跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.90) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/21 19:01
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:潘碧霞
研究生(外文):PAN,BI-SHIA
論文名稱:探討Parse理論於初產婦的生產經驗
論文名稱(外文):Exploring Parse’s Theory in Childbirth Experience of Primipara
指導教授:顧雅利顧雅利引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ya-Lie Ku
口試委員:蘇翔王琳華
口試委員(外文):Su, HsiangWang, L-H
口試日期:2017-09-08
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:輔英科技大學
系所名稱:護理系碩士班
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:護理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:106
語文別:中文
論文頁數:64
中文關鍵詞:Parse理論初產婦生產經驗
外文關鍵詞:Parse’s theoryPrimiparaChildbirth experience
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:477
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:71
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
背景:研究者工作於產科地區醫院數十年,每年約有 1800-2200位產婦,觀察其進入待產室時對產痛的不安與焦慮,而 Parse 人類轉變理論以病人爲照顧中心,理論的建構意義、共創相關性節律型態,和共同超越轉變等三個原則,可運用於初產婦生產的三個產程階段,以瞭解其獨特的生產經驗。

目的:本研究目的乃探討 Parse 理論於初產婦的生產經驗。

方法:本研究採 Parse 理論銓釋現象學設計,立意取樣標準為初產婦、自然生產者、剖腹生產,懷孕週數 38 到 42 週間,初產婦及新生兒均無產前或產後內科合併症、願意參加此研究,並簽署書面同意書者為研究參與者。本研究於 IRB 通過後即開使收案,採半結構式會談指引,依 Colaizzi現象學研究步驟進行資料的分析,研究嚴謹度採Lincoln 及 Guba(1985)提出可信賴性做資料的評量。

研究結果:四位初產婦的生產經驗包括(ㄧ)家人、同事、同學的生產經驗,(二)網路搜尋相關生產資訊,(三)傳統風俗文化,(四)生產方式的選擇,(五)初產婦的生產過程,(六)初產婦生產過程的支持,(七) 初產婦生產過程的協助。此外,研究者再將四種類型初產婦生產經驗進行結構性整合,進行啟發性的銓釋,呈現生產前想像真實與虛擬的生產經驗,透過語言和文化來建構生產方式的價值與意義。生產中能或不能配合呼吸的教導,用力或拒絕用力的限制,揭露或隱藏麻醉的恐懼和產痛,自我掙扎或接受他人的指引。生產後反思自然產超越產痛的經驗,剖腹產和自然產轉剖腹產超越陌生手術環境的恐懼,剖腹產轉自然產超越自我控制的平衡點,化阻力為助力的生產過程。
Background:The principal author has decades of experience in the obstetrics department of a regional hospital, where approximately 1800–2200 mothers give birth each year. The signs of anxiety and apprehension over labor pains can be observed among the mothers upon their entry to the delivery room, and Parse’s human becoming theory focuses on patientorientated care with three principles of meaning, rhythmicity, and transcendence could apply into three stages of delivery primipara to understand their unique delivery experiences.

Purpose of the Study: The purpose of this study is to explore the Parse theory in childbirth experience of primipara.

Methods:This study used Parse theory hermeneutic phenomenology design and purposive sampling was adopted to recruit participants that conformed to the following criteria: primipara, normal spontaneous vaginal delivery, caesarean section, 38–42 weeks of pregnancy, no antepartum or postpartum complications in mother and child, and voluntary participation with written consent. This study was started to collect data after IRB approved (No.17-034-B1) by following the semi-structured interviews. Analysis of the data was based on the phenomenological procedures of Colazzi, and the reliability and validity of the present study were ensured by adherence to the trustworthiness standards detailed by Lincoln and Guba(1985).

Results: The childbirth experiences of four primiparas were classified into the following categories: (a) The childbirth experiences of family members, colleagues, and school friends, (b) Search of childbirth-related information on the Internet, (c) Traditional customs and culture, (d) Choice of delivery methods, (e) The delivery process of the primiparas, (f) Support received by the primiparas during the delivery, and (g) Assistance provided for the primiparas during the delivery. Additionally, Four categories of the childbirth experiences were structurally integrated for heuristic interpretation to present the realistic and unrealistic expectations of the childbirth experience before the delivery, and the value and meaning of the delivery methods constructed through language and culture. The primiparas’ childbirth experiences included whether they were able to adopt the breathing technique they were taught, their limitation to push, the disclosure or disguise of their fear of anesthesia and the delivery pain, and their self-struggle or acceptance of instructions. The primiparas reflected their individual childbirth experiences after the delivery that some primiparas overcame the pain during the vaginal delivery, another overcame the fear of an unfamiliar surgical environment when undergoing caesarian section, and the other surpassed the threshold of selfcontrol and turned resistance to assistance when the mode of delivery was changed from caesarian section to vaginal delivery.

目 錄
誌謝 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------i
中文摘要 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------ii
英文摘要 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------iv
目錄 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------v
表目錄 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------vii
圖目錄 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------viii
第一章 緒論-------------------------------------------------------------------------1
第一節 研究動機與重要性------------------------------------------------------------1
第二節 研究目的----------------------------------------------------------------------4
第三節 名詞解釋----------------------------------------------------------------------4
一 Parse理論 --------------------------------------------------------------------4
二 初產婦------------------------------------------------------------------------5
三 生產經驗----------------------------------------------------------------------5
第二章 文獻探討----------------------------------------------------------------------6
第一節 Parse 人類轉變理論---------------------------------------------------------6
第二節 Parse 理論的研究文獻-------------------------------------------------------9
第三節 初產婦的生產經驗------------------------------------------------------------12
第三章 研究方法----------------------------------------------------------------------19
第一節 銓釋現象學和 Parse 護理研法-------------------------------------------------21
第二節 研究對象與和研究場所--------------------------------------------------------22
第三節 研究結果------------------------------------------------------------------23
第四節 資料收集過程和資料分析------------------------------------------------------25
第五節 研究倫理------------------------------------------------------------------29
第四章 討論與結論--------------------------------------------------------------------30
第一節 研究參與者的基本資料--------------------------------------------------------30
第二節 初產婦生產經驗的擷取與綜合---------------------------------------------------32
第三節 啟發性的詮釋研究結果.-------------------------------------------------------46
第四節 研究者的解讀與反思.---------------------------------------------------------49
一 研究者的解讀----------------------------------------------------------------49
二 研究者反思------------------------------------------------------------------51
第五節 研究討論-------------------------------------------------------------------54
一 初產婦的生產經驗------------------------------------------------------------54
二 Parse 理論詮釋初產婦的生產經驗-----------------------------------------------56
第五章 結論與建議--------------------------------------------------------------------58
第一節 研究結論-------------------------------------------------------------------58
第二節 研究建議-------------------------------------------------------------------59
一 醫療機構實務---------------------------------------------------------------64
二 護理實務-------------------------------------------------------------------60
三 護理教育-------------------------------------------------------------------60
四 護理研究-------------------------------------------------------------------61
第三節 研究限制--------------------------------------------------------------------61
第四節 研究者個人的反思與應用-----------------------------------------------------------61
參考文獻 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------65
中文文獻 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------65
英文文獻 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------68
附錄一 人體實驗委員同意書---------------------------------------------------------------75
附錄二 研究同意書----------------------------------------------------------------------76
附錄三 深入對談同意書-------------------------------------------------------------------78
附錄四 個案基本資料表-------------------------------------------------------------------79
附錄五 引用鈕教授之表格-----------------------------------------------------------------80
參考文獻
中文文獻
衛生福利部國民健康署(2016)‧104年出生通報統計年報取自http://www.hpa.gov.tw/Bhpnet/Portal/File/ThemeDocFile/20160830041617645.
卯靜儒(2015)‧改革主題的銓釋現象學初探:以學習共同體為例‧ 市北教育學刊,(49),55-78。
杜友蘭(2013)‧護理理論與實務應用‧(三版)臺北:華杏。
李玉蘭(2014)‧以詮釋現象學觀點看新住民教材及閱讀經驗‧學校行政雙月刊,92,1-24。
林淑浣、陳筱瑀(2008)‧以帕西護理研究法探討脊髓損傷照顧者家庭重整的生活經驗。實證護理,4(3),173-181。
林妙穎、謝伶瑜(2014)‧穴位按壓滅輕待產婦產痛及縮短產程時間之成系統性文獻回顧置統合分析‧中西整合醫學雜誌,16(1),23-32。
周汎澔、劉美君(2013)‧運用帕西人類適轉理論協助臥床安胎婦女經歷住院之轉變‧高雄護理雜誌,30(1),83-96。
高美玲 (2013)‧第七屆正常生育與分娩國際研討會‧大會主題Learning from each other,中國大陸:杭州師範大學。
高美玲(2016,10月)‧第十一屆正常待產與分娩國際大會參會報告‧海報發表於澳洲第十一屆正常待產與分娩國 際大會.雪梨市:
高麗娟、黃光獻(2014)‧體育運動質性資料分析方法‧體育學報,47(2), 159-178。
翁嘉穗(2015)‧運用帕西理論協助畸胎瘤病童及其家庭適轉之護理經驗‧新生學報,(15),15-28。
黃盈智(2012)‧以詮釋現象學探究國軍精進士官制度下的組織文化與組織公民行為‧國防管理學報,33 (2),15-35。
曹慈翠(2013)‧以帕西護理研究法探討變性者性別重整之共通生活經驗(碩士論文)‧ 取自華藝線上圖書館。
曹英(2015)•剖腹產議題的回顧與探討•高雄護理雜誌,32(2),95- 105。
陳淑溫、鄭博仁(2015)•初次剖腹產後的生產方式決策策略•助產雜誌,(57),55-65。
郭素珍(2015)‧從性別觀點看醫療化的婦女生產‧護理雜誌,62(1), 10–1。
曾雅玲、余玉眉(2004)‧產婦生產主觀經驗探討‧護理研究,2(4),327-338。
曾雅玲、郭淑瑜、蔡素華(2013)‧生產疲憊:一個重要卻常被忽略的症狀‧護理雜誌60(6),16-20。
鈕文英(2017)‧質性研究方法與論文寫作‧(二版)。臺北:雙葉。
廖怡甄、顏永杰、應純哲(2013)‧護理人員參與音樂治療訓練之行為意圖研究‧寶建醫護與管理雜誌,11(2),44-56。
盧玉嬴、劉書玉、高美玲、吳淑芳、梁淑媛(2013)‧東台灣地區婦女生經驗及其相關因素探討‧護理暨健康照護研究,9(4),301-310。
謝錦櫻、周美玲.(1999)‧以病人為中心的護理-帕西護理實務法‧護理雜誌,46(4),40-45。
賴惠玲(2002)‧ Transition to the Empty Nest: A Phenomenological Study. 慈濟護理雜誌,1(3),88-94。
穆佩芬(1996)‧現象學研究法‧護理研究 4(2),195-202。
Parse,R.R.(2002)‧人的轉成思想體系(劉淑娟、謝錦櫻、李絳桃、孫吉珍合譯)‧台北:五南。(原著出版於1998)

英文文獻
American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG).http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/NewsReleases/2017/Approaches-for-Obgyns-Limit-Intervention-DuringLabor-and-Birth-in-Low-Risk-Pregnancies.
Alavi,A.,Bahrami,M.,Zargham-Boroujeni,A.,& Yousefy,A.(2016).Threats to Pediatric Nurses' Perception of Caring Self efficacy:AQualitativeStudy.Iran Red Crescent Med J,18(3),e25716. doi:10.5812/ircmj.25716
Almond,D.,Chee,C.P.,Sviatschi,M.M.,& Zhong,N.(2015).Auspicious birth dates among Chinese in California.Econ Hum Biol,18,153 159.doi:10.1016/j.ehb.2015.05.005.
Amy Hurst,R.,MSN.(2016).Labor Second Stage Providing Nursing Care.NURSING PRACTICE & SKILL,1-7.
Amy Hurst,R.,MSN (2017).Labor Third Stage Providing Nursing Care.NURSING PRACTICE & SKILL, 1-7.
Askari,F.,Atarodi,A., Torabi, S., & Moshki, M.(2014).Exploring Women's Personal experences of giving birth in Gonabad city : a qualitative study. Glob Journal Health Science,6(5),46-54.doi:10.5539/gjhs.v6n5p46.
Backstrom,C.,Larsson, T., Wahlgren, E., Golsater, M., Martensson, L. B., & Thorstensson,S.(2017).'It makes you feel like you are not alone': Expectant first-time mothers' experiences of social support within the social network, when preparing for childbirth and parenting. Sex Reproduction Health, 12, 51-57.doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2017.02.007
Baumann,S.L.(2013).Feeling bored: a Parse research method study with olderadults.Nursing Science Quility, 26(1),42-52. doi:10.1177/0894318412467071
Bernitz,S.,Qian, P., Sandvik, L.,& Blix, E. (2016). Evaluation of satisfaction with care in a midwifery unit and an obstetric unit: a randomized controlled trial of low-risk women.BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth,16,143.http://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0932-x
Bunkers,S.S.(2010).The lived experience of feeling sad. Nursing Science Quility 23(3),231-239. doi:10.1177/0894318410371831
Carlsson,I.M. 2016).Being in a safe and thus secure place, the core of early labour: Asecondary analysis in a Swedish context. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being,11, 10.3402/qhw.v11.30230.
http://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v11.30230
Chalermkitpanit,P.,Thonnagith, A.,Engsusophon,P.Charuluxananan,S.,& Honsawek, S. (2017). Noradrenaline, Serotonin, GABA, and Glycine in Cerebrospinal Fluid during Labor Pain: A Cross-Sectional Prospective Study. Pain Research Management, 2017, 2752658. doi:10.1155/2017/2752658
Chen,H.Y.(2010). The lived experience of moving forward for clients with spinal cord injury: A Parse research method study. Journal of Adventure Nursing, 66(5), 1132-1141. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05271. Condon, B. B. (2014). The Living Experience of Feeling Overwhelmed: A Parse Research Study. Nursing Science Quility, 27(3), 216-225. doi:10.1177/0894318414534487
Crowther,S.,Ironside, P.,Spence,D.,& Smythe, L.(2016).Crafting Stories in Hermeneutic Phenomenology Research: A Methodological Device. Qualitative Health Research, 27(6),826-835. doi:10.1177/1049732316656161
Crowther, S., & Smythe, E. (2016). Open,trusting relationships underpin safety in ruralmaternity a hermeneutic phenomenology study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 16(1), 370. doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1164-9
Debra Rose Wilson, P. M. R. I. A.-B. C.(2016).Parse’s Nursing Theory and its Application to Families Experiencing Empty Arms. International Journal of Childbirth Education 31(2), 29-35.
Dehcheshmeh, F. S., & Rafiei, H. (2015). Complementary and alternative therapies to relieve labor pain: A comparative study between music therapy and Hoku point ice massage. Complement Therapy Clinical Practice, 21(4), 229-232. doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2015.09.002
Delis, P. C., Leger, R. R., Longton, F., & Chandler, D. L. (2015). Camp Hope: Integrating Tai Chi and Humanbecoming in a Camp for Children. Nursing Science Quility, 28(4), 322-324. doi:10.1177/0894318415599221
Dellicour, S., Sevene, E., McGready, R., Tinto, H., Mosha, D., Manyando, C., . . . Stergachis, A. (2017). First-trimester artemisinin derivatives and quininetreatments and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in Africa and Asia: A meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS Med, 14(5), e1002290. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002290
Doucet, T. J. (2008). Having faith: a Parse research method study. Nursing Science Quility, 21(4), 343 352.doi:10.1177/0894318408323490
Eliza Schub, R., BSN (2016). Cesarean Section, Planned: Preparing the Patient.
Elmir,R., & Schmied, V. (2016). A meta-ethnographic synthesis of fathers' experiences of complicated births that are potentially traumatic. Midwifery, 32, 66-74. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2015.09.008
Fathi Najafi, T., Latifnejad Roudsari, R., & Ebrahimipour, H. (2017). The best encouraging persons in labor: A content analysis of
Iranian mothers' experiences of labor support. PLoS One, 12(7), e0179702.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0179702
Feeley, C., & Thomson, G. (2016). Why do some women choose to freebirth in the UK? An interpretative phenomenological study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 16, 59. doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0847-6
Hanci, V., Yurtlu, B. S., Domi, R., Shibata, Y., & Eyigor, C. (2017). Acute Postoperative Pain Control. Pain Research Management, 2017, 7831014. doi:10.1155/2017/7831014
Hanley, G. E., Munro, S., Greyson, D., Gross, M. M., Hundley, V., Spiby, H., & Janssen, P. A. (2016). Diagnosing onset of labor: a systematic review of definitions in the research literature. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 16(1), 71. doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0857-4
Hillary Mennella, D., MSN, ANCC-BC (2016). Parse's Theory of Human Becoming.
Hodnett, E. D., Gates, S., Hofmeyr, G. J., & Sakala, C. (2013). Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Systematic Review, 7, CD003766. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub5
Henshall, C., Taylor, B., & Kenyon, S. (2016). A systematic review to examine the evidence regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options for where to give birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 16, 53. doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0832-0 Iravani, M., Janghorbani, M., Zarean, E., & Bahrami, M. (2015). An overview of systematic reviews of normal labor and delivery management. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res, 20(3), 293-303. [Downloaded free from http://www.ijnmrjournal.net on Saturday, January 28, 2017, IP: 111.254.183.156.
Iravani, M., Zarean, E., Janghorbani, M., & Bahrami, M. (2015). Women's needs and expectations during normal labor and delivery. Journal of Education Health Promotion, 4, 6. doi:10.4103/2277-9531.151885
Moraloglu, O., Kansu-Celik, H., Tasci, Y., Karakaya, B. K., Yilmaz, Y., Cakir, E., & Yakut, H. I. (2017). The influence of different maternal pushing positions on birth outcomes at the second stage of labor in nulliparous women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 30(2), 245-249. doi:10.3109/14767058.2016.1169525
Mylonas, I., & Friese, K. (2015). Indications for and Risks of Elective Cesarean Section. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 112(29-30), 489-495. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2015.0489
Nilver, H., Begley, C., & Berg, M. (2017). Measuring women's childbirth experiences: a systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments. BMCPregnancy Childbirth, 17(1), 203. doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1356-y
Otogara, M., Karimi Shahanjarini, A., Hazavehei, S. M. M., Poorolajal, J., Radnia, N., Akrami, F., & Bagheri, F.(2017). Exploring perceptions of instructors about 4215-4224. doi:10.19082/4215
Oyetunde, M. O., & Ojerinde, O. E. (2013). Labour pain perception and use of nonpharmacologic labour support in newly delivered mothers in Ibadan, Nigeria.African Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 7(4).
Parse, R. R. (1997). Transforming research and practice with the human becoming theory. Nurs Sci Q, 10(4), 171-174. doi:10.1177/089431849701000409
Parse, R. R. (1998). The human becoming school of thought: A perspective for nurses and other health professionals. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Parse, R. R. (2001). The lived experience of contentment: a study using the Parseresearch method. Nurs Sci Q, 14(4), 330-338. doi:10.1177/08943180122108481
Parse, R. R. (2003). The lived experience of feeling very tired: a study using the Parse research method. Nurs Sci Q, 16(4), 319-325. doi:10.1177/0894318403256418
Parse, R. R. (2010). Human Dignity. Nurs Sci Q, 23(3), 257-262. doi:10.1177/0894318410371841
Parse, R. R. (2012). New humanbecoming conceptualizations and the humanbecoming community model: expansions with sciencing and living the art. Nurs Sci Q, 25(1), 44-52. doi:10.1177/0894318411429068
Parse, R. R. (2013). Living Quality. Nurs Sci Q, 26(2), 111-115.doi:10.1177/0894318413477145
Parse, R. R. (2013). Living quality: a humanbecoming phenomenon. Nurs Sci Q, 26(2), 111-115. doi:10.1177/0894318413477145
Parse, R. R. (2014). Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing. Nurs Sci Q, 27(3), 189-189.doi:10.1177/0894318414534472
Parse R. R. (2014). The humanbecoming paradigm: A transformational worldview.Pittsburgh: A Discovery International Publication.
Parse, R. R. (2015). Nursing: A Basic or Applied Science. Nurs Sci Q, 28(3), 181-182.doi:10.1177/0894318415585636
Parse, R. R. (2016). Quality of Life: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon. Nurs Sci Q, 29(3), 185. doi:10.1177/0894318416630108
Samantha J. Charlick, P. c. B. H. B. B., Lois McKellar, PhD BN(Hons) BMid, Andrea Fielder, PhD BSc(Hons) BSc, and Jan Pincombe, PhD MAppSc DipEd BA RM RN IN (2015).Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Implementing Research to Influence Breastfeeding Education. International Journal of Childbirth Education, 30(2).
Stapleton, S., & Pattison, N. (2015). The lived experience of men with advanced cancer in relation to their perceptions of masculinity: a qualitative phenomenological study. J Clin Nurs, 24(7-8), 1069-1078. doi:10.1111/jocn.12713
Susan Crowther1, P. I., Deb Spence3, and Liz Smythe3. (2016). Crafting Stories in Hermeneutic Phenomenology Research: A Methodological Device. Qualitative Health Research 1-10.
Whitburn, L. Y., Jones, L. E., Davey, M. A., & Small, R. (2017). The meaning of labour pain: how the social environment and other contextual factors shape women's experiences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 17(1), 157. doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1343-3
Valiani, M., Rezaie, M., & Shahshahan, Z. (2016). Comparative study on the influence of three delivery positions on pain intensity during the second stage of labor. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 21(4),372–378.http://doi.org/10.4103/1735-9066.185578


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 卯靜儒(2015)‧改革主題的銓釋現象學初探:以學習共同體為例‧ 市北教育學刊,(49),55-78。
2. 林淑浣、陳筱瑀(2008)‧以帕西護理研究法探討脊髓損傷照顧者家庭重整的生活經驗。實證護理,4(3),173-181。
3. 林妙穎、謝伶瑜(2014)‧穴位按壓滅輕待產婦產痛及縮短產程時間之成系統性文獻回顧置統合分析‧中西整合醫學雜誌,16(1),23-32。
4. 周汎澔、劉美君(2013)‧運用帕西人類適轉理論協助臥床安胎婦女經歷住院之轉變‧高雄護理雜誌,30(1),83-96。
5. 高麗娟、黃光獻(2014)‧體育運動質性資料分析方法‧體育學報,47(2), 159-178。
6. 翁嘉穗(2015)‧運用帕西理論協助畸胎瘤病童及其家庭適轉之護理經驗‧新生學報,(15),15-28。
7. 黃盈智(2012)‧以詮釋現象學探究國軍精進士官制度下的組織文化與組織公民行為‧國防管理學報,33 (2),15-35。
8. 陳淑溫、鄭博仁(2015)•初次剖腹產後的生產方式決策策略•助產雜誌,(57),55-65。
9. 郭素珍(2015)‧從性別觀點看醫療化的婦女生產‧護理雜誌,62(1), 10–1。
10. 曾雅玲、郭淑瑜、蔡素華(2013)‧生產疲憊:一個重要卻常被忽略的症狀‧護理雜誌60(6),16-20。
11. 廖怡甄、顏永杰、應純哲(2013)‧護理人員參與音樂治療訓練之行為意圖研究‧寶建醫護與管理雜誌,11(2),44-56。
12. 盧玉嬴、劉書玉、高美玲、吳淑芳、梁淑媛(2013)‧東台灣地區婦女生經驗及其相關因素探討‧護理暨健康照護研究,9(4),301-310。
13. 謝錦櫻、周美玲.(1999)‧以病人為中心的護理-帕西護理實務法‧護理雜誌,46(4),40-45。
14. 賴惠玲(2002)‧ Transition to the Empty Nest: A Phenomenological Study. 慈濟護理雜誌,1(3),88-94。
15. 穆佩芬(1996)‧現象學研究法‧護理研究 4(2),195-202。