(3.220.231.235) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/03/07 10:40
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:沈家麒
研究生(外文):SHEN,CHIA-CHI
論文名稱:董事會資本廣度與深度對新產品績效之影響 ─CEO權力為干擾變數
論文名稱(外文):The Effect of Board Capital Breadth and Depth on New Product Performance - The Moderating Role of CEO Power
指導教授:翁鶯娟翁鶯娟引用關係
指導教授(外文):WONG,YING-JIUAN
口試委員:張恆瑜王崇昱翁鶯娟
口試委員(外文):CHANG,HENG-YUWANG,CHUNG-YUWONG,YING-JIUAN
口試日期:2017-11-19
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄應用科技大學
系所名稱:企業管理系碩士在職專班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2018
畢業學年度:106
語文別:中文
論文頁數:42
中文關鍵詞:董事會資本CEO權力創新績效
外文關鍵詞:Board CapitalCEO PowerNew Product PerformanceEventStudyMultiple Regression Analysis
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:112
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:9
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
本研究以2011年至2015年台灣上市公司為樣本,以事件研究法探討上市公司推出新產品宣告之股價異常報酬影響。利用多元迴歸分析來探討董事會資本廣度與深度對新產品宣告之股價異常報酬是否有正向及負向的影響,以及納入CEO power作為調節變數是否影響之間關聯性,以檢視此變數對董事會資本廣度及董事會資本深度、新產品宣告異常報酬所帶來的影響效果。
本研究探討董事會資本廣度、深度與CEO權力與企業創新績效三者之間關係進行實證研究,並以CEO權力作為調節變數。本研究之實證檢驗,結果發現,董事會資本廣度越廣對企業創新績效有正向影響,意即董事成員背景異質性越高,較易獲取外部資源,用以提供企業公司治理所須。反之,同質性越高,產業鑲嵌度越深,董事成員決策偏好將因相似的思維體系,而導致抑制企業創新的表現。本研究進一步發現,董事會資本之功能,將受到強大CEO權力的調節,而分別對董事會資本廣度對創新績效的正向影響產生削弱;對董事會資本深度對創新績效負向影響產生強化,故與本研究預期干擾假設相符。

Based on the stocked-listed companies in Taiwan from 2011 to 2015 as the sample set, this study explores the relationship between board capital and announcing firms’ performance of new product using the event study method. In addition, we utilize multiple regression analysis to assess the following questions: (1) does board capital breadth have a positive effect on new product announcements performance (2) does board capital depth have a negative effect on new product announcements performance (3) does CEO power have a moderating effect on the relationship between board capital(breadth and depth) and new product announcements performance

The study finds that (1) board capital breadth has a positive impact on new product announcements performance (2) board capital depth has a negative impact on new product announcements performance
(3) CEO power has a moderating effect on the relationship between board capital (breadth and depth) and new product announcements performance. Our findings provide a number of useful implications for research and practice.

目 錄
摘要 i
ABSRTACT ii
目錄 iii
圖目錄 iv
表目錄 v
第一章 緒論1
第一節 研究背景與動機1
第二節 研究目的3
第三節 研究流程3
第二章 文獻探討4
第一節 創新績效4
第二節 董事會資本5
第三節 董事會資本與創新績效7
第四節 CEO權力和偏好之調節效果10
第三章 研究方法14
第一節 研究架構14
第二節 樣本來源14
第三節 變數定義與衡量15
第四節 實證模型建立25
第四章 實證結果26
第一節 樣本資料敘述性統計分析26
第二節 迴歸統計分析28
第五章 結論與建議30
第一節 研究結論30
第二節 研究貢獻與管理意涵31
第三節 研究限制32
參考文獻34

一、中文部份
1.字佩芬 (2003)。資訊揭露程度、外資法人持股率與股價報酬率間之關係研究。 中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所(碩士論文)。
2.李國銘(2006)。董事會特性、獨立董事制度與經營績效之關聯性-以中國上市公司為例。國立成功大學會計學系(碩士論文)。
3.沈中華、李建然 (2000)。 事件研究法: 財務與會計實證研究必備。 臺北市:華泰。
4.翁明祥(2005)。指數選擇權之套利機會與套利策略-台指選擇權之研究。國立台灣大學財務金融學研究所(碩士論文)。
5.張嘉恬(2015)。重大資本支出決策、CEO權力與公司價值。東海大學管理學院財務金融研究所(碩士論文)。
6.梁富梅(2007)。董監事結構、董監事連結與經營績效關係之研究。國立台北大學企業管理系(博士論文)。
7.陳晏儀 、 盧正治 、 盧正壽(2017)。CEO權力、員工分紅與公司績效。全球商業經營管理學報,9期,頁83-98。
8.陳雯惠(2010)。董事會資本、董監酬勞與溢領薪酬現象關係之探討-以金融保險業為例。國立成功大學會計學系(碩士論文)。
9.黃詩敏(2008)。高階管理團隊董事會特性與企業績效之關聯性研究。中原大學會計研究所(碩士論文)。
10.葉珣霳(2008)。台灣資訊產業現金增資與競租行為之研究。國立台灣大學經濟學研究所(碩士論文)。
11.謝錦堂(2000)。股票上櫃過程董事會改造之研究。國立台北大學企業管理系(博士論文)。
二、英文部分
1.Aboody, D., & Lev, B. (2000). Information asymmetry, R&D, and insider gains. The journal of Finance, 55(6), 2747-2766.
2.Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?. Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1), 107-124.
3.Boyd, B. (1990). Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model. Strategic Management Journal, 11(6), 419-430.
4.Boyd, B. K. (1994). Board control and CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), 335-344.
5.Business Roundtable. 2005. Principles of Corporate Governance. Business Roundtable: Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.businessroundtable.org/sites/ default/files/CorporateGovPrinciples.pdf (accessed 9 June 2009).
6.Cho, H. J., & Pucik, V. (2005). Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value. Strategic management journal, 26(6), 555-575.
7.Chen, H. L. (2014). Board capital, CEO power and R&D investment in electronics firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(5), 422-436.
8.Carpenter, M. A. (2000). The price of change: The role of CEO compensation in strategic variation and deviation from industry strategy norms. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1179-1198.
9.Cohen, J., Cohen, P., & Stephen, G. (2003). West, and Leona S. Aiken. 2003. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3.
10.Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. (2001). The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management journal, 44(4), 639-660.
11.Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. (2001). The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management journal, 44(4), 639-660.
12.Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, S95-S120.
13.Cooper, R. G. (1985). Industrial firms' new product strategies. Journal of Business Research, 13(2), 107-121.
14.Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of financial economics, 51(3), 371-406.
15.Chen, H. L. (2014). Board capital, CEO power and R&D investment in electronics firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(5), 422-436.
16.Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (1997). CEO and board chair roles held jointly or separately: much ado about nothing?. The Academy of Management Executive, 11(3), 11-20.
17.Daily, C. M., & Johnson, J. L. (1997). Sources of CEO power and firm financial performance: A longitudinal assessment. Journal of Management, 23(2), 97-117.
18.Dalton, D. R., & Kesner, I. F. (1987). Composition and CEO duality in boards of directors: An international perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 18(3), 33-42.
19.Datta, D. K., Guthrie, J. P., & Rajagopalan, N. (2002). Different industries, different CEOs? A study of CEO career specialization. People and Strategy, 25(2), 14.
20.Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of management, 16(1), 49-64.
21.Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management journal, 32(3), 543-576.
22.Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bourgeois, L. J. (1988). Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of management journal, 31(4), 737-770.
23.Eisenhardt, K. M., Jean L. Kahwaji & LJ Bourgeois, III. 1997." How Management Teams Can Have a Good Fight.". Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 77-86.
24.Finkelstein, S. (1992). Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management journal, 35(3), 505-538.
25.Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1989). Chief executive compensation: A study of the intersection of markets and political processes. Strategic Management Journal, 10(2), 121-134.
26.Geletkanycz, M. A., Boyd, B. K., & Finkelstein, S. (2001). The strategic value of CEO external directorate networks: Implications for CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(9), 889-898.
27.Goes, J. B., & Park, S. H. (1997). Interorganizational links and innovation: The case of hospital services. Academy of management journal, 40(3), 673-696.
28.Golden, B. R., & Zajac, E. J. (2001). When will boards influence strategy? Inclination× power= strategic change. Strategic management journal, 22(12), 1087-1111.
29.Golden, B. R., & Zajac, E. J. (2001). When will boards influence strategy? Inclination× power= strategic change. Strategic management journal, 22(12), 1087-1111.
30.Golden, B. R., & Zajac, E. J. (2001). When will boards influence strategy? Inclination× power= strategic change. Strategic management journal, 22(12), 1087-1111.
31.Goodstein, J., Gautam, K., & Boeker, W. (1994). The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic management journal, 15(3), 241-250.
32.Griffin, A. (1997). PDMA research on new product development practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices. Journal of product innovation management, 14(6), 429-458.
33.Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. (1993). Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management journal, 36(4), 844-863.
34.Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (1993). Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 14(6), 401-418.
35.Hamel, G., & Skarzynski, P. (2001). Innovation: The new route to wealth. Journal of Accountancy, 192(5), 65.
36.Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American sociological review, 149-164.
37.Harrison, J. R., Torres, D. L., & Kukalis, S. (1988). The changing of the guard: Turnover and structural change in the top-management positions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 211-232.
38.Haynes, K. T., & Hillman, A. (2010). The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1145-1163.
39.Higgins, J. M. (1995). Innovation: the core competence. Planning review, 23(6), 32-36.
40.Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management review, 28(3), 383-396.
41.Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management journal, 40(4), 767-798.
42.Huff, A. S. (1982). Industry influences on strategy reformulation. Strategic Management Journal, 3(2), 119-131.
43.Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J. A., & Peyronnin, K. (1991). Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Journal of applied psychology, 76(5), 675.
44.Jackson, S. E., May, K. E., & Whitney, K. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations, 204, 261.
45.Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. (2013). Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39(1), 232-262.
46.Jensen, M., & Zajac, E. J. (2004). Corporate elites and corporate strategy: How demographic preferences and structural position shape the scope of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 25(6), 507-524.
47.Judge, W. Q., & Zeithaml, C. P. (1992). Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process. Academy of management Journal, 35(4), 766-794.
48.Kim, Y., & Cannella, A. A. (2008). Toward a social capital theory of director selection. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(4), 282-293.
49.Kor, Y. Y. (2006). Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1081-1099.
50.Miller, C. C., Burke, L. M., & Glick, W. H. (1998). Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon executives: Implications for strategic decision processes. Strategic Management Journal, 39-58.
51.Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of management review, 21(2), 402-433.
52.Mason, S. P., & Merton, R. C. (1985). The role of contingent claims analysis in corporate finance.
53.Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242-266.
54.Oakey, R. P., Rothwell, R., & Cooper, S. (1988). The management of innovation in high-technology small firms: innovation and regional development in Britain and the United States. Quorum Books.
55.Ocasio, W. (1994). Political dynamics and the circulation of power: CEO succession in US industrial corporations, 1960-1990. Administrative science quarterly, 285-312.
56.Patton, A., & Baker, J. C. (1987). Why wont directors rock the boat. Harvard Business Review, 65(6), 10.
57.Pennings, J. M. (1980). Interlocking directorates. Jossey-Bass Inc Pub.
58.Priem, R. L., Lyon, D. W., & Dess, G. G. (1999). Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research. Journal of Management, 25(6), 935-953.
59.Puranam, P., Singh, H., & Zollo, M. (2006). Organizing for innovation: Managing the coordination-autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 263-280.
60.Riahi-Belkaoui, A., & Pavlik, E. (1993). Effects of ownership structure, firm performance, size and diversification strategy on CEO compensation: A path analysis. Managerial Finance, 19(2), 33-54.
61.Ruekert, R. W., & Walker, O. C. (1987). Interactions between marketing and R&D departments in implementing different business strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 8(3), 233-248.
62.Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative science quarterly, 224-253.
63.Schumpeter, J. A. (1932). Ladislaus von Bortkiewicz. Economic Journal, ÉO, 3380340.
64.Singh, V., Terjesen, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom:: How do women and men differ?. European Management Journal, 26(1), 48-58.
65.Spender, J. C. (1989). Industry recipes: The nature and sources of managerial judgment. Oxford, UK: Basic Blackwell.(1994)," Knowing, Managing and Learning," Management Learning, 25(3), 387-412.
66.Sridharan, U. V., & Marsinko, A. (1997). CEO duality in the paper and forest products industry. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 10(1), 59-65.
67.Stiles, P., & Taylor, B. (2001). Boards at work: How directors view their roles and responsibilities: How directors view their roles and responsibilities. OUP Oxford.
68.Useem, M. (1979). The social organization of the American business elite and participation of corporation directors in the governance of American institutions. American Sociological Review, 553-572.
69.Westphal, J. D., & Bednar, M. K. (2005). Pluralistic ignorance in corporate boards and firms' strategic persistence in response to low firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 262-298.
70.Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management journal, 35(1), 91-121.
71.Williams, K., & O’Reilly, C. (1998). The complexity of diversity: A review of forty years of research. Research in organizational behavior, 21, 77-140.
72.Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of management, 15(2), 291-334.
73.Zhang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. (2003). Explaining new CEO origin: Firm versus industry antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 327-338.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔