(34.239.176.198) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/04/23 20:43
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:葉思辰
研究生(外文):Sy-Chern Yeh
論文名稱:探討軟體開發團隊回復力的前置因素與後續影響
論文名稱(外文):Exploring the Antecedents and Consequences of ISD Team Resilience
指導教授:徐士傑徐士傑引用關係
指導教授(外文):Jack Shih-Chieh Hsu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中山大學
系所名稱:國際經營管理碩士學程
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2018
畢業學年度:106
語文別:英文
論文頁數:77
中文關鍵詞:團隊智商團隊情商組織支持團隊績效團隊回復力
外文關鍵詞:Team recovery performanceTeam IQTeam EQOrganizational supportTeam resilience
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:41
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:1
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
隨著團隊在組織中扮演的角色越來越重要,以及團隊回復力對於組織經營與成長的重要性與日俱增;儘管如此,過去針對團隊回復力所做的研究仍寥寥可數。因此,本研究從資訊系統開發團隊的角度出發,針對團隊回復力的前置因素與後續影響進行探討。在本研究中,我們就團隊智商、 團隊情商、以及組織支持對於團隊回復力的影響分別探討,以及團隊回復力與團隊績效之間的關係。從153個資訊專案團隊的問卷調查發現,團隊回復力對於團隊績效有顯著的正面影響;在前置因素方面,團隊智商與組織支持對於團隊回復力產生顯著的正面影響。從這些實證的結果可以發現,團隊成員的自身能力培養與組織間的支持對於身陷危機的團隊來說相當重要與關鍵,相關管理實務意涵亦於文末討論。
Despite the growing interest in the study of resilience in organizations and much work in organizations is performed by teams, little work has been carried out to capture resilience at a team-level setting. The present study aims to provide a comprehensive framework to address information systems development (ISD) team resilience, and to explore the antecedents and consequences of team resilience. In this study, we examine the predicting roles of team IQ, team EQ, and organizational support on team resilience, which brings a superior team recovery performance. Based on the sample of 153 project teams, the findings of the study indicate that (1) team resilience is positively related to ISD team recovery performance, (2) team IQ is positively associated with team resilience, and (3) organizational support has a significant impact on team resilience. The results provide theoretical implications on the past literature in ISD team resilience, and specify the capabilities and resources ISD teams develop and need in a fast-paced environment. Future research suggestions are discussed.
國立中山大學研究生學位論文審定書 i
ACKNOWLEDGEMEMTS ii
摘要 iii
ABSTRACT iv
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Research Questions 4
1.3 Objectives of the Research 5
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 6
2.1 Teams 6
2.1.1 Teams and teamwork 6
2.1.2 Team types 8
2.1.3 Team recovery performance 10
2.2 Team Resilience 16
2.2.1 What comprises team resilience 17
2.2.2 Team resilience and team recovery performance 18
2.3 Team Quotients 20
2.3.1 Team IQ 20
2.3.2 Team IQ and team resilience 21
2.3.3 Team EQ 22
2.3.4 Team EQ and team resilience 23
2.4 Organizational Support 24
2.4.1 Nurturant support 25
2.4.2 Nurturant support and team resilience 25
2.4.3 Action-facilitating support 26
2.4.4 Action-facilitating support and team resilience 27
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHOD 28
3.1 Research Framework 28
3.2 Survey Design 29
3.2.1 Sample and procedure 29
3.2.2 Measures 30
3.3 Data Analysis 33
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS 34
4.1 Descriptive Statistics 34
4.2 Correlations 39
4.3 Results Analysis 42
4.3.1 Hypotheses testing 42
4.3.2 Research findings 43
CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 45
5.1 Discussion 45
5.2 Further Discussion 46
5.3 Research Contributions 49
5.3.1 Theoretical implications 49
5.3.2 Practical implications 50
5.4 Research Limitations 52
5.5 Future Research 54
Reference 55
Appendix 60
Akgün, A. E., Dayan, M., & Di Benedetto, A. (2008). New product development team intelligence: Antecedents and consequences. Information & Management, 45(4), 221-226.

Andrews, F. M., & Farris, G. F. (1967). Supervisory practices and innovation in scientific teams. Personnel Psychology, 20, 497–575.

Baruch, Y., & Lin, C. P. (2012). All for one, one for all: Coopetition and virtual team performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 1155-1168.

Beehr, T. A., & O’Hara, K. (1987). Methodological designs for the evaluation of occupational stress interventions. Stress and health: Issues in research methodology, 79-112.

Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 92(3), 595.

Carton, A. M., & Cummings, J. N. (2012). A theory of subgroups in work teams. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 441-470.

Chou, T. C., Chang, P. L., Cheng, Y. P., & Tsai, C. T. (2007). A path model linking organizational knowledge attributes, information processing capabilities, and perceived usability. Information & Management, 44(4), 408-417.

Cohen, S. (1992). Stress, social support, and disorder. The meaning and measurement of social support, 109-124.

Coutu, D. L. (2002). How resilience works. Harvard business review, 80(5), 46-56.

Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. W. (1990). Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching.

Cutrona, C. E., & Suhr, J. A. (1992). Controllability of stressful events and satisfaction with spouse support behaviors. Communication Research, 19(2), 154-174.

Druskat, V. U., & Wolff, S. B. (2001a). Building the emotional intelligence of groups. Harvard business review, 79(3), 80-91.

Druskat, V. U., & Wolff, S. B. (2001b). Group emotional intelligence and its influence on group effectiveness. The emotionally intelligent workplace: How to select for, measure, and improve emotional intelligence in individuals, groups and organizations, 132-155.

Dumont, M., & Provost, M. A. (1999). Resilience in adolescents: Protective role of social support, coping strategies, self-esteem, and social activities on experience of stress and depression. Journal of youth and adolescence, 28(3), 343-363.

Edson, M. C. (2012). A complex adaptive systems view of resilience in a project team. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29(5), 499-516.

Fredickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. American psychologist, 56(3), 218-226.

Gross, S. E. (1995). Compensation for teams: How to design and implement team-based reward programs. Amacom.

Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315–342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029–1045.

Hertog, P. D. (2000). Knowledge-intensive business services as co-producers of innovation. International journal of innovation management, 4(04), 491-528.

Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization science, 12(4), 435-449.

Hoegl, M. (2005). Smaller teams–better teamwork: How to keep project teams small. Business Horizons, 48(3), 209-214.

Huang, S., & Cummings, J. N. (2011). When critical knowledge is most critical: Centralization in knowledge-intensive teams. Small Group Research, 42(6), 669-699.

Hunter, J. E. (1980). Test validation for 12,000 jobs: An application of synthetic validity and validity generalization to the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.

Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternate predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72–98.

Jessup, H. R. (1990). New roles in team leadership. Training & Development Journal, 44(11), 79-84.

Jones, M. C., & Harrison, A. W. (1996). IS project team performance: An empirical assessment. Information & Management, 31(2), 57-65.

Jordan, P. J., & Lawrence, S. A. (2009). Emotional intelligence in teams: Development and initial validation of the short version of the Workgroup Emotional Intelligence Profile (WEIP-S). Journal of Management & Organization, 15(4), 452-469.

Jordan, P. J., & Troth, A. C. (2004). Managing emotions during team problem solving: Emotional intelligence and conflict resolution. Human performance, 17(2), 195-218.

Jordan, P. J., Ashkanasy, N. M., Härtel, C. E., & Hooper, G. S. (2002). Workgroup emotional intelligence: Scale development and relationship to team process effectiveness and goal focus. Human resource management review, 12(2), 195-214.

Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Harvard Business Review Press.

King, L. A., King, D. W., Fairbank, J. A., Keane, T. M., & Adams, G. A. (1998). Resilience–recovery factors in post-traumatic stress disorder among female and male Vietnam veterans: Hardiness, postwar social support, and additional stressful life events. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(2), 420.

Lapoint, P. A., & Haggard, C. R. (2013). Design Prototypes Inc. project management (A): Selection of the project team. Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies, 19(5), 95.

Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585–634.

Lin, T. C., Hsu, J. S. C., Cheng, H. L., & Chiu, C. M. (2015). Exploring the relationship between receiving and offering online social support: a dual social support model. Information & Management, 52(3), 371-383.

Loon Hoe, S. (2007). Shared vision: a development tool for organizational learning. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 21(4), 12-13.

Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child development, 71(3), 543-562.

Masten, A. S., & Reed, M. J. (2002). Resilience in development. [In:] CR Snyder, SJ López (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 74–88).

Masten, A. S., Best, K. M., & Garmezy, N. (1990). Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Development and psychopathology, 2(4), 425-444.

Menhart, S. F. (1999). Emotional intelligence: An alternative explanation of career success. Development of a multi-componential theory of emotional intelligence and its relationship to interview outcomes.

Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological review, 102(2), 246.

Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634.

Öztürk, P., Rossland, K., & Gundersen, O. E. (2010). A multiagent framework for coordinated parallel problem solving. Applied Intelligence, 33(2), 132-143.

Polites, G. L., & Karahanna, E. (2012). Shackled to the status quo: The inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. MIS quarterly, 36(1).

Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M., & Teach, R. J. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Leader influence on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 120–151.

Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American journal of orthopsychiatry, 57(3), 316.

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 86(1), 162.

Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The leadership quarterly, 15(1), 33-53.

Shumaker, S. A., & Brownell, A. (1984). Toward a theory of social support: Closing conceptual gaps. Journal of social issues, 40(4), 11-36.

Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.

Stephens, J. P., Heaphy, E. D., Carmeli, A., Spreitzer, G. M., & Dutton, J. E. (2013). Relationship quality and virtuousness: Emotional carrying capacity as a source of individual and team resilience. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49(1), 13-41.

Stewart, G. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32, 29–54.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 509-533.

Wood, W., & Quinn, J. M. (2004). The Power of Repetition in Daily Life: Habits and Intentions Guide Behavior. Unpublished Manuscript, Duke University, Durham, NC.

Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of business venturing, 10(1), 43-58.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔