臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

在台灣，婚姻制度的變遷顯而易見，而對於伴侶關係品質的研究，目前相關的不是僅單純各別探討同居或結婚，就是單純探討以同居經驗來區分已婚者的關係品質差異。因此，本文將使用台灣青少年生命歷程資料(TYP)，其抽樣樣本來自24-32歲的成人，以同居經驗、結婚意願為依據，將伴侶關係型態分為四大類，即婚前有同居的已婚者、婚前無同居的已婚者、同居有結婚意願者、同居無結婚意願者，共有762人（男性352人，女性410人），並以選擇性因素、制度性因素、承諾性因素三大論點，去比較與解釋四大類伴侶關係型態的快樂程度差異，為本文主要研究目的。
進而可得到五個主要結論：
一、 72%是已婚者、28%是同居者，同居人口比例並不高。
二、 在與伴侶快樂程度的分佈當中，雖然不快樂僅占全部的3.6%，但可以發現女性不快樂的人較男性多。
三、 婚前有同居的已婚者與婚前無同居的已婚者相比，兩者之間的快樂程度無明顯差異。
四、 與有結婚意願的同居者相比，無結婚意願的同居者之快樂程度會較低，亦是四類中最低。
五、 對有結婚意願的同居者而言，在未控制任何選擇性因素時，其快樂程度是四類中最高的。但在控制個人特質與原生家庭等因素後，發現其快樂程度與已婚者群並沒有顯著差異。

Using data from the Taiwan Youth Project (TYP), this research examines the ways in which union types affect the relationship happiness of coupled young adults aged 24-32. Specifically, married and cohabiting respondents are divided into four relationship categories: married respondents that ever or never lived with their spouses before the entry into marriage, and cohabitors with or without marriage plans.
The final analytic sample size of this research consists of 352 young men and 410 young women. The analyses show several important empirical findings. First, approximately 28% of the 762 coupled respondents were in a nonmarital cohabitation relationship. Second, on average, the respondents reported high levels of relationship happiness, although women were less happy than their male counterparts about their relationships. Third, relationship happiness varies across the union types. Specifically, while other family and individual characteristics were not taken into consideration, the cohabiting respondents intending to marry with their partners reported the highest levels of relationship happiness. However, with all things being equal, there was no significant disparity in relationship happiness between marrieds and cohabitors with marriage plans while those in cohabitation relationships but without marriage plans reported the lowest levels of relationship happiness. Finally, the contributions to the study of family change and implications for related social policies in Taiwan are discusse

中文論文提要 ........................................................... ii
英文論文提要 ........................................................... iii
目錄 I
表次 II
一、前言 ................................................................ 1
二、文獻回顧 ............................................................. 4
（一）台灣同居現況與發展 .................................................. 4
（二）不同伴侶類型的關係滿意度異............................................ 5
（三）影響同居與婚姻的關係滿意度差異三大論點................................. 7
(1) 選擇性因素(selection factors)......................................... 7
(2) 制度化因素(institutionalization) ..................................... 11
(3) 承諾性因素(commitment) ............................................... 13
（四）其他因素影響伴侶關係型態的滿意度（快樂感）.............................. 15
（五）小結 ............................................................... 16
三、研究方法 ............................................................. 17
（一）研究架構 ........................................................... 17
（二）研究假設 ........................................................... 17
（三）資料來源 ........................................................... 18
（四）變項的測量 ......................................................... 19
（五）分析方法 ........................................................... 22
四、研究結果 ............................................................. 23
第一節、樣本描述分析 ...................................................... 23
第二節、不同伴侶關係型態的滿意度差異 ....................................... 26
第三節、不同伴侶快樂度的影響因素之迴歸分析 .................................. 27
五、結論 ................................................................. 32
（一）研究結果與貢獻 ...................................................... 32
（二）研究限制與建議 ...................................................... 35
參考文獻 ................................................................. 37

Amato, P. R., & Rogers, S. J. (1997). “A longitudinal study of marital problems and subsequent divorce. ” Journal of Marriage the Family, 59, 612-624.
Axinn W.G., & Thornton, A. (1996). The influence of parents' marital dissolutions on children's attitudes toward family formation. Demography, 33, 66-81.
Axinn, W. G., & Thornton, A. (1992). “The relationship between cohabitation and divorce: Selectivity or causal influence?”, Demography, 29, 357-374.
Baxter, J. (2005). “To marry or not to marry: marital status and the household division of labor. ” Journal of Family Issues, 26(3): 300–321.
Beaujouan, É. & Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (2011). “Cohabitation and marriage in Britain since the 1970s. Population Trends.”, Autumn Issue,145, 35-59.
Booth, A., & Johnson, D. (1988). “Premarital cohabitation and marital success.” Journal of Family Issues, 9(2), 255-272.
Brown, S. L. (2003). “Relationship quality dynamics of cohabiting unions.” Journal of Family Issues, 24(5), 583-601.
Brown, S. L. (2004). “Moving from cohabitation to marriage: Effects on relationship quality.” Social Science Research, 33, 1-19.
Brown, S. L., Manning W. D, Payne K. K., (2014). “Relationship quality among cohabitors versus married couples.” National Center for Family & Marriage Research, 1-30.
Brown, S.L. & Kawamura, S. (2010). “Relationship quality among cohabitors and marrieds in older adulthood.” Social Science Research, 39,777–786.
Brown, S.L., Booth, A., (1996). “Cohabitation versus marriage: a comparison of relationship quality.” Journal of Marriage and the Family ,58, 668–678.
Bumpass, L. L. & Lu, H. (1999). “Trends in cohabitation and implications for children's family contexts in the U.S.” CDE Work. Pap. No. 98-15. Cent. Demography Ecol., University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Bumpass, L. L. & Sweet, J. A. (1989). “National estimates of cohabitation.” Demography, 26, 615-625.
Bumpass, L. L., J. A. Sweet, and A. Cherlin. (1991), “The Role of Cohabitation in Declining Rates of Marriage.” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53(11): 913-927
Cohan, C. L., & Kleinbaum, S. (2002). “Toward a greater understanding of the cohabitation effect: Premarital cohabitation and marital communication.”, Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(1), 180-192.
Duvander, Ann Z.E. (1999). “The transition from cohabitation to marriage: A longitudinal study of the propensity to marry in sweden in the early 1990s. ” Journal of Family Issues, 1(20):698-717.
Glick, P. C. and G. B. Spanier. (1980). “Marriage and Unmarried Cohabitation in the Effects on Subsequent Marital Adjustment. ” Family Relations, 32(1): 139-147.
Hoem, J. & Hoem, B. (1988). “The Swedish Family: Aspects of Contemporary Development.”, Journal of Family Issues, 9, 397-424.
Huang P.M., Smock P.J., Manning W.D., & Bergstrom-Lynch C.A. (2011) “He Says, She Says: Gender and Cohabitation” J Fam Issues. 32(7): 876–905.
Johnson, M. P. (1973). Commitment: A conceptual structure and empirical application. The Sociological Quarterly, 14, 395-406.
Kiecolt, K. J., & Acock, A. C. (1988). “The long-term effects of family structure on gender-role attitudes.” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(3):709-717.
Kiernan, K. (2004). “Unmarried cohabitation and parenthood in Britain and Europe.” Law & Policy, 26, 1-24.
Lofquist, D., Lugaila, T., O’Connell, M., & Feliz, S. (2012). Households and families: 2010. 2010 Census Briefs, C2010BR-14. Retrieved 01-28-13 from http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-14.pdf
Manning, W.D. and Smock, P.J. (2002). “First comes cohabitation and then comes marriage? A research note.” Journal of Family Issues, 23(8): 1065–1087.
Manning, W.D., & Smock, P.J. (2005). Measuring and modeling cohabitation: New perspectives from qualitative data. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 989-1002.
Manning, W.D., Longmore, M.A., & Giordano, P.C. (2004). The Changing Institution of Marriage: Adolescents’ Expectations to Cohabit and Marry. Paper presented at the 2004 Social Capital Foundation Conference in Brussels, Belgium
Mason, K. O. & Bumpass L. L., (1975), “U.S. Women’s Sex-Role Ideology, 1970.” American Journal of Sociology ,80(5): 1212-1219.
Nock, S.L., (1995). “A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships.” Journal of Family Issues 16, 53–76.
Noller, p. , & Feeney, J. A. (Eds). (2006).Close relationships:function,forms,and process. New York:Psychology Press.
Oppenheimer, V. K., (2003), “Cohabiting and Marriage During Young Men’s Career-Development Process.” Demography, 40(1): 127-149.
Popenoe, D and Whitehead B. D.. (1999), “Should We Live Together? :What Young
Schoen R, Weinick R.M. (1993). “Partner choice in marriagesa nd cohabitations.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 55:408-14
Smock, P.J., (2000). “Cohabitation in the United States: a appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications.” Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1–20.
Stanley, S, M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2006). “Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. ” Journal of Marriage and Family, 55(4):499-505.
Stanley, S, M., Whitton, S. W., & Markman, H. J. (2004). “May I do: interpersonal commitment and premarital or nonmarital cohabitation ” Journal of Marriage and Family, 25(4):496-519.
Stanley, S.M. & Markman, H.J. (1992). “Assessing commitment in personal relationships. ” Journal of Marriage and the Family 54(3): 595–608.
Stryker, J. (1997). “Abstinence or else. ” Nation, 264, 19-21.
Tai, T. o., Baxter, J. & Hewitt, B. (2014). “Do co-residence and intentions make a difference? Relationship satisfaction in married, cohabiting, and living apart together couples in four countries.” Demographic Research, 31, 71-104.
Teachman J.D. (2003). “Premarital sex, premarital cohabitations, and the risk of subsequent marital dissolution among women.” Journal of Marriage and Family,65:444–55.
Teachman, J. D., Thomas, J. & Paasch, K. (1991). “Legal status and the stability of coresidential unions.” Demography, 28, 571 – 585.
Thompson, E., & Colella, U. (1992). Cohabitation and marital stability: Quality or commitment? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 259-267.
Thornton, A., W. G. Axinn and D. H. Hill. (1992). “Reciprocal Effects of Religiosity, Cohabitation , and Marriage.” American Journal of Sociology, 98(3): 628-651.
Thornton, A., W. G. Axinn, and J. D. Teachman. (1995). “The Influence of School Enrollment and Accumulation on Cohabitation and Marriage in Early Adulthood,” American Sociological Review, 60(5): 762–774. United States.” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42(1): 19-30.
Umberson D. (1992) “Gender, marital status, and the social control of health behavior.” Soc Sci Med,34:907–17
Watson, R. E. L., (1983), “Premarital Cohabitation vs. Traditional Courtship: Their Effects on Subsequent Marital Adjustment.”, 31(1),139-147.
Wiik, K.A., Bernhardt, E., and Noack, T. (2009). “A study of commitment and relationship quality in Sweden and Norway. ” Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 465–477.
Wiik, K.A., Keizer, R.K., and Lappegard, T. (2012). “Relationship Quality in Marital and Cohabiting Unions Across Europe ” Journal of Marriage
and Family, 74, 389-398.
何嘉雯 （1998）。〈臺北縣市大學生親子關係,婚姻態度對婚前性行為影響之研究〉。未出版之碩士論文，中國文化大學生活應用科學研究所，臺北。
利翠珊（1993）。〈已婚婦女代間互動與婚姻滿意度之關係〉。《輔仁學誌》，第27期，頁81-98。
吳明燁、伊慶春（2003），〈婚姻其實不只是婚姻：家庭因素對於婚姻滿意度的影響。〉，《人口學刊》第26期，頁 71-95。
呂玉瑕（1981）。〈社會變遷中台灣婦女事業觀: 婦女角色意識與就業態度的探訪。〉，《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》，第50期，頁25- 66。
呂玉瑕、周玉慧 （2015），〈二十一世紀台灣青少年性別角色態度之形成與變遷。〉，《台灣社會學刊》，第58期，頁95-155。
周玉惠、謝雨生（2012），〈每下愈況或漸入佳境？：夫妻婚姻品質之變化與相互影響性〉。《台灣社會學刊》，第23期，頁101-154。
邱愛婷（2013）。〈婚前是否同居對夫妻關係品質的影響：結婚理由的調節效果。〉未出版之碩士論文，天主教輔仁大學 兒童與家庭學系碩士論文。
柯澍馨、何嘉雯（2007）。〈父母婚姻關係、父母控制對青少年子女婚前性行為影響之研究〉，《台灣性學學刊》，第13卷第1期，頁31-50。
柯澍馨．何嘉雯（2004）。〈大學生親子關係、婚姻態度與婚前性行為之研究—以台北縣市私立大學學生為例〉，《華岡農科學報》，第13期，頁57-74。
徐光國（2003）。《婚姻與家庭》。臺北市：揚智出版社。
張明正（2001）。〈現代化與青年之兩性關係取向－以台灣地區為例〉，『跨世紀台灣的人口與相關現象』學術研討會。
張書豪（2009）。〈台灣同居生活的樣貌－規範與需求的落差。〉，未出版碩士論文，南華大學社會學研究所，嘉義。
教育部（2007），〈結婚不必靠運氣〉。《婚姻教育民眾自學手冊》，頁1-112。
許連高（譯）（1991）。《Dewevre-Fourcade, Mireille著同居。》台北：遠流。
陳毓容（2011）。〈談婚前同居關係與婚前教育之現況〉。《家庭教育雙月刊》，第34期，頁56-63。
楊靜利（2004），〈同居的生育意涵與台灣同居人數估計〉。《台灣社會學刊》，第32期，頁189-213。
楊靜利（2014），〈同居、婚姻與生育：人口學觀點的多元成家〉。巷口社會學，取自：https://twstreetcorner.org/2014/01/06/yangchingli/。
劉家樺 （2016），〈婚前同居與婚姻滿意度和離婚意願：以配對樣本為例。〉，「2016台灣青少年成長歷程研討會－成年初期的發展」，台北：中研院社會所。
鍾宜吟、蔡明璋，（2008），〈婚前同居、婚姻價值與婚姻滿意度：台灣民眾的分析〉。《研究台灣》，第5期，頁44-72。
簡維昌（2009），〈同居家庭及其教育介入探討。〉，《家庭教育雙月刊》，第21期，頁40-53。
簡維昌（2010），〈不同世代未婚者之同居態度、同居經驗及其婚姻態度之研究。〉，未出版之碩士論文，國立嘉義大學家庭教育與諮商研究所，嘉義。