臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究的目的在於了解安全領導如何影響安全管理績效，與其影響之機
制。主管的領導對於員工的表現影響最大，領導的以身作則攸 關員工的工作態
度。變革型領導過去二十年深受管理領域的重視，但在安全管理上，尚未得到
同等的重視。變革型領導的核心是以下四種特質 佐理想以影響、啟發鼓舞、
智力激發、個別化關懷。
本研究與台灣某企業合作進行問卷調查，以變革型領導與三種先期安全績
效 安全溝通、安全參與、安全知能，做相關分析；在第二階段之研究，加入
工作壓力，當作修飾因子，再與上述三種安全績效做線性回歸分析。結果顯示
變革型領導與三種安全績效都有正相關；且加入工作壓力後的線性回歸也都為
正相關。研究結果顯示員工處在合適的工作壓力下，變革型領導對於員工的三
種 先期安全績效 安全溝通、安全參與、安全知能，有更明顯的效應。
台灣的管理需要隨著時代的改變而有所應對，我們目前在安全績效管理中還些
微落後國外，希望能藉由此次的研究能對於改善國內職業安全管理有些許啟
示。

The purpose of this study is to understand how safety leadership affects safety management performance and its impact. The leadership of manager has the greatest impact on the performance of the employees, and the leading role of the leader determines the attitude of the employees. The transformational leadership has been deeply valued in the management research field in the past two decades, but not received equal in the area of safety management. The core of transformational leadership is the following four characteristics: Idealized Influence, Inspirational Motivation, Intellectual Stimulation and Individualized Consideration.
This study cooperated with a Taiwanese company via questionnaire survey. We analyze transformational leadership and its influence on the following three types of safety performances: safety communication, safety participation and safety competencies in terms of correlation analysis. In the subsequent part of this study, We use stress as a modifier in linear regression analysis with the three safety performances as dependent variables. The results show that transformational leadership is positively correlated with three safety performance; and also positively correlated in linear regression analysis. The results show that employees are under the proper work pressure, transformational leadership has more significant effects on three safety performances: safety communication, safety participation, and safety competencies.
The management level in Taiwan industry needs to respond to changes in the times. We are still lagging behind in the world stage of safety management. Hopefully, this
V
study will have some implications for improving domestic occupational safety management.

致謝
中文摘要
ABSTRACT
目錄
圖目錄
第一章 緒論
1.1背景
1.2目的
第二章 文獻回顧
2.1領導
2.2變革型領導
2.3交易型領導
2.4安全管理績效
2.4.2安全參與
2.4.3安全知能
2.5工作壓力
第三章 研究設計與方法
3.1研究流程與架構
3.2研究對象與研究工具
3.3分析方法
第四章 結果與討論結果與討論
4.1信度分析
4.2相關分析
4.3迴歸分析
第五章 結論與建議結論與建議
文獻資料

1. Guldenmund, F.W., The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research. Safety science, 2000. 34(1-3): p. 215-257.
2. Cooper, D., Effective safety leadership: Understanding types & styles that improve safety performance. Professional Safety, 2015. 60(02): p. 49-53.
3. Veltri, A., et al., A data-based evaluation of the relationship between occupational safety and operating performance. Journal of SH&E Research, 2007. 4(1): p. 3-22.
4. Probst, T.M. and A.X. Estrada, Accident under-reporting among employees: Testing the moderating influence of psychological safety climate and supervisor enforcement of safety practices. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2010. 42(5): p. 1438-1444.
5. Barling, J., C. Loughlin, and E.K. Kelloway, Development and test of a model linking safety-specific transformational leadership and occupational safety. Journal of applied psychology, 2002. 87(3): p. 488.
6. Clarke, S. and K. Ward, The role of leader influence tactics and safety climate in engaging employees' safety participation. Risk Anal, 2006. 26(5): p. 1175-85.
7. 黃以謙 , 泰然駕馭都市壓力 . 民 92.
8. Guldenmund, F.W., The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research. 2000.
9. 蔡正杰 , 領導風格與領導效能之關聯性研究 - 以中部地區運動製造器材
產業為例 . 民 100.
10. 杜佩蘭 , et al., 領導行為 , 組織學習與組織認同關係之研究 . 管理實務與
理論研究 , 2009. 3(1): p. 45-67.
11. Tajfel, H., Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. 1981: CUP Archive.
12. Clarke, S., Safety leadership: A meta‐analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2013. 86(1): p. 22-49.
13. Paine, J.L.B.a.L.S., The Error at the Heart of Corporate Leadership 2019.
14. Bass, B.M., Leadership and performance beyond expectations. 1985: Collier Macmillan.
15. Avolio, B.J., B.M. Bass, and D.I. Jung, Re‐examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 1999. 72(4): p. 441-462.
16. Willis, S., S. Clarke, and E. O'Connor, Contextualizing leadership: Transformational leadership and Management-By-Exception-Active in safety-critical contexts. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2017. 90(3): p. 281-305.
17. Griffin, M.A. and X. Hu, How leaders differentially motivate safety compliance and safety participation: The role of monitoring, inspiring, and learning. Safety Science, 2013. 60: p. 196-202.
18. Kark, R., B. Shamir, and G. Chen, The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of applied psychology, 2003. 88(2): p. 246.
19. 謝賢書 , 變革型安全領導風格對現代企業安全績效之影響 . 不詳 .
20. Zohar, D., The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups. Journal of organizational behavior, 2002. 23(1): p. 75-92.
21. Kuhnert, K.W., and Philip Lewis, Transactional_and_Transformational_Leade. 1987.
22. Afshari, L. and P. Gibson, How to increase organizational commitment through transactional leadership. Leadership & Organization Development
42
Journal, 2016. 37(4): p. 507-519.
23. Kark, R. and D.J.A.o.M.R. Van Dijk, Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: The role of the self-regulatory focus in leadership processes. 2007. 32(2): p. 500-528.
24. Kark, R., D. Van Dijk, and D.R. Vashdi, Motivated or Demotivated to Be Creative: The Role of Self-Regulatory Focus in Transformational and Transactional Leadership Processes. Applied Psychology, 2018. 67(1): p. 186-224.
25. Zohar, D., A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of applied psychology, 2000. 85(4): p. 587.
26. 楊振宗楊振宗, Discussing the communication. Army Professional Journal. 民民93.
27. Robbins, S.P. and T. Judge, Essentials of organizational behavior. Vol. 200. 1992: Prentice Hall.
28. Cigularov, K.P., P.Y. Chen, and J. Rosecrance, The effects of error management climate and safety communication on safety: a multi-level study. Accid Anal Prev, 2010. 42(5): p. 1498-506.
29. Yan, C.H., A study on relations of communication capability, attitude and communication effectiveness. 1999.
30. 閻建政閻建政, 衛衛., 組織溝通要素對組織溝通效能及組織溝通要素對組織溝通效能及. 民民100.
31. Brock, D., et al., Interprofessional education in team communication: working together to improve patient safety. Postgrad Med J, 2013. 89(1057): p. 642-51.
32. Zohar, D., Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. Journal of applied psychology, 1980. 65(1): p. 96.
33. Morgeson, F.P. and D.A. Hofmann, The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of management review, 1999. 24(2): p. 249-265.
34. Mearns, K., et al., Measuring safety climate on offshore installations. Work & Stress, 1998. 12(3): p. 238-254.
35. Probst, T.M., Safety and insecurity: exploring the moderating effect of organizational safety climate. Journal of occupational health psychology, 2004. 9(1): p. 3.
36. Neal, A., M.A. Griffin, and P.M. Hart, The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety science, 2000. 34(1-3): p. 99-109.
37. CCSA, Introduction_to_safety_competencies_for_web. 2013.
38. Okuyama, A., K. Martowirono, and B. Bijnen, Assessing the patient safety competencies of healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf, 2011. 20(11): p. 991-1000.
39. Beehr, T.A. and J.E. Newman, Job stress, employee health, and organizational effectiveness: A facet analysis, model, and literature review 1. Personnel psychology, 1978. 31(4): p. 665-699.
40. 湯柏齡 ;陳永煌 ;諶立中 , 工作壓力 . 民 91.
41. 楊智傑 , 成人之工作壓力與情緒管理 . 民 91.
42. 黃寶園 , 工作壓力對工作滿足、職業倦怠的影響之研究；統合分析取向 . 民 98.
43. Sutherland, V.J. and C.L. Cooper, Exercise and stress management: Fit employees: Healthy organisations? International Journal of Sport Psychology, 1990.
44. Likert, R., A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology, 1932.
45. 吳統雄 , 態度與行為研究的信度與效度：理論、應用、反省 . 民 107.
46. Udovičić, M., et al., What we need to know when calculating the coefficient of correlation? Biochemia medica: Biochemia medica, 2007. 17(1): p. 10-15.
44
47. 永析統計及論文諮詢永析統計及論文諮詢, 皮爾森積差相關分析皮爾森積差相關分析(Pearson Correlation)-說明與說明與SPSS操作操作. 民民106.
48. 蘇容梅蘇容梅, 大學關係行銷對學生行為意向之影響大學關係行銷對學生行為意向之影響— 學校品牌知名度的調節學校品牌知名度的調節. 民101.