跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.220.251.236) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/04 11:19
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:洪文靜
研究生(外文):HONG,WEN-JING
論文名稱:應計品質與資訊競爭因素對價值攸關性之影響 –以台灣上市公司為例
論文名稱(外文):The Impacts of Accrual Qualities and Information Competition Factors on the Value Relevance of Taiwan Listed Companies
指導教授:蕭哲芬蕭哲芬引用關係
指導教授(外文):HSIAU,CHI-FEN
口試委員:蔡秋田趙雅儀蕭哲芬
口試委員(外文):TSAI,CHIU-TIENCHAO,YA-YIHSIAU,CHI-FEN
口試日期:2018-01-18
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄第一科技大學
系所名稱:會計資訊系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2018
畢業學年度:106
語文別:中文
論文頁數:41
中文關鍵詞:應計品質資訊競爭因素價值攸關性
外文關鍵詞:Accrual QualitiesInformation Competition FactorsValue Relevance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:161
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本文以會計資訊與股價之關聯性來衡量價值攸關性,探討應計品質與資訊競爭因素對價值攸關性之影響。主要考量到應計品質受到資訊風險的影響,較佳的應計品質可以減少未來現金流量與盈餘的偏差程度,因而提升未來現金流量對盈餘的敏感性,有助於投資人對公司價值的預測,亦能進一步提升企業的盈餘價值攸關性,而資訊競爭因素能降低資訊不對稱程度,減少知情投資者透過資訊不對稱進行自利行為,故若能有效降低資訊不對稱情形,預期能提升價值攸關性,因此本文主要探討應計品質與資訊競爭程度改變時,企業的盈餘價值攸關性會有何影響,另一方面,資訊競爭能有效降低資訊不對稱之情形。

本文以應計品質與資訊競爭因素:(1)機構投資者持股比例;(2)總股東人數取自然對數;(3)機構投資者持股比例與控制持股比例之相對比例,探討三者對價值攸關性之影響。研究應計品質較佳、資訊競爭程度較高的公司,能否提升未來現金流量與盈餘的敏感性,具有較高的價值攸關性,以了解投資者是否會以此會計資訊作為決策的參考。實證結果顯示,部分支持應計品質愈高,會計資訊的價值攸關性愈高。亦部分支持資訊競爭程度愈高,會計資訊的價值攸關性愈高。

此外,本文將應計品質區分為本質性應計品質與裁決性應計品質,分別探討本質性應計品質與裁決性應計品質加入資訊競爭因素後,分別對價值攸關性之影響,實證結果顯示,應計品質能提升會計資訊的價值攸關性,主要是受到本質性應計品質之影響,而非受到裁決性應計品質之影響。

This paper investigates the impacts of accrual qualities and information competition factors on the value relevance of Taiwan listed companies. Accrual quality is affected by information risk, higher accruals quality can decrease the deviations of earnings from future cash flows and increase the sensitivity of earnings to cash flows, and the information competition can reduce information asymmetry.

Accrual qualities and information competition factors:(1) the ratio of institutional investors (2) the natural logarithm of the total number of shareholders (3) the ratio of institutional ownership to controlling shareholders’ ownership investigates on the value relevance. Investigates the higher accruals quality of companies whether increase the sensitivity of earnings to cash flows and has higher value relevance, understand whether investors will use this accounting information as a reference for decision. Empirical results show that accrual qualities and information competition factors can enhance the accounting information value relevance.

In addition, this study also distinguishes between accruals qualities driven by economic fundamentals (innate accruals quality) versus management choices (discretionary accruals quality).Investigates the innate accruals quality and discretionary accruals quality with information competition factors on the value relevance. Empirical results show that accrual qualities and information competition factors can enhance the accounting information value relevance are mainly driven by innate accruals quality rather than discretionary accruals quality.
摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 vi
第一章、緒論 1
第一節 研究背景及動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究架構 3
第二章、文獻探討與研究假說 6
第一節 應計品質與資訊風險成本 6
第二節 資訊競爭因素與價值攸關性 8
第三章、研究設計 11
第一節 應計品質之衡量與實證模型 11
第二節 價值攸關性之衡量與實證模型 12
第三節 樣本選取與資料來源 14
第四章、實證結果與分析 24
第一節 應計品質(AQ)之衡量 24
第二節 價值攸關性之衡量 28
第五章、結論 37
參考文獻 39

一、中文部分
(1)范宏書與陳靜宜,2014,“會計師任期與財務報表價值攸關性”,會計審計論叢,4卷,1期,頁1-23。
(2)紀邵瑩,2015,資訊競爭與會計保守性,國立雲林科技大學,碩士論文。
(3)張慧貞,2013,機構投資者與會計資訊價值攸關性之關係,國立雲林科技大學,碩士論文。
(4)陳天欣,2006,應計品質與資金成本之關聯性,國立台灣大學,碩士論文。
(5)陳耿秋,2015,資訊競爭對會計資訊價值攸關性之影響,國立雲林科技大學,碩士論文。
(6)陳慶隆、林品妤與范宏書,2016,“實質盈餘管理、資訊競爭與盈餘資訊性”,證券市場發展季刊,28卷,4期,頁39-91。
(7)鄭桂蕙、余俊憲與王蘭芬,2012,“內部控制缺失與應計品質–獨立董監之調節效果 ”,東吳經濟商學學報,79期,頁81-120。
(8)鄭舒瑋,2014,資訊競爭對盈餘資訊性之影響,國立雲林科技大學,碩士論文。
(9)鄧湛詠,2014,財務報表品質與資訊風險關聯性探討,靜宜大學,碩士論文。
(10)劉子菁,2017,會計盈餘之應計品質與管理薪酬契約間關係之研究–以台灣上市公司為例,國立高雄第一科技大學,碩士論文。
(11)賴梨雯,2006,應計數品質、盈餘品質與股票報酬之關連性研究,輔仁大學,碩士論文。
(12)盧佩玉,2010,應計項目品質與公司現金持有之關聯性研究,國立政治大學,碩士論文。

二、外文部分
(1)Allen, W. and Phillips, M., 2000, “Corporate Equity Ownership, Strategic Alliances, and Product Market Relationships. ” Journal of Finance, vol. 55 (June): pp.2791-2815.
(2)Ball, R. and Brown, P., 1968, “ An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Income Numbers. ”, Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 6 (2), pp.159-178.
(3)Beaver, W. H., 1968, “The Information Content of Annual Earnings Announcements.”,Journal of Accounting Research , vol.6 (Supplement), pp.67-92.
(4)Burgstahler, D. C. and Dichev, I. D., 1997, “ Earnings, Adaptation, and Equity Value.”, The Accounting Review , vol.72 (2), pp.187-215.
(5)Barth, M. E., Beaver, W. H. and Landsman, W. R., 1998, “Relative Valuation Roles of Equity Book Value and Net Income as a Function of Financial Health.” , Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol.25 (1), pp.1-34.
(6)Barth, M. E., Cram, D. P. and Nelson, K. K., 2001, “Accruals and Prediction of Future Cash Flows.”, The Accounting Review, vol.76(1), pp. 27-58.
(7)Banker, B. D. and Huang, R., 2009, “Incentive Contracting and Value Relevance of Earnings Cash Flows. ”, Journal of Accounting Research, vol.47(3), pp.647-678.
(8)Black, E. L. and White, J. J., 2003, “An International Comparison of Income Statement and Balance Sheet Information: Germany, Japan and the US.”, European Accounting Review, vol.12 (1), pp.29-46.
(9)Collins, D. W., Maydew, E. L., and Weiss, I. S., 1997, “Changes in the Value-Relevance of Earnings and Book Values over the Past Forty Years,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 24(1), pp. 39-67.
(10)Chan, K., Chan, L., Jegadeesh, N., and Lakonishok, J., 2006, “ Earnings Quality and Stock Returns.”, Journal of Business, vol.79(3), pp.1041-1082.
(11)Dechow, P. M., Dichev, I. D., 2002, The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: the Role of Accruals Estimation Errors., The Accounting Review, vol. 77 (Supplement), pp.35-59.
(12)Francis, J., and Schipper, K., 1999, “ Have Financial Statements Lost Theirrelevance? ”, Journal of Accounting Research , vol.37 (2), pp. 319-352.
(13)Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P. and Schipper, K., 2005, “The Market Pricing of Accruals Quality.”, Journal of Accounting and Economics , vol. 39(2), pp. 295–327.
(14)Jacobs, M. T., 1991, “Short-Term America: the Causes and Cures of Our Business Myopia.” Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
(15)McConnell, J. J., and Servaes, H., 1990, “Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value.” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 27, pp.595-612.
(16)Pound, J., 1988, “ Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight. ”Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 20, pp.237-265.
(17)Porter, M. E., 1992, “Capital Choices: Changing the Way America Invests in Industry. ” Boston, MA: Council on Competitiveness. Harvard Business School.
(18)Rajgopal, S., and Venkatachalam, M., 1997, “The Role of Institutional Investors in Corporate Governance: an Empirical Investigation. ”Working Paper, University of Iowa.
(19)Salancik, G.R. and Pfeffer, J., 1980, “The Effects of Ownership and Performance on Executive in U.S. Corporations,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 23, pp. 653-664.
(20)Schipper, K., and Vincent, L., 2003, “Earnings Quality. ”, Accounting Horizons, vol. 17(Supplement), pp.97-110.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top