跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.85) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/19 07:09
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:葉妲莉
研究生(外文):Daria Jablonska
論文名稱:創業過程的國際比較研究-台灣與波蘭中小企業
論文名稱(外文):The International Comparison Study of Entrepreneurial Process -Taiwanese and Polish Small and Medium Enterprises
指導教授:蔡正飛蔡正飛引用關係
指導教授(外文):Philip C.F. Tsai
口試日期:20-07-2017
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:文藻外語大學
系所名稱:國際事業暨文化交流研究所
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:國際事務學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:英文
論文頁數:108
中文關鍵詞:創業成立企業小中型企業國際比較商業環境
外文關鍵詞:EnterpreneurshipEnterpreneurial processSMEBusiness environmentComparison
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:215
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:46
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
The future prosperity of any economy depends to a considerable extent on its success in promoting entrepreneurship and innovation. Another important factor is effective and prompt absorption of technological advances. Nowadays in all these processes, small and medium sized firms, especially those newly established, play a critical role in the development and growth of a country economy and support unemployment reduction. This is the main conclusion from many previous research in the field of entrepreneurship. It is also a reason why so many of modern economics emphasizes
on the so-called “pro-SME” policy.
The study is focused on Small and Medium enterprises (SMEs) in the Republic
of Poland and Republic of China. It describes the processes of doing business by comparing key factors for entrepreneurs who decide to start own business. Also this paper concerns the regulations and other aspects relates with running business. Thereby the paper gives a clear picture of business environment created for SMEs in both countries.
In past several years, both Taiwanese and Polish governments successfully had developed many tools for small, medium size enterprises to improve their performance.
As both countries have totally different cultural and economical background, the main curiosity of this research is to find out similarities and differences between Taiwanese
and Polish way to become successful entrepreneur.
The research provides the cross-culture evidence on the links between success factors of SMEs policy and individual predispositions of two given countries, which are Poland and Taiwan. The aim of this study is to contribute to the enhancement of knowledge of the entrepreneurial process through an understanding of the values, characteristics, and actions of entrepreneurs over time.
Table of Contents

Abstract....................................................2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.............................................3
1. Background and motivation...........................7
1.1 Statement of the problem...........................10
1.2 Objective of the study.............................11
1.3 Research questions.................................12
2 Literature review..................................12
2.1 Historical overview of the entrepreneurship........12
2.2 Meaning and definitions of entrepreneurship........14
2.2.1 The 14 Pillars of Entrepreneurship.................18
2.3 Entrepreneurial process ...........................21
2.3.2 Measurement of entrepreneur process................24
2.4 Factors affecting entrepreneurship.................25
2.5 Benefits of entrepreneurship.......................25
2.6 Definition of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)..26
2.6.1 Definition of small medium enterprise in Taiwan....27
2.6.2 Definition of small medium enterprise in Poland....30
2.6.3 Small Business Entrepreneur [SBE]..................31
2.7 The importance of SME’s sector....................31
2.8 The stages in the development of micro, small
and medium enterprises................ ....................32
2.9 A General Model of Entrepreneurial Success......34
2.10 Barriers to SMEs entrepreneurship..................36
3. Methodology........................................37
3.1 Area of study......................................37
3.2 Research Design....................................38
3.3 Framework..........................................38
3.3.1 Data Sources.......................................39
3.3.2 Interviews.........................................39
3.3.3 Focus Group Interviews.............................39
3.4 Data analysis methods..............................40
3.5 Research obstruction...............................40
4. Poland and Taiwan entrepreneurial profile..........41
4.1 Introduction.......................................41
4.1.2 Comparison of cultural factors based on Hofstede’s model of cultural dimensions...............................46
4.2 Poland and Taiwan bilateral relations..............49
4.3 Taiwanese Small and Medium Enterprises Development.51
4.3.1 Financial and Funding of SMEs......................55
4.3.2 Challenges for the entrepreneurship in Taiwan......56
4.4 Entrepreneurial success of SMEs in Poland..........57
4.4.2 Challenges for entrepreneurship in Poland..........66
5. Findings and Discussion............................72
5.1 Participants.......................................72
5.2 Interview process..................................73
5.3 Results............................................74
5.4 Discussion.........................................82
5.4.1 Reliability........................................84
6. Conclusions........................................84
6.1 Summary of findings................................84
7. Implications.......................................88
7.1 Implication for academic research..................88
7.2 Implication for business practices.................88
7.3 Limitations........................................90
Referances.................................................91
Appendixes................................................100
Referances

1. Archibugi, D. (2003). The global challenge to industrial districts. Small and medium-sized enterprises in Italy and Taiwan. Technovation, 23 (11), 901-902. doi:10.1016/s0166-4972(03)00080-4
2. Ács, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (2005). Handbook of entrepreneurship research: an interdisciplinary survey and introduction. New York: Springer.
3. Ács, Z. J., Szerb, L., Autio, E., & Lloyd, A. (2017). 2017 Global Entrepreneurship Index [PDF]. Washington: The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute.
4. Baker, T., Gedajlovic, E., & Lubatkin, M. (2005). A framework for comparing entrepreneurship processes across nations. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(5), 492-504. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400153
5. Barreto, H. (1989). The entrepreneur in microeconomic theory: disappearance
and explanation.
6. Baumol, W. J. (1990 ). Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5), 893-921. Retrieved Jan. & Feb., 2017, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2937617 .
7. Bąkiewicz, A. (2012). Transformation of economic system in Poland. The SMEs
and EU integration. Revista Universitaria RUTA,13, 71-86.
8. Birley, S. (1985). The Role of Networks in the Entrepreneurial Process. Journal of Business Venturing,1(1), 107-117.
9. Boettke, P. J. (2002). Information and Knowledge: Austrian Economics in Search of its Uniqueness. The Review of Austrian Economics,15(4), 263-274. doi:10.1023/a:1021190719156
10. Bratnicki, M. (2002). Przedsiębiorczość i przedsiębiorcy współczesnych organizacji. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uczelniane Akademii Ekonomicznej im. Karola Adamieckiego w Katowicach.
11. Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
12. Bula, H. O. (2012). Evolution and Theories of Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Business and Commerce,1(11). Retrieved May 30, 2017,
from http://www.ijbcnet.com/1-11/IJBC-12-11106.pdf
13. Bygrave, W. D. (2011). Equity Financing: Informal Investment, Venture Capital,
and Harvesting. The Portable MBA in Entrepreneurship, 161-195. doi:10.1002/9781118256121.ch7
14. Bygrave, W. D. (2011). The Entrepreneurial Process. The Portable MBA in Entrepreneurship, 1-26. doi:10.1002/9781118256121.ch1
15. Casson, M. C. (1982). The entrepreneur: an economic theory. Totowa, N.J: Barnes & Noble Books.
16. Chepurenko, A. Y., Gabelko, M., & Obraztsova, O. (n.d.). Early-Stage Entrepreneurial Activity: An Explanatory Model for Cross-Country Comparisons. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2001334
17. Churchill, N. C., & Lewis, V. L. (1983). The five stages small business growth. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 30-46.
18. Czemiel-Grzybowska, W., & Skowronek-Mielczarek, A. (2015). Entrepreneurship research in the Poland. Technological and Economic Development of Economy,23(3), 504-519. doi:10.3846/20294913.2015.1070770
19. Davidsson, P. (1995). Culture, structure and regional levels of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development,7(1), 41-62. doi:10.1080/08985629500000003
20. Davidsson, P., Delmar, F., & Wiklund, J. (2012). Entrepreneurship and the growth of firms. Cheltenham, Glos, UK: Edward Elgar.
21. Dees, J. G. (2001). Social entrepreneurship. The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. doi:10.1057/9781137294678.0736
22. Delmar, F. (1996). Entrepreneurial behavior and business performance. Stockholm.
23. Ding, H. (n.d.). Taiwan. Handbook of Research on Asian Entrepreneurship. doi:10.4337/9781781952658.00041
24. Dudziak, W., & Kisil, A. (2011). Etapy rozwoju MSP. Gazeta Małych i Średnich Przedsiębiorstw,4(108). Retrieved February, 2017, from http://www.gazeta-msp.pl/?id=pokaz_artykul&indeks_artykulu=1607&dz_id=36
25. Dwyer, S., Mesak, H., & Hsu, M. (2005). An Exploratory Examination of the Influence of National Culture on Cross-National Product Diffusion. Journal of International Marketing,13(2), 1-27. doi:10.1509/jimk.13.2.1.64859
26. Economic profiles of China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. (2009). Routledge Studies on the Chinese Economy Economic Convergence in Greater China, 15-69.
27. Endres, A. M., & Woods, C. R. (2007). The case for more “subjectivist” research on how entrepreneurs create opportunities. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research,13(4), 222-234. doi:10.1108/13552550710760003
28. Executive Summary: Changing structures of SME networks: lessons from the publishing industry in Taiwan. (2005). Long Range Planning,38(2), 117. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2005.02.006
29. Poland, Central Statistic Office of Poland. (2016). Financial results of economic entities in 2015. Warszawa: Central Statistical Office.
30. Fiscal Information Agency, Ministry of Finance. (n.d.). Retrieved June 30, 2017, from http://www.bing.com/cr?IG=7C8579A23E4B43D3A304A19903C0DB22&CID=338220F9B83B62F8151B2A48B93D6365&rd=1&h=taCCouNkHIZQxfPsJZ0652MCcAvqhb5b7OyI3g6hZeY&v=1&r=http%3a%2f%2fwww.fia.gov.tw%2fdp.asp%3fmp%3d5&p=DevEx,5063.1
31. Frączkiewicz-Wronka, A., & Grewiński, M. (2012). Przedsiębiorczość w Polsce: bariery i perspektywy rozwoju. Warszawa: Wyższa Szkoła Pedagogiczna TWP.
32. Frieske, K. W., & Berger, B. (1994). Kultura przedsiębiorczości. Warszawa: Oficyna Literatów "Rój".
33. Frieske, K. W., & Berger, B. (1994). Kultura przedsiębiorczości. Warszawa: Oficyna Literatów "Rój".
34. Gaweł, A. (2007). Ekonomiczne determinanty przedsiębiorczości. Poznań: Wydawn. Akademii Ekonomicznej.
35. Geert Hofstede - Geert Hofstede. (n.d.). Retrieved June 30, 2017, from https://geert-hofstede.com/
36. Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index (GEDI): The 14 Pillars of Entrepreneurship [PDF]. (n.d.).
37. http://policy-cepp.gmu.edu/files/pdfs/Challenge/GEW-GEDI%20challenge%20-%20variables%20explained%20(add%20info).pdf
38. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM). (2017). Global Report 2016/17 [PDF]. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA).
39. Hayton, J. C., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). National Culture and Entrepreneurship: A Review of Behavioral Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,26(4), 33-52. Retrieved from http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5641&context=lkcsb_research
40. Hébert, R. F., & Link, A. N. (2006). Historical perspectives on the entrepreneur. Boston Mass.: Now .
41. Hisrich, R. D., & Peters, M. P. (1995). Entrepreneurship: starting, developing and managing a new enterprise. Chicago: Irwin.
42. Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2005). Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
43. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., Minkov, M., & Durska, M. (2011). Kultury i organizacje: zaprogramowanie umysłu. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
44. Hughes, J. %. (1983). Arthur Cole and Entrepreneurial History. Business and Economic History,12, 133-144. Retrieved December 27, 2016, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23702745
45. Hébert, R. F., & Link, A. N. (2006). Historical Perspectives on the Entrepreneur. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship,2(4), 261-408. doi:10.1561/0300000008
46. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review,65(1), 19. doi:10.2307/2657288
47. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review,65(1), 19. doi:10.2307/2657288
48. Janczewski, J. (2012). Problematyka zarządzania mikroprzedsiębiorstwem na rynku usług transportowych. Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Humanitas. Zarządzanie,13(1), 74-88.
49. Kamba-Kibatshi, M. (2013). Znaczenie działalności małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw w Polsce w kontekście turbulencji rynkowych w gospodarce. Nierówności społeczne a wzrost gospodarczy, (34), 320-338.
50. Kożuch, B. (2002). O przedsiębiorczości małej i „dużej”. Współczesne Zarządzanie,4, 39-48.
51. Kraśnicka, T. (2002). Koncepcja rozwoju przedsiębiorczości ekonomicznej i pozaekonomicznej. Katowice: Wydaw. Uczelniane AE.
52. Krijgsman, J. (2012). The influence of national culture on entrepreneurial processes A comparison between Mexican and Dutch entrepreneurs (Unpublished master's thesis). The Netherlands, Enschede/ University of Twente. Retrieved November, 2016, from http://purl.utwente.nl/essays/61638
53. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publ.
54. Kumar, M. (2015). Role of Entrepreneurship in Future Economic Development of Taiwan. Open Journal of Business and Management,03(04), 389-402. doi:10.4236/ojbm.2015.34038
55. Kuo, F. W. (2015). An Empirical Study of Small- and Medium-Sized Firms in Taiwan: Entrepreneurship, Core Competency and Market Performance. Web Journal of Chinese Management Review,18(3), 1-25.
56. Lichtarski, J., & Brajer-Marczak, R. (2007). Podstawy nauki o przedsiębiorstwie. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej im. Oskara Langego.
57. Lin, C. Y., & Chen, M. Y. (2007). Does innovation lead to performance? An empirical study of SMEs in Taiwan. Management Research News,30(2), 115-132. doi:10.1108/01409170710722955
58. Lloyd-Reason, L., Damyanov, A., Nicolescu, O., & Wall, S. (2003). Internationalisation process, SMEs and transitional economies: a four-country perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management,5(3/4), 206. doi:10.1504/ijeim.2005.006526
59. Lloyd-Reason, L., Damyanov, A., Nicolescu, O., & Wall, S. (2005). Internationalisation process, SMEs and transitional economies: a four-country perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management,5(3/4), 206. doi:10.1504/ijeim.2005.006526
60. Loasby, B. J., & Casson, M. (1983). The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory. The Economic Journal,93(372), 931. doi:10.2307/2232766
61. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying The Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct And Linking It To Performance. Academy of Management Review,21(1), 135-172. doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568
62. Łapacz, D. (2015). Udział małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw w wytwarzaniu PKB - Polska na tle Unii Europejskiej . Współczesna Gospodarka,6(1), 43-51.
63. Matejun, M., & Szczepańczyk, M. (2010). Aktualne problemy zarządzania małymi i średnimi przedsiębiorstwami: praca zbiorowa. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Łódzkiej.
64. Matusiak, K. B. (2002). Entrepreneurship and Innovativeness of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) in Poland. Small Firms and Entrepreneurship in Central and Eastern Europe, 97-122. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-57460-3_5
65. May, M. (n.d.). Retrieved June 30, 2017, from http://en.parp.gov.pl/
66. Mckendrick, N. (1960). Josiah Wedgwood: An Eighteenth-Century Entrepreneur In Salesmanship And Marketing Techniques. The Economic History Review,12(3), 408-433. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0289.1960.tb00950.x
67. Mckendrick, N. (1960). Josiah Wedgwood: An Eighteenth-Century Entrepreneur in Salesmanship and Marketing Techniques. The Economic History Review,12(3), 408-433. doi:10.2307/2590885
68. Mcmullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (n.d.). Entrepreneurial Action and the Role of Uncertainty in the Theory of the Entrepreneur. A Psychological Approach to Entrepreneurship, 3-23. doi:10.4337/9781783479801.00007
69. Milton-Smith, J. (2002). Asia-Pacific Perspectives of International Entrepreneurship. Handbook of Research on International Entrepreneurship. doi:10.4337/9781845420512.00024
70. Morris, M. H., Davis, D. L., & Allen, J. W. (1994). Fostering Corporate Entrepreneurship: Cross-Cultural Comparisons of the Importance of Individualism Versus Collectivism. Journal of International Business Studies,25(1), 65-89. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490849
71. Mueller, S. L., & Thomas, A. S. (2001). Culture and entrepreneurial potential. Journal of Business Venturing,16(1), 51-75. doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(99)00039-7
72. Nityananda, J., & Mohanty, A. N. (2012). Strategic Entrepreneurship: Key to Success For Competitiveness & Globalization. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR),1(3), 208-214. Retrieved November 30, 2016, from www.ijsr.net.
73. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) . (2004). Promoting Entrepreneurship and Innovative SMEs in a Global Economy [PDF]. Paris: OECD PUBLICATIONS.
74. Piasecki, B., Rogut, A., & Smallbone, D. (2000). Wpływ integracji Polski z Unią Europejską na sektor MSP. Warszawa: Polska Fundacja Promocji i Rozwoju Małych i Średnich Przedsiębiorstw.
75. Piecuch, T. (2013). Przedsiębiorczość: podstawy teoretyczne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck.
76. Pinillos, M., & Reyes, L. (2009). Relationship between individualist–collectivist culture and entrepreneurial activity: evidence from Global Entrepreneurship Monitor data. Small Business Economics,37(1), 23-37. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9230-6
77. Polityka Insight. (2015). Small and medium enterprises in Poland – obstacles and development [Brochure]
78. Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości. (2014). Report on the condition of small and medium-sized enterprise sector in Poland 2014-2016 (Rep.). Warsaw: PARP.
79. Ministry of Development Poland. (2016). Responsible Development Plan [Brochure]. Author.
80. Rachwał T., Ziolo Z. (2005) Entrepreneurship and the Contemporary Challenges of Civilization. Entrepreneurship — Education
81. Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2000). Psychological approaches to entrepreneurial success. A general model and an overview of findings. In C.L. Cooper & I.T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 101-142). Chichester: Wiley.
82. Ronstadt, R. C. (1984). Entrepreneurship: Text, Cases and Notes. Lord Publishing, Incorporated.
83. Samitowska, W. (2011). Barriers To The Development Of Entrepreneurship Demonstrated By Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises In Poland. Economics & Sociology,4(2), 42-49. doi:10.14254/2071-789x.2011/4-2/5
84. Samitowska, W. (2011). Barriers To The Development Of Entrepreneurship Demonstrated By Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises In Poland. Economics & Sociology,4(2), 42-49. doi:10.14254/2071-789x.2011/4-2/5
85. Schaper, M. T., Volery, T., Weber, P., & Gibson, B. (2014). Entrepreneurship and small business. Milton, Qld: John Wiley & Sons Australia.
86. Schaper, M., Volery, T., Weber, P., & Gibson, B. J. (2014). Entrepreneurship and small business. Milton, Qld: John Wiley and Sons Australia.
87. Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(1), 92-116.
88. Shane, S. A. (1992). Why do some societies invent more than others? Journal of Business Venturing,7(1), 29-46. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(92)90033-n
89. Shane, S. A. (2007). A general theory of entrepreneurship: the individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltenham: Elgar.
90. Skrzypek, J. (2012). Biznesplan: model najlepszych praktyk. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Poltext.
91. Small and Medium Enterprise Administration, Ministry of ... (n.d.). Retrieved June 30, 2017, from http://www.bing.com/cr?IG=2C7236640E154C208B99BF57FB2BF84A&CID=1933DB67340B671C0EF4D1D6350D66ED&rd=1&h=JswmxyB6PdlTSHYkgm489OiUwVt5Lnv03FmLJ_siQJk&v=1&r=http%3a%2f%2fwww.moeasmea.gov.tw%2fmp.asp%3fmp%3d2&p=DevEx,5063.1
92. Spinelli, S., Adams, R. J., & Timmons, J. A. (2016). New venture creation: entrepreneurship for the 21st century. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
93. Stienstra, M. R., Harms, R., ten Ham, R., & Groen, A. J. (2012). Culture and entrepreneurial processses: evidence of influence. In ICSB International Council for Small Business World Conference 2012, Leading from the edge. Wellington: International Council for Small Business.
94. Survey of the Financial Conditions of Private and Public Enterprises, R.O.C (Rep.). (2015). Taipei: Bank of Taiwan.
95. Targalski, J., Francik, A., & Czaja, I. (2009). Przedsiębiorczość i zarządzanie firmą: teoria i praktyka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck.
96. Targalski, J., & Czaja, I. (2010). Rozwój przedsiębiorczości w nowych krajach członkowskich Unii Europejskiej: innowacyjność, przedsiębiorczość, konkurencyjność. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego.
97. Taiwan, Small and Medium Enterprise Administration, Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA). (2009, September 2). The Definition of SMEs. Retrieved February, 2017, from http://www.moeasmea.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=70&CtNode=261&mp=2
98. The Evolving Definition of SMEs in Taiwan [PDF]. (2015). Small and Medium Enterprise Administration, Ministry of Economic Affairs.
99. The new SME definition: user guide and model declaration. (2005). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
100. Timmons, J. A. (1989). The entrepreneurial mind. Andover (Mass.): Brick House.
101. Towards One Taiwan, One China. Discard outdated "One China" policy. (1996). International Committee for Human Rights in Taiwan. Retrieved April, 2017, from http://www.taiwandc.org/twcom/tc71-int.pdf
102. Vendetti, D. (2010). Company Evolution – The Organizational Lifecycle [PDF]. Product Arts.
103. Veselka, M. (2005). Taiwans Economic Development: The Role of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Beyond the Statistics. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.872387
104. Wang, A. (2010, November 5). Small businesses make big contribution. Taiwan Today . Retrieved May, 2017.
105. Weber, M. (1958). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalis. New York: Scribner.
106. Wedgwood, C. V. (1960). Truth and opinion; historical essays. New York: Macmillan.
107. Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth . Small Business Economics,13(1), 27-56. doi:10.1023/a:1008063200484
108. Wiklund, J., Dahlqvist, J., & Havnes, P. A. (2002). Entrepreneurship as new business activity: Empirical evidence from young firms. In Frontiers of entrepreneurship research 2001: proceedings of the Twenty-first Annual Entrepreneurship Research Conference. Babson Park, MA: Babson College, Kauffman Foundation.
109. Your key to European statistics. (n.d.). Retrieved May 29, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/
110. Yu, F. T. (2012). Entrepreneurship and Taiwan's economic dynamics. Berlin: Springer.
111. Zbierowski, P. (2015). New impulse for European economy? Comparison of entrepreneurship in Turkey and Poland. Journal of Economics and Management,
20, 73-85.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top