跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.82) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/17 04:41
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:沈暐程
研究生(外文):Shen, Wei-Cheng
論文名稱:長期臥床之皮膚微循環反應性充血評估
論文名稱(外文):Assessment of Skin Microcirculation in Bedridden during Reactive Hyperemia
指導教授:龍希文龍希文引用關係
指導教授(外文):Lung, Chi-Wen
口試委員:鮑建國簡慧雯龍希文
口試委員(外文):Bau, Jian-GuoChien, Hui-WenLung, Chi-Wen
口試日期:2018-06-14
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:亞洲大學
系所名稱:創意商品設計學系
學門:設計學門
學類:產品設計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2018
畢業學年度:106
語文別:中文
論文頁數:76
中文關鍵詞:雷射都卜勒血流計微循環褥瘡閉塞後反應性充血潰瘍
外文關鍵詞:Laser-Doppler FlowmetryMicrocirculationBedsoresPost occlusive Reactive Hyperemia (PORH)Ulcers
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:450
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:78
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
褥瘡有提高其他併發症的風險。以微循環和褥瘡的關係研究中,較少對於皮膚微循環的連續觀察。本研究假設五周間,三個群組之間:臥床無褥瘡患者 (臥床組)、傷口癒合(癒合組)與惡化狀態(惡化組),骶骨軟組織的皮膚微循環是否會有差異。目的希望藉由了解在在五周內,不同受試者之間微循環變化。本研究方法是以反應性充血檢測骶骨軟組織的皮膚微循環。受測者首先進行3分鐘一般血流狀態監測後,再施加200mmHg之壓力5分鐘,最後釋放壓力後持續監測4分鐘。本研究數據有[1]Braden 量表;[2]皮膚水、油份;[3]反應性充血前後最高皮膚微循環量比值(充血比值);[4]反應性充血前後皮膚微循環量積分比值(積分比值)。結果在五周內的三次比較中,充血比值與積分比值皆不具有統計上顯著差異。在潰瘍與血流相關性,癒合組潰瘍變化與充血比值的相關係數,為0.85呈現統計上顯著相關。表示對於癒合組,微循環血管的瞬間收縮程度可作為對潰瘍變化的觀察。惡化組則在潰瘍大小變化與充血比值、積分比值相關性表現分別為 -0.09與-0.10不具顯著相關。不能以微循環參數作為對於傷口程度的觀察項目。


Pressure ulcers can increase the risk of other complications. In the study of the relationship between microcirculation and pressure ulcers, there is less continuous observation of skin microcirculation in bedsores patients. The hypotheses of this study were that in the three group, the bedridden with pressure ulcer healing (healing group), bedridden with pressure ulcer worsening (worsening group),and bedridden without pressure ulcer (bed group), the microcirculation will be different, and it will be related with change in ulcer size of pressure ulcers. The purpose is to observe the observation of reactive hyperemia after occlusion, to understand the five-week microcirculation changes, to compare the differences in microcirculation among different groups, and to explore the correlation between the assessment parameters. The post occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) was measured with a laser Doppler flow meter. After 3 minutes of general blood flow monitoring was performed on the skin of the sacrum, a pressure of 200 mmHg was applied for 5 minutes. After the release of pressure, the reaction perfusion was continued for 4 minutes . The parameters in this study were [1] Braden Scale [2] skin water and oil [3] ratio of maximum skin microcirculation before and after reactive hyperemia (hyperemia ratio) [4] ratio of skin microcirculation before and after reactive hyperemia (Integral ratio). The results of this study were no significant differences between the hyperemia ratio and the integral ratio in three consecutive biweekly comparisons. In the relation between ulcer and blood flow, the correlation coefficient between the ulcer change and the hyperemia ratio of ulcer healing was significantly correlated with 0.85. This indicates that the degree of instantaneous contraction of the microcirculatory wall in ulcer healing patients can be used as an observation of ulcer changes. There was no significant correlation is -0.09 and -0.10 for the worsening group between the ulcer size change and the blood flow hyperemia ratio and the correlation ratio of the integral ratios. In worsening gorup, microcirculation parameters cannot be used as an observation item for the degree of wound.


目錄
謝誌 6
摘要 7
壹、前言 9
1-1. 褥瘡現況 9
1-2. 褥瘡原因 10
1-3. 褥瘡評估與預防 11
1-4. 微循環與傷口 14
1-5. 老化對皮膚微循環的影響 15
1-6. 假設與目的 16
貳、研究方法 17
2-1. 研究對象 17
2-2. 研究流程 19
2-3. 儀器與設備 20
2-4. 資料量測 24
2-5. 閉塞後反應性充血 28
2-6. 血流數據 30
2-7. 統計 31
參、結果 32
3-1. 基本資料 32
3-2. 五周微循環變化 32
3-3. 三組受測者間之差異 36
3-4. 各項評估項目間相關性 39
肆、討論 42
4-1. 五周微循環變化討論 42
4-2. 各分組間微循環討論 42
4-3. 各分組間參數相關性討論 43
4-4. 水分、油份與血流的探討 44
4-5. Braden量表討論 45
4-6. 吉尼係數用於評估之可能性 45
4-7. 實驗限制 46
4-8. 未來工作 47
伍、結論 48
參考文獻 49
附錄 53
附錄一、Braden量表評分標準 53
附錄二、整體測試流程 54
附錄三、Matlab數據分析程式碼 55
附錄四、實驗注意事項 67
附錄五、一般人基本資料 67
附錄六、含一般人之分析表 68
附錄七、受試者同意書 73

表目錄
表1. 褥瘡風險評估表比較 12
表2. Braden Scale活動評量積分量表 13
表3. 研究前後樣本數 18
表4. 臥床者基本資料 32
表5. 血流、潰瘍、水分三次連續雙周比較 33
表6. 血流、潰瘍、水分三次連續雙周比較之P-value 33
表7. 三組間微循環、水油、Braden參數平均與顯著性 36
表8. 各項評估項目間相關性 39
表9. Braden量表 53

圖目錄
圖1. 骶骨位置 11
圖2. 研究流程 19
圖3. 都卜勒血流計 20
圖4. 固定後探頭 21
圖5. 都卜勒探頭固定外殼結構 21
圖6. 機台示意 22
圖7. 實際測驗 22
圖8. 機台實體 23
圖9. 皮膚水分測試儀 24
圖10. 比例尺與潰瘍選取範例 25
圖11. 比例尺與潰瘍之數據範例 25
圖12. PORH流程 27
圖13. PORH示意 29
圖14. 皮膚微循環資料示意 30
圖15. 反應性充血前後最高皮膚微循環量比值趨勢 34
圖16. 反應性充血前後皮膚微循環量積分比值 35
圖17. 潰瘍連續三次雙周間大小變化 35
圖18. 血流參數差異圖 37
圖19. 水分、油分血流差異圖 38
圖20. Braden量表 39
圖21. 潰瘍變化圖 41
圖22. 步驟流程圖 54
圖23. 含一般人血流參數差異圖 69
圖24. 含一般人之水分、油分差異圖 70


Aggarwal, B. B., Vijayalekshmi, R., & Sung, B. (2009). Targeting inflammatory pathways for prevention and therapy of cancer: short-term friend, long-term foe. Clinical Cancer Research, 15(2), 425-430.
Ayello, E. A., & Braden, B. (2002). How and Why to Do Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment. Advances in Skin & Wound Care, 15(3), 125-131.
Bergstrom, N., Braden, B., Kemp, M., Champagne, M., & Ruby, E. (1998). Predicting pressure ulcer risk: a multisite study of the predictive validity of the Braden Scale. Nursing research, 47(5), 261-269.
Bouten, C. V. (1996). Etiology and pathology of pressure sores: a literature review.
Boyko, T. V., Longaker, M. T., & Yang, G. P. (2018). Review of the Current Management of Pressure Ulcers. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 7(2), 57-67.
Bryant, R., & Nix, D. (2016). 急性與慢性傷口照護-最新處置概念Acute and Chronic Wounds, 4th Edition: 台灣愛思唯爾
Catherine VanGilder, M., Amlung, S., Harrison, P., & Meyer, S. (2009). Results of the 2008–2009 International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence™ Survey and a 3-year, acute care, unit-specific analysis. Ostomy Wound Manage, 55, 39-45.
do Amaral Tafner, P. F., Chen, F. K., Rabello Filho, R., Corrêa, T. D., de Freitas Chaves, R. C., & Neto, A. S. (2017). Recent advances in bedside microcirculation assessment in critically ill patients. Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva, 29(2), 238.
Earl, N. R. (2014). Microvascular Function in Metabolically Healthy Groups Differing in BMI and Waist Circumference.
García-Fernández, F. P., Pancorbo-Hidalgo, P. L., & Agreda, J. J. S. (2014). Predictive capacity of risk assessment scales and clinical judgment for pressure ulcers: a meta-analysis. Journal of Wound Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 41(1), 24-34.
Gates, P. E., Strain, W. D., & Shore, A. C. (2009). Human endothelial function and microvascular ageing. Experimental physiology, 94(3), 311-316.
Hotta, K., Chen, B., Behnke, B. J., Ghosh, P., Stabley, J. N., Bramy, J. A., . . . Muller‐Delp, J. M. (2017). Exercise training reverses age‐induced diastolic dysfunction and restores coronary microvascular function. The Journal of physiology, 595(12), 3703-3719.
Huang, W.-C., Chang, S.-R., & Tang, C.-M. (2014). Reducing patient pressure sore incidence density in the pediatric surgical intensive care unit. Hu Li Za Zhi, 61(2), S60.
Jan, Y. K., Brienza, D. M., Boninger, M. L., & Brenes, G. (2011). Comparison of skin perfusion response with alternating and constant pressures in people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 49(1), 136-141.
Jan, Y. K., Liao, F., Rice, L. A., & Woods, J. A. (2013). Using reactive hyperemia to assess the efficacy of local cooling on reducing sacral skin ischemia under surface pressure in people with spinal cord injury: a preliminary report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 94(10), 1982-1989.
Kwan, R. L.-C., Wong, W.-C., Yip, S.-L., Chan, K.-L., Zheng, Y.-P., & Cheing, G. L.-Y. (2015). Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy promotes healing and microcirculation of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: a pilot study. Advances in Skin & Wound Care, 28(5), 212-219.
Ma, M.-q., Ji, W.-p., & Fan, Q.-p. (2016). 压力性溃疡与负压创面疗法的研究进展. 国际护理研究, 4(3), 23.
Marshall, S., Kerr, J., Carlson, J., Cadmus-Bertram, L., Patterson, R., Wasilenko, K., . . . Natarajan, L. (2015). Patterns of weekday and weekend sedentary behavior among older adults. Journal of aging and physical activity, 23(4), 534-541.
Meehan, M. (1994). National pressure ulcer prevalence survey. Advances in wound care: the journal for prevention and healing, 7(3), 27-30, 34, 36-28.
Mehal, W. Z. (2015). 慢性發炎,就像細胞著火. 科學人雜誌, 163(2015年9月).
Mestre-Deharo, C., & Sayag, J. (1991). Histologic signs of cutaneous aging. Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique, 86(6), 425-432.
Montagna, W., & Carlisle, K. (1990). Structural changes in ageing skin. British Journal of Dermatology, 122(s35), 61-70.
Muller-Delp, J. M., Hotta, K., Chen, B., Behnke, B. J., Maraj, J. J., Delp, M. D., . . . Morgan, H. E. (2017). Effects of age and exercise training on coronary microvascular smooth muscle phenotype and function. Journal of Applied Physiology, jap. 00459.02017.
Norton, D., McLaren, R., & Exton-Smith, A. N. (1962). An investigation of geriatric nursing problems in hospital: Churchill Livingstone Edinburgh.
Pérez-Sánchez, A., Barrajón-Catalán, E., Herranz-López, M., & Micol, V. (2018). Nutraceuticals for skin care: A comprehensive review of human clinical studies. Nutrients, 10(4), 403.
Park, K. (2015). Role of micronutrients in skin health and function. Biomolecules & therapeutics, 23(3), 207.
Pyke, K. E., & Tschakovsky, M. E. (2005). The relationship between shear stress and flow‐mediated dilatation: implications for the assessment of endothelial function. The Journal of physiology, 568(2), 357-369.
Qaseem, A., Mir, T. P., Starkey, M., & Denberg, T. D. (2015). Risk assessment and prevention of pressure ulcers: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Annals of internal medicine, 162(5), 359-369.
Raposio, E., Bertozzi, N., Moretti, R., Grignaffini, E., & Grieco, M. P. (2017). Laser Doppler Flowmetry and Transcutaneous Oximetry in Chronic Skin Ulcers: A Comparative Evaluation. Wounds, 29(7), 190-195.
Schoonhoven, L., Haalboom, J. R., Bousema, M. T., Algra, A., Grobbee, D. E., Grypdonck, M. H., & Buskens, E. (2002). Prospective cohort study of routine use of risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcers. Bmj, 325(7368), 797.
Singh, N., Armstrong, D. G., & Lipsky, B. A. (2005). Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Jama, 293(2), 217-228.
Tsai, K.-C., Hung, C.-T., Huang, J.-Y., & Kan, N.-P. (2015). 遠距監測與不同身體活動量對中高齡女性高壓防治的評估. 大專體育學刊, 17(3), 353-363.
Tsioufis, C., Dimitriadis, K., Katsiki, N., & Tousoulis, D. (2015). Microcirculation in hypertension: an update on clinical significance and therapy. Current vascular pharmacology, 13(3), 413-417.
Ungprasert, P., Wijarnpreecha, K., Koster, M. J., Thongprayoon, C., & Warrington, K. J. (2016). Cerebrovascular accident in patients with giant cell arteritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Paper presented at the Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.
Waterlow, J. (1985). Pressure sores: a risk assessment card. Nursing times, 81(48), 49-55.
Yamada, T., Ohta, T., Ishibashi, H., Sugimoto, I., Iwata, H., Takahashi, M., & Kawanishi, J. (2008). Clinical reliability and utility of skin perfusion pressure measurement in ischemic limbs--comparison with other noninvasive diagnostic methods. J Vasc Surg, 47(2), 318-323. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.10.045
Yamamoto-Suganuma, R., & Aso, Y. (2009). Relationship between post-occlusive forearm skin reactive hyperaemia and vascular disease in patients with Type 2 diabetes--a novel index for detecting micro- and macrovascular dysfunction using laser Doppler flowmetry. Diabet Med, 26(1), 83-88.
Zhao, R., Liang, H., Clarke, E., Jackson, C., & Xue, M. (2016). Inflammation in chronic wounds. International journal of molecular sciences, 17(12), 2085.
于博芮. (2010). 紗布下的祕密--你療解了嗎?. 科學月刊, 510-526.
李建荣. (2005). 压疮的防治及护理.
許美玉, 于博芮, 蕭晴文, & 趙慧玲. (2017). 壓瘡名詞與分級系統變革. [Changes to the Staging and Definitions of Pressure Ulcer]. 榮總護理, 34(2), 110-117. doi: 10.6142/vghn.34.2.110
陳建璋. (2011). 糖尿病傷口經驗談. 中華民國糖尿病衛教學會會訊, 7(2), d1-2.
彭丽. (2014). 褥疮的防治及护理. 今日健康, 13(8), 290-290.
游祥明, 宋晏仁, 古宏海, 傅毓秀, & 林光華. (2004). 心臟血管系統:血液. In 古宏海 (Ed.), 解剖學2版 (pp. 414-478): 華杏出版股份有限公司 Farseeing Pubshing Co., Ltd.
黃玉玲, 林慧玲, 王方, & 吳淑芳. (2015). 預防手術後壓瘡照護流程之發展. 護理雜誌, 62(6), 98-104.
黃博偉. (2016). 2016輔具產業全球市場與技術趨勢暨國內市場與學術研發量能. 輔具之友 (21), 38期(2016年9月), 15.
黃智生. (2008). 發炎反應-常見文明病的始作俑者. 科 學 發 展 Science Development, 422(2月), 6.
蔡宗憲. (2014). 雷射都卜勒血流信號在健康評估的分析與應用. (碩士), 逢甲大學, 台中市.
张恩芹. (2008). 褥疮的防护与治疗经验. 黑龍江醫藥, 21(1), 57-58.
贾红影, 段征征, 吴欣娟, & 刘义兰. (2016). 临床护士压疮风险评估现状及影响因素研究进展. 护理研究: 上旬版, 30(5), 1537-1540.


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top