跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.220.251.236) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/04 11:17
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:賴自瑋
研究生(外文):LAI, TZU-WEI
論文名稱:解構主管情緒勞動對部屬的組織公民行為的影響歷程
論文名稱(外文):The Indirect Effect of Leader’s Emotional Labor on Subordinate’s Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Communication Quality as a Mediator
指導教授:許金田許金田引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hsu, Chin-Tien
口試委員:吳宗祐賴姿伶
口試委員(外文):Wu, Tsung-YuLai, Tzu-Ling
口試日期:2017-06-09
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:銘傳大學
系所名稱:諮商與工商心理學系碩士在職專班
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:心理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2018
畢業學年度:106
語文別:中文
論文頁數:41
中文關鍵詞:情緒勞動組織公民行為溝通品質表層演出深層演出
外文關鍵詞:Communication QualityEmotional LaborOrganizational Citizenship BehaviorDeep ActingSurface Acting
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:203
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
過去研究情緒勞動中,大部份在研究對應顧客的第一線服務人員的相關心理、情緒及工作成果,本研究則聚焦於主管與部屬在工作中的人際互動,並將工作場域與對象從第一線服務人員與顧客轉移到組織內的主管和部屬,以此深入地探究員工在工作中的組織公民行為與主管情緒勞動的關聯性,同時探討溝通品質對兩者的中介效果。因此,有以下三個研究目的:一、主管的情緒勞動與部屬的組織公民行為之間具有關聯性;二、主管的情緒勞動與溝通品質之間具有關聯性;三、溝通品質對主管的情緒勞動與部屬的組織公民行為之間關係具有中介效果。以台灣企業組織在職並與部屬共事已達半年以上的主管為研究對象,回收有效問卷為183份。結果顯示,主管的情緒勞動會影響部屬的組織公民行為;其次,主管的情緒勞動對溝通品質有影響;最後,溝通品質對主管的情緒勞動與部屬的組織公民行為之間關係具有中介效果。本研究最後提出結論及建議。
Drawing from the Emotional Labor, this study has three objectives; first, to assess the effect of leader’s Emotional Labor (deep acting and surface acting) on subordinate’s Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB), second, to test the effect of leader’s Emotional Labor (deep acting and surface acting) on the Communication Quality between leaders and subordinates, finally, to explore the mediating effect of Communication Quality on the relationship between leader’s Emotional Labor and subordinate’s OCB. Survey data were collected from a sample of 183 full-time employees working in Taiwan.
Results indicated that the Emotional Labor (deep acting) was positively related to Communication Quality and OCB, respectively, but Emotional Labor (surface acting) was negatively related to Communication Quality and OCB, respectively. Furthermore, Communication Quality fully mediated the relationship between Emotional Labor (deep acting and surface acting) and OCB. Finally, the limitations of the research are discussed and suggestions for further research are proposed.

摘 要 i
Abstract ii
謝 誌 iii
目 錄 iv
壹、 緒論 1
背景 1
研究動機 1
研究目的 3
貳、 文獻探討 4
一、 主管的情緒勞動 4
二、 溝通品質 6
三、 部屬的組織公民行為 8
四、 主管的情緒勞動與部屬的組織公民行為 9
五、 主管的情緒勞動與溝通品質 10
六、 溝通品質的中介效果 11
參、 研究方法 13
一、 研究架構與假設 13
二、 研究設計與研究對象 14
三、 研究變項與衡量 14
四、 測量模式分析 16
肆、 研究結果 17
一、 敘述統計及各變項之相關分析 17
二、 假說驗證 18
伍、 結論與建議 21
一、 結論 21
二、 理論意涵 23
三、 實務意涵 23
四、 研究限制與建議 24
參考文獻 26
附錄:問卷 31

中文文獻
吳宗祐(2008)。由不當督導到情緒耗竭:部屬正義知覺與情緒勞動的中介效果。中華心理學刊,50(2),201-221。
吳宗祐(2013)。主管與部屬互動中情緒勞動:回顧、釐清、及前瞻。人力資源管理學報,13(3),57-105。
呂思齊、黃智、周式瀅、林淑慧(2015)。領導者與部屬關係之後果分析:主管信任之中介分析。勞資關係論叢,17(2),1-13。
林永森、黃文雄、張少熙、林玲玉(2014)。表層及深層演出對工作倦怠與離職意圖之影響:兼論幽默感之調節效果。戶外遊憩研究,28(1),73-103。
林家五、張國義、劉貞妤、林裘緒、陳筱華(2009)。差序對待知覺與同事信任對公平態度與政治行為之影響。本土心理學研究,31,143-175。
紀乃文(2014)。情緒勞動對組織是利是弊?探討知覺主管支持、同事支持對情緒勞動與服務績效、離職傾向關係的差異化干擾效。組織與管理,7(1),115-160。
許順旺、張姮燕、巫幸澐、許中駿(2015)。客務部門第一線員工情緒勞務、工作滿足與組織公民行為之相關研究-以工作特性為干擾變項。企業管理學報,106(9),1-26。
曾瑞真、曾玲珉譯(1996)。人際關係與溝通,台北:先覺出版社。Rudolph F. Verderber & Kathleen S. Verderber (1995). Rudolph F. Verderber, Kathleen S. Verderber. (1995), Inter-act:Using interpersonal communication skills”, International Thomson Publishing.
黃敦群、紀乃文、張雅婷、郭洧岑(2014)。情緒勞動的前因、後果與潛在干擾變數:統合分析法之探討。人力資源管理學報,14(3),93-134。DOI: 10.6147/JHRM.2014.1403.04
鄔佩君、陳彰儀、吳宗祐(2005)。華人企業服務人員情緒勞動方式的前置因素與其結果之關係:以銀行行員為例。國立政治大學「教育與心理研究」,28(4),693-719。
鄭仁偉、陳春希、袁梅玲、李姿瑩(2012)。不當督導、印象管理與退卻行為之研究─表層演出與深層演出的中介效果。輔仁管理評論,19(2),1-28。
鄭伯壎、林家五(1998)。差序格局與華人組織行為:臺灣大型民營企業的初步研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,86,29-72。
英文文獻
Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H., (1993). Emotional labor in service roles: The influence of identity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 88−115.
Bono, J. E., & Vey, M. A. 2005. Toward understanding emotional management at work: A quantitative review of emotional labor research. In C. E. J. Hartel, W. J. Zerbe, & N. M. Ashkanasy (Eds.), Emotions in organizational behavior: 213-233. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brotheridge, C. M., & Grandey, A. A. (2002). Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives of “people work.” Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 17-39.
Brotheridge, C. M., & Lee, R. T. (2003). Development and validation of the emotional labor scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 365–379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317903769647229
Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. 2001. The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86 (2), 278-321.
Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. 1997. Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (3) , 421-444.
Fisk, G. M., & Friesen, J. P. (2012). Perceptions of leader emotion regulation and LMX as predictors of followers’ job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 1-12.
Gardner, W.L., Fischer, D., & Hunt, J.G. (2009). Emotional labor and leadership: a threat to authenticity? The leadership Quarterly,20, 466-482.
Glaser, J., & Salovey, P. (1998). Affect in electoral politics. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 156–172.
Gonzaga, G. C., Keltner, D., Londahl, E. A., & Smith, M. D. (2001). Love and the commitment problem in romantic relations and friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 247–262.
Goodwin, R. E., Groth, M., & Frenkel, S. J. (2011). Relationships between emotional labor, job performance, and turnover. Journal of Vactional Behavior, 79(2), 538-548.
Grandey, A. A. (2003). When 'the show must go on': Surface acting and deep acting as determinants of emotional exhaustion and peer-rated service delivery. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 86-96.
Grandey, A. A. 2000. Emotion regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 95-110.
Grandey, A. A., Dickter, D. N., & Sin, H. P. (2004). The customer is not always right: Customer aggression and emotion regulation of service employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 397-418.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Hu, X., & Shi, J. (2015). Employees' surface acting in interactions with leaders and peers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(8), 1132-1152.
Humphrey, R. H. (2012). How do leaders use emotional labor? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 740-744.
Humphrey, R. H., Pollack, J. M., & Hawver, T. (2008). Leading with emotional labor. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 151-168.
Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. 2007. Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 269-277.
Johnson, S. K. (2008). I second that emotion: Effects of emotional contagion and affect at work on leader and follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 1-19.
Kim, H. J. (2008). Hotel service providers’ emotional labor: The antecedents and effects on burnout. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27(2), 151-161.
Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1): 131-142.
Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. O. (2008). Educational administration: Concepts and practices. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Cengage.
Mintzberg, H. (1973). The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper & Row Pub, 93-94.
Mohr, J., & Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, conflict resolution techniques, Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135-152.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. New York: Lexington Books.
Ozcelik, H. (2012). An empirical analysis of surface acting in intra-organizational relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 34(3), 291-309. doi: 10.1002/job.1798
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Project Management Institute. 2012. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (5th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press
Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653-663
Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., Bommer, W. H., & Tetrick, L. E. 2002. The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 590-598.
Yam, K. C., Fehr, R., Keng-Highberger, F. T., Klotz, A. C., & Reynolds, S. J. (2016). Out of control: A self-control perspective on the link between surface acting and abusive supervision. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 101(2), 292-301. doi:10.1037/apl0000043
Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations, 6th ed. Upper Saddle Creek, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Zellars, K. L., Tepper B. J., & Duffy M. K. (2002). Abusive Supervision and Subordinates' Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1068-1076.

電子全文 電子全文(本篇電子全文限研究生所屬學校校內系統及IP範圍內開放)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 吳宗祐(2008)。由不當督導到情緒耗竭:部屬正義知覺與情緒勞動的中介效果。中華心理學刊,50(2),201-221。
2. 吳宗祐(2013)。主管與部屬互動中情緒勞動:回顧、釐清、及前瞻。人力資源管理學報,13(3),57-105。
3. 林永森、黃文雄、張少熙、林玲玉(2014)。表層及深層演出對工作倦怠與離職意圖之影響:兼論幽默感之調節效果。戶外遊憩研究,28(1),73-103。
4. 林家五、張國義、劉貞妤、林裘緒、陳筱華(2009)。差序對待知覺與同事信任對公平態度與政治行為之影響。本土心理學研究,31,143-175。
5. 紀乃文(2014)。情緒勞動對組織是利是弊?探討知覺主管支持、同事支持對情緒勞動與服務績效、離職傾向關係的差異化干擾效。組織與管理,7(1),115-160。
6. 許順旺、張姮燕、巫幸澐、許中駿(2015)。客務部門第一線員工情緒勞務、工作滿足與組織公民行為之相關研究-以工作特性為干擾變項。企業管理學報,106(9),1-26。
7. 黃敦群、紀乃文、張雅婷、郭洧岑(2014)。情緒勞動的前因、後果與潛在干擾變數:統合分析法之探討。人力資源管理學報,14(3),93-134。DOI: 10.6147/JHRM.2014.1403.04
8. 鄭伯壎、林家五(1998)。差序格局與華人組織行為:臺灣大型民營企業的初步研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,86,29-72。