(3.227.235.183) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/04/13 22:46
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:張心怡
研究生(外文):Chang, Hsin-Yi
論文名稱:家庭教育資源對台灣國中生英語學業成就之影響
論文名稱(外文):A Study to Family Educational Resources and TheirEffects on Junior High School Students’ EnglishAchievement in Taiwan
指導教授:魏式琦魏式琦引用關係
指導教授(外文):Wey, Shyh-Chyi
口試委員:陳淑珠楊士賢
口試委員(外文):CHEN,SHU-CHUYANG,SHIH-HSIEN
口試日期:2016-10-05
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立雲林科技大學
系所名稱:應用外語系
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:105
語文別:英文
論文頁數:86
中文關鍵詞:家庭教育資源家庭文化資源家庭社會資源英語學習成就
外文關鍵詞:family educational resourcefamily cultural capitalfamily social capitalEnglish achievement
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:255
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:39
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究旨在探究家庭教育資源跟國中生英語學業成就之關係,利用家庭背
景、家庭文化資產,以及家庭社會資產各個面向去獲得其影響英語學業成就之重
要因素。本研究從剛完成國中基本學力測驗的184 位九年級畢業生,採取問卷開
始著手調查。此研究將會針對三個不同居住區域的學校,偏鄉、郊區、以及城市
進行量化研究。關於得到的結果如下:
1. 家庭背景與學生英語成就有顯著相關。
2. 家庭文化資產與學生英語成就有顯著相關。
3. 家庭社會資源與學生英語成就有顯著關係。
針對本研究發現,研究者分別對於家長以及教育單位提出幾點建議。並對未
來家庭教育資源相關之研究提出相關方向。
The purpose of the study is to explore the relationships between family
educational resources and the English achievement of junior high school students.Family educational resources comprise family background, family cultural capital, and family social capital. The investigation started with a questionnaire survey which was completed by 184 ninth-grade students who just participated in the Comprehensive Assessment of Program of Junior High School Students. The study focused on the correlation of family educational resources and English achievement. Using survey of the quantitative study, three school were selected in different regions, rural country, suburban, and metro city.

The research results are summarized as follows:
1. There were significant effects between family background and English
achievement.
2. There were significant effects between family cultural capital and English
achievement.
3. There were significant relationships between family social capital and English
achievement.

Regarding to the results of the findings, the researcher provided suggestions for educational administration institutions and parents. Also, discussion addressed to further researchers associated with family educational resources was provided in the study.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
摘要………………………………………….……i
ABSTRACT (English)………………………………………………..ii
Acknowledgement…………………………………………................iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS…...………………………………………..iv
LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………vi
LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………viii
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION……………………………..….1
1.1 Background and Motivation…………………………………………….1
1.2 Purpose of the Study…………………………………………………….2
1.3 Research Questions……………………………………………………...3
1.4 Significance of Study……………………………………………………3
1.5 Definition of Terms……………………………………………………...4
1.6 Organization of the Study……………………………………………….7
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW……………………………..8
2.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………...8
2.2 Family Background……………………………………………………...8
2.3 Family Cultural Capital…………………………………………….........10
2.4 Family Social Capital……………………………………………………12
CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH METHODS…….…………………….16
3.1 Research Design…………………………………………………………16
3.2 Sampling…………………………………………………………………16
3.3 Instruments…………….…………………………………….………………17
3.3.1 Family Background…….……………………………………….18
3.3.2 Family Cultural Capital………………………..………………..19
3.3.3 Family Social Capital……………………………..…………….20
3.3.4 English Achievement………………………………..…………..22
3.4 Data Collection Procedure……………………………………………...........22
3.5 Data Analysis……………………………………..………………………….23
CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS OF THE STUDY………………………24
4.1 Results for Research Question 1……………………………………….24
4.2 Results for Research Question 2……………………………………….37
4.3 Results for Research Question 3……………………………………….46
CHAPTER FIVE: DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS………….56
5.1 Summary of the Study………………………………………………….56
5.2 Discussion of the Study………………………………………………...57
5.3 Implications…………………………………………………………….60
5.4 Limitation………………………………………………………………61
5.5 Suggestions for Future Research……………………………………….62
REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………..64
APPENDIX A (Chinese)……..………………………………………………….70
APPENDIX B (English)……………...…………………………………………73
References
Astone, N. M. & McLanahan, S. S. (1994). Family structure, residential mobility, and
school dropout: A research note. Demography, 31(4), 575-584.
Blake, J. (1981). Family size and the quality of children. Demography, 18(4),
421-442.
Blake, J. (1989). Family size and achievement. California: California Press.
Blau, M. P. & Duncan, Otis D. (1967). The American occupation structure. N.J.:
Wiley.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American
Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
Burkam, David, T. & Lee, Valerie, E. (2002). Inequality at the satrting gate: Social
background differences in achievement as children begin school. University of
Michigan.
DiMaggio, P. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture
participation on the grades of U.S. high school students. American
Sociological Review, 47(2), 189-201.
65
DeGraaf, P. M. (1986). The impact of financial and cultural resources on educational
attainment in the Netherlands. Sociology of Education, 59, 237-246.
Dustmann, C. (2004). Parental background, primary to secondary school transitions,
and wages. Oxford Economic Papers, 56(2), 209-230.
Goldscheider, F. K. & Goldscheider, C. (1991). The intergenerational flow of income:
Family structure and the status of black Americans. Journal of Marriage and
the Family, 53(2), 499-508.
Goyette, Kimberly. & Yu Xie. (1999). Educational expectations of Asian American
youths: Determinants and ethic differences. Sociology of Education, 72: 22-36.
Hao, L. & Bonstead-Bruns, M. (1998). Parent-Child Differences in Educational
Expectations and the Academic Achievement of immigrant and native students.
Sociology of Education 71: 175-198.
Hauser, R. M. & David L. Featherman. (1977). The process of stratification: Trends
and analysis: Academic Press.
Ho, Sui-Chu, E. & Willms, J. D. (1996). Effects of parental involvement on
eighth-grade achievement. Sociology of Education, 69(2), 126-141.
Kalmijn, M. (1994). Mother's occupation status and children's schooling. American
Sociological Review, 59(2), 257-275.
Lareau, A. (1987) Social Class Differences in Family-School Relationships: The
66
Importance of Cultural Capital. Sociology of Education 60(2): 73-85.Col
Lauer, C. (2003). Family background, cohort and education: A French-German
Comparison based on a Multivariate Ordered Probit Model of Educational
Attainment. Labour Economics, 10(2), 231-251.
McNeal, J. & Ralph B. (1999). Parental involvement as social capital: Differetial
effectiveness on science achievement, truancy, and dropping out. Social
Forces, 78(1), 117-144.
Muller, C. (1993). Parent involvement and academic achievement: An analysis of
family resources available to the child. New York: Westview Press.
Shavit, Y., Yaish, M., Bar-Haim, E. (1993). Persistent Inequality. Changing
Educational Attainment
in Thirteen Countries. Boulder, CO.: Westview Press.
Teachman, J. D. (1987). Family background, educational resources, and educational
attainment. American Sociological Review, 52(4), 548-557.
Valerie E. Lee & David T. Burkam. (2002). Inequality at the starting gate: Social
background differences in achievement as children begin school: University of
Michigan.
White, L. & Rogers, S. J. (2000). Economic circumstances and famiy outcomes: A
review of the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 1035-1051.
67
Wojtkiewicz, R. A. & Katharine M. Donato. (1995). Hispanic educational attainment:
The effects of family background and nativity Social Forces, 74(2), 559-574.
68
王釿釧 (1995)。家庭結構、家庭關係與青少年生活適應之分析研究。學生輔導
36:108-118。
王麗雲、游錦雲 (2005)。學童社經背景與暑期經驗對暑期學習成就進展影響之
研究。教育研究集刊 51(4):1-41。
江民瑜 Jiang (2006)。國小學生家長參與學校教育行為之影響機制探討:以高雄
縣市為例。臺灣教育社會社會學研究 6(1):41-81。
李敦仁 & 余民寧 (2005)。社經地位、手足數目、家庭教育資源與教育成就結構
關係模式之驗證:以TEPS 資料庫資料為例。臺灣教育社會學研究 5(2):
1-47。
林俊瑩 (2006)。國小家長對子女的教育期望、參與學校教育態度及參與行為之
關聯性。教育政策論壇 9(1):177-210。
林俊瑩 (2007)。檢視個人與家庭因素、學校因素對學生學業成就的影響:以SEM
與HLM 分析我國國中教育階段機會均等及相關問題。高雄:國立高雄師範
大學教育學系博士論文。
林義男 Lin (1993)。國中學生家庭社經背景、父母參與及其學業成就的關係。輔
導學報 16:157-212。
姜得勝 (2004)。台灣家庭結構的巨變與其衝擊。台灣教育 630:2-13。
侯崇文 (2001)。家庭結構、家庭關係與青少年偏差行為探討。應用心理研究 11:
25-43。
69
孫清山 & 黃毅志 (1996)。補習教育、文化資本與教育取得。台灣社會學刊 19:
96-137。
馬信行 (1985)。家庭文化背景與學業成績的關係。國立政治大學學報 51:
139-165。
鄒浮安 (1994)。家庭社經地位與學業成就之關係:後設關係。教育研究資訊
2(3):38-47。
鄭淵全Cheng (1997)。社經地位、能力、學校教育過程與國小學生學業成就之關
係-功能典範與衝突典範之探究。高雄:國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論
文。
蔡順良 (1985)。家庭社經地位、父母管教態度與學校環境對國中學生自我肯定
及生活適應之影響研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理系教育心理學報 18:
239-264。
蔡毓智 (2002)。學習資產對學業成績之影響 - 以台北市國三學生基本學力測驗
成績為例。台北: 國立政治大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
謝孟穎 (2003)。家長社經背景與學生學業成就關聯性之研究。教育研究集刊
49(2):255-287。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔