跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.169) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/03/20 16:33
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:沈孟德
研究生(外文):SHEN,MENG-TE
論文名稱:傳統電商平台與社群網站對於白牌服飾購買意願之比較-以Yahoo!拍賣及Instagram為例
論文名稱(外文):Comparison of Traditional E-commerce Platforms and Social Medial Websites for Unbranded Clothing Purchase Intention -Case Study of Yahoo! Auctions and Instagram.
指導教授:謝子良謝子良引用關係
指導教授(外文):HSIEH,TZYY-LIANG
口試委員:林沂品劉秉承
口試委員(外文):LIN, YI-PINBenson P. C. Liu
口試日期:2019-07-10
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立雲林科技大學
系所名稱:創意生活設計系
學門:設計學門
學類:綜合設計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:92
中文關鍵詞:電子商務Instagram品牌權益社群媒體知覺品質購買意願
外文關鍵詞:E-commerceInstagramBrand equitySocial mediaPerceived qualityPurchase intention
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:318
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:4
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
網際網路的成熟,使網路購物蓬勃發展,顧客有更多元的平台作為網路購物的選擇,近年以社群媒體為主的新渠道被開闢,以互動及交流為主的模式吸引大批顧客,國內部分服飾業者也利用社群高頻互動、高曝光度的優勢作為自有品牌的溫床。相較過去的傳統電商平台,對於顧客及業者,如何有效的選擇平台與策略,達成有效的買賣關係,並能夠長久經營,為本研究探討之主要目的。
本研究以國內傳統電商品牌Yahoo拍賣與當代社群媒體品牌Instagram的品牌權益觀點進行比對,而後以知覺品質構面,分析知覺價質與知覺風險對購買意願之影響,並以此為基礎提出較適應市場之服務及行銷策略,達成品牌化及提升品牌權益之目的,並進一步提升購買意願。
本研究以網路問卷之調查方式,共計回收有效問卷372份,資料分析方法以描述性統計分析、信度分析、獨立T檢定分析、效度分析及迴歸分析,研究結果顯示,當商品為白牌服飾時,無論何種平台之品牌權益,皆會影響知覺價值,而知覺價值的增加,同樣會影響顧客的購買意願,其中有關於知覺風險的部分,對於購買意願之影響微弱,本研究認為是目前國內網路購物相關法規及物流的成熟,對於顧客的保障甚為完整,使顧客相對來說較為在意網路購物平台的知覺價值及其他品牌權益。選擇社群媒體的顧客比例已與選擇傳統電商的顧客比例一致,普遍來說,社群媒體的顧客在品牌權益與知覺價質的感受程度較高,此結果也與購買意願呈現正相關。
本研究認為,網路購物相較於實體店鋪販售商品,對於顧客來說屬於風險較高之消費環境,網路購物平台業者可透過社群漸增加曝光度,並且建立良好的互動、交流模式提升顧客的知覺感受,也讓顧客更加瞭解平台的資訊,同時經由建立或者與現有成熟廠商進行合作,完整物流、付款、退換貨機制,降低財物可能蒙受損失的可能性,使顧客能安心消費,進而提升購買意願。

The maturity of the Internet has made online shopping flourish. Consumers have more platforms to serve as online shopping choices. In recent years, new channels based on social media have been opened up. Due to interactional and communicational qualities of social media, they are attracting a large number of consumers. Some domestic apparel manufacturers also take advantage of the community's high-frequency interaction and high exposure as a hotbed of their own brands. The purpose of this chapter is to review the literature on methodologies for consumers and vendors to effectively select platforms and strategies to achieve effective long term trading relationships by comparing differences between traditional and new patterns e-commerce platforms.
This study compares the traditional domestic e-commerce brand Yahoo Auctions with the contemporary social media brand Instagram's brand equity view. It then goes on to analyze the impact of perceived quality and perceived risk on purchase intention based on perceived quality. According to the result of the study, proposing market-oriented services and marketing strategies, achieving branding, enhancing brand equity, and further enhancing purchase intention.
In this paper, 372 valid questionnaires were collected utilizing an online questionnaire survey. The data analysis methods were descriptive statistical analysis, reliability analysis, independent T-test analysis, validity analysis and regression analysis. The results showed that when the goods were white In the case of brand apparel, regardless of the brand equity of the platform, it will affect the perceived value, and the increase of the perceived value will also affect the consumers' willingness to purchase. Among them, the part of the perceived risk has a weak influence on purchase intention. Because of the maturity of domestic online shopping regulation and logistics and the protection of consumers is complete, consumers are more concerned about the perceived value of online shopping platforms and rights of other brands. The proportion of consumers who choose social media has been consistent with the proportion of consumers who choose traditional e-commerce. Generally speaking, social media consumers have a higher level of perception of brand equity and perceived price that is also positively related to purchase intention.
As far as this paper is concerned, online shopping is an unsafe environment for consumers compared to the physical store shopping experience. Online shopping platform operators can gradually increase their exposure through the community and establish a positive interaction and communication mode. Moreover, it can enhance the consumer's perception and let customers know more about the platform information. At the same time, by establishing or cooperating with existing mature manufacturers, which has complete logistics, payment, return, and exchange mechanisms can reduce the possibility of property damage due to this system consumers can feel at ease — therefore increasing the willingness to purchase.

摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
目錄 iii
表目錄 vii
圖目錄 x
第一章 緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的 5
1-3 研究範圍與限制 5
1-4 研究流程 6
第二章 文獻回顧與相關理論 7
2-1 電子商務 7
2-1-1電子商務的定義 7
2-1-2 P2P (PEER-TO-PEER) 8
2-1-3從B2C到C2C 9
2-1-4台灣電商平台 11
2-1-5台灣自有網路服飾品牌-YAHOO拍賣 13
2-2品牌 14
2-2-1品牌的定義 14
2-2-2品牌權益 15
2-2-3平台品牌權益(PLATFORM BRAND EQUITY) 21
2-3知覺品質 21
2-3-1知覺價值(PERCEIVED VALUE) 21
2-3-2知覺價值的衡量 22
2-3-3知覺風險(PERCEIVED RISK) 24
2-3-4知覺風險的衡量 24
2-4購買意願的衡量 25
2-5社群 26
2-5-1品牌與社群營銷 26
2-5-2社群的定義 27
2-5-3線上社群 28
2-5-4社群經濟 29
2-5-5品牌社群 30
2-5-6 INSTAGRAM社群媒體 33
第三章 研究方法 36
3-1 研究架構與假設 36
3-1-1社群媒體品牌權益與社群媒體知覺價值之關係 36
3-1-2社群媒體品牌權益與社群媒體知覺風險之關係 36
3-1-3傳統電商品牌權益與傳統電商知覺價值之關係 37
3-1-4傳統電商品牌權益與傳統電商知覺風險之關係 37
3-1-5知覺價值與購買意願之關係 37
3-1-6知覺風險與購買意願之關係 38
3-2操作性定義與衡量問項 38
3-2-1平台品牌權益問項 39
3-2-2平台知覺價值問項 40
3-2-3平台知覺風險問項 42
3-2-4購買意願 44
3-3研究設計 45
3-3-1研究對象 45
3-3-2資料收集與分析 45
第四章 資料分析 47
4-1 敘述性統計分析 47
4-1-1樣本人口統計資料 47
4-1-2樣本網路購物經驗統計資料 55
4-1-3信度分析與因素分析 59
4-2 信效度分析 60
4-2-1 研究信度結果 60
4-2-2 研究效度結果 60
4-2-3抽樣結構結果 61
4-3 獨立T檢定 61
4-3-1性別對個人背景量表之獨立樣本T檢定 61
4-3-2電商平台對個人背景量表之獨立樣本T檢定 61
4-3-3電商平台對各量表之獨立樣本T檢定 62
4-4研究假說之驗證 68
第五章 結論與建議 76
5-1研究結論 76
5-1-1平台品牌權益對於平台知覺價值之影響 76
5-1-2平台品牌權益對於平台知覺風險之影響 77
5-1-3平台知覺價值對於網路購物意願之影響 77
5-1-4平台知覺風險對於網路購物意願之影響 78
5-1-5社群特性對於網路購物意願之影響 79
5-2後續研究限制與建議 80
參考文獻 81
中文文獻 81
英文文獻 83
附錄 89
第一部分 89
第二部分 91

中文文獻
1.丁家永(2014)<<互聯網下顧客如何認識品牌意義與價值>>,南京師範大學心理學院碩士論文,南京
2.丁家永(2017)<<戰略品牌的三個基本思維>>,南京師範大學心理學院碩士論文,南京
3.王爾敏(1977).史學方法.東華書局。
4.中央通訊社(2016) <<網路使用者轉移至照片分享平台-Instagram在亞太地區及台灣使用率成長率兩倍>>https://www.cna.com.tw/postwrite/Detail/201172.aspx#.XAJCfxMzbVo(2016.09.29)
5.今週刊(2014)<< 群經濟 用社群創商機>>https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/154685/post/201409040058/%E7%BE%A4%E7%B6%93%E6%BF%9F%20%E7%94%A8%E7%A4%BE%E7%BE%A4%E5%89%B5%E5%95%86%E6%A9%9F?utm_source=%E4%BB%8A%E5%91%A8%E5%88%8A&utm_medium=autoPage(2014.09.04)
6.今週刊(2017)<<發揮網紅影響力!3步驟打造Instagram火紅品牌>> https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/80394/post/201711270020/%E7%99%BC%E6%8F%AE%E7%B6%B2%E7%B4%85%E5%BD%B1%E9%9F%BF%E5%8A%9B%EF%BC%81%EF%BC%93%E6%AD%A5%E9%A9%9F%E6%89%93%E9%80%A0Instagram%E7%81%AB%E7%B4%85%E5%93%81%E7%89%8C?utm_source=%E4%BB%8A%E5%91%A8%E5%88%8A&utm_medium=autoPage(2017.11.21)
7.方鄒昭聰(無日期) <<電子商務簡介>>http://www.ntpu.edu.tw/mis/faculty/ctfang/ec.htm
8.李伯謙、周善謙,Kotler, Philip 原著2004 <<行銷管理概論>>,台北:華泰。
9.林嘉玲, & 韓復華. (2011). 網拍女性服飾之經營模式分析: 以東京著衣為例 (Doctoral dissertation).
10.張紹勳. (2001). 研究方法. 台中: 滄海書局.
11.崔磊. (2011). 我國B2B電子商務信用管理問題研究. 科技經濟市場, (4), 73-75.
12.楊炳清(2012) <<創新型行銷經營運用於電子商務C2C網站>>,康寧大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文,臺北
13.資策會(MIC) <<2019虛擬經濟三大商機:商務、社交、娛樂>>https://mic.iii.org.tw/IndustryObservations_PressRelease02.aspx?sqno=499(2018.08.28)
14.國家發展委員會(2017) <<106年持有手機民眾數位機會調查>>https://www.ndc.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=55C8164714DFD9E9&s=C57A53FF739B6D3D(2017.12)
15.動腦雜誌(2016)<<社群平台新霸主,品牌如何操作Instagram>>https://blog.dcplus.com.tw/marketing-knowledge/social_marketing/98315(2016.09.13)
16.電商Tony(2018) <<台灣電商平台比較整理-平台排名與費用比較>>
https://atm70000.com/%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E9%9B%BB%E5%95%86%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0%E6%AF%94%E8%BC%83%E6%95%B4%E7%90%86-%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0%E6%8E%92%E5%90%8D%E8%88%87%E8%B2%BB%E7%94%A8%E6%AF%94%E8%BC%83/(2018.08.03)
17.經濟部統計處(2018) <<指尖商機看俏!我國電子購物業近7年平均成長7.4%>>https://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/dos/bulletin/Bulletin.aspx?kind=9&html=1&menu_id=18808&bull_id=4972(2018.02.05)
18.經濟部(2016) <<105年度電子商務雲端創新應用與基礎環境建置計畫我國 B2C 網路商店經營現況研析報告>>https://www.cnra.org.tw/edm/2016b2c.pdf(2016.12)
19.數位時代(2017)https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/45854/alibaba-taobao-become-a-content-and-social-driven-commerce-platform(2017.08.21)
20.榮泰生. (2007). 網路行銷: 電子商務實務. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.

英文文獻
1.Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name, New York.
2.Arnould, E. J., & Price, L. L. (1993). River magic: Extraordinary experience and the extended service encounter. Journal of consumer Research, 20(1), 24-45.
3.American Marketing Association(AMA)(1995)<< Dictionary>>https://www.ama.org/resources/Pages/Dictionary.aspx?dLetter=B
4.Aaker, D.A. (1996) Measuring Brand Equity across Products and Markets. California Management Review, 38, 102.
5.Aaker, D.A. and Joachimsthaler, E. (2000) Brand Leadership: Building Assets in an Information Economy. Simon and Schuster, New York.
6.Agarwal, M. K., & Rao, V. R. (1996). An empirical comparison of consumer-based measures of brand equity. Marketing letters, 7(3), 237-247.
7.Ann Handley & C. C. Chapman (2012) Content Rules: How to Create Killer Blogs, Podcasts, Videos, Ebooks, Webinars That Engage Customers and Ignite Your Business, WILEY, Hoboken
8.Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. Chicago, IL, 384-398.
9.Bettman, J. R. (1973). Perceived risk and its components: a model and empirical test. Journal of marketing research, 10(2), 184-190.
10.Boorstin, D. J. (1974). The Americans: the democratic experience (Vol. 3). Vintage.
11.Baalbaki, S. S. (2012). Consumer perception of brand equity measurement: a new scale (Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas).
12.Baldauf, A., Cravens, K. S., & Binder, G. (2003). Performance consequences of brand equity management: evidence from organizations in the value chain. Journal of product & brand management, 12(4), 220-236.
13.Bastos, W., & Levy, S. J. (2012). A history of the concept of branding: practice and theory. Journal of Historical Research in Marketing, 4(3), 347-368.
14.Biel, A. L. (1992). How brand image drives brand equity. Journal of advertising research, 32(6), 6-12.
15.Bonner, P. G., & Nelson, R. (1985). Product attributes and perceived quality: Foods.
16.Business Jargons(BJ)Brand Equity, https://businessjargons.com/brand-equity.html
17.Cox, D. F. (1967). Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior.
18.Cunningham, M. S. (1967). The major dimensions of perceived risk. Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior.
19.Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (2003). Becoming critical: education knowledge and action research. Routledge.
20.Chen, L. H. (2008). Internationalization or international marketing? Two frameworks for understanding international students' choice of Canadian universities. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 18(1), 1-33.
21.Cherington , P.T.(1920), The Elements of Marketing, Macmillan, New York, NY
22.Clark,F.E .(1927)Principles of Marketing, Macmillan, New York, NY
23.Clow, K. E., & Baack, D. (2005). Brand and Brand Equity. Concise Encyclopedia of Advertising, Haworth Press, Inc.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/ 03/nielsen _globalfa ces_maro9.pdf
24.China Insights Consultancy(CIC)(2018) CIC報告:台灣進入C2C電商時代,http://www.media-outreach.com/release.php/View/5755(08/07/2018)
25.Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of marketing research, 28(3)
26.Dan, C. (2014). Consumer-To-Consumer (C2C) Electronic Commerce: The Recent Picture. International Journal of networks and communications, 4(2), 29-32.
27.David Ogilvy (1985) Ogilvy on Advertising, Bloomsbury Pub Plc, USA
28.Dickey, I. J., & Lewis, W. F. (2010). The evolution (revolution) of social media and social networking as a necessary topic in the marketing curriculum: a case for integrating social media into marketing classes. Advances in Marketing: Embracing Challenges and Change-A Global Perspective.
29.Draglet(2019) <>https://www.draglet.com/blockchain-p2p-web/
30.Eggert, A., & Ulaga, W. (2002). Customer perceived value: a substitute for satisfaction in business markets?. Journal of Business & industrial marketing, 17(2/3), 107-118.
31.eMarketer(2015) Brand Engagement on Instagram Is High-for Now,https://www.emarketer.com/Article/Brand-Engagement-on-Instagram-Highfor-Now/1012789(06/08/2015)
32.Falkenberg, A. W. (1996). Marketing and the wealth of firms. Journal of Macromarketing, 16(1), 4-24.
33.Farquhar, P. H. (1989). Managing brand equity. Marketing research, 1(3).
34.Gemünden, H. G. (1985). Perceived risk and information search. A systematic meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2(2), 79-100.
35.Gehrke, D., & Turban, E. (1999, January). Determinants of successful website design: relative importance and recommendations for effectiveness. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers (pp. 8-pp). IEEE.
36.Garretson, J. A., & Clow, K. E. (1999). The influence of coupon face value on service quality expectations, risk perceptions and purchase intentions in the dental industry. Journal of Services Marketing, 13(1), 59-72.
37.Glynn, M. S., & Woodside, A. G. (Eds.). (2012). Business-to-business Marketing Management: Strategies, Cases and Solutions (Vol. 18). Emerald Group Publishing.
38.Gini Dietrich(2018) Spin Sucks, https://spinsucks.com/communication/pr-pros-must-embrace-the-peso-model/ (01/04/2018)
39.Heidemann, J., Klier, M., & Probst, F. (2012). Online social networks: A survey of a global phenomenon. Computer networks, 56(18), 3866-3878.
40.Heidemann, J., Stojanovic, M., & Zorzi, M. (2012). Underwater sensor networks: applications, advances and challenges. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 370(1958), 158-175.
41.Hoffman, D. L., T. P. Novak and P. Chatterjee (), “Internet Use in the United States: 1995 Baseline Estimates and Preliminary Market Segments”, working paper, Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University , April,1995
42.Heidi Cohen (2011) Riverside marketing strategies,http://riversidemarketingstrategies.com/ (15/08/2011)
43.INFO CENTER(2017) Welcoming 1 Million Advertisers,https://instagram-press.com/blog/2017/03/22/welcoming-1-million-advertisers/(2017.03.22)
44.INFO CENTER(2017) Bringing More Transparency to Commercial Relationships on Instagram,https://instagram-press.com/blog/2017/06/14/bringing-more-transparency-to-commercial-relationships-on-instagram/(2017.06.14)
45.INFO CENTER(2018) Bringing Shopping to Instagram Stories,https://instagram-press.com/blog/2018/06/12/shopping-in-instagram-stories/(2018.06.12)
46.INFO CENTER(2018) New Ways to Shop on Instagramhttps://instagram-press.com/blog/2018/09/17/new-ways-to-shop-on-instagram/(2018.09.17)
47.INFO CENTER(2018) Introducing more ways to shop on Instagram,https://instagram-press.com/blog/2018/11/15/introducing-more-ways-to-shop-on-instagram/(2018.11.15)
48.Jay Baer (2011) The NOW Revolution:7 shifts to Make Your Business Faster, Smarter and More Social, WILEY, Hoboken
49.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 216-23.
50.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 216-23.
51.July 10, 2010).
52.Jung, C. G. (1964). Man and His Symbols Doubleday and Co. Gar-den City NY, 175Jung175Man.
53.Kalakota, R., & Whinston, A. B. (1997). Electronic commerce: a manager's guide. Addison-Wesley Professional.
54.Kapferer , J.N.,& Kapferer , J.N.(2004) The new strategic brand management: Creating and sustaining brand equity long term. London: Kogan Page
55.Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. the Journal of Marketing, 1-22.
56.Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. the Journal of Marketing, 1-22.
57.Keller, K. L. (2001). Building customer-based brand equity: A blueprint for creating strong brands (pp. 3-27). Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
58.Keller, K. L. (2003). Brand synthesis: The multidimensionality of brand knowledge. Journal of consumer research, 29(4), 595-600.
59.Keller, K.L. (1998) Strategic Brand Management :Building ,Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
60.Kim, A.J. and Ko, E. (2012) Do Social Media Marketing Activities Enhance Customer Equity? An Empirical Study of Luxury Fashion Brand. Journal of Business Research, 65, 1480-1486.
61.Kim, P. (1990). A perspective on brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 7(4), 63-67.
62.Krishna, V. (2002). Auction Theory Academic Press. San Diego, USA.),
63.Krishnan, B. C., & Hartline, M. D. (2001). Brand equity: is it more important in services?. Journal of services marketing, 15(5), 328-342.
64.Krishnan, H. S. (1996). Characteristics of memory associations: A consumer-based brand equity perspective. International Journal of research in Marketing, 13(4), 389-405.
65.Lassar, W., Mittal, B., & Sharma, A. (1995). Measuring customer-based brand equity. Journal of consumer marketing, 12(4), 11-19.
66.Li, Z. and Chaipoopirutana, A.P.D.S. (2016) The Important Factors that Influence on Building Brand Loyalty towards Chang’an Car Brand in Xi’An City, Shaanxi, China.
67.Lois K. Geller (1996) Response, OUP, UK
68.Maggard , J.P.(1976)Positioning revisited Journal of Marketing,40(1),pp63
69.Mitchell, V. W., & Greatorex, M. (1988). Consumer risk perception in the UK wine market. European Journal of Marketing, 22(9), 5-15.
70.Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationships between providers and users of market research: the dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of marketing research, 29(3), 314-328.
71.Monroe, K. B. (1994). Perceived price fairness: A new look at an old construct. ACR North American Advances.
72.Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1985). The effect of price on subjective product evaluations. Perceived quality, 1(1), 209-232.
73.Muniz, A. M., & O'guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of consumer research, 27(4), 412-432.
74.Morgan, J. (2000). A simple model of advertising and subscription fees. Economics Letters, 69(3), 345-351.
75.McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W., & Koenig, H. F. (2002). Building brand community. Journal of marketing, 66(1), 38-54.
76.Mattern, J. (2017). Instagram. Minnesota: ABDO.
77.Milewicz, C. and Saxby, C. (2013) Leaders’ Social Media Usage Intentions for in-Bound Customer Communications. Management Research Review, 36, 849-867.
78.Milewicz, C., & Saxby, C. (2013). Leaders' social media usage intentions for in-bound customer communications. Management Research Review, 36(9), 849-867.
79.Moore, K., & Reid, S. (2008). The birth of brand: 4000 years of branding. Business History, 50(4), 419-432.
80.Moore, K., & Reid, S. (2008). The birth of brand: 4000 years of branding. Business History, 50(4), 419-432.
81.MBAlib(2017) Business To Customer,https://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/B2C(25/01/2017)
82.Neti, S. (2011). Social media and its role in marketing. International Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business Systems, 1(2), 1-15.
83.NETI, S. (2011). Socıal medıa and ıts role ın marketıng. International Journal of Enterprise Compu International Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business Systems. v. 1 n. 2, p. 1-16.
84.Nielsen Corporation (2009), “Global faces and networked places”, available at: http://blog.nielsen.
85.Nielsen, G., & Ro, J. Y. (2009). Mammaglobin, a valuable diagnostic marker for metastatic breast carcinoma. International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2(4), 384.
86.judgments. Journal of consumer research, 14(4), 495-507.
87.Oram, A. (2001). Peer-to-Peer: Harnessing the power of disruptive technologies. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".。
88.Ovidiu Ioan Moisescu, (2005), The concept of brand equity – A comparative approach-MPRA Paper No. 32013
89.Owais (2007)’The Hot History & Cold Future of Brands’, Journal of Managerial Sciences,1(1), pp75-87
90.Park, C. S., & Srinivasan, V. (1994). A survey-based method for measuring and understanding brand equity and its extendibility. Journal of marketing research, 271-288.
91.Pew Research Center(2018)Social Media Use in 2018,http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018/(01/03/2018)
92.Pew Research Center(2018) Teens,Social Media & Technology,http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/(31/05/2018)
93.Qualman, E. (2010). Socialnomics: How social media transforms the way we live and do business. John Wiley & Sons.
94.Page, C., & Lepkowska-White, E. (2002). Web equity: a framework for building consumer value in online companies. Journal of consumer marketing, 19(3), 231-248.
95.Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Finding commection in a computerized world. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc..
96.Ravi Pappu, R., Quester, P. G., & Cooksey, R. W. (2005). Consumer-based brand equity: improving the measurement–empirical evidence. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 14(3), 143-154.
97.Rehman, A., Zia-ur-Rehman, M. and Akhtar, W. (2012) Factors Affecting Brand Loyalty: A Perspective of Fast Food Restaurants. Actual Problems of Economics, 130.
98.Ritzer, G. (2001). Explorations in the sociology of consumption: Fast food, credit cards and casinos. Sage.London
99.Romm,(1997). Virtual communities and society: Toward an integrative three phase model. International journal of information management, 17(4), 261-270.
100.Sheth, J. N. (2002). The future of relationship marketing. Journal of services marketing, 16(7), 590-592.
101.SARANGAN, B.; RAGEL, V. R. (2014). The ımpact of engagement wıth socıal medıa marketıng on brand awareness. Indian Journal of Research in Management, Business and Social Sciences. v. 2, n. 2, p. 129-136.
102.Sarangan, S., & Vinoth, S. C. (2014). Application of fuzzy compromise solution method for fit concept selection. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(3), 1052-1063.
103.Sergio Zyman (2003) The End of Advertising as We Know It, WILEY, Hoboken
104.Simon, C. J., & Sullivan, M. W. (1993). The measurement and determinants of brand equity: A financial approach. Marketing science, 12(1), 28-52.
105.Stern, B. B. (2006). What does brand mean? Historical-analysis method and construct definition. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 216-223.
106.Stern, B.B. (2006), “What does brand mean? Historical-analysis method and construct definition”,
107.T. Tailor (2018) LearnMarketing.net,http://www.learnmarketing.net/(03/01/2018)
108.Veblen, T. (1899),The Theory of the Leisure Class, New York,NY
109.Weilbacher,W.M .(1995),Brand Marketing, NTC Business Books, Chicago,IL,PP4
110.Wong, F.Y. and Sidek, Y. (2008) Influence of Brand Loyalty on Consumer Sportswear. International Journal of Economics and Management, 2, 221-236.
111.Wood, L. (2000). Brands and brand equity: definition and management. Management decision, 38(9), 662-669.
112.Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of marketing, 60(2), 31-46

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 創新型行銷經營運用於電子商務C2C網站
2. 購買涉入、購買動機、網站環境特性對網路生鮮蔬菜購買意願之影響
3. 品牌來源國及品牌權益影響消費者購買產品及服務意願之研究
4. 產品資訊情境、參考價格與知覺品質對消費者購買行為之影響
5. 價格折扣與品牌形象對消費者知覺品質、知覺價值及購買意願的影響--以筆記型電腦為例
6. 品牌形象、知覺品質、知覺價值、購買意願及消費行為關係之研究─以捷安特為例
7. 品牌權益、促銷方式及促銷效果關聯之研究-以運動鞋與衛生紙為例
8. 參考價格區間與知覺品質對知覺價值與購買意願之影響
9. 消費者購屋行為之探討-品牌權益,品牌態度與購屋評估準則對購屋意圖之影響
10. 促銷評價影響品牌權益及購買意願模式之研究-以洗面乳為例
11. 網路推薦訊息類型對消費者信任、知覺風險、知覺品質以及對購買意願之影響
12. 零售業商店國際品牌和自有品牌對購買傾向的影響—以家樂福量販店為例
13. 商店形象與自有品牌形象對自有品牌知覺風險、知覺品質、知覺價值與購買意願之影響-以大型量販店為例
14. 汽車品牌形象與中古車之知覺風險、知覺品質及知覺價值對購買意願關係之探討
15. 品牌來源國國家形象、品牌名稱、價格對知覺品質與購買意願影響之研究-以中國上海地區少淑服消費者為例
 
無相關期刊