑(2011)。設計想像力之探討-以個案創意設計分析為例。文化創意產業研究學報,1(1),1-12。
陳長益(譯)(2006)。陶倫斯創造思考測驗圖型版(原作者:Kathy, G. & Torrance, E. P.)。臺北市:心理。(原著出版年:2002)
陳拱北(1997)。公共衛生學。臺北市:巨流。
陳昭儀(2003)。傑出科學家及藝術家之比對研究。教育與心理研究,26(2),199-225。
陳柏熹(2012)。以生產探索模式為基礎之跨領域創造想像實作研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:100‐2511‐S‐003‐062‐MY2),未出版。
陳學志、洪素蘋、許禕芳、邱皓政、關秉寅、詹志禹(2009)。擴散性思考與聚斂性思考的交會:有限解答之擴散 性思考測驗之編製與信效度檢驗。教育科學研究期刊,54(4),29-61。
陳龍安(2006)。創造思考教學的理論與實際(第六版)。臺北市:心理。
傅美慧(2008)。從聯結理論探討創造思考教學對國小學童創造力之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東市。
黃英修(2014)。激發視覺與產品設計過程之想像力環境因子研究。高雄師大學報,36,83-101。
黃郁晴(2011)。多點觸控手勢與使用者心智表徵研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹市。
黃振華、李明輝(2005)。論康德哲學。臺北市:時英。
黃譯瑩(2003)。學術社群說出「創造力」的語文及其反映的思維:一般創造力與兒童創造力研究文本對照中的啟示。師大學報,48(2),255-276。
楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園(1988)。社會及行為科學研究法。臺北市:東華。
楊新北(譯)(1984)。科學之路(原作者:W. I. B. Beveridge)。臺北市:長堤。(原著出版年:1996)
葉玉珠(2004a)。「科技創造力測驗」的發展與常模的建立。中國測驗學會測驗學刊,51(2),127-162。
葉玉珠(2004b)。「科技創造力測驗」的發展與常模的建立。測驗學刊,51(2),127-162。
葉玉珠(2005)。科技創造力測驗。臺北市:心理。
葉玉珠、李梅齡、葉玉環、林志哲、彭月茵(2006)。幼兒創造力測驗之發展。測驗學刊,53,129-154。
葉重新(2004)。教育研究法。臺北市:心理。
詹志禹(2005)。人類的創造力從何而來。科學人雜誌,45,38-41。
詹雨臻、葉玉珠(2005)。生活問題解決測驗之發展。測驗學刊,52,1-30。
蓋浙生(2000)。成本效益分析。臺北市:教育大辭書。
劉旨峰(2012)。運用不同想像力教學策略在製作水陸兩用船舶創意設計之成效與運用創意思考螺旋教學策略培養國小學生想像力與船舶科技實作能力。國科會研究計畫編號NSC100-2511-S008-017-MY2,未出版。
蔡承志(譯)(2009)。大腦比天空更遼闊:揭開大腦產生意識的謎底(原作者G. M. Edelman)。臺北市:商周。(原著出版年:2005)
蔡俊輝(1996)。例題變異性與習作方式對國小學童數學類比解題之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
鄭英耀(2012)。未來教學的想像-科學想像力之模式驗證:課程發展與教學實驗。國科會研究計畫編號NSC100-2511-S110-007-MY2。
魯俊賢、吳毓瑩(2007)。過程技能之二階段實作評量:規劃、實踐與效益探究。科學教育學刊,15(2),215~239。
盧祈銘(2015)。智力、創造力各成份與學業成績之相關探討(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
蕭雅竹、黃松元(2005)。靈性健康量表之建構及信、效度考驗-以護理學生爲題。實證護理,1(3),218-227。doi:10.6225/JEBN.1.3.218
謝甫佩、洪振芳(2006)。從匯合取向的觀點探討科學創造力的評量。科學教育月刊,291,11-23。
魏勇剛、龍長權 & 宋武譯 (2010)。量表編製: 理論與應用。臺北市: 五南。

Adair, J. E. (1990). The art of creative thinking: how to be innovative and develop great ideas. Great Britain and the United States by Kogan Page.
Alavi, M., & Carlson, P. (1992). A review of MIS research and disciplinary development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8 (4), 45-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1992.11517938
Alfonso-Benlliure, V., Meléndez, J. C., & García-Ballesteros, M. (2013). Evaluation of a creativity intervention program for preschoolers vicente. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 112– 120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.005
Amabile, T. M. (1983). Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.
Amabile, T. M. (1990). Motivation and personal histories. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 61-91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367-403.
Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Mohr, L. A. (1994). Critical service encounters: The employees viewpoint. The Journal of Marketing, 95-106.
Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Tetreault, M. S. (1990). The service encounter: diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents. The Journal of Marketing, 71-84.
Brandimonte, M. A., & Walter, G. (1993). Mental image reversal and verbal recoding: When ducks become rabbits. Memory & Cognition, 21(1), 23-33. doi.org/10.3758/BF03211161
Brewer, J. D. (2004). Imagining the sociological imagination: the biographical context of a sociological classic. The British Journal of Sociology, 5(3), 317-333. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2004.00022.x
Byrne, R. M. J. (2005). The rational imagination: how people create alternatives to reality. Cambridge MA: MIT.
Byrne, R. M. J. (2007). Precis of the rational imagination: how people create alternatives to reality. Behavioral And Brain Sciences, 30, 439-480. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X07002579
Carter, L. (2010). The transcendent function, moments of meeting and dyadic consciousness: constructive and destructive co-creation in the analytic dyad. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 55, 217-227.
Cartwright, P., & Noone, L. (2006). Critical imagination: a pedagogy for engaging pre-service teachers in the university classroom. College Quarterly, 9(4). Retrieved from http://www.senecac.on.ca/quarterly/2006-vol09-num04-fall/cartwright_noone.html
Castelli, P., & Ghetti, S. (2014). Resisting imagination and confabulation: Effects of metacognitive training. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 339-356.
Catharine, P. (1955). What is creative thinking. New York: Philosophical Library.
Caygill, H. (1995). A Kant dictionary. Oxford: UK; Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell Reference.
Chalmers, D. J., French, R. M., & Hofstadter, D. (1991). High-level perception, representation, and analogy: a critique of artificial intelligence methodology. CRCC Technical Report, 49, 1-36.
Charles, R. E., & Runco, M. A. (2001). Developmental trends in the evaluative and divergent thinking of children. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 417-437.
Chiu, F.C. (2012). Fit between future thinking and future orientation on creative imagination. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 234-244.
Clark, J., M., & Paivio, A. (1989). A cognitive perspective on scientific language. American Psychologist, 44(3), 500-512.
Collins, F. (2014). Globalizing higher education in and through urban spaces: Higher education projects, international student mobilities and trans-local connections in Seoul. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 55(2), 242-257. doi: 10.1111/apv.12055
Connor, K. P. O., & Aardema. F. (2005). The imagination: cognitive, pre-cognitive, and meta-cognitive aspects. Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 233-256.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Col.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
D’Argembeau, A., & Mathy, A. (2011). Tracking the construction of episodic future thoughts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, (2), 258-270. doi: 10.1037/a0022581
Daston, L. J. (1984). Galilean analogies: imagination at the bounds of sense. Isis, 75(2), 302-310.
DE Cruz, H., & DE Smedt, J. (2010). Science as structured imagination. Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(4), 37-52.
De Fruty, F., Leewen, K., DE Bolle, M., & DE Clercq, B. (2008). Sex differences in school performance as a function of conscientiousness, imagination and the mediating role of problem behaviour. Eur. J. Pers. 22, 167-184. doi: 10.1002
De Jong, T. M. (2010). The role of art in science. METU JFA, 27(1), 23-44. doi:10.4305
DErcole, M., Castelli, P., Giannini, A. M., & Sbrilli, A. (2010). Mental imagery scale: a new measurement tool to assess structural features of mental representations. Meas. Sci. Technol, 21, 1-8. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/21/5/054019
Dominowski, R.L., & Dallob, P. (1995). Insight and problem solving. In R.J. Sternberg & J.E. Davidson (Eds.), The Nature of Insight, 33-62. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Eisner, E. W. (2002). The educational imagination: On the Design and Evaluation of School Programs. (3rd Ed.s). New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: the natural history of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Fazal, R. (2006). Imagination and the globalization of educational policy research. Globalization, Societies and Education, 4(2), 193 – 205. doi: 10.1080/14767720600752551
Finke, R. A. (1990). Creative imagery: discoveries and inventions in visualization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Finke, R. A. (1996). Imagery, creativity, and emergent structure. Consciousness and Cognition, 5(3), 381-93.
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327-358.
Forbus, K. D., Gentner, D., Markman, A. B., & Ferguson, R. W. (1998). Analogy just looks like high-level perception: why a domain-general approach to analogical mapping is right. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 10(2), 231-257.
Frankl, V. E. (1967). Psychotherapy and existentialism: selected papers on logotherapy. New York: Touchstone.
Gentner, D ., & Colhoun, J. (2010). Analogical processes in human thinking and learning. In A. von Müller., E. Pöppel., B. Glatzeder., V. Goel., & A. von Müller., On Thinking: Towards a Theory of Thinking. Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170. Reprinted in A. Collins & E. E. Smith (Eds.). Readings in cognitive science: A perspective from psychology and artificial intelligence. Palo Alto, CA: Kaufmann.
Gentner, D. (1998). Analogy. In W. Bechtel & G. Graham (Eds.), A companion to cognitive science (pp. 107-113). Oxford: Blackwell.
Gentner, D. (1999). Analogy. In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (Eds.), The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences (pp. 17-20). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Gentner, D. (2003). Analogical reasoning, psychology of. In Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science ,1 , 106-112. London: Nature Publishing Group.
Gentner, D. (2010). Bootstrapping the mind: analogical processes and symbol systems. Cognitive Science, 34 (5). 752-775. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01114.x
Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. (2008). Metaphor as structure-mapping. In R. Gibbs (Ed.s). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 109-128). New York, NY: Cambridge University.
Gentner, D., & Forbus, K. (2011). Computational models of analogy. WIREs Cognitive Science, 2, 266-276.
Gentner, D., & Law, K. (1995). MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19, 141-205.
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (2006). Defining structural similarity. The Journal of Cognitive Science, 6, 1-20.
Gentner, D., & Medina, J. (1998). Similarity and the development of rules. Cognition, 65, 263-297.
Gentner, D., Brem, S., Ferguson, R. W., Markman, A. B., Levidow, B. B., Wolff, P., & Forbus, K. D. (1997). Analogical reasoning and conceptual change: a case study of johannes kepler. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(1), 3-40.
Gentner, D., Brem, S., Ferguson, R. W., Wolff, P., Markman, A. B., & Forbus, K. D. (1997). Analogy and creativity in the works of Johannes Kepler. In Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Vaid, J. (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp.403-459). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2004). Analogical encoding: facilitating knowledge transfer and integration. Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
Giesen, D. Meertens, V, Vis-Visschers, r., & Beukenhorst, D. (2012). Questionnaire development. Statistics Netherlands: The Hague/Heerlen.
Goff, K., & Torrance, E. P. (2002). Brief demonstrator of the Torrance Tests of creative thinking : Training/teaching for Adult with technical data. Bensenville, IL: Scolastic Testing Service.
Goldstein, E.B., Baker, R., & MacKewn, A. (2005). Concept maps and coglab online manual for Goldstein’s cognitive psychology: Connecting mind, research, and everyday experience (pp.225-229). Belmont, California: Thomson Wadsworth.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor Analysis (2ndEd.s). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Grady, J. (2005). Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1595-1614.
Guilford, J. P. (1959). Traits of creativity. In H. H. Anderson & M. S. Anderson (Eds.), Creativity and its cultivation, addresses presented at the
Gündoğan, A., Ari, M., & Gönen, M. (2013). The effect of drama on the creative imagination of children in different age groups. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(2), 206-220.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7 ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Heath, G. (2008). Exploring the imagination to establish framework for learning. Stud Philos Educ, 27, 115-123.
Hedlund, J., Antonakis, J., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Tacit Knowledge and Practical Intelligence: Understanding the Lessons of Experience. USA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. DASW01-99-K-0004.
Hocevar, D. (1979). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191-196.
Imaginative Education Research Group. (2009). Imaginative education. Retrieved from http://ierg.net/about/briefguide.html
James, M. (1867). The intuitions of the mind inductively investigated. New York: Robert Carter.
Jordan, K. (1991). Reviewed work: principles of mental imagery by Ronald A. The American Journal of Psychology, 104(3), 460-463. doi: 10.2307/1423251
Karwowski, M. (2008a). Measuring creativity using the test of creative imagination (TCI). Part 1. Presentation of a new instrument to measure creative potential. The New Educational Review, 14(1), 44-54.
Karwowski, M. (2008b). Measuring creativity using the test of creative imagination (TCI). Part 2. On validity of the TCI. The New Educational Review, 15(2), 216-232.
Karwowski, M. (2008c). Giftedness and intution. Gifted and Talented, 23(1), 115-124.
Karwowski, M. Gralewski, J. Lebuda, I., & Wi´sniewska, E. (2007). Creative teaching of creativity teachers: Polish perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity , 2 , 57–61. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2006.10.004
Kaufman, J. C. (2006). Self-reported differences in creativity by gender and ethnicity. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1065–1082.
Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the muses: development of the kaufman domains of creativity scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 1-11 doi: 10.1037/a002975
Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cole, J. C., & Sexton, J. D. (2008). A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the consensual assessment technique. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 171-178.
Kaufman, J. C., Cole, J. C., & Baer, J. (2009). The construct of creativity: a structural model for self-reported creativity ratings. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 119–134. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01310.x
Kieran, M., & Lopes, D. M. (2003). Imagination, philosophy, and the arts. Taylor & Francis. Retrieved from http://lib.myilibrary.com/Browse/open.asp?ID=4686&loc=15
Kitson, A. (2009). Knowledge translation and guidelines: a transfer, translation or transformation process? Int J Evid Based Healthc, 7, 124–139. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1609.2009.00130.x
Kitson, A., Hons, B., & Frcn, D.P. (2009). Knowledge translation and guidelines: a transfer, translation or transformation process? Int J Evid Based Healthc, 7, 124–139. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1609.2009.00130.x
Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. New York: Routledge.
Konstantinidou, E., Michalopoulou, M., Agelousis, N., & Kourtesis, T. (2003). Primary physical education perspective on creativity: the characteristics of the creative student and their creative outcomes. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science,3 (3), 234-247.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: the grammar of visual design. NY: Routledge.
Kurian, G. T. (2013). The AMA dictionary of business and management. New York: AMACOM, American Management Association.
Kurtz, K. J., Miao, C., & Gentner, D. (2001). Learning by analogical bootstrapping. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(4), 417-446.
Kuzmicova, A. (2014). Literary narrative and mental imagery: a view from embodied cognition. Style, 48(3), 275-293.
Lane, S., & Stone, C.A. (2006). Performance assessments. In B. Brennan (4rded Ed.s), Educational Measurement (pp.387-431). New York: National Councilon Measurement in Education and American Councilon Education.
Law, K., Forbus, K. D., & Gentner, D. (1994). Simulating similarity-based retrieval: A comparison of ARCS and MAC/FAC. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 543-548.
Licuanan, B. F., Dailey, L. R., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Idea evaluation: Error in evaluating highly original ideas. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(1), 1-27.
Lieberman, M. D. (2000). Intuition: A Social Cognitive Neuroscience Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 109-137. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.126.U09
Ma, Hsen - Hsing. (2006). A synthetic analysis of the effectiveness of single components and packages in creativity training programs. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 435-446.
Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (2000). Structure mapping in the comparison process. American Journal of Psychology, 113(4), 501-538.
Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (2001). Thinking. Annual review of psychology, 52, 223-247.
Mayer, R. E. (1995). The search for insight: grappling with gestalt psychologys unanswered questions. In Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1995). The Nature of Insight. Cambridge, England, London: MIT.
McBurney, H. H. (1994). Research methods. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole.
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232.
Mende, J. (2005). The poverty of empiricism. Informing Science Journal, 8, 189-209.
Mohammadi1, M. M., & Khah, A. H. (2011). A comparative analysis of Ghazali and Egan’s views on imagination and education: the mythic understanding and children learning. Intl. J. Humanities,18(2), 19-35.
Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K., & Partlow. P. (2012). Creative thinking: processes, strategies, and knowledge. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 30–47. doi: 10.1002/jocb.003
Murphy, P., Murphy., Peters, M. A., & Marginson, S. (2010). Imagination: three models of imagination in the age of the knowledge economy first printing edition. New York: Peter Lang.
National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education. (1999). All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. Sudbury: National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education: DfEE and DCMS. Retrieved from http://www.cypni.org.uk/downloads/alloutfutures.pdf
Novak, J. D., & Cañas , A. J. (2008). The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them, Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, 2008, Retrieved from http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1996). The knowledge-based economy. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/51/8/1913021.pdf
Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied Imagination. New York: Scribners.
Palmer, B., Griffin, M. T. Q., Reed, P. J., & Fitzpatrick, J. (2010). Self-transcendence and Work Engagement in Acute Care Staff Registered Nurses. Crit Care Nurs Q, 33(2), 138–147.
Park, K., Daston, L. J., & Galison, P. L. (1984). Bacon, Galileo, and Descartes on imagination and analogy. Isis, 75(2), 287-289.
Patrick, C. (1995). What is creative thinking. New York: Philsophical Library.
Pearson, R. H., & Mundform, D. J. (2010). Recommended sample size for conducting exploratory factor analysis on dichotomous data. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 9(2), 359-368. http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/jmasm/vol9/iss2/5
Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Does spirituality represent the sixth factor of personality? Spiritual transcendence and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 67, 986–1013. doi:10.1111/1467–6494.00080
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologist? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96.
Plucker, J. A., Qian, M., & Schmalensee, S. L. (2014). Is what you see what you really get? Comparison of scoring techniques in the assessment of real-world divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 26(2), 135-143. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2014.9010231
Plucker, J., & Makel, M. (2010). Assessment of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 48-73). New York, NY: Cambridge.
Plucker, J., Qian, M., & Wang, S. (2011). Is originality in the eye of the beholder? Comparison of scoring techniques in the assessment of divergent thinking. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45, 1-22.
Pozzer, L. L., & Roth, W. M. (2003). Prevalence, function, and structure of photographs in high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1089-1114.
Pyka, A., & Hanusch, H. (2006). Applied Evolutionary Economics and the Knowledge-based Economy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Reber, P. J., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., & Mesulam, M. M. (2003). Dissociating explicit and implicit category knowledge with fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(4), 574-583.
Reed, P.G. (1989). Mental health of older adults. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 11(2), 143-163.
Reed, P.G. (1991a). Toward a nursing theory of self transcendence: Deductive reformulation using developmental theories. Advances in Nursing Science, 13(4), 64-77.
Reed, P.G. (1991b). Self-transcendence and mental health in oldest-old adult. Nursing Research, 40(1), 5-11.
Reed, P.G. (2003). The theory of self-transcendence. In M.J. Smith. & P.R. Liehr (Eds.), Middle range theory for nursing.(pp.145-165). New York: Springer.
Robinson, K. (2010). Out of our minds, learning to be creative. Oxford, UK: Capstone.
Runco, M, A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent Thinking as an Indicator of Creative Potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66-75. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Runco, M. A. (1996). Creativity and development: recommendations. New Directions for Child Development, 72, 87-90.
Runco, M. A. (1999). Tactics and strategies for creativity. In M. A. Runco and S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, San Diego: Academic.
Runco, M. A. (2003). Critical creative processes. Perspectives on creativity research.(pp.129-151). Cresskill, NJ, US: Hampton.
Runco, M. A. (2007a). A hierarchical framework for the study of creativity. New Horizons in Education 55(3), 1-9.
Runco, M. A. (2007b). Creativity - theories and themes: research, development, and practice. Burlington: Elsevier Academic.
Runco, M. A. (2008). Commentary: divergent thinking is not synonymous with creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 93-96. doi: 10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.93.
Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2000-2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3&4), 393-400. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_16
Rytovaara, M. (2010). The transcendent function in adolescence: miracle cures and bogeymen. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 55, 204-217.
Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2004). A dual coding theoretical model of reading. In R. B. Ruddell, & N. J. Unrau (5th Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp.1329-1362). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Saracho, O. (2012). Creativity theories and related teachers’ beliefs. Early Child Development and Care, 182 (1), 35-44.
Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: a quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361-388.
Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., Martinez, J. L., & Richard, C. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 68-85.
Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (1995). The creative cognition approach. Cambridge: MIT.
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The triarchic mind: A new theory of human intelligence. New York: Viking.
Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University.
Sternberg, R. J.(1977). lntelligence, information processing, and Analogical Reasoning. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: The Free.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677-688.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp.3-15). New York: Cambridge University.
Sternberg, R. J., Forsythe, G. B., Hedlund, J., Horvath, J. A., Wagner, R. K., Williams, W. M., Snook, S., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2000). Practical intelligence in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Sternberg, R., & Davidson, J. E. (1995). The Nature of Insight. Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England: The MIT.
Thomas, N. J. T. (1997). Imagery and the coherence of imagination: a critique of white. Journal of Philosophical Research, 22, 95-127.
Thomas, N. J. T. (1999). Are theories of imagery theories of imagination? An active perception approach to conscious mental content. Cognitive Science, 23(2), 207-245.
Torff, B. (2001). Intuitive Conceptions Among Learners and Teachers. In Torff, B.,& Sternberg, R.(2001).Understanding and teaching the intuitive mind student and teacher learning. New Jersey Lawrence: Erlbaum Associates.
Torff, B., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Understanding and teaching the intuitive mind student and teacher learning. New Jersey Lawrence: Erlbaum Associates.
Torrance, E. P. (1984). Pupil experience. London: Croon Helm.
Torrance, E. P., Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (1989). Handbook of creativity. New York:Cambridge University.
Torres-Olave. B. (2011). There Is a World Out There: Spatial Imagination, Agency, and Academic Culture in a Mexican University Program. Comparative Education Review, 55(1), 30-55.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1930/2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journalof Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7-12.
Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L., & Lenz, E. R. (1991). Measurement in nursing research (2nd Ed.). Philadelphia: A. Davis.
Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of conceptual structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1-40.
Ward, T. B., Smith, R. A., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.s). Handbook of creativity (pp.189-212). NewYork: Cambridge University.
Ward, T.B., & Wickes, K. N. S. (2009). Stable and dynamic properties of category structure guide imaginative thought. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 15-23. doi: 10.1080/10400410802633376
Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Modes of expertise in creative thinking: Evidence from case studies. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich., & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp.761-787). New York: Cambridge University.
Welch, L. (1946). Recombination of ideas in creative thinking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30(6), 638-643.
Williams, F. E. (1980). Creativity assessment packet. Buffalo, NY: DOK.
Williams, J., & Chesterman, A. (2002). The map: a beginners guide to doing research in translation studies. Manchester, UK: St. Jerome.
Yeager, D. S., Henderson, M. D., Paunesku, D., Walton, D.G., Gregory, M., D’Mello, S., Spitzer, B. J., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). Boring but Important: A Self-Transcendent Purpose for Learning Fosters Academic Self-Regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(4), 559-580.
Youssef-Shalala, A., Ayres, P. Schubert, C., & Sweller, J. (2014). Using a general problem-solving strategy to promote transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20, (3), 215-231.
Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23(1), 24-37. http://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.545713
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 何英奇(1987)。大專學生之生命意義感及其相關:意義治療法基本概念之實徵性研究。教育心理學報,20,87-106。doi:10.6251/BEP.19870601.6
2. 何英奇(1990)。生命態度剖面圖之編製:信度與效度之研究。師大學報,35,71-94。
3. 何雍慶、蘇宏仁、賴文儀、林泰安(2008)。消費者轉換行為之研究。遠東學報,25(1),179-190。
4. 吳坤璋、吳裕益、黃台珠(2005)。科學探究能力測驗的編制與信效度考驗。測驗學刊,52(2),119-148。
5. 林仁煥(2008)。由全球化觀點談校長創新卓越領導。學校行政,54,12~32。
6. 邱發忠(2010)。「詞彙概念聯結測驗」─ 創造潛能測量工具的發展。測驗學刊,57(2),295-324。
7. 邱發忠、陳學志、林耀南、涂莉苹(2012)。想像力概念之初探。教育心理學報,44(2),389-410。
8. 邱發忠、陳學志、徐芝君、吳相儀、卓淑玲(2008)。內隱與外顯因素對創造作業表現的影響。中華心理學刊,50(2),125-145。
9. 邱皓政、歐宗霖(2013)。從心境邁向情境:情境判斷測驗在人事甄選與心理特質評量上的發展與應用。國家菁英季刊, 9(2),109-127。
10. 侯雅齡(2009)。幼兒資優特質與科學創造力的關係:心流經驗之中介效果。特殊教育研究學刊,34(2),101-118。
11. 張雨霖、陳學志、陳瑛霞、邱發忠、林耀南、王蔓甄、林鴻文(2013)。淺談高中職階段未來想像與創意之人才培育。創造學刊,4(1),73-98。
12. 梁朝雲、李元榮(2010)。想像力研究對資訊傳播學域的啟發。資訊傳播研究,1(1),89-113。
13. 梁朝雲、許育齡(2011)。轉化虛無─試論想像力評測指標。資訊傳播研究,2(1),99-111。
14. 梁朝雲、黃英修、許育齡(2011)。什麼因素促進學生想像。工業設計,39(2),125-134。
15. 許育齡、梁朝雲(2012)。探究想像力的意涵與特徵—探索性與驗證性因素分析之發現。教育心理學報,44(2),349-372。