一、英文文獻
1.Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268-81.
2.Ahiablame, L. M., Engel, B. A., & Chaubey, I. (2012). Effectiveness of Low Impact Development Practices: Literature Review and Suggestions for Future Research, Water Air Soil Pollut, 223, 4253-4273.
3.Alberti, M., Booth, D., Hill, K., Coburn, B., Avolio, C., Coed, S., & Spirandelli, D. (2007). The impact of urban patterns on aquatic ecosystems: An empirical analysis in Puget lowland sub-basins. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80, 345-361.
4.Alexander, D. (2000). Confronting Catastrophe:New Perspectives on Natural Disaster. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.Andersen, T. K., & Shepherd, J. M. (2013). Floods in a changing climate. GeographyCompass, 7(2), 95–115.
6.Anderson, W. P., Kanaroglou, P. S., & Miller, E. J. (1996). Urban form, Energy, and the Environment: A Review of Issues, Evidence and Policy, Urban Studies, 33(1), 7-35.
7.Associated Programme on Flood Management[APFM] (2007). APFM Technical Document No. 6- Formulating A Basin Flood Management Plan- A Tool for Integrated Flood Management, WMO/GWP Associated Programme on Flood Management.
8.Burns, M. J., Fletcher, T. D., Walsh, C. J., Ladson, A. R., & Hatt, B. E. (2012). Hydrologic shortcomings of conventional urban stormwater management and opportunities for reform. Landscape and urban planning, 105(3), 230-240.
9.Cervero, R., Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), 199-219.
10.Chen, Y. Ru., Yeh, C. H., & Yu, B. (2011). Integrated application of the analytic hierarchy process and the geographic information system for flood risk assessment and flood plain management in Taiwan. Natural Hazards, 59(3), 1261-1276.
11.Conzen, M. R. G. (1960). Alnwick, Northumberland: a study in town-plan analysis. Transactions and Papers (Institute of British Geographers), (27), iii-122.
12.Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J , & Shirley, W. L (2003). Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazard. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242-261.
13.Cutter, S. L., Mitchell, J. T. and Scott, M. S. (2000). Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County. South Carolina. Annuals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(4), 713-37.
14.Danodaram, C., Giacomoni, M. H., Khedun, C. P., Holmes, H., Ryan, A., Saour, W., Zechman, E. M. (2010).Simulation of combined best management practices and low impact development for sustainable stormwater management, Journal of the American water resources association, 46(5).
15.Dewan, A. M. (2013). Floods in a megacity: geospatial techniques in assessing hazards,risk and vulnerability. New York: Springer.
16.Eakin, H. & Luers, A. L. (2006). Assessing the vulnerability of social- environmental systems. Annual Reviewof Environment and Resources, 31, 365-94.
17.Eakin, H., Lerner A. & Murtinho F. (2010). Adaptive capacity in evolving peri-urban spaces: Responses to flood risk in the Upper Lerma River Valley, Mexico. Global Environmental Change, 20(1), 14-22.
18.Fletcher, T. D., Shuster, W., Hunt, W. F., Ashley, R., Butler, D., Arthur, S. … Viklander, M. (2014). SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more–The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage, Urban Water Journal, 12(7), 525-542.
19.FLO-2D Software (2017). FLO-2D GDS Manual. eastern Arizona.
20.Foster, J., Lowe, A., & Winkelman, S. (2011). The value of green infrastructure for urban climate adaptation. Center for Clean Air Policy, 750, 1-52.
21.Gallopín, G. C. (2006). Linkage between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 293-303.
22.Godschalk, D. R. (1991). Disaster Mitigation and Hazard Management, Emergency Management:Principles and Practice for Local Government, 131-160.
23.Green, W. H. & Ampt, G. A. (1911). Studies on soil physics, part 1: The flow of air and water through soils, J. Agric. Sci., 4(1), 1-24.
24.Greve, A. I. (2012). Linking urban form, land cover pattern, and hydrologic flow regime in the Puget Sound Lowland. Urban ecosystems, 15(2), 437-450.
25.Haase, D. & Nuissl, H. (2007). Does urban sprawl drive changes in the water balance and policy? The case of Leipzig (Germany) 1870-2003. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80(1-2), 1-13.
26.Hammer, W. (1972). Handbook of System and Product Safety. Prentice-Hall.
27.Heramb, C. & Attarian, J. L. (2006). The Chicago Green Alley Handbook. Chicago: Department of Transportation.
28.Hoyer, J., Dickhaut, W., Kronawitter, L., & Weber B. (2011). Water Sensitive Urban Design Principles and Inspiration for Sustainable Stormwater Management in the City of the Future. Hamburg:HafenCity Universität.
29.IPCC (2001). Climate Change 2001: Working Group II: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability . Glossary of Terms. The Physics Teacher, 3(1), 45.
30.IPCC (2007). Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.IPCC, (2014). Climate Change 2013: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.Jacob, J. S. & Lopez, R. (2009). Is Denser Greener? An Evaluation of Higher Density Development as an Urban Stormwater‐Quality Best Management Practice. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 45(3), 687-701.
33.Kawata, Y. (2002). Potential of hugh flood disasters in density populated urban areas in Japan, The 2nd Workshop on The Development of Integrated Disaster Reduction Systems on Compound Urban Floodings, Kobe, 23-27.
34.Liao, K. H., Le, T. A., & Van Nguyen, K. (2016). Urban design principles for flood resilience: Learning from the ecological wisdom of living with floods in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. Landscape and Urban Planning, 155, 69-78.
35.Lloyd, S.D., Wong, T. H. F. & Chesterfield, C. J. (2002). Water sensitive urban design - a stormwater management perspective.
36.Marshall, S. (2005). Urban Pattern Specification Solutions, Institute of Community Studies, London.
37.McCuen, R. et al. (1996). Hydrology, FHWA-SA-96-067, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
38.Mitchell, J. K. (1998). Hazards in changing cities, Applied Geography, 18(1), 1-6.
39.Mora, S. C. & Vahrson, W. G. (1994). Macrozonation Methodology for Landslide Hazard Determination. Bulletin of the Association of Engineer Geologists, 31(1), 49-58.
40.Moudon, A. V. (1997). Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary fied. Urban Morphology , 1, 3-10.
41.Nguyen, D. D. (2013). Size, Shape and Dispersion: Urban form evolution in Saigon River Basin and its impacts on hydrologic performance from 1990 to 2010. Urban form & hydrologic performance in Saigon River Basin 49th ISOCARP Congress.
42.Nielsen, M. B. & Jensen, M. B. (2015). Land cover in single-family housing areas and how it correlates with urban form. Urban Ecosyst, 18(4), 1103-1123.
43.O’Brien, J. S., Julien, P. Y. & Fullerton, W. T. (1993), Two-dimensional water flood and mudflow simulation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 119(2), 244-261.
44.Park, C. C. (1991). Environmental Hazards. London: Macmillan Education.
45.Parker, D. (Ed.). (2000). Floods. London: Routledge.
46.Pauleit, S., Ennos, R. & Golding, Y. (2005). Modeling the environmental impacts of urban land use and land cover change-a study in Merseyside, UK, Landscape and Urban Planning, 71, 295-310.
47.Prince George's County (Md.). Department of Environmental Resources. Programs & Planning Division. (1999). Low-impact development: an integrated design approach. Retrived from:https://www.epa.gov/
48.Quan, R. S. (2014). Rainstorm waterlogging risk assessment in central urban area of Shanghai based on multiple scenario simulation. Natural Hazard, 73(3), 1569-1585
49.Rygel, L., O’sullivan, D., & Yarnal, B. (2006). A method for constructing a social vulnerability index: an application to hurricane storm surges in a developed country. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change, 11(3), 741-764.
50.Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
51.Schueler, T. (2003). Impact of impervious cover on aquatic systems.Center for Watershed Protection. Ellicott City, MD.
52.Smith, K. (2001). Environmental Hazards：Assessing Risk and Reducing Disaster. London: Taylor and Francis Group.
53.Tsai, Y. H. (2005). Quantifying Urban Form: Compactness versus ‘Sprawl’, Urban Studies, 42(1), 141–161.
54.U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development[HUD] (2003). The practice of low impact development. Office of Policy Development and Research. Washington, D.C. Report prepared by NAHB Research Center, Inc.
55.Unified Facilities Crireria[UFC] (2010). Low Impact Development. Retrived from:https://www.wbdg.org/
56.United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction[UNISDR] (2004). Living with Risk: A global review of disaster reduction initiatives . United Nations Publications.
57.United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction[UNISDR] (2002). Guidelines for Reducing Flood Losses:United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva, Switzerland:United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.
58.United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction[UNISDR] (2009). Terminology of Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva, Switzerland:United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.
59.United States Environmental Protection Agency[USEPA] (2000). Low Impact Development(LID), A Literature Review. Retrived from:https://www.epa.gov/
60.Victorian Stormwater Committee (1999). Urban stormwater:best-practice environmental management guidelines. CSIRO publishing.
61.Villagra’n de Leon, J. C. (2006). Vulnerability a Conceptual and Methodological Review, Bonn:United Nations University, Institute for Environment and Human Security.
62.Wong, T. H. F. (2006). An Overview of Water Sensitive Urban Design Practices in Australia, Water Practice & Technology, 1(1).
63.Woods-Ballard, B., Wallingford, H. R., Kellagher, R., Wallingford, H. R., Black, P. M., & Jefferies, V. C. (2007). The SuDS manual(Vol. 697). London: Ciria.
64.Woods-Ballard, B., Wallingford, H. R., Kellagher, R., Wallingford, H. R., Black, P. M., & Jefferies, V. C. (2015). The SuDS manual(Vol. 753). London: Ciria.
65.Zimmerman, M. J., Waldron, M. C., Barbaro, J. R., Sorenson, J. R. (2010). Effects of low-impact-development (LID) practices on streamflow, runoff quantity, and runoff quality in the ipswich river basin, massachusetts: a summary of field and modeling studies, US Geol. Surv., Circ, 1361.
二、中文文獻
1.三峽區公所(2015)。三峽區地區災害防救計畫。新北：三峽區公所。
2.內政部建築研究所(2012)。社區及建築基地減洪防洪規劃手冊。臺北：內政部建築研究所。
3.內政部消防署(2015)。中央災害應變中心蘇迪勒颱風災害應變處置報告第9報。臺北：內政部消防署。
4.內政部營建署(2015)。「水環境低衝擊開發設施操作手冊編制與案例評估」委託技術服務案總結報告。臺北：內政部營建署。
5.內政部營建署(2015)。水環境低衝擊開發設施操作手冊。臺北：內政部營建署。
6.王瑋(2014)。都會區淹水耐災策略之評估-以新北市瓦窯溝為例。國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程研究所碩士論文，臺北。7.包匡(2012)。都市舊市區民眾避難時間模擬之研究－以新莊區為例。設計與環境學報，13，1-15。
8.行政院農委會水土保持局(2005)。水土保持手冊。臺北：行政院農委會水土保持局
9.何宇申(2013)。Flo-2D應用於中壢都會區的淹水分析。國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所碩士論文，臺北。10.吳杰穎、李玉生(2010)。非結構式減災措施運用於空間規劃與管理之研究。建築學報，72，169-186。
11.吳杰穎、邵珮君、林文苑、柯于璋、洪鴻智、陳天建、陳亮全、黃智彥、詹士樑、薩支平(2012)。災害管理學辭典。臺北：五南書局。
12.吳杰穎、黃昱翔(2011)。颱洪災害脆弱度評估指標之建立：以南投縣水里鄉為例。都市與計劃，38(2)，195-218。
13.吳瑞賢、林松青、蘇文瑞、洪明瑞、廖瑋璿、廖偉信、張哲豪、韋家振(2008)。天然災害防治導論。新北：全華圖書股份有限公司。
14.李欣輯、楊惠萱、廖楷民、蕭代基(2010)。水災社會脆弱性指標之建立。建築與規劃學報，10(3)，163-182。
15.沈丹、張明亮(2006)，SWMM模型在城市生命體循環系統中的應用，大連理工大學海岸及近海工程國家重點實驗室
16.林美君、蘇明道、蔡博文、陳敬宏、劉惠玲(2012)。統計區分類系統在洪災事件之人口暴露量推估。農業工程學報，58(3)，40-49。
17.林郁珊(2017)。低衝擊開發策略之耐水患都市設計評估研究。國立成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文，臺南。18.林漢良(2015)。災害風險評估理論與實務—劃設永久安置基地之應用。臺南：國立成功大學規劃與設計學院。
19.林漢良、謝俊民(2008)。建立易致災地區之安全建地劃設機制與準則。臺北：內政部營建署城鄉發展分署。
20.洪鴻智、陳令韡(2012)。颱洪災害之整合性脆弱度評估—大甲溪流域之應用。地理學報，(65)，79-96。
21.洪鴻智、陳羚怡(2007)。洪災風險評估與災害風險稅課徵—以台北市為例。臺灣土地研究，10(2)，95-125。
22.徐硯庭(2014)。低衝擊開發運用在高都市化地區的減洪效益：以新北市中永和地區為例，國立臺灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文，臺北。23.桃園縣政府水務局(2012)。鳶山堰水庫蓄水範圍及臨近集水區水質保護設施規劃計畫。桃園：桃園縣政府水務局。
24.馬士元(2002)。整合性災害防救體系架構之探討，國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所博士論文，臺北。25.國家災害防救科技中心(2015)。2015年蘇迪勒颱風災害調查彙整報告。臺北：災防中心。
26.張倉榮、許銘熙、賴進松、譚義績、潘宗毅、張向寬(2011)。台灣脆弱度及風險地圖製作與整合應用(2/2)，臺北市：經濟部水利署。
27.張學聖、廖晉賢 (2013)。臺南市土地使用計畫之水災風險分析。都市與計劃，40(1)，59-79。
28.張學聖、劉佩佳(2015)。考量空間關聯之地區洪災脆弱性研究以雲林縣易淹水地區為例。地理學報，79，1-29。
29.許庭綺(2016)。山區聚落之颱風災害風險評估分析—以高雄市為例。國立成功大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文，臺南。30.許銘峰(2008)。台灣地區都市型態特徵之比較研究。國立成功大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文，臺南。31.陳中豪、陳文福(2007)。分析階層程序法應用於坡地社區災害風險分析之研究-以臺北市山坡地老舊聚落為例。坡地防災學報，6(1)，17-32。
32.陳令韡(2012)。大甲溪流域颱洪脆弱度評估：分析網路程序法之應用。國立臺北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系碩士論文，臺北。33.陳加榮(2011)。都市次與氣候變亦對都會地區淹水之衝擊評估—以台中都會區為例。國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所碩士論文，臺北。34.陳亮全、陳海立(2009)。易致災都市空間發展之探討:以臺北盆地都市水災形成為例。都市與計劃，34(3)，293-315。
35.陳品先(2011)。以水災風險管理觀點評估土地使用調洪策略之研究-以鹽水溪流域為例。國立成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文，臺南。
36.陳建智(2014)。以淹水模式評估保水減洪策略之成效－臺中市筏子溪流域個案研究。國立臺灣大學理學院地理環境資源學研究所碩士論文，臺北。37.陳柏蒼(2016)。災害管理與實務。出版：五南出版社。
38.陳禹銘、蘇昭郎、樊國恕(2009)。災害風險評估研究之探討。危機管理學刊，6(1)，41-50。
39.陳起鳳、陳志方、莫懿美(2016)。都市低衝擊開發之綠屋頂應用與效益。中華技術學刊，46，46-57。
40.游景雲、邱昱嘉、陳葦庭、徐佳鴻、王順加(2016)。運用低衝擊開發於都市治水策略之探討。土木水利，43(5)，19-31。
41.馮正一、劉怡安、張育瑄(2009)。應用TRIGRS分析集水區中尺寸坡地入滲與穩定性。水土保持學報，41(3)，339- 356。
42.黃美純、賴俊良(1986)。雨水管理估算方法之應用與土地使用規劃。都市與計劃，13，173-198。
43.黃書禮、詹士樑、洪鴻智(2007)。國土保育地區防災空間規劃策略之整合型規劃─國土保育地區防災空間規劃。臺北：內政部營建署。
44.新北市政府水利局(2012)。透水保水設施規劃參考手冊。新北：新北市政府水利局。
45.楊靜怡(2009)。颱洪災害回復力之評估：以台中市、台中縣龍井鄉與東勢鎮為例。國立臺北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系碩士論文，臺北。46.經濟部水利署(2016)。中華民國一O五年臺灣水文年報第二部分—河川水位及流量。臺北：經濟部水利署臺北辦公處。
47.經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所(2006)。區域排水整治及環境營造規劃參考手冊。臺北：經濟部水利署。
48.經濟部水資源局(2000)。水文設計應用手冊。臺北：經濟部。
49.詹士樑、黃書禮、王思樺(2003)。台北地區洪水災害風險分區劃設之研究。都市與計劃，30(4)，263-280。
50.鄒克萬、黃書偉(2007)。都市土地利用變遷對自然環境衝擊之空間影響分析。地理學報，(48)，1-18。
51.雷祖強、陳憲宗、陳昶憲、鍾侑達、王欣萍、靳鈞評(2017)。水災災害風險評估模式之研究－以臺中市易淹水範圍為例。臺灣水利，65(2)。
52.廖朝軒、蔡燿隆(2002)。從健全都市水環境談雨水滯蓄措施之應用。水資源管理季刊，4(2)，8-18。
53.褚志鵬(2009)。Analytic Hierarchy Process Theory層級分析法(AHP)理論與實作。國立東華大學企業管理學系教學講義。
54.劉格非(2014)。水環境低衝擊開發設施操作手冊編制與案例評估計畫。臺北：內政部營建署。
55.鄧振源、曾國雄(1989)。層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上)。中國統計學報，27(6)，13707-13724。
56.盧鏡臣、陳永明、張志新、郭彥廉(2009)。台灣在氣候及環境變遷下之淹水風險評估—鄉鎮層級的評估。臺北：國家災害防救科技中心。
57.蕭新煌、周素卿、黃書禮(2017)。臺灣的都市氣候議題與治理。出版：國立臺灣大學出版中心。
58.蕭煥章(2008)。水災脆弱性評估模式之建立-以汐止市為例。中國文化大學地理學研究所博士學位論文，臺北。59.謝宗霖(2013)。都會區淹水模式之比較利用。國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所碩士論文，臺北。60.謝豐澤(2012)。都市化與氣候變遷對都會地區淹水之衝擊評估：以台中都會區為例。國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所碩士論文，臺北。
61.薩支平(2000)。淹水潛勢資料在土地使用規劃與管理之初步應用研究。臺北：內政部建築研究所。
62.蘇柏誠(2013)。屋頂綠化保水效能之降雨逕流水文模式建立。國立臺灣海洋大學河海工程學系碩士論文，臺北。63.龔楚媖、顏葆琳、李宗融、吳宜昭、于宜強(2015)。台灣極端降雨事件：1992-2013年重要事件彙整，新北市：國家災害防救科技中心。
64.行政院農業委員會農業試驗所(2010)。土壤資源空間資料標準，臺北：農業試驗所。