(3.236.228.250) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/04/13 13:00
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:廖羿涵
研究生(外文):LIAO,YI-HAN
論文名稱:台灣上市家族企業社會情感財富之初探
論文名稱(外文):The exploration of socioemotional wealth in Taiwan’s public-listed family firms
指導教授:劉韻僖劉韻僖引用關係
指導教授(外文):LIU,YUN-SHI
口試委員:陳心田陳儀蓉
口試委員(外文):CHEN,SHIN-TIENCHEN,YI-JUNG
口試日期:2018-06-27
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立雲林科技大學
系所名稱:企業管理系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2018
畢業學年度:106
語文別:中文
論文頁數:72
中文關鍵詞:社會情感財富家族企業內容分析法
外文關鍵詞:socioemotional wealthfamily firmscontent analysis
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:231
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
家族企業的經營面臨家族情感與企業營運的雙重挑戰,考量的範圍涵蓋經濟利益與社會和情感因素造成的非經濟利益,由於過去的相關研究多借用家族涉入的代理變數進行家族企業行為的探討,缺乏直接衡量家族企業的社會情感財富(SEW),故本研究選取20家台灣上市家族企業為研究樣本,透過內容分析法分析公開文本資料,並配合SEW理論模型進行分類及編碼,試圖探索出家族企業重視社會情感財富的內涵,以及比較分析各構面的相互影響關聯。研究結果顯示SEW五個構面中,公開揭露程度最高的構面為「緊密的社會關係」;再者,「家族控制和影響」、「緊密的社會關係」和「情感的依附」三個構面均與「世代傳承的家族延續」具有正向關係;而「家族成員對企業的認同」則是與「家族控制和影響」和「世代傳承的家族延續」存有負向相關。最後,本研究亦發現不同的家族企業特徵(機構法人股權、公司規模、公司績效),其家族的SEW也有明顯的差異。
The management of family firms faces dual challenges of family emotion and business operation. The scope of the consideration covers the economic benefits and non-economic benefits caused by social and emotional factors. Due to the previous related research borrows the family involvement as agent variables to explore entrepreneurial behavior in the family firms, but has been criticized for not estimating family member’s socioemotional wealth (SEW) directly. Therefore, this study selects 20 Taiwanese listed companies as research samples, not only analyzes market observation information but also classifies and encodes SEW models through content analysis methods to directly measure the SEW composition. The effect seeks to explore the connotation of SEW of family firms, as well as the interaction in the SEW various structures. The result of the analysis was found that family firms value the “binding social ties”. Moreover, each aspect including “family control and influence”, “binding social ties”, and “emotional attachment” is positively correlated to “renewal of family bonds to the firm through dynastic succession”. But apart from “family members’ identification with the frim”, it is negatively correlated to “family control and influence” and “renewal of family bonds to the firm through dynastic succession”. However, this study was also discovered that different family features: corporate governance, company size, and company performance have significant differences for SEW.
摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
目錄 iii
表目錄 v
圖目錄 vi
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究問題與目的 2
第三節 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 家族企業相關文獻 5
第二節 社會情感財富的起源和理論內涵 8
第三章 研究方法 17
第一節 樣本來源 17
第二節 研究衡量 18
第四章 研究結果與分析 25
第一節 質性結果分析 25
第二節 量化結果分析 41
第三節 家族異質性之影響分析 48
第五章 結論與建議 55
第一節 研究結論 55
第二節 實務意涵 56
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 57
參考文獻 59

中文文獻
1.陳定國(1986)。有效經營,天下叢書,台北:經濟與生活出版事業股份有限公司,142。
2.許士軍、陳光中(1989)。台灣家族企業發展與家族結構關係, 行政院國家科學會專題研究報告。
3.鍾喜梅、劉韻僖、葉匡時(2003)。我國上市公司家族控制力與董事會運作關係之探討. 中山管理評論, 頁, 341-365。
4.鍾喜梅、李琬茜、林立農(2006)。家族控制、策略自主與國際化:台灣汽車業家族集團的個案分析。2006年台灣社會學年會暨國科會專題研究成果發表會。
5.鍾喜梅、葉家豪(2010)。家族連結, 政商關係與多角化擴張: 台灣家族集團的跨時分析. 組織與管理, 3(1), 67-106。
6.劉韻僖(2017)。台灣上市櫃家族企業社會情感財富的組成與影響。科技部研究計畫。

英文文獻
1.Barnes, L. B., & Hershon, S. A. (1976). Transferring power in the family business. Harvard Business Review, 54(4), 105-114.
2.Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Larraza-Kintana, M. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less?. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 82-113.
3.Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258-279.
4.Boeker, W., & Goodstein, J. (1993). Performance and successor choice: The moderating effects of governance and ownership. Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 172-186.
5.Brannon, D. L., & Edmond, V. P. (2016). A socioemotional wealth perspective in small family firms. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 22(1), 51.
6.Carrigan, M., & Buckley, J. (2008). ‘What's so special about family business?’An exploratory study of UK and Irish consumer experiences of family businesses. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(6), 656-666.
7.Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 29(5), 555-576.
8.Chrisman, J. J., Kellermanns, F. W., Chan, K. C., & Liano, K. (2010). Intellectual foundations of current research in family business: An identification and review of 25 influential articles. Family Business Review, 23(1), 9-26.
9.Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 23(4), 19-39.
10.Cruz, C. C., Gómez-Mejia, L. R., & Becerra, M. (2010). Perceptions of benevolence and the design of agency contracts: CEO-TMT relationships in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 69-89.
11.Cruz, C., Justo, R., & De Castro, J. O. (2012). Does family employment enhance MSEs performance?: Integrating socioemotional wealth and family embeddedness perspectives. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 62-76.
12.Cruz, C., & Arredondo, H. (2016). Going back to the roots of socioemotional wealth. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 14(3), 234-243.
13.Davis, P. (1983). Realizing the potential of the family business. Organizational Dynamics, 12(1), 47-56.
14.Debicki, B. J., Van de Graaff Randolph, R., & Sobczak, M. (2017). Socioemotional wealth and family firm performance: A stakeholder approach. Journal of Managerial Issues, 29(1), 82.
15.De Massis, A., Chirico, F., Kotlar, J., & Naldi, L. (2014). The temporal evolution of proactiveness in family firms: The horizontal S-curve hypothesis. Family Business Review, 27(1), 35-50.Donnelley, R. G. (1964). The family business. Harvard Business Review, 42(4), 93-105.
16.Dyck, B., Mauws, M., Starke, F. A., & Mischke, G. A. (2002). Passing the baton: The importance of sequence, timing, technique and communication in executive succession. Journal of business venturing, 17(2), 143-162.
17.Dyer, W. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2006). Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 785-802.
18.Gersick, K. E., Gersick, K. E., Davis, J. A., Hampton, M. M., & Lansberg, I. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Harvard Business Press.
19.Gersick, K. E., Lansberg, I., Desjardins, M., & Dunn, B. (1999). Stages and transitions: Managing change in the family business. Family Business Review, 12(4), 287-297.
20.Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative science quarterly, 52(1), 106-137.
21.Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653-707.
22.Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
23.Jiang, D. S., Kellermanns, F. W., Munyon, T. P., & Morris, M. L. (2018). More than meets the eye: A review and future directions for the social psychology of socioemotional wealth. Family Business Review, 31(1), 125-157.
24.Lee, M. S., & Rogoff, E. G. (1996). Research note: Comparison of small businesses with family participation versus small businesses without family participation: An investigation of differences in goals, attitudes, and family/business conflict. Family Business Review, 9(4), 423-437.
25.Micelotta, E. R., & Raynard, M. (2011). Concealing or revealing the family? Corporate brand identity strategies in family firms. Family Business Review, 24(3), 197-216.
26.Miller, D., Lee, J., Chang, S., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2009). Filling the institutional void: The social behavior and performance of family vs non-family technology firms in emerging markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(5), 802-817.
27.Miller, D., & Breton‐Miller, L. (2014). Deconstructing socioemotional wealth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(4), 713-720.
28.Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Allyn & Bacon. Needham Heights, USA.Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2003b). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of business venturing, 18(4), 450-473.
De Rosenblatt, P. C., Mik, L., Anderson, R. M., & Johnson, P. A. (1985). The family in business: Understanding and dealing with the challenges entrepreneurial families face.Shepherd, D. A., Wiklund, J., & Haynie, J. M. (2009). Moving forward: Balancing the financial and emotional costs of business failure. Journal of business venturing, 24(2), 134-148.
29.Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 27(4), 339-358.
30.Vardaman, J. M., & Gondo, M. B. (2014). Socioemotional wealth conflict in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1317-1322.
31.Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?. Journal of financial Economics, 80(2), 385-417.
32.Ward, T. B., & Scott, J. (1987). Analytic and holistic modes of learning family-resemblance concepts. Memory & Cognition, 15(1), 42-54.
33.Zientara, P. (2017). Socioemotional wealth and corporate social responsibility: A critical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(1), 185-199.
34.Zellweger, T. M., & Astrachan, J. H. (2008). On the emotional value of owning a firm. Family Business Review, 21(4), 347-363.
35.Zellweger, T. M., & Dehlen, T. (2012). Value is in the eye of the owner: Affect infusion and socioemotional wealth among family firm owners. Family Business Review, 25(3), 280-297.
36.Zellweger, T. M., Kellermanns, F. W., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2012). Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science, 23(3), 851-868.


電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20231231)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔