跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.172) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/15 23:37
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:白明翰
研究生(外文):BAI, MING-HAN
論文名稱:以模擬遊戲探討玩家行為與人格特質之關係
論文名稱(外文):Exploring the Relationship of Player Behavior and Personality Traits Using Simulation Game
指導教授:施如齡施如齡引用關係
指導教授(外文):SHIH, JU-LING
口試委員:施如齡許衷源莊宗嚴
口試委員(外文):SHIH, JU-LINGHSU, CHUNG-YUANCHUANG, TSUNG-YEN
口試日期:2018-03-20
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺南大學
系所名稱:數位學習科技學系碩博士班
學門:教育學門
學類:教育科技學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2018
畢業學年度:106
語文別:中文
論文頁數:87
中文關鍵詞:數位遊戲人格特質玩家行為
外文關鍵詞:Digital GamePersonality TraitsPlayer Behavior
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:2105
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:122
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
心理學家多年來研究與發展人格理論,已在人格心理學建立起深厚的基礎架構,人們可以透過這些理論認識與區分人格特質。隨著數位科技的發展,人類無時不刻與各種數位內容互動,尤其是數位遊戲,在遊戲過程中會有許多不同的玩家行為。近年也有許多研究者針對人格特質與玩家行為進行研究,希望能從研究中了解人格特質與玩家行為之間的關係。
本研究透過艾森克人格特質問卷的題目情境,設計一款遊戲式人格特質評量系統,在實驗過程中蒐集受測者的玩家行為歷程以及人格特質結果,並研究分析遊戲式人格特質評量系統的設計架構可行性,以及人格特質與玩家行為之間的關係。
透過艾森克人格特質問卷評量結果與本研究的遊戲式人格特質評量分數分析發現,本研究的系統在外傾性評量的狀況良好,但在神經質評量的狀況不佳;透過人格特質評量結果與玩家行為項目的分析發現,人格特質外傾性與角色互動操作的部分玩家行為項目有顯著關係,且受測者會將人格特質的外傾性和神經質投射於對話回應選項的選擇上。
These years, psychologists research and development of personality theory, personality psychology has established a profound infrastructure. Through these theories, people can understand and distinguish personality traits. With the development of digital technology, human beings interact with all kinds of digital contents all the time, especially in digital games. There are many different player behaviors during the game. In recent years, many researchers have also conducted research on personality traits and player behaviors, hoping to understand the relationship between personality traits and player behaviors from the research.
In this study, we design a game-based personality trait evaluation system based on the Eysenck personality questionnaire. During the experiment, collect the subject's player behavior and personality traits. The final analyze the feasibility of a game-based personality trait evaluation system and the relationship between personality traits and player behavior.
The results showed that the game-based personality trait evaluation system developed in this study was effective in assessing the effects of extroversion, but the evaluation of neuroticism was not effective. In addition, we found that there is a significant relationship between extraversion and some of the player behavior items, and the subjects will project their personality traits on the dialog response options.
摘要 i
Abstract ii
目次 iii
表次 v
圖次 vi
附錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究問題 3
第四節 名詞釋義 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 人格特質 5
第二節 玩家行為 8
第三章 研究方法 12
第一節 研究架構 12
第二節 研究流程 13
第三節 研究工具 14
第四節 系統設計 15
第四章 研究結果 26
第一節 人格特質評量結果性別差異分析 26
第二節 人格特質問卷與遊戲評量系統分析 28
第三節 人格特質問卷情境與玩家行為分析 34
第五章 結論與建議 39
第一節 結論 39
第二節 建議 41
參考文獻 43
Aiken, L. R. (1997). Psychological Testing and Assessment. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological monographs, 47(1), i.
Barrett, P. T., Petrides, K. V., Eysenck, S. B. G., & Eysenck, H. J. (1998). The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: An examination of the factorial similarity of P, E, N, and L across 34 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(5), 805-819. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00026-9
Bartle, R. (1996). Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. Journal of MUD research, 1(1), 19.
Bowden, S. C., Saklofske, D. H., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Sudarshan, N. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (2016). Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire across 33 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.028
Castronova, E. (2008). Synthetic worlds: The business and culture of online games: University of Chicago press.
Drachen, A., Riley, J., Baskin, S., & Klabjan, D. (2014). Going out of business: Auction house behavior in the Massively Multi-player Online Game Glitch. Entertainment Computing, 5(4), 219-232. doi: 10.1016/j.entcom.2014.09.001
Eysenck, H. J. (1958). A short questionnaire for the measurement of two dimensions of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 42(1), 14.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1958). Personality and individual differences.
Eysenck, S. B., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(1), 21-29.
Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Review of personality and social psychology, 2(1), 141-165.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative" description of personality": The big-five factor structure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59(6), 1216.
Griebel, T. (2006). Self-portrayal in a simulated life: Projecting personality and values in The Sims 2. Game Studies, 6(1).
Jacob, L., Clua, E., & de Oliveira, D. (2017). Oh Gosh!! Why is this game so hard? Identifying cycle patterns in 2D platform games using provenance data. Entertainment Computing, 19, 65-81. doi: 10.1016/j.entcom.2016.12.002
Jeng, S.-P., & Teng, C.-I. (2008). Personality and motivations for playing online games. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 36(8), 1053-1060.
Karpinskyj, S., Zambetta, F., & Cavedon, L. (2014). Video game personalisation techniques: A comprehensive survey. Entertainment Computing, 5(4), 211-218. doi: 10.1016/j.entcom.2014.09.002
Kugler, T., Neeman, Z., & Vulkan, N. (2014). Personality traits and strategic behavior: Anxiousness and aggressiveness in entry games. Journal of Economic Psychology, 42, 136-147. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2014.02.006
McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (1985). Comparison of EPI and psychoticism scales with measures of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(5), 587-597. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(85)90008-X
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five‐factor model and its applications. Journal of personality, 60(2), 175-215.
McCreery, M. P., Kathleen Krach, S., Schrader, P. G., & Boone, R. (2012). Defining the virtual self: Personality, behavior, and the psychology of embodiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 976-983. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.019
McCreery, M. P., Vallett, D. B., & Clark, C. (2015). Social interaction in a virtual environment: Examining socio-spatial interactivity and social presence using behavioral analytics. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 203-206. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.044
Meng, J., Williams, D., & Shen, C. (2015). Channels matter: Multimodal connectedness, types of co-players and social capital for Multiplayer Online Battle Arena gamers. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 190-199. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.007
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 574.
Phares, E. J. (1991). Introduction to Personality: HarperCollins.
Si, C., Pisan, Y., Tan, C. T., & Shen, S. (2017). An initial understanding of how game users explore virtual environments. Entertainment Computing, 19, 13-27. doi: 10.1016/j.entcom.2016.11.003
Spronck, P., Balemans, I., & Van Lankveld, G. (2012). Player Profiling with Fallout 3. Paper presented at the AIIDE.
Stenros, J. (2014). In defence of a magic circle: The social, mental and cultural boundaries of play. Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association, 1(2).
Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Pathways To Psychology Study Guide 2e (2nd ed.). Singapore: Cengage Learning.
Szczepaniak, J. (2012). Hardcore Gaming 101: Zettai Zetsumei Toshi 3. Retrieved September 18, 2015, from http://www.hardcoregaming101.net/ZZT/zzt3.htm
Van der Linden, D., Tsaousis, I., & Petrides, K. V. (2012). Overlap between General Factors of Personality in the Big Five, Giant Three, and trait emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(3), 175-179. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.001
van Hemert, D. A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Poortinga, Y. H., & Georgas, J. (2002). Structural and functional equivalence of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire within and between countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(8), 1229-1249. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00007-7
Van Lankveld, G., Schreurs, S., & Spronck, P. (2009). Psychologically Verified Player Modelling. Paper presented at the GAMEON.
Van Lankveld, G., Schreurs, S., Spronck, P., & Van Den Herik, J. (2010). Extraversion in games. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computers and Games.
van Lankveld, G., Spronck, P., Van den Herik, J., & Arntz, A. (2011). Games as personality profiling tools. Paper presented at the Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG), 2011 IEEE Conference on.
Williams, D., Ducheneaut, N., Xiong, L., Zhang, Y., Yee, N., & Nickell, E. (2006). From tree house to barracks: The social life of guilds in World of Warcraft. Games and culture, 1(4), 338-361.
Woodford, D. (2008). Abandoning the magic circle.
Worth, N. C., & Book, A. S. (2014). Personality and behavior in a massively multiplayer online role-playing game. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 322-330. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.009
Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Joireman, J., Teta, P., & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five. Journal of personality and social psychology, 65(4), 757.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top