臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

在學術領域中，尋找關鍵人物或研究，以及其所附帶的合作研究關係等資訊，對於新的設計研究者來說，是十分有價值的。在SOFTlab與CAADRIA學會合作的機緣下，得以擁有龐大的WOCAD學術關聯式資料庫的研究資料，能夠來達成上述的系統實作。
本研究選擇使用本體作為知識探索的媒介，先將原始的WOCAD學術關聯式資料庫映射至WOCAD學術本體，並透過本體論視覺化，將WOCAD學術本體進行表現力上的增幅，透過可互動之本體論視覺化結果，以及本體支援語意推理功能，提升研究者查詢WOCAD學術本體時的效率，進而幫助他們順利進行研究與獲取知識。

In the academia, finding key people, researches, and the accompanying collaborative network is valuable for new design researchers. The opportunity for cooperation between SOFTlab and CAADRIA. There is a huge WOCAD academic relation database can implement the system.
This study decided to use ontology as the medium of knowledge exploration. First, using ontology mapping tool to covert the relational database into ontology form. And through ontology visualization, the WOCAD academic ontology increase in expressiveness. On the visualization results, as well as ontology support semantic inference function, improve the efficiency of researchers in querying WOCAD academic ontology and then help them to conduct research and acquire knowledge smoothly.

摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 vii
一、 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 研究架構 2
二、 文獻探討 4
2.1 學術知識探索的方法 4
2.2 本體論的知識探索 6
2.3 WOCAD學術本體視覺化建置相關理論與工具介紹 7
2.3.1 WOCAD學術資料 7
2.3.2 本體論視覺化 9
2.3.3 Protégé 9
2.3.4 Apache Jena 10
2.3.5 OWL 10
2.3.6 VOWL 11
2.4 文獻小結 12
三、 研究方法 13
3.1 使用情境描述 14
3.2 需求分析 14
3.3 功能設計 16
3.4 選擇使用VOWL呈現之作用 17
3.5 CAAD ontology之作用 18
四、 系統設計 19
4.1 技術評估 19
4.1.1 本體論設計工具 19
4.2 資料原理 20
4.2.1 類別 24
4.2.2 物件屬性 25
4.3 系統架構 27
4.4 系統需求 28
4.4.1 對於作者相關資料進行搜尋 28
4.4.2 對於作品相關資料進行搜尋 28
4.5 系統元件設計 28
4.5.1 資料擷取模組 28
4.5.2 半自動建置WOCAD學術本體 29
4.5.3 WOCAD學術本體查詢模組 29
4.6 介面功能介紹 30
4.7 互動流程與情境 33
五、 評估 38
5.1 設定測試目標與規則 38
5.2 測試結果 39
5.3 評估與改善意見 42
六、 結論與未來研究 44
6.1 結論 44
6.2 未來研究 45
參考文獻 46

[1]W. W. Powell, K. W. Koput, and L. Smith-Doerr, "Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology," Administrative science quarterly, pp. 116-145, 1996.
[2]M. E. Newman, "The structure of scientific collaboration networks," Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 404-409, 2001.
[3]S.-H. Huang and T.-W. Chang, "DISCOVERING CO-AUTHOR RELATIONSHIP IN WOCAD DATA USING ONTOLOGY VISUALIZATION" presented at the 2018 Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation (ECEI 2018), Macau, P.R. China, 2018.
[4]H. Denis. (1985). The Free On-line Dictionary of Computing.
[5]T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila, "The semantic web," Scientific american, vol. 284, no. 5, pp. 34-43, 2001.
[6]M. Biezunski, M. Bryan, and S. Newcomb, "ISO/IEC FCD 13250: 1999-Topic Maps," 1999.
[7]P. Heim, S. Lohmann, and T. Stegemann, "Interactive relationship discovery via the semantic web," in Extended Semantic Web Conference, 2010, pp. 303-317: Springer.
[8]G. L. Andrienko and N. V. Andrienko, "Interactive maps for visual data exploration," International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 355-374, 1999.
[9]T. R. Gruber, "A translation approach to portable ontology specifications," Knowledge acquisition, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 199-220, 1993.
[10]N. Guarino, "Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation," International journal of human-computer studies, vol. 43, no. 5-6, pp. 625-640, 1995.
[11]R. J. Brachman, "On the epistemological status of semantic networks," in Associative networks: Elsevier, 1979, pp. 3-50.
[12]A. Saito, K. Umemoto, and M. Ikeda, "A strategy-based ontology of knowledge management technologies," Journal of knowledge Management, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 97-114, 2007.
[13]N. F. Noy and D. L. McGuinness, "Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology," ed: Stanford knowledge systems laboratory technical report KSL-01-05 and Stanford medical informatics technical report SMI-2001-0880, Stanford, CA, 2001.
[14]M. Lanzenberger, J. Sampson, and M. Rester, "Visualization in ontology tools," in Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems, 2009. CISIS'09. International Conference on, 2009, pp. 705-711: IEEE.
[15]A. Katifori, C. Halatsis, G. Lepouras, C. Vassilakis, and E. Giannopoulou, "Ontology visualization methods—a survey," ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 39, no. 4, p. 10, 2007.
[16]J. H. Gennari et al., "The evolution of Protégé: an environment for knowledge-based systems development," International Journal of Human-computer studies, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 89-123, 2003.
[17]G. Antoniou and F. Van Harmelen, "Web ontology language: Owl," in Handbook on ontologies: Springer, 2004, pp. 67-92.
[18]S. Lohmann, S. Negru, F. Haag, and T. Ertl, "VOWL 2: user-oriented visualization of ontologies," in International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, 2014, pp. 266-281: Springer.
[19]I. Horrocks, P. F. Patel-Schneider, H. Boley, S. Tabet, B. Grosof, and M. Dean, "SWRL: A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML," W3C Member submission, vol. 21, p. 79, 2004.
[20]S. Bauer, S. Grossmann, M. Vingron, and P. N. Robinson, "Ontologizer 2.0—a multifunctional tool for GO term enrichment analysis and data exploration," Bioinformatics, vol. 24, no. 14, pp. 1650-1651, 2008.
[21]林聖峰, "架構改變時比較知識本體與資料庫," 碩士, 軟體工程研究所, 國立中央大學, 桃園縣, 2013.
[22]S. Lohmann, V. Link, E. Marbach, and S. Negru, "WebVOWL: Web-based visualization of ontologies," in International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, 2014, pp. 154-158: Springer.
[23]S. Cursi, D. Simeone, and I. Toldo, "A semantic web approach for built heritage representation," in International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Futures, 2015, pp. 383-401: Springer.
[24]S. Lohmann, S. Negru, F. Haag, and T. Ertl, "Visualizing ontologies with VOWL," Semantic Web, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 399-419, 2016.
[25]A. Sinha et al., "An overview of microsoft academic service (mas) and applications," in Proceedings of the 24th international conference on world wide web, 2015, pp. 243-246: ACM.
[26]A. Maedche and S. Staab, "Ontology learning for the semantic web," IEEE Intelligent systems, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 72-79, 2001.