臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近年來，國際景氣表現低迷，許多國家紛紛產生外移他國投資之現象，尤其是東南亞國家，在政經方面皆展現穩定之成長，因此吸引各國企業爭相前往投資。對於向來以外貿為導向的台商而言，東南亞國家的經濟成長率、充足的年輕勞動力以及對於外人投資的開放等條件無一不是吸引台商進駐的原因，而政府為配合此趨勢也制定一系列新南向政策，鼓勵台商前進東南亞搶占市場先機。

隨著海外子公司數量的增加以及產業環境的急遽變動，多國籍企業在掌控其子公司上面臨更艱鉅的挑戰，也因此產生了許多子公司自主行為相關之研究，目的是希望能透過子公司的內外部自主行為，幫助母公司對內改善營運效率、對外開發市場新機會。但這些研究大多聚焦在母子公司的互動關係，較少著墨子公司本身心理層面的影響，故本研究欲採用子公司經理人外控人格特質為調節變數，試圖探討子公司自主行為是否會因此而改變對組織公平性的影響。

本研究採用問卷調查法蒐集樣本，研究樣本參考「台灣區機械業同業公會會員名錄(TAMI)」及「台灣經濟新報資料庫(TEJ)」所登錄之廠商名單，進行篩選後寄出問卷，填答對象限定為在海外擁有子公司之我國企業中高階經理人，有效問卷回收共計131份。本研究利用SPSS統計套裝軟體進行各項實證研究分析，得到的結果如下：
1.子公司外部自主行為對資訊公平存在正向顯著之影響
2.子公司外部自主行為對程序公平存在正向顯著之影響
3.子公司內部自主行為對資訊公平存在正向顯著之影響
4.子公司內部自主行為對程序公平存在正向顯著之影響
5.外控人格負向調節子公司外部自主行為對資訊公平間的關係
6.外控人格正向調節子公司內部自主行為對資訊公平間的關係

In recent years, the international economy is in a slump, and many countries have experienced the phenomenon of investing in other countries. The most popular investment countries are Southeast Asian countries, which have shown steady growth in political and economic aspects, thus attracting companies from all over the world to come to invest. For foreign trade-oriented Taiwanese enterprise, the economic growth rate of Southeast Asian countries, the abundant young labor force, and the openness of foreign investment are all factors that attract Taiwanese enterprise. The government has also formulated a series of “New Southbound Policy” to cope with this trend, encouraging Taiwanese enterprise to seize Southeast Asia market opportunities.

With the increase of overseas subsidiaries and the rapid changes in the industrial environment, multinational corporations face more arduous challenges in controlling their subsidiaries. As a result, many subsidiary initiative researches have been conducted with the aim of helping the parent company to improve both operational efficiency and develop new opportunities in the market. However, most of these studies focus on the interaction between parent and subsidiary companies, and less on the psychological level of the subsidiary itself. Therefore, this study wants to adopt the external control personality traits of the subsidiary managers as the moderating variable, trying to explore whether the subsidiary initiative will change the impact of organizational justice.

The samples of this study was obtained from the questionnaire survey, and the sample refers to the list of TAMI in China (Taiwan Association of Machinery Industry) and TEJ (Taiwan Economic Journal). The respondents are limited to the middle and high-level managers of oversea subsidiary. Finally, a total of 131 valid questionnaires were collected, and various empirical studies were conducted using the SPSS statistical software system. The results are shown as following:

1.The external subsidiary initiative will affect informational justice positively.
2.The external subsidiary initiative will affect procedural justice positively.
3.The internal subsidiary initiative will affect informational justice positively.
4.The internal subsidiary initiative will affect procedural justice positively.
5.The interaction between external subsidiary initiative and external control affect informational justice negatively.
6.The interaction between internal subsidiary initiative and external control affect informational justice positively.

第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景 2
第二節研究目的與問題 4
第三節研究範圍 5
第四節研究流程 6
第二章文獻探討 7
第一節子公司自主行為 7
第二節組織公平 12
第三節內外控人格 15
第四節假說推導 17
第五節研究架構 22
第三章研究方法與設計 23
第一節研究變數之操作型定義 23
第二節研究工具與對象 27
第三節資料分析方法 29
第四章實證研究結果與分析 31
第一節樣本敘述 31
第二節構面之敘述性統計分析 35
第三節信度與效度分析 36
第四節迴歸分析 46
第五節假說檢定 50
第五章結論與建議 54
第一節研究結論 55
第二節管理意涵與研究貢獻 58
第三節研究限制與未來研究建議 59
參考文獻 60
一、中文部分 60
二、英文部分 62
附錄一研究問卷 67

一、中文部分

1.丁學勤 (2009)，組織公平、內外控人格特質與組織衝突關係之研究，國立政治大學教育與心理研究，32卷四期，pp.99-123
2.吳明隆 (2005)，SPSS與統計應用分析，台北，五南
3.李貴惠、于卓民、司徒達賢 (2007)，內外部網絡對於多國公司在台子公司角色演化的影響，Chiao Da Management Review，Vol. 27 No. 2,pp.169-201
4.周文賢 (2002)，多變量統計分析-SAS/STAT使用方法，台北，智勝
5.林明賢 (2005)，內在個人特質與外在環境對創業態度及意圖之影響，國立政治大學企管所碩士論文
6.邱皓政 (2017)，多元迴歸的自變數比較與多元共線性之影響：效果量、優勢性與相對權數指標的估計與應用，台大管理論叢，第27卷第三期，pp.1-44
7.邱雅萍、黃銘章、盧亭均 (2008)，多國籍企業派任子公司高階主管影響因素之研究－代理理論觀點，人力資源管理學報，第8卷第3期，pp.25-48
8.徐遵慈 (2014)，臺灣產業的「新南向政策」，貿易政策論叢第22期，pp.67-111
9.陳禹昕 (2017)，子公司自主權與子公司經理人社會認知對子公司自主行為之影響，國立中正大學企管所碩士論文
10.陳湘琳 (2004)，跨國企業在台子公司之自發性行動對其設入其他國家市場經營主導性之影響，國立中山大學企管所碩士論文
11.曾志弘 (2001)，多國籍企業子公司自主權與主導行為影響因素之研究：以多國籍企業在台子公司為例，國立中山大學企管所博士論文
12.黃馨逸 (2013)，子公司自主性、母子公司鑲嵌、母公司慣性及母公司動態能力對台商大陸子公司組織學習機制配適影響之研究，國立中正大學企管所碩士論文
13.廖明坤、于卓民、司徒達賢 (2006)，台商大陸子公司決策自主權影響因素之研究，中山管理評論2006年六月號，第十四卷第二期，pp.397-427
14.鄭勝泰 (2002)，人格特質對工作績效影響之探討：以某運輸服務業之T公司為例，國立中央大學人資所碩士論文
15.藍婉倩 (2017)，以創業心理知覺、制度同形探討台商海外子公司自主行為，國立中正大學企管所碩士論文

二、英文部分

1.Alan M. Rugman, Alain Verbeke (2001) Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises, Strategic Management Journal, Volume 22, Issue 3,
pp 237-250
2.Alan M. Rugman, Alain Verbeke (2004) A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises, Journal of International Business Studies, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 3-18
3.Anil K. Gupta & V. Govindarajan (1994) Organizing for knowledge flows within MNCs, International Business Review, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp. 443-457
4.Bies R. & Moag J.S. (1986) Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness, Negotiation in Organizations, Volume 1 Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press,
pp 43-55
5.Birkinshaw, J. (1997) Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives, Strategic Management Journal,
pp 207-229.
6.Birkinshaw, J. M., & Fry, N. (1998) Subsidiary initiatives to develop new markets, MIT Sloan Management Review, 39(3), pp 51-61.
7.Birkinshaw, Hood & Jonsson (1998) Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations - the role of subsidiary initiative, Strategic Management Journal, Volume 19, No. 3, pp. 221-241
8.Chockalingam Viswesvaran & Deniz S. Ones (2002) Examining the construct of organizational justice: A meta-analytic evaluation of relations with work attitudes and behaviors, Journal of Business Ethics, Volume 38, No. 3, pp. 193-203
9.Christopher A Bartlett & Sumantra Ghoshal (1989) Managing across borders: New organizational responses, Sloan Management Review, (1986-1998); 29, 1; ABI/INFORM Global ,pp. 43
10.Dónal O’Brien (2011) Subsidiary strategy and the role of the subsidiary manager : Integrating the middle manager perspective, Academy of International Business Conference (AIB-UKI), Edinburgh
11.Fornell C. & Larcker D. F. (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, (18:1), pp. 39-50
12.G.T. Lumpkin, Gregory G. Dess (1986) Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance, The Academy of Management Review, Volume 21, No. 1, pp. 135-172
13.J.H Taggart (1999) MNC subsidiary performance, risk, and corporate expectations, International Business Review Volume 8, Issue 2, pp. 233-255
14.James H. Taggart (1997) Autonomy and procedural justice: A framework for evaluating subsidiary strategy, Journal of International Business Studies, Volume 28, No. 1, pp. 51-76
15.Jason A. Colquitt, Donald E. Conlon, Michael J. Wesson, Christopher O. L. H. Porter & K. Yee Ng (2001) Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research, Journal of Applied Psychology,
Volume 86, No. 3, pp. 425-445
16.Jason A. Colquitt (2001) On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure, Journal of Applied Psychology, Volume 86, No. 3, pp 386-400
17.Jerald Greenberg (1990) Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow, Sage Journals, Volume 16, Issue 2
18.Julian B. Rotter (1966) Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement, Psychological Monographs, Volume 80, No. 1,Whole No. 609
19.Julian Birkinshaw, Allen Morrison & John Hulland (1995) Structural and competitive determinants of a global integration strategy, Strategic Management Journals, Volume16, Issue 8, pp. 637-655
20.Julian Birkinshaw, N. Fry (1998) Subsidiary initiatives to develop new markets, Sloan Management Review,39(3), pp. 51-61
21.Julian Birkinshaw (1999) The determinants and consequences of subsidiary initiative in multinational corporations, Sage Journals, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp. 9-36
22.Julian Birkinshaw and Allen J Morrison (1995) Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational structure, Journal of International Business Studies, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp. 729-753
23.Kanter R. M. (1982). The middle manager as innovator, Harvard Business Review, 60, pp 95-105.
24.Lind E. Allan & Tyler Tom R (1988) The social psychology of procedural justice, The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, New York, NY, US: Plenum Press
25.Martin B. Kormanik, Tonette S Rocco (2009) Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A review of the locus of control, Human Resource Development Review 8(4), pp. 463-483
26.Muhammad Mustafa Raziq, Martin Perry (2012) Foreign direct investment in New Zealand: The subsidiary-management perspective, British Academy of Management 2012 Conference
27.Patrick M. Gichira, Dr Susan M. Were, Dr George O. Orwa (2017) Relationship between perceptions of informational justice and employee commitment in health sector nongovernmental organizations in Kenya, European Journal of Human Resource, Volume 1, Issue 1 No.1, pp. 74-97
28.Paul E. Spector (1982) Behavior in organizations as a function of employee's locus of control, Psychological Bulletin, Volume 91, No. 3, pp. 482-497
29.Phares, E. Jerry (1976) Locus of control in personality, Kansas State University, General Learning Press
30.Raziq, M. M., Borini, F. M. & Perry, M. (2014) Subsidiary initiatives and subsidiary autonomy: Evidence from New Zealand and Brazil, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(3), pp. 589-605.
31.Robert H. Moorman (1991) Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, Volume 76, No. 6, pp. 845-855
32.Sharon Watson O’Donnell (2000) Managing foreign subsidiaries: agents of headquarters, or an interdependent network? Strategic Management Journals, Volume 21, Issue 5, pp. 525-548
33.Stopford, John M., and L. T. Wells Jr. (1972) Managing the multinational enterprise: Organization of the firm and ownership of the subsidiary, NY: Basic Books, 1972, French ed.
34.Sumantra Ghoshal & Nitin Nohria (1989) Internal differentiation within multinational corporations, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp. 323-337
35.Susanna Baldwin (2006) Organizational justice, Institute for Employment Studies
36.Ulf Andersson & Mats Forsgren (2000) In search of centre of excellence: Network embeddedness and subsidiary roles in multinational corporations, Management International Review, Volume 40, No. 4, pp. 329-350
37.W. Chan Kim & Renée A. Mauborgne (1991) Implementing global strategies: The role of procedural justice, Strategic Management Journals, Volume 12, Issue S1, pp. 125-143
38.William H. A. Johnson John W. Medcof(2007) Motivating proactive subsidiary innovation: Agent-based theory and socialization models in global R&D, Journal of International Management, 13(4), pp. 472-487