臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究經由實驗室及抄紙機生產實際抄造來探討漿料配率、纖維形態、磨漿對於家庭用紙柔軟度性質的影響。實驗結果顯示，磨漿會明顯降低家庭用紙柔軟度，在低於游離度500 mL (CSF)時，則漸趨和緩。家庭用紙柔軟度及蓬嵩柔軟度與纖維形態的纖維長厚比值有關，而表面柔軟度與纖維纖細度值有關。抄紙機生產選擇纖維長厚比及纖維纖細度值較高的漿種，經由紙漿配率及磨漿程度調整，在品質水準範圍內，可以生產柔軟度較優的產品。

This study examined the effects of furnish mixing ratios, fiber morphologies, and refining on the softness of household paper based on laboratory experiments and actual paper machine production line results. The experimental results indicated that refining significantly reduced the softness of household paper. At a pulp freeness of < 500 mL CSF, the effect was alleviated. Hand-felt tissue softness results based on Tissue Softness Analyzer determinations and bulk softness changed according to the fiber length-to-thickness ratio of fiber morphological characteristics. The surface softness of tissues varied with the fiber length-to-coarseness ratio. On site production can modulate the product softness to remain at higher levels by selecting fibers with a greater length-to-thickness ratio and fiber length-to-coarseness ratio, coupled with adjustments to the furnish mix and refining degree.

封面內頁
簽名頁
中文摘要 iii
ABSTRACT iv
誌謝 v
目錄 viii
圖目錄 x
表目錄 xii
論文內容相關名稱代號對照表 xiv
第一章 前言 1
1.1研究動機 1
1.2 研究目的 3
第二章 文獻回顧 5
2.1背景資料 5
2.2手感及儀器柔軟度測試方法 14
2.2.1人體手感柔軟度測試法 14
2.2.2 TSA柔軟度分析儀測試法 15
第三章 實驗設計及設備 20
3.1實驗目的 20
3.2 實驗架構 20
3.3 實驗材料、設備與方法 21
3.3.1手抄紙實驗 21
3.3.1.1材料 21
3.3.1.2設備 21
3.3.1.3方法 21
3.3.2 抄紙機生產用纖維與設備 23
第四章 實驗結果及討論 25
4.1 纖維形態 25
4.2 紙漿配比與游離度對家庭用紙性質之影響 26
4.2.1抗張強度 27
4.2.2破裂強度 28
4.2.3柔軟度 30
4.3抄紙機試驗生產 40
第五章 結論與建議 48
5.1結論 48
5.2建議 48
參考文獻 49
附錄一 56
附錄二 58
附錄三 59
附錄四 60
附錄五 61
附錄六 62
附錄七 63
附錄八 64

圖1-1 柔軟度定義圖 1
圖2-1 紙漿組成與手感柔軟度關係圖 7
圖2-2 粗糙度定義示意圖 8
圖2-3 造紙常用針葉樹纖維長厚比比較圖 11
圖2-4 造紙常用針葉樹纖維纖細度比較圖 11
圖2-5 造紙常用闊葉樹纖維長厚比比較圖 12
圖2-6 造紙常用闊葉樹纖維纖細度比較圖 13
圖2-7 手感測試法與TSA HF測試原紙的相關性 16
圖2-8 手感測試法與TSA HF測試衛生紙的相關性 17
圖2-9 TSA儀器測試家庭用紙的感測方法 17
圖2-10 TSA儀器測試家庭用紙柔軟度TS7與TS750的感測方法 18
圖2-11 TSA儀器測試家庭用紙D值的動作原理 18
圖2-12 纖維坍塌性與細胞腔圓周長關係示意圖 19
圖3-1手抄紙實驗流程圖 22
圖3-2抄紙機生產實驗流程圖 24
圖4-1不同配料游離度對手抄紙抗張指數的影響 28
圖4-2 不同配料游離度對手抄紙破裂指數的影響 29
圖4-3 不同配料游離度對手抄紙TSA HF的影響 32
圖4-4不同配料游離度對手抄紙TS7的影響 33
圖4-5不同配料游離度對手抄紙TS750的影響 35
圖4-6不同配料游離度對手抄紙TSA D值的影響 36
圖4-7抄紙機試驗配率對手感柔軟度及厚度的影響 45
圖4-8 抄紙機試驗衛生紙配率對TSA分析項目測試結果 46
圖4-9 抄紙機試驗衛生紙配率對縱向抗張強度的影響 47

表2-1 造紙常用針葉樹纖維形態、長厚比與纖細度比較表 10
表2-2 造紙常用闊葉樹纖維形態、長厚比與纖細度比較表 12
表2-3 手感柔軟測試法 15
表4-1 實驗用針葉漿及闊葉漿的纖維形態性質 26
表4-2不同配料游離度對手抄紙抗張指數的影響 27
表4-3 不同配料游離度對手抄紙破裂指數的影響 29
表4-4 不同配料游離度對手抄紙TSA HF的影響 31
表4-5 不同配料游離度對手抄紙TS7的影響 33
表4-6不同配料游離度對手抄紙TS750的影響 34
表4-7不同配料游離度對手抄紙D值的影響 35
表4-8 游離度CSF 450條件下R2分析 37
表4-9游離度CSF 500條件下R2分析 37
表4-10游離度CSF 550條件下R2分析 37
表4-11游離度CSF 600條件下R2分析 37
表4-12 手抄紙TSA HF柔軟度與相關物性迴歸參數表 38
表4-13 手抄紙TSA HF柔軟度與其函數迴歸參數表 39
表4-14 手抄紙TSA HF柔軟度與L/T、L/W迴歸參數表 39
表4-15 抄紙機試驗生產TSA HF柔軟度與其函數迴歸參數表 42
表4-16 抄紙機試驗生產TSA HF柔軟度與L/T等物性迴歸參數表 42
表4-17 抄機試驗生產TSA HF柔軟度與L/W等物性迴歸參數表 43
表4-18 抄紙機試驗生產成品測試物性一覽表 44
表4-19 抄紙機試驗配率對TSA柔軟度測試結果一覽表 45
表4-20 抄紙機試驗衛生紙配率對縱向抗張強度的影響 46

參考文獻

1.史穆克，陶泰來譯。1985。第二章，樹木及木漿纖維的特性。製漿造紙技術手冊，食貨出版社，pp 19-36。
2.鄧澤殷。2011。面紙手感柔軟度之量化研究–互反判斷矩陣之 應用。大葉大學環境工程學系，博士論文，彰化。
3.張清賀，彭元興，鄧澤殷。2009。磨漿機控制系統介紹。漿紙技術，13(1):23-32。
4.Ampulski RS., Hollmark H. 2007. Softness moving towards the virtual test. Tissue World, December-January, 2007, p 40.
5.Bates JD, Stevens SS. 1960. Warmth and cold: Dynamics of sensory intensity. J. Exper. Psych, 60(3): 183-192.
6.Bradley M, Meltzer FP, Watson P. 2013. Getting it right - cost, quality and sustainability opportunities using British Columbia NSK. 5th Annual Specialty Paper Conference, November 6-8, 2013, Stuttgart, Germany.
7.Burman A. 2006. Acacia (BAKP) - The fibre of choice. in Proc. of 60th Appita Annual Conference and Exhibition, 3-5 April, 2006, Melbourne, Vic. Austria, pp 473-479.
8.Campbell C. 2002. Crepe control optimization to improve production efficiency and enhance handfeel softness. in Proc. of 2002 TAPPI Technology Summit, 11 Dec., 2009, Atlanta, GA, USA, pp 31-38.
9.Campbell C, Pawlowska L, Huang X. 2016. Utilising Kemview sheet analyser to optimise softness and control the creping process. Chemicals, Technical Theme, 16 Sept., 2016.
10.Carette J. 2016. Understanding and measuring tissue softness. Tissue 360° Forum, TAPPI, May 16-18, 2016, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
11.Civille GV, Dus CA. 1990. Development of terminology to describe handfeel properties of paper and fabrics. J. of Senor Study, 5(1): 19-32.
12.Chang CH, Yu ST, Perng YS. 2017. Effects of furnish and refining on the properties of household paper. Cellulose Chemistry and Technology (Accepted , Dec.12, 2017)
13.Concalves C. 2001. The eucalyptus fiber for tissue papers. in Proc. of 7th Brazilian Symposium on the Chemistry of Lignins and other Wood Components, 2-5 Sep., 2001, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, pp 317-323.
14.Corscadden K, Lester K. 2008. Testing tissue softness. Tissue World J., Feb/Mar, 2008, pp 39-40.
15.Dutt D, Tyagi CH. 2011. Comparison of various eucalyptus species for their morphological, chemical, pulp and paper making characteristics. Indian J. of Chemical Technology, 18(2): 145-151.
16.El-Hosseiny F, Anderson D. 1999. Effect of fiber length and coarseness on the burst strength of paper. Tappi J., 82(1): 202-203.
17.Eymin-Petot-Tourtollet G, Cottin F, Cochaux A, Petit-Conil M. 2003. The use of MorFi analyser to characterise mechanical pulps. in Proc. of International Mechanical Pulping Conference, 2-5 June, 2003, Quebec city, Quebec, Canada. pp 225-232.
18.Fisher R, Chuang H. 1971. The relationship between fiber and paper properties. in Proc. of the International Fiber Physics Conference, 20-23 Sept., 1971, Mont Gabriel, Quebec, Canada.
19.Foelkel C. 2007. Advanced in Eucalyptus fiber properties and paper products. in www.celso-foelkel.com.br.
20.Foelkel C. 1998. Eucalyptus wood and pulp quality requirements oriented to the manufacture of tissue and printing & writing papers. in Proc. of the 52nd Appita Conference, 11-14 May, 1998, Brisbane, Australia.
21.Gallay W. 1973. Textural Properties of Paper: Measurements and Fundamental Relationships, in the Fundamental Properties of Paper Related to its Uses, Vol. 2, F. Bolam Ed., Transactions of the Symposium held at Cambridge.
22.Garnsworthy RK, Gully RL, Kandiah RP, Kenins P, Mayfield RJ, Westerman RA. 1988. Understanding the cause of prickle and itch from the skin contact of fabric. RA report No. G64, Feb. 1988. Belmont, Victoria, Australia.
23.Gigac J, Fiserova M. 2008. Influence of pulp refining on tissue paper properties. Tappi J., 7(8): 27-32.
24.Gruner A. 2016. TSA - Tissue/nonwovens softness analyzer: a new method of measure the softness of nonwovens and textiles. Hygienix 2016, Oct. 24-27, 2016, Orlando, USA.
25.Hagemeyer RW, Manson DW. 1992. Stock Preparation, Chapter X, Refining, Pulp and Paper Manufacture, TAPPI & CPPA. pp 187-219.
26.Hoffman P. 2002. Furnish optimization-there is a new method for optimizing paper products, tissue in particular, which can mean cost savings or quality improvement. in PPE, Paperloop May/Jun, p 24.
27.Ho J, Hutton B, Proctor J, Batchelor W. 2007. Development of a tissue creping test rig. Chemeca, IChemEA, pp 1334-1340.
28.Hollmark H. 1983. Evaluation of tissue paper softness, Tappi J., 66(2): 97-99.
29.Hallmark BH. 1976. The softness of household paper products and related products, the fundamental properties of paper related to its uses, Transactions of the symposium held at Cambridge on September, 1973, Vol. 2 of 2, Ed. Francis Bolam, The British Paper and Board Industry Federation, London, pp 696-703.
30.Hallmark H. 1984. Mechanical properties of tissue, Handbook of Physical and Mechanical Testing of Paper and Paperboard, N.Y., Vol. 1, pp 497-521.
31.Hollmark H, Ampulski RS. 2004. Measurement of tissue paper softness: a literature review. Nordic Pulp and Paper Research Journal, 10(3): 345-353.
32.Hsu JC, Lakhani NN. 2000. Production of soft paper products from coarse cellulosic fibers. U.S. Patent 6074527.
33.Janda BW. 2014. Sheet structure process effect on tissue properties. in Proc. of PaperCon 2014, TAPPI, April 27-30, 2014, Nashville, Tennessee.
34.Kasten U. TSA operating instruction. Feb., 2014, Emtec, Germany.
35.Kawabata S, Niwa M. 1985. A proposal of the standardized measuring condition for mechanical property of apparel fabrics, in Objective Measurement: Application to Product Design and Process Control, ed. by Kawabata S. et al., The textile Machinery Society of Japan, Osaka.
36.Kerekes RJ, Schell CJ. 1995. Effects of fiber length and coarseness on pulp flocculation. Tappi J., 78(2): 133-139.
37.Kibblewhite P. 2005. Fibre influences on tissue quality. in Proc. of 2nd Eucalypt Colloquium, May 24-26, 2005. Concepción, Chile.
38.Kim JJ, Shalev I, Barker RL. 1994. Softness properties of fabric-like tissues. in Proc. of the TAPPI Nonwovens Conference, 14-16 Feb., 1994, Orlando, FL., USA, pp 143-147.
39.Kuo LS, Cheng YL. 2000. Effects of creping conditions on surface softness of tissue paper - application of sled method. Tappi J., 83(12): 61-65.
40.Lamb HJ. 2003. Determination of softness of tissue products, in Proc. of 3rd PTS Tissue Symposium, Munich, Germany
41.Liu J, Hsieh J. 2004. Characterization of tissue softness. Tappi J., 3(4): 3-8.
42.Lumiainen J. 2000. Refining of Chemical Pulp, Chapter 4, Papermaking Science and Technology, Book 8, Fapet Oy.
43.Lyne MB, Whiteman A, Donderi DC. 1983. Multi-dimensional scaling of tissue quality, in Proc. of the TAPPI International Paper Physical Conference, 19-22 Sept., 1983, Harwichport, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA, pp 213-219.
44.Lyne MB, Whiteman A, Donderi DC. 1984. Multidimensional scaling of tissue quality. Pulp and Paper Canada, 85(10): T259-T265.
45.Majid K, Milad T, Ramin V. 2014. Chemical and biometrical properties of Plum of Plum wood and its application in pulp and paper production. Maderas Cienc. tecnol., 16(3): 313-322.
46.Marks LE. 1974. Sensory Processes. Academic Press, New York and London.
47.Nanko H, Button A, Hillman D. 2005. The World of Market Pulp. WOMP, LLC, Appleton, Wisconsin.
48.Niskanen K. 1998. Paper Physics. Book 16, Papermaking Science and Technology, Fapet, Hersinke, Finland.
49.Ostendorf W, Sheehan J, Kleinwaecthter MH. 2016. The complexity of understanding and measuring tissue softness. in Proc. of Tissue 360° Forum, TAPPI, May 16-18, 2016, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
50.Pan Y, Habeger C, Biasca J. 1989. Empirical Relationships between tissue softness and out-of-plane ultrasonic measurements. IPC Technical Paper Series, Number 322, The Institute of Paper Chemistry, Appleton, Wisconsin, USA.
51.Patterson T. 2013. Evaluating and enhancing tissue softness. in Proc. of PaperCon 2014, TAPPI, April 27-May 1, 2013, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
52.Perng YS, Wang EIC. 2012. Optimization of handsheet greaseproof properties: the effects of furnish, refining, fillers and binders. BioResources, 7(3): 3895-3909.
53.Perng YS, Wang EIC, Cheng YL, Chen YC. 2009. Effect of fiber morphological characteristics and refining on handsheet properties. Taiwan J. For. Sci., 24(2): 127-139.
54.Petit-Conil M, Ruiz J. 2009. Pulp softness potential: a methodology to assess and compare pulps. in Proc. of ABTCP-PI, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
55.Pratt WK. 1978. Image Feature Extraction, Digital Image Processing, John Wiley & Sons, New York. pp 505.
56.Robertson G, Olson J, Allen P, Chan B, Seth R. 1999. Measurement of fiber length, coarseness, and shape with the fiber quality analyzer. Tappi J., 82(10): 93-98.
57.Ruiz J, Sacon VM, Silva FHP, Eichorn S, Bley L, Sabel H, Villette MJ, Tourtollet GEP, Petit-Conil M. 2010. Tissue softness: an objective on-line industrial value. Przeglad Papierniczy, 66(8): 471-476.
58.Rust JP, Shalev I, Keadle TL, Barker RL. 1994. Evaluation of surface softness of tissue paper products by using mechanical stylus scanning, optical image analysis and fuzzy sets. in Proc. of the TAPPI Nonwovens Conference, 14-16 Feb., 1994, Orlando, FL, USA, pp 143-154.
59.Sarimweis F, Retsina T. 2000. Tissue softness prediction using neural network methodologies. in Proc. of 86th Annual meeting, Preprints A, 1-3 February, 2000, Montreal, Que, Canada, pp A27-A30.
60.Seth R. 1998. Beating and refining response of some reinforcement pulps. in Proc. of 84th Annual Meeting, CPPA Technical Section, Montreal, Canada.
61.Seth R. 1995. The effect of fibre length and coarseness on the tensile strength of wet webs: a statistical geometry explanation. Tappi J., 78(3): 99-102.
62.Sloan JH. 1994. How to maximize the dry crepe process. Tappi J., 77(8): 298.
63.Sloan JH. 1991. Yankee dryer coatings. Tappi J., 74(8): 123-126.
64.Stevens JC. 1965. Tappi Journal, 48 (4): 63.
65.Stitt J, Richardson H. 2014. Defining the physical characteristics that cause tissue softness. Tissue World Magazine, September/October.
66.Teng TY, Wang EIC, Perng YS. 2011. A reciprocal matrix approach to the analysis of hand-felt softness of facial tissues. Tappi J., 10(3): 39-46.
67.Van Eperen RH, Hardacker KW, Winck WA, Van den Akker JA. 1962. IPC Project 2220, Report 5, The Institute of Paper Chemistry, Appleton, WI, USA.
68.Varghese M, Vishnu KNS, Bennt SSR, Jaghdes S. 1995. Genetic effect on wood and fiber traits of Eucalyptus grandis provenances. in Proc. of Eucalyptus Plantations: Improving Fibre Yield and Quality. CRCTHF-IUFRO Conference, 19-24 February, 1995, Hobart, Australia, pp 64-67.
69.Watson P. 2009. Fiber Morphology on Temap Website, Canfor Pulp Limited Partnership, CPLP.
70.Watson P. 2017. Helping you solve the fiber puzzle. in www.temap.com.
71.Watson P. 2013. The role of high quality NBSK in premium tissue products. in Proc. of Tissue World Barcelona, March 18-21, 2013, Barcelona, Spain.
72.Watson P, Martinez F, Janssen W, Jang HF. 2011. Producing high quality soft tissue paper grades using selected softwood and hardwood pulps, and optimizing the ratio and furnish treatment. in www.temap.com.
73.Watson P, Bradley M. 2009. Canadian pulp fibre morphology: superiority and considerations for end use potential. The Forestry Chronicle, 85(3): 401-408.