臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

重金屬廢水由於存在如EDTA的螯合反應變得更加復雜化，這些配體在表面處理或印刷電路板行業的水中普遍存在;通過常見的化學沉澱法產生金屬氫氧化物沉澱去除重金屬已不再是可行的。在本研究中，採常用於生產金屬納米粒子的化學還原法來去除和回收銅離子，產生的金屬納米粒子可以做為載體提高還原的效果及速率。在本研究中，將化學還原法和薄膜過濾程序結合在一起處理含銅和配體的電子廢水，並將其稱為“還原結晶”。中空纖維膜浸沒安裝於封閉反應器中，以隔絕減少空氣中的氧氣對還原過程的影響。 pH和ORP為實驗中的主要對照參數。在這項研究中，研究了pH、ORP，對銅去除效率、銅顆粒大小和薄膜阻塞的影響。
結果顯示，在pH值為5〜8，ORP為-400mV和-500mV的條件下，銅的還原/去除率為87-92％。使用連續性Cu（II）還原系統還原含銅和鎳的廢水；可達近90％的銅去除效率，然而鎳去除率僅只有15％。連續還原系統中薄膜於3天操作後TMP迅速增加。可以發現金屬光澤顆粒懸浮在薄膜槽中及中空纖維膜被一層金屬塗層覆蓋。加入銅金屬顆粒做為結晶種子可以提高了還原/回收速率同時減少薄膜阻塞的影響。TMP保持穩定直到實驗結束。從系統收集的固體樣品中可以鑑定出金屬銅和氧化亞銅(Cu2O)。模擬廢水中同時含有重金屬銅及鎳時，可實現幾乎93％的銅去除效率，符合要求台灣EPA對銅的排放標準。但在鎳的去除上僅達到15％的去除效率，未來需進一步處理。

Treatment of the metal-containing wastewater is complicated by the presence of ligands, such as EDTA, which are ubiquitous in metal-containing wastewaters from surface finishing or printed circuit board industries; the common practice to remove metal through metal hydroxide precipitation is no longer a viable option. Chemical reduction, which has commonly used for the production of metal nanoparticles, was employed to remove and recover copper ions in this study.
In the current study, chemical reduction and membrane filtration are combined to treat electronic wastewater containing copper and ligands, and the process is dubbed as reduction "crystallization process". A closed reactor with submerged type membrane installed was designed to minimize the effect of oxygen from air on the reduction process. Both pH and ORP are used as the control parameters for the treatment process. In this study, effects of pH, hydraulic retention time, solid retention time on copper removal efficiency, the size of copper particles, and membrane fouling were studied. The result shows that 87-92% of copper reduction/ removal was achieved at pH of 5 to 8 and ORP of -400 mV and -500 mV, respectively. The synthetic wastewater containing both copper and nickel ions was treated using the continuous Cu(II) reduction system. Almost 90% of copper removal efficiency is achieved by the system, while it is merely 15% for nickel removal efficiency. In membrane integrated continuous Cu(II) reduction system, the TMP increased rapidly after a 3-day operation. Visually, hollow fiber membranes were covered by a layer of coating and shiny metallic particles suspending in membrane tank can be spotted. Injecting Cu seed particles enhanced the reduction rate of Cu, and the coating of membrane surface can be reduced. TMP remained low and stable until the end of operation. Metallic copper and cuprous oxide (Cu2O) were identified in the solid samples collected from systems. Re-oxidation of metallic copper particles by atmospheric oxygen during sample handling or incomplete reduction of Cu(II) ions during reduction process might also result in the formation of cupric or cuprous oxides.

Catalog I
List of Figure III
List of Table VI
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Literature Review 4
2.1 Treatment of heavy metal-containing wastewater 4
2.1.1 Chemical precipitation 4
2.1.2 Ion-exchange method 4
2.1.3 Electrolysis method 5
2.1.4 Membrane separation process 6
2.1.5 Chemical reduction 11
2.2 Sodium dithionite 12
Chapter 3 Material and Methods 16
3.1 Materials and Experimental setup 16
3.1.1 Chemicals and reagents 16
3.1.2 Wastewater qualities 17
3.1.3 Membrane information 18
3.2 Experimental setup and procedures 20
3.2.1 Precipitation of metals by pH adjustment 20
3.2.2 Continuous Cu(II) reduction system 20
3.2.3 Membrane integrated continuous Cu(II) reduction system 23
3.3 Analytical method 25
3.3.1 Scanning electron microscope (SEM) 25
3.3.2 Flame atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) 25
3.3.3 X-ray Diffraction 25
3.3.4 TOC analyzer 26
Chapter 4 Results and discussion 27
4.1 Metal removal by pH adjustment 27
4.2 Continuous Cu(II) reduction system 32
4.2.1 The effectiveness of solid/liquid separation 33
4.2.2 The effects of pH and ORP 36
4.3 Membrane integrated continuous Cu(II) reduction system 41
4.3.1 Determination of membrane fouling 47
4.3.2 Improving copper removal efficiency and reducing membrane fouling by seed addition 48
4.4 Solid analysis 50
Chapter 5 Conclusion and suggestions 55
5.1 Conclusion 55
5.2 Suggestions 56
Reference 58

 
List of Figure
Figure 1. Schematic comparison of selected separation process [47]. 7
Figure 2. The filtration mechanism of membrane. 7
Figure 3. Membrane fouling mechanism. 10
Figure 4. The standard redox potential of various redox couples [69]. 15
Figure 5. The module of hollow fiber membranes. 18
Figure 6. The module of experimental membrane. 19
Figure 7. Continuous Cu(II) reduction system 22
Figure 8. Membrane integrated continuous Cu(II) reduction system. 24
Figure 9. Distribution of copper dominant species as a function of pH in the presence of EDTA. Modeled with MINEQL+. Total concentration for copper and EDTA are both 10-3 M. 28
Figure 10. Distribution of nickel dominant species as a function of pH in the presence of EDTA. Modeled with MINEQL+. Total concentration for nickel and EDTA are both 10-3 M. 28
Figure 11. The precipitation of (a) copper sulfate liquid and (b) nickel sulfate liquid. The original pH of copper sulfate and nickel sulfate liquids are 0.98 and 5.05, respectively. 29
Figure 12. Effect of pH on (a) copper removal efficiency and (b) nickel removal efficiency. The original pH of copper sulfate and nickel sulfate liquids are 0.98 and 5.05, respectively. 30
Figure 13. Distribution of nickel dominant species as a function of pH in the presence of citric. Modeled with MINEQL+. Total concentration for nickel and citric are both 10-3 M. 31
Figure 14. The copper removal efficiency as a function of time. ORP of -400 mV and pH of 6. 34
Figure 15. The copper removal efficiency as a function of time. ORP of -500 mV and pH of 6. 34
Figure 16. The average copper removal efficiency as a function of ORP. 35
Figure 17. The average copper removal efficiency as a function of pH. 36
Figure 18. The average ratio of dithionite /Cu molar as a function of pH. 37
Figure 19. The removal efficiency of metal as a function of time. At pH 6. 38
Figure 20. The average metal removal efficiency as a function of ORP. 39
Figure 21. Distribution of mixing condition dominant species as a function of pH in the presence of EDTA. Modeled with MINEQL+. Total concentration for copper, nickel, and EDTA are both 10-3 M. 40
Figure 22. Determination of membrane pressure of chemical reduction. pH of 6, ORP of -400 mV, HRT of 60 min. On/off cycle = 9 min/1 min. 42
Figure 23. Photos of membranes for (a) clean membrane, (b) membrane A after a 5-day operation and (c) membrane B after a 12-day operation. 42
Figure 24. SEM analysis of membrane surface for (a) clean membrane, (b) membrane A, and (c) membrane B. 46
Figure 25. The average removal efficiency of copper as a function of time by membrane integrated continuous Cu(II) reduction system. Experiment condition: pH of 6; ORP of -400 mV; HRT of 60 min. 47
Figure 26. Determination of membrane pressure of chemical reduction with seed added. pH of 6, ORP of -400 mV. 49
Figure 27. The removal efficiency as a function of time at pH 6 and ORP -400 mV, respectively. 49
Figure 28. XRD analysis of solid samples collected from the reduction of wastewater A. (a) continuous Cu(II) reduction system at various pH and ORP value, (b) membrane integrated continuous Cu(II) reduction system at pH 6 and various ORP. 51
Figure 29. XRD analysis of solid samples collected from the reduction of wastewater B at pH 6 and various ORP. 52
Figure 30. Photos of particle size at different days with chemical reduction at pH 5. 53
Figure 31. Photos of particle size at different days with chemical reduction at pH 6. 53
Figure 32. Photos of particle size at different days with chemical reduction at pH 7. 53
Figure 33. Photos of particle size at different days with chemical reduction at pH 8. 53
Figure 34. Zeta potentials of a-alumina, copper and cuprous oxide as a function of pH [71]. 54
Figure 35. The new system with membrane filter setup. 57
 
List of Table
Table 1. Chemical materials 16
Table 2. The information of wastewater from PCB production process. 17
Table 3. The information of hollow fiber membrane. 19
Table 4. Parameters of particle and fluid are used for Stocks’ law in continuous Cu(II) reduction system. 21
Table 5. Parameters of particle and fluid are used for Stocks’ law in membrane integrated continuous reduction system. 23
Table 6. The mass balance of copper in filtrate and solids. (Unit, mg) 31
Table 7. The coefficient of variation by with filtration and without filtration. 35
Table 8. Membrane fouling resistance. 48

[1] R.-S. Juang, S.-W. Wang, Metal recovery and EDTA recycling from simulated washing effluents of metal-contaminated soils, Water Research, 34 (2000) 3795-3803.
[2] S. Jiang, F. Fu, J. Qu, Y. Xiong, A simple method for removing chelated copper from wastewaters: Ca(OH)2-based replacement-precipitation, Chemosphere, 73 (2008) 785-790.
[3] 經濟部工業局, 印刷電路板製造業水污染防治技術, (1994).
[4] A. Khelifa, S. Aoudj, S. Moulay, M. De Petris-Wery, A one-step electrochlorination/electroflotation process for the treatment of heavy metals wastewater in presence of EDTA, Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 70 (2013) 110-116.
[5] Q.-Y.H. S.-Y. Chen, Heavy metals recovery from printed circuit board industry wastewater sludge by thermophilic bioleaching process, (2014).
[6] L. Charerntanyarak, Heavy metals removal by chemical coagulation and precipitation, (1994).
[7] S. Jiang, J. Qu, Y. Xiong, Removal of chelated copper from wastewaters by Fe2+-based replacement–precipitation, Environmental Chemistry Letters, 8 (2010) 339-342.
[8] H. He, D. Wu, L. Zhao, C. Luo, C. Dai, Y. Zhang, Sequestration of chelated copper by structural Fe(II): Reductive decomplexation and transformation of CuII-EDTA, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 309 (2016) 116-125.
[9] C. Gómez-Lahoz, F. García-Herruzo, J.M. Rodríguez-Maroto, J.J. Rodríguez, Copper Removal from Water by Chemical Reduction with Sodium Borohydride, Separation Science and Technology, 27 (1992) 1449-1468.
[10] C. Gómez-Lahoz, F. García-Herruzo, J.M. Rodríguez-Maroto, J.J. Rodríguez, Heavy Metal Removal by Chemical Reduction with Sodium Borohydride. A Pilot-Plant Study, Separation Science and Technology, 27 (1992) 1569-1582.
[11] A.d.L. José L. Valverde , Marcela González , and Juan F. Rodríguez, Ion-Exchange Equilibria of Cu2+, Cd2+, Zn2+, and Na+ Ions on the Cationic Exchanger Amberlite IR-120, (2001).
[12] S. Verbych, N. Hilal, G. Sorokin, M. Leaper, Ion Exchange Extraction of Heavy Metal Ions from Wastewater, Separation Science and Technology, 39 (2005) 2031-2040.
[13] E. Pehlivan, T. Altun, Ion-exchange of Pb2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, and Ni2+ ions from aqueous solution by Lewatit CNP 80, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 140 (2007) 299-307.
[14] L. Alvarado, I.R. Torres, A. Chen, Integration of ion exchange and electrodeionization as a new approach for the continuous treatment of hexavalent chromium wastewater, Separation and Purification Technology, 105 (2013) 55-62.
[15] A. Da̧browski, Z. Hubicki, P. Podkościelny, E. Robens, Selective removal of the heavy metal ions from waters and industrial wastewaters by ion-exchange method, Chemosphere, 56 (2004) 91-106.
[16] F. Fu, Q. Wang, Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review, Journal of Environmental Management, 92 (2011) 407-418.
[17] R.N. Ntimbani, G.S. Simate, S. Ndlovu, Removal of copper ions from dilute synthetic solution using staple ion exchange fibres: Dynamic studies, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 4 (2016) 3143-3150.
[18] J.P. Chen, L.L. Lim, Key factors in chemical reduction by hydrazine for recovery of precious metals, Chemosphere, 49 (2002) 363-370.
[19] Y.-H. Chou, J.-H. Yu, Y.-M. Liang, P.-J. Wang, C.-W. Li, S.-S. Chen, Recovery of Cu(II) by chemical reduction using sodium dithionite, Chemosphere, 141 (2015) 183-188.
[20] Y.-H. Chou, J.-H. Yu, Y.-M. Liang, P.-J. Wang, C.-W. Li, S.-S. Chen, Recovery of Cu(II) by chemical reduction using sodium dithionite: effect of pH and ligands, Water Science and Technology, 72 (2015) 2089-2094.
[21] W.I. Wu, C.F. Lin, S.C. Panchangam, C.H. Wu, A.P.K. Hong, Recovery of metallic copper by integrated chemical reduction and high gradient magnetic separation, Environmental Technology, 32 (2011) 817-824.
[22] W.I. Wu, C.H. Wu, P.K.A. Hong, C.F. Lin, Capture of metallic copper by high gradient magnetic separation system, Environmental Technology, 32 (2011) 1427-1433.
[23] N. Fatin-Rouge, A. Dupont, A. Vidonne, J. Dejeu, P. Fievet, A. Foissy, Removal of some divalent cations from water by membrane-filtration assisted with alginate, Water Research, 40 (2006) 1303-1309.
[24] J. Landaburu-Aguirre, V. García, E. Pongrácz, R.L. Keiski, The removal of zinc from synthetic wastewaters by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration: statistical design of experiments, Desalination, 240 (2009) 262-269.
[25] R.-S. Juang, L.-C. Lin, Treatment of complexed Copper(II) solutions with electrochemical membrane processes, Water Research, 34 (2000) 43-50.
[26] N. Adhoum, L. Monser, N. Bellakhal, J.-E. Belgaied, Treatment of electroplating wastewater containing Cu2+, Zn2+ and Cr(VI) by electrocoagulation, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 112 (2004) 207-213.
[27] M. Hunsom, K. Pruksathorn, S. Damronglerd, H. Vergnes, P. Duverneuil, Electrochemical treatment of heavy metals (Cu2+, Cr6+, Ni2+) from industrial effluent and modeling of copper reduction, Water Research, 39 (2005) 610-616.
[28] I. Heidmann, W. Calmano, Removal of Zn(II), Cu(II), Ni(II), Ag(I) and Cr(VI) present in aqueous solutions by aluminium electrocoagulation, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 152 (2008) 934-941.
[29] D. Voglar, D. Lestan, Electrochemical treatment of spent solution after EDTA-based soil washing, Water Research, 46 (2012) 1999-2008.
[30] M.A. Barakat, New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater, Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 4 (2011) 361-377.
[31] G. Chen, Electrochemical technologies in wastewater treatment, Separation and Purification Technology, 38 (2004) 11-41.
[32] T.A. Kurniawan, G.Y.S. Chan, W.-H. Lo, S. Babel, Physico–chemical treatment techniques for wastewater laden with heavy metals, Chemical Engineering Journal, 118 (2006) 83-98.
[33] R.S. Dobson, J.E. Burgess, Biological treatment of precious metal refinery wastewater: A review, Minerals Engineering, 20 (2007) 519-532.
[34] A.R. Costa, M.N. de Pinho, Effect of membrane pore size and solution chemistry on the ultrafiltration of humic substances solutions, Journal of Membrane Science, 255 (2005) 49-56.
[35] D.e.a. AYRES, Removing Heavy Metals from waste., (1994).
[36] S.-Y. Kang, J.-U. Lee, S.-H. Moon, K.-W. Kim, Competitive adsorption characteristics of Co2+, Ni2+, and Cr3+ by IRN-77 cation exchange resin in synthesized wastewater, Chemosphere, 56 (2004) 141-147.
[37] R.D. Armstrong, M. Todd, J.W. Atkinson, K. Scott, Selective electrodeposition of metals from simulated waste solutions, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 26 (1996) 379-384.
[38] J.-Q. Jiang, N. Graham, C. André, G.H. Kelsall, N. Brandon, Laboratory study of electro-coagulation–flotation for water treatment, Water Research, 36 (2002) 4064-4078.
[39] D. Lakshmanan, D.A. Clifford, G. Samanta, Ferrous and Ferric Ion Generation During Iron Electrocoagulation, Environmental Science & Technology, 43 (2009) 3853-3859.
[40] M.Y.A. Mollah, P. Morkovsky, J.A.G. Gomes, M. Kesmez, J. Parga, D.L. Cocke, Fundamentals, present and future perspectives of electrocoagulation, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 114 (2004) 199-210.
[41] N. Kongsricharoern, C. Polprasert, Electrochemical precipitation of chromium (Cr6+) from an electroplating wastewater, Water Science and Technology, 31 (1995) 109-117.
[42] M.F. Pouet, A. Grasmick, Urban wastewater treatment by electrocoagulation and flotation, Water Science and Technology, 31 (1995) 275-283.
[43] P. Gao, X. Chen, F. Shen, G. Chen, Removal of chromium(VI) from wastewater by combined electrocoagulation–electroflotation without a filter, Separation and Purification Technology, 43 (2005) 117-123.
[44] G. Issabayeva, M.K. Aroua, N.M. Sulaiman, Electrodeposition of copper and lead on palm shell activated carbon in a flow-through electrolytic cell, Desalination, 194 (2006) 192-201.
[45] Y. Oztekin, Z. Yazicigil, Recovery of metals from complexed solutions by electrodeposition, Desalination, 190 (2006) 79-88.
[46] N. Meunier, P. Drogui, C. Montané, R. Hausler, G. Mercier, J.-F. Blais, Comparison between electrocoagulation and chemical precipitation for metals removal from acidic soil leachate, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 137 (2006) 581-590.
[47] M.L. Davis, Water wastewater engineering, McGraw-Hill, (2011).
[48] Y. Ku, S.-W. Chen, W.-Y. Wang, Effect of solution composition on the removal of copper ions by nanofiltration, Separation and Purification Technology, 43 (2005) 135-142.
[49] C.-K. Liu, C.-W. Li, Simultaneous recovery of copper and surfactant by an electrolytic process from synthetic solution prepared to simulate a concentrate waste stream of a micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration process, Desalination, 169 (2004) 185-192.
[50] E. Samper, M. Rodríguez, M.A. De la Rubia, D. Prats, Removal of metal ions at low concentration by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS), Separation and Purification Technology, 65 (2009) 337-342.
[51] R.-S. Juang, M.-N. Chen, Measurement of Binding Constants of Poly(ethylenimine) with Metal Ions and Metal Chelates in Aqueous Media by Ultrafiltration, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 35 (1996) 1935-1943.
[52] R.-S. Juang, M.-N. Chen, Retention of copper(II)—EDTA chelates from dilute aqueous solutions by a polyelectrolyte-enhanced ultrafiltration process, Journal of Membrane Science, 119 (1996) 25-37.
[53] R.-S. Juang, M.-N. Chen, Removal of Copper(II) Chelates of EDTA and NTA from Dilute Aqueous Solutions by Membrane Filtration, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 36 (1997) 179-186.
[54] C.-W. Li, C.-H. Cheng, K.-H. Choo, W.-S. Yen, Polyelectrolyte enhanced ultrafiltration (PEUF) for the removal of Cd(II): Effects of organic ligands and solution pH, Chemosphere, 72 (2008) 630-635.
[55] J. Labanda, M.S. Khaidar, J. Llorens, Feasibility study on the recovery of chromium (III) by polymer enhanced ultrafiltration, Desalination, 249 (2009) 577-581.
[56] M.K. Aroua, F.M. Zuki, N.M. Sulaiman, Removal of chromium ions from aqueous solutions by polymer-enhanced ultrafiltration, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 147 (2007) 752-758.
[57] K. Trivunac, S. Stevanovic, Removal of heavy metal ions from water by complexation-assisted ultrafiltration, Chemosphere, 64 (2006) 486-491.
[58] H.-J. Kim, K. Baek, B.-K. Kim, J.-W. Yang, Humic substance-enhanced ultrafiltration for removal of cobalt, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 122 (2005) 31-36.
[59] G.F.P. P.L.M. Clair N. Sawyer, chemistry for environmental engineering and science, 5/e, (2003).
[60] B. Tansel, W.Y. Bao, I.N. Tansel, Characterization of fouling kinetics in ultrafiltration systems by resistances in series model, Desalination, 129 (2000) 7-14.
[61] K. Kimura, Y. Hane, Y. Watanabe, G. Amy, N. Ohkuma, Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water, Water Research, 38 (2004) 3431-3441.
[62] C. In-Soung, C. Pierre Le, J. Bruce, J. Simon, Membrane Fouling in Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 128 (2002) 1018-1029.
[63] G.P.D. N. Geoffroy, Reductive precipitation of elemental selenium from selenious acidic solutions using sodium dithionite, Department of Mining and Materials Engineering, (2009).
[64] K.S. Tan, K.Y. Cheong, Advances of Ag, Cu, and Ag–Cu alloy nanoparticles synthesized via chemical reduction route, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 15 (2013) 1537.
[65] T.P. Phetla, F. Ntuli, E. Muzenda, Reduction crystallization of Ni, Cu, Fe and Co from a mixed metal effluent, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 18 (2012) 1171-1177.
[66] L.M. de Carvalho, G. Schwedt, Polarographic determination of dithionite and its decomposition products: kinetic aspects, stabilizers, and analytical application, Analytica Chimica Acta, 436 (2001) 293-300.
[67] N. Geoffroy, G.P. Demopoulos, Reductive Precipitation of Elemental Selenium from Selenious Acidic Solutions Using Sodium Dithionite, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 48 (2009) 10240-10246.
[68] J.E. Szecsody, J.S. Fruchter, M.D. Williams, V.R. Vermeul, D. Sklarew, In Situ Chemical Reduction of Aquifer Sediments:  Enhancement of Reactive Iron Phases and TCE Dechlorination, Environmental Science & Technology, 38 (2004) 4656-4663.
[69] C.-W. Li, J.-H. Yu, Y.-M. Liang, Y.-H. Chou, H.-J. Park, K.-H. Choo, S.-S. Chen, Ni removal from aqueous solutions by chemical reduction: Impact of pH and pe in the presence of citrate, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 320 (2016) 521-528.
[70] S.J. Chang, C.A. Tung, B.W. Chen, Y.C. Chou, C.C. Li, Synthesis of non-oxidative copper nanoparticles, RSC Advances, 3 (2013) 24005-24008.
[71] T.-H. Tsai, S.-C. Yen, Localized corrosion effects and modifications of acidic and alkaline slurries on copper chemical mechanical polishing, Applied Surface Science, 210 (2003) 190-205.