臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

目的:探討某橡膠墊圈工廠勞工暴露的噪音情形、沖壓床機械安全分析和環境各種懸浮微粒之測量(包括〖PM〗_1.0、〖PM〗_2.5、〖PM〗_4.0 、〖PM〗_10、TSP)，藉由現場觀察與工作環境測量來瞭解作業環境內的暴露結果並加以分析。
研究方法:使用英國Cirrus 型號 CR:832C之噪音計測量作業環境中的噪音暴露與頻譜分析，在工作時間八小時內每半小時測量一次每次持續5分鐘，共測量兩週；並使用台灣泰仕型號TES-1354個人噪音劑量計在噪音發生區域進行個人八小時噪音暴露量測定。使用美國Met One攜帶式粉塵偵測器 AEROCET 831 在工作時間內每半小時測量一次進行作業場所懸浮微粒之量測，並現場觀察沖壓床機械之安全設計。
研究結果:1.作業環境中噪音第一週平均值介於85.8~90.4 dB(A)；第二週平均值介於84.2~90.2 dB(A)。2.機械附近噪音皆大於90 dB(A)，三次機械噪音平均值介於91.4~93.2 dB(A)。3.在1000Hz、2KHz、4KHz、8KHz 每個音頻之音壓位準幾乎都超過90.0 dB(A)，介於89.1~98.5 dB(A)。4.個人噪音暴露量測26位勞工，噪音暴露區勞工平均暴露結果介於89.9~93.4 dB(A)；非噪音暴露區勞工平均值介於82.1~83.9 dB(A)。5.懸浮微粒全廠的濃度〖PM〗_1.0平均值18.5~22.4 μg/m^3；〖PM〗_2.5平均值介於39.9~62.1μg/m^3；〖PM〗_4.0平均值147.0~292.7 μg/m^3；〖PM〗_10平均值介於1704.4~2619.3 μg/m^3；TSP平均值介於3055.3~4791.3 μg/m^3。6.安全裝置設備的部分-有光電式安全裝置、緊急停止裝置、腳踏開關以及自動進料系統:觀察結果沖壓機械屬於低危險性。
結論:作業環境及機械附近噪音皆大於90 dB(A)，音頻分析中噪音幾乎都集中於中高頻頻率；在噪音區域所測得之勞工噪音個人暴露劑量結果幾乎都大於90 dB(A)；作業環境中的懸浮微粒大都屬於粒徑10μm的胸腔性懸浮微粒(PM_10)與總懸浮微粒的濃度較高；現今的沖壓機械大部分都使用自動進出料系統及主要防護具皆具備，對勞工而言在安全方面屬於低危險程度。

Objectives: To investigate the noise exposure situation of worker in a rubber washer factory , the safety analysis of pressing machinery,and the measurement of particle matter in the environment(including〖PM〗_1.0、〖PM〗_2.5、〖PM〗_4.0 、〖PM〗_10、TSP).
Methods: The Cirrus’s model CR: 832C noise meter was used to measure the noise level and spectrum analysis in the working environment, it is measured every half hour during the eight hours of working for 5 minutes each time for a total of two weeks. And use of personal dosimeters to measure personal noise exposure in the region of the noise occurrence. Using a portable dust detector AEROCET 831 to measure the particle matter in the work place every half hour during working hours. On-site observation of the safety design of press machines.
Results: 1. The first week noise average in the working environment is between 85.8 ~90.4 dB(A); the second week average is between 84.2 ~ 90.2 dB(A). 2. The noise near pressing machinery the is over than 90 dB(A), and the three measurements average value is between 91.4 ~ 93.2 dB(A).3. At 1000HZ, 2KHZ, 4KHZ, 8KHZ, the sound pressure level of each audio is almost over 90.0 dB(A), which is between 89.1 and 98.5 dB(A).4. Personal noise exposure measures of 26 workers, the average exposure of workers in the noise exposure area is between 89.9 and 93.4 dB(A); the worker noise average in non-noise exposure areas is between 82.1~ 83.9 dB(A).5.Theconcentration of particle matters〖PM〗_1.0average 18.5~22.4μg/m^3;〖PM〗_2.5average between 39.9~62.1μg/m^3;〖PM〗_4.0average 147.0~292.7μg/m^3; 〖PM〗_10 average value is between 1704.4~2619.3μg/m^3; TSP average is between 3055.3~4791.3μg/m^3.6. The security device of the pressing machinery - a photoelectric safety device, an emergency stop means, a foot switch, and automatic feeding system and observation results: pressing machines is low hazard.
Conclusions: The noise in the working environment and near the machine is over than 90 dB(A). The noise in the audio analysis is almost concentrated in the mid-high frequency. The noise exposure measured by the workers in the noise area is almost over than 90 dB(A);Most of the particle matters in the working environment belong to the thoracic particle matter (PM_10) with a particle size larger than 10 μm and the concentration of total suspended particles is higher; Most of today''s stamping machines use automatic feed and discharge systems and major protective systems, which are low-risk for workers.

摘要 I
Abstract III
目錄 V
圖目錄 VII
表目錄 IX
第一章、前言 1
第一節、研究背景與動機 1
第二節、研究目的 3
第二章、文獻探討 4
第一節、墊圈(Washer)之製造及應用 4
第二節、橡膠材料(Rubber) 5
第三節、沖壓機械之安全 6
第四節、懸浮微粒之構成及健康危害 11
第五節、噪音 19
第三章、研究方法 30
第一節、研究架構 30
第一節、研究架構 30
第二節、研究對象 31
第三節、研究工具及設計 31
第四章、研究結果 37
第一節、廠內之噪音分析 37
第二節、廠內作業環境懸浮微粒之分析 46
第三節、沖壓機械之安全分析評估 59
第五章、討論 61
第一節、作業場所中噪音分析 61
第二節、作業場所中懸浮微粒濃度 62
第三節、沖壓機械安全評估分析 64
第六章、結論與建議 65
第一節、結論 65
第二節、建議 66
參考文獻 67

Birgitta B, Peter H; Sources and effects of low‐frequency noise;The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America;1996; 99;2985.
Brown JS, Gordon T, Price O, Asgharian B; Thoracic and respirable particle definitions for human health risk assessment; Particle and Fibre Toxicology; 2013; 10; 12.
Chen H, Goldberg MS, Villeneuve PJ; A systematic review of the relationbetween long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and chronicdiseases; Reviews Environment Health; 2008;23;243–297.
David Hu1 JJ;PM_2.5 pollution and risk for lung cancer;A Rising Issue in China. Journal of Environmental Protection; 2014;5;731-738.
Elise EM ,Van K, Hanneke K, Hendriek CB, Caroline B A, Brigit A M Staatsen;The association between noise exposure and blood pressure and ischemic heart disease: a meta-analysis; Environmental Health Perspectives; 2002; 110(3); 307–317.
Hamra GB, Guha N, Cohen A; Outdoor particulate matter exposure and lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis; Environmental Health Perspectives; 2014;122(9);906-911.
Hamra GB, Laden F, Cohen AJ, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Brauer M, Loomis D. Lung cancer and exposure to nitrogen dioxide and traffic-A systematic review and meta-analysis ; Environmental Health Perspectives ; 2015;123(11);1107-1112.
Hanna V,Timo K, Leena T ; Long-term effect of occupational noise on the risk of coronary heart disease; Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health；2005;31(4):291–299


Hugh WD, Kay T, Susan M.K, Murray R.H, Clyde H, Paul A. Demers; Occupational exposure to noise and mortality from acute myocardial Infarction; Epidemiology ; 2005 ; 16(1); 25-32
Kerstin PW, Johanna B, Anders K, Stephen B; Low frequency noise "pollution" interferes with performance; A Bi-monthly Inter-disciplinary International Journal; 2001;4(13);33-49.
Ki-Hyun K, Ehsanul K , Shamin K ; A review on the human health impact of airborne particulate matter; Environment International ; 2015; 74 ; 136-143.
Krewski D, Jerrett M, Burnett RT; Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality ; Research Reports Health Effects Institute;2009;140;5-114; discussion 115-136.
Madbuli H, Noweir; Noise exposure as related to productivity, disciplinary actions, absenteeism, and accidents among textile workers; Journal of Safety Research;1984;15(4);163-174.
Maela R, Anne M; Chronic exposure to noise in industry the effects on satisfaction, stress symptoms, and company attachment; Environment and Behavior;2002;34(5);651-671.
Nawrot TS, Nackaerts K, Hoet PH, Nemery B; Lung cancer mortality and fine particulate air pollution in Europe; International Journal of Cancer; 2007;120(8):1825-1826; author reply 1827.
Pope CA 3rd, Burnett RT, Thun MJ, Calle EE, Krewski D, Ito K, Thurston GD；Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution；The Journal of the American Medical Association;2002; 287(9); 1132-1141.



Suadicani P, Hein HO, Gyntelberg F; Occupational noise exposure, social class, and risk of ischemic heart disease and all-cause mortality – a 16-year follow-up in the Copenhagen Male Study ; Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health；2012;38(1):19-26
Talbott E, Helmkamp J, Matthews K, Kuller L, Cottington E, Redmond G.; Occupational noise exposure noise-induced hearing loss and theepidemiology of high blood pressure; American Journal ofEpidemiology;1985; 121(4);501–514.
Ta-Yuan C, Bing-Fang H, Chiu-Shong L, Ren-Yin C, Ven-Shing W,Bo-Ying B, Jim-Shoung L; Occupational noise exposure and incident hypertension in men: A Prospective Cohort Study; American Journal of Epidemiology;2013; 177(8);818-825.
Tim SN,Kristiaan N,Peter H.M ,Benoit N; Lung cancer mortality and fine particulate air pollution in Europe; International Journal of Cancer; 2007;120(8); 1825-1826.
Tomei G, Fioravanti M, Cerratti D, Sancini A, Tomao E, Rosati MV, Vacca D, Palitti T, Di Famiani M, Giubilati R, De Sio S, Tomei F.; Occupationalexposure to noise and the cardiovascular system: a meta-analysis; Sci Total Environ. 2010; 408(4);681-689.
Villeneuve PJ, Weichenthal SA, Crouse D, Miller AB, To T, Martin RV, van Donkelaar A, Wall C, Burnett RT; Long-term exposure to fine particulate matter air pollution and mortality among Canadian women；Epidemiology; 2015;26(4):536-545.
Vinikoor-Imler LC, Davis JA, Luben TJ. An ecologic analysis of county-level PM2.5 concentrations and lung cancer incidence and mortality; International journal of environmental research and public health; Jun2011;8(6); 1865-1871.
Virkkunen H, Kauppinen T, Tenkanen L.; Long-term effect of occupational noise on the risk of coronary heart disease ;Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health ; 2005;31(4):291–199.
MingyuZ,Mueller NT, HongjianW, XiumeiH, Appel, Lawrence J, XiaobinW; Maternal exposure to ambient particulate matter ≤2.5 µm during pregnancy and the risk for high blood pressure in childhood；Hypertension； 2018,；72(1)；194-201.
高小萍、陳姵安、劉志青；行政院國家同步軸射中心輻射及操作安全組；P 13-14。
毛義方：沖床工作安全，大同公司，單行本，1981。
李平雄、黃郁婷、王文德(2015)；機件原理Ⅰ；華興文化出版。
趙子巖；沖壓機械的安全對策；工業安全科技; 2006 ; 60;P 15-19。
林桂儀、盧士一;國內 3K 製程A+行業噪音現況調查與建立工程改善模式;勞工安全衛生研究所; 2014。
林桂儀、盧士一；噪音暴露對勞工生/心理影響之研究；行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所；2013。
橡膠業安全衛生自主管理實務手冊；經濟部工業局；2002。
王玲宜；職業噪音暴露對對製造業員工聽力損失及冠心病風險相關性研究；臺中；中國醫藥大學碩士論文；2013。
張子沅、楊智傑、林宏霖、黃華庭、周宏昱、林俊廷；精實管理之研究與探討；彰化；建國科技大學專題研究；2012。
謝曼麗；保護你的聽力，還是失去它？—擊退職場噪音；勞工安全衛生簡訊；2011；105；P 12-13。
謝男鴻、吳宗鋼；PM2.5對作業場所勞工的危害探討；勞動及職業安全衛生簡訊；2016；7；P 4-9。
粉塵危害預防實務；行政院勞工委員會北區勞動檢查所；2008。
勞工聽力危害預防手冊；行政院勞委會勞工安全衛生研究所；2008。
謝男鴻、鐘順輝；細懸浮微粒對作業場所勞工之暴露危害評估；勞動部勞動及職業安全衛生研究所；2016。
陳友剛；微量粉塵對健康之影響；勞工安全衛生簡訊；1995；10；P 9-10
謝宗原；辦公室的懸浮微粒– 看不見的健康殺手；勞工安全衛生簡訊；122；P 8。
阮國棟、吳婉怡、黃冠穎；待解謎團—環境中奈米微粒；科學發展；2008；421；P 26-31。
周百謙；懸浮微粒與身體健康；長庚醫訊；2016 ；37 (1)；P 15-16。
鄭尊仁；細懸浮微粒的健康效應及法規制訂；生態台灣；2012；35；P 6-9。楊啟賢、董道興、李諺儒；工作環境安全衛生狀況認知調查-問卷架構及信效度修正；勞動部勞動及職業安全衛生研究所；2016。
林桂儀、林政佑；評估職場噪音暴露對勞工夜間睡眠品質之影響；勞動部勞動及職業安全衛生研究所；2016。
行政院勞工委員會(2004)；勞動檢查年報；行政院勞工委員會編印；台北。
製造業機械操作之災害預防；行政院勞委會勞工安全衛生研究所；2008。
魏國彥；認識懸浮微粒；行政院環境保護署編印；2015。
傅彬貴、許正園；空氣汙染PM2.5增加肺癌風險；台中醫林；90；取自: http://www.tcmed.org.tw/edcontent.php?lang=tw&tb=43&id=24
勞工噪音傷害；國軍高雄總醫院，2018；取自:https://goo.gl/SaL7yk
高雄市噪音防制網；取自: https://goo.gl/oMw3KC
綠十字健康網；取自:http://www.greencross.org.tw/index.htm
細懸浮微粒管制；行政院環境保護署；取自: https://goo.gl/RLSVIu
空氣品質標準；空氣品質改善維護資訊網；行政院環境保護署；取自: https://goo.gl/RLSVIu
室內空氣品質標準；全國法規資訊庫；取自: https://goo.gl/RBS3Fa
職業安全衛生設施規則；全國法規資訊庫；取自:https://goo.gl/aSjN9b
勞工作業場所容許暴露標準；全國法規資訊庫；取自:https://goo.gl/awvdwN