跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.91) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/20 01:55
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:劉怡君
研究生(外文):LIU, YI-CHUN
論文名稱:旅遊攝影者人格特質、休閒涉入、心流體驗對幸福感影響之研究
論文名稱(外文):The Effects of Travel Photographers’ Personality Traits, Leisure Involvement, Flow Experience on Subjective Well-being
指導教授:林擎天林擎天引用關係
指導教授(外文):LIN, CHIN-TIEN
口試委員:高育芸林淑芬
口試委員(外文):GAO, YU-YUNLIN, SHU-FEN
口試日期:2019-06-16
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:大葉大學
系所名稱:休閒事業管理學系碩士在職專班
學門:民生學門
學類:運動休閒及休閒管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:119
中文關鍵詞:旅遊攝影者人格特質心流體驗休閒涉入幸福感
外文關鍵詞:travel photographerspersonality traitsflow experienceleisure involvementsubjective well-being
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:26
  • 點閱點閱:523
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:170
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
旅遊與攝影有著密不可分的關係,旅人總試圖將旅程中的點點滴滴記錄下來供日後回憶。本研究旨在探討旅遊攝影者之人格特質、休閒涉入、心流體驗、幸福感之現狀;旅遊攝影者之人格特質、休閒涉入、心流體驗、對幸福感的影響並分析不同背景變項在幸福感的差異。
測量工具包括人格特質量表、休閒涉入量表、心流體驗量表及幸福感量表、個人背景變項等五部分。本研究採立意抽樣,在網路上發放網路問卷,問卷發放時間2019年3、4月。統計方法包含描述性統計、信度分析、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、多元迴歸分析等。
研究發現不同的「年齡」、「婚姻狀態」、「職業」、「每個月花費在攝影上的軟體、零件費用」在幸福感有顯著差異。人格特質的神經質、外向型、開放型、友善型及嚴謹型對其幸福感有預測力。旅遊攝影者的休閒涉入之「自我表達」對幸福感有預測力。旅遊攝影者的心流體驗之「專注與回饋」、「自我意識的喪失」對幸福感有預測力。旅遊攝影者的人格特質之神經質、外向性,休閒涉入之吸引力、自我表達及心流體驗之專注與回饋對幸福感有預測力。
本研究證實旅遊攝影者人格特質、休閒涉入、心流體驗對幸福感有預測力,期許研究結果可供觀光部門及旅遊業者做旅遊推廣與行程設計的參考,做為提升幸福感之參考。

Travel and photography are inextricably linked with each other. Travelers always attempt to record every detail of their journey, about which the travelers may reminisce in the future. This study aims to explore and discuss: how travel photographers’ personality traits, leisure involvement, and experience of “flow” in their work affects their sense of subjective wellbeing; the effect of travel photographers’ personality traits on their sense of subjective wellbeing; the effect of travel photographers’ experience of “flow” in their work on their sense of subjective wellbeing; the effect of travel photographers’ leisure involvement on their sense of subjective wellbeing, and the effect of travel photographers’ personality traits, experience of “flow” in their work, and leisure involvement on their sense of wellbeing.
Measurement instruments included the following five components: the Scale for Personality Traits, the Scale for Leisure Involvement, the Scale for “Flow” Experience, the Scale for Subjective Wellbeing, and individual demographic variables. This study employed purposive sampling, and distributed questionnaires on-line. Questionnaires were distributed in March and April, 2019. Statistical methods included descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, and multiple regression analysis.
This study found that significant difference in subjective wellbeing can be observed in terms of “age”, “marital status”, “occupation”, and “monthly expenses on photography soft-ware and components for cameras”. In terms of personality traits, predictors for travel photographers’ subjective wellbeing included neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. Extraversion and neuroticism had strongest effects. In terms of travel photographers’ leisure involvement, “self-expression” predicted travel photographers’ subjective wellbeing. In terms of travel photographers’ experience of “flow” in their work, “concentration and feedback”, and “loss of self-consciousness” predicted travel photographers’ subjective wellbeing. Travel photographers’ personality traits, which include neuroticism and extraversion; leisure involvement, which includes attraction and self-expression; and experience of “flow” in their work, which includes concentration and feedback, predicted their subjective wellbeing.
Based on the final research results, the study provides constructive recommendations and serves as a reference for the tourism sector and people who work in the travel industry.
目錄
封面內頁
簽名頁
中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
謝誌 iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 名詞釋義 5
第四節 研究範圍與對象 6
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 旅遊攝影者 7
第二節 幸福感 10
第三節 人格特質 16
第四節 休閒涉入 20
第五節 心流體驗 23
第六節 各變項之間相關研究 28
第三章 研究方法 31
第一節 研究架構 31
第二節 研究假設 32
第三節 問卷設計 32
第四節 問卷發放與實施 42
第五節 統計分析方法 42
第四章 研究結果與分析 45
第一節 問卷調查及問卷回收 45
第二節 信度分析 46
第三節 研究樣本之基本資料分析 47
第四節 描述性統計分析 56
第五節 驗證假設 61
第五章 結論與建議 75
第一節 研究結果 75
第二節 綜合討論 80
第三節 建議 83
附錄 106


圖目錄

圖3-1- 1研究架構圖 31



表目錄

表2-5-1心流體驗定義表 24
表2-5-2心流體驗構面彙整表 27
表3-3-1人格特質量表 34
表3-3-2休閒涉入量表 35
表3-3-3心流體驗量表 37
表3-3-4幸福感量表 39
表3-3-5個人背景變項題項表 41
表4-2-1人格特質信度分析表 46
表4-2-2休閒涉入量表信度分析表 46
表4-2-3心流體驗信度分析表 47
表4-2-4幸福感信度分析表 47
表4-3-1旅遊攝影者個人基本資料次數分配表 54
表4-4-1人格特質描述性統計表 57
表4-4-2休閒涉入各構面之描述性統計表 58
表4-4-3心流體驗各構面之描述性統計表 59
表4-4-4幸福感描述性統計表 61
表4-5-1性別在幸福感之獨立樣本t檢定分析表 62
表4-5-2年齡在幸福感之單因子變異數分析表 62
表4-5-3教育程度在幸福感之單因子變異數分析表 62
表4-5-4婚姻狀態在幸福感之單因子變異數分析表 63
表4-5-5職業在幸福感之單因子變異數分析表 63
表4-5-6平均月所得在幸福感之單因子變異數分析表 64
表4-5-7旅行類型在幸福感之獨立樣本t檢定分析表 64
表4-5-8旅行費用在幸福感之單因子變異數分析表 65
表4-5-9攝影工具在幸福感之單因子變異數分析表 65
表4-5-10現有攝影工具價值在幸福感之單因子變異數分析表 65
表4-5-11攝影零件費用在幸福感之單因子變異數分析表 66
表4-5-12照片上傳網路與否在幸福感之獨立樣本t檢定分析表 66
表4-5-13上傳的網路平台在幸福感之單因子變異數分析表 67
表4-5-14加入網路社群與否在幸福感之獨立樣本t檢定分析表 67
表4-5-15留言與否在幸福感之單因子變異數分析表 67
表4-5-16修圖軟體使用與否在幸福感之獨立樣本t檢定分析表 68
表4-5-17專業攝影師與否在幸福感之獨立樣本t檢定分析表 68
表4-5-18人格特質對幸福感之迴歸分析摘要表 70
表4-5-19休閒涉入對幸福感之迴歸分析摘要表 71
表4-5-20心流體驗對幸福感之迴歸分析摘要表 72
表4-5-21人格特質、心流體驗、休閒涉入對幸福感迴歸分析摘要表 74
表5-1研究假設與驗證結果摘要表 79

一、中文文獻
尹駿(譯)(2007)。現代觀光-綜合論述與分析(二版)(原作者:Steven J. Page, Joanne Connell)。台北:鼎茂。
呂佩勳(2009)。健康旅遊體驗與幸福感之研究。臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系學位論文,未出版,台北市。
吳珍妮、吳淑女(2013)。網球運動者之休閒動機,休閒涉入與幸福感的相關研究。運動與遊憩研究,7(4),99-120。
吳經熊(1992)。內心悅樂之泉源。台北市:東大。
李敏蕙、李世昌、李文基(2018)。銀髮族休閒涉入及幸福感之研究。休閒事業研究,16(2),30-44。
李維靈、施建彬、邱翔蘭(2007)。退休老人休閒活動參與及其幸福感之相關研究。Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 27-35.
沈進成、陳鈞坤、黃鈺婷、曾慈慧(2011)。體驗為休閒涉入影響顧客價值之中介模式之研究:以溫泉旅遊遊客為例。觀光旅遊研究學刊,6(1),79-96。
林子雯(1996)。成人學生多重角色與幸福感之相關研究。未出版之碩士論文,高雄師範大學成人教育研究所,高雄市。
林子雯(2000)。成人學生角色扮演、社會支持與幸福感之相關研究。正修學報,13,269-290。
林志鈞、湯和展(2015)。路跑運動參與者參與動機、遊憩專業化與流暢體驗之研究。興國學報,16,1-20。
林宗賢、李安娜、王乃玉(2012)。數位旅遊照片與遊客體驗之初探。島嶼觀光研究,4(4),26-42。
林欣慈、蔡明昌(2015)。自我實現、心流體驗與幸福感之研究:以參與鐵人三項中老年族群為例。運動休閒管理學報,12(2),15-28。
林倩綺、陳宏斌、吳佳玲(2009)關於旅遊:視覺的語境。運動與遊憩研究,4(1),94-104。
林朝欽、李英弘(2001)。遊憩體驗之多階段性驗證。戶外遊憩研究,14(1),1-10。
林寶如、陳佳儒、陳子蕙(2016)。高雄林園工業區員工休閒涉入與幸福感之研究。運動與觀光研究,5(1),1-12。
邱明宗(2007)。登山健行者人格特質、休閒滿意對登山行為及生活滿意度的影響—以台中市大坑地區為例。大葉大學休閒事業管理學系研究所未出版之碩士論文,未出版,彰化。
邱皓政(2011)。量化研究與統計分析。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
施建彬(1995)。幸福感來源與相關因素之探討。高雄醫學院行為科學研究所碩士論文,高雄。
洪蘭(譯)(2017)。邁向圓滿:掌握幸福的科學方法&練習計畫。(原作者:Martin E.P. Seligman)。台北:遠流出版公司。
翁玲玉(2008)。大學生之人格特質、工作假期認知與投入意願相關之研究。大葉大學休閒事業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化。
郭周蓉(2014)。撞球運動參與者社會支持、流暢體驗及主觀幸福感之研究。國立臺灣師範大學運動與休閒學院體育學系碩士學位論文,未出版。
張良漢、蘇士博、王偉琴(2006)。不同活動涉入程度對地方依戀之研究。運動休閒管理學報,3(2),1-18。
張定綺(譯)(1993)。快樂,從心開始(原作者:Csikszentmihalyi, M.)。台北市:天下遠見。
張春興(2006)。張氏心理學辭典(重訂版)。臺北市:東華
張樑治、劉吉川、余嬪(2004)。安養機構老人心流體驗與生活滿意關係之研究。戶外遊憩研究,17(3),19-36。
莊慧秋(1987)。幸福哪裏來?幸福理論的探索。載於張老師月刊編輯部(主編),中國人的幸福觀-命運與幸福(頁192-202)。台北:張老師出版社。
莊耀嘉、李雯娣(2001)。兒童性格結構:五大模型的本土化檢驗。中華心理學刊,43(1),65-82。
許南嫆、黃娟娟(2016)。慢跑者之人格特質、參與動機及幸福感之研究。高應科大體育,(15),181-190。
許雅惠(2016)。台中市國小教師人格特質、休閒活動參與及幸福感關係之研究。逢甲大學碩士論文,未出版,台中。
許綺玲(1999)。迎向靈光消逝的年代(原作者:Walter Beniamin)。台北:台灣攝影工作室。
陳秀娟(譯)(1998)。生命的心流:追求忘我專注的圓融生活(原作者:Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi)。台北:天下遠見出版公司。
陳春安、林成吉、鄭清滿(2012)。路跑流暢體驗量表之驗證性因素分析。南台學報,37(4),43-56。
陳美存、鄭天明、蕭祐詠(2018)。遊憩者的個人投入重要嗎?遊憩涉入、投入與心流體驗關係之研究。戶外遊憩研究,31(3),61-83。
陳柏仰(2018)。飛鏢參與者休閒涉入、流暢體驗與休閒效益關係之研究。未出版,國立臺灣師範大學運動與休閒學院,體育學系碩士學位論文,台北市。
陳南福、陳明宏(2017)。國高中生網球選手參與動機、流暢體驗對運動承諾之研究。運動休閒管理學報,14(2),99-111。
陳慧玲、林安庭(2011)。登山運動參與者涉入程度、流暢體驗與幸福感之相關研究。臺灣體育運動管理學報,11(1),25-50。
陳耀棋、蔡俊傑(2011)。長、短式流暢經驗量表之發展。大專體育, (113),49-55。
陸洛(1998)。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,8(1),115-137。
曾文志(2007)。大學生對美好生活的常識概念與主觀幸福感之研究。教育心理學報,38(4),417-441。
曾婉如(2015)。桃園市國小教師人格特質、人際關係對幸福感之影響。大葉大學休閒事業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化。
黃文雄、林永森、謝琦強、連啟伶(2016)。解說志工休閒涉入預測分析之跨層次研究。戶外遊憩研究,29(4),37-65。
黃宛諭(譯)(2018)。觀光客的凝視3.0(原作者:John Urry & Jonas Larsen)台北市:書林。
黃堅厚(2004)。人格心理學。臺北市:心理。
黃燦然(譯)(2018)。論攝影(原作者:Susan Sontag)台北市:麥田。
楊中芳、楊宜音(1997)。性格與社會心理測量總覽(上)—情感篇。台北市:遠流。
楊欽城、柳立偉、湯斯凱(2015)。飛盤運動參與者參與動機、涉入程度與流暢體驗之研究。中原體育學報,6,105-117。
溫卓謀、章勝傑(2019)。大學休閒水肺潛水課程參與者學習歷程的心流體驗與情緒經驗之研究。運動休閒管理學報,16(1), 1-22。
鄭天明、張台達(2011)。自行車遊憩者休閒涉入,休閒-家庭衝突與幸福感間之關係研究。休閒運動健康評論,2(2),144-163。
廖月娟(譯)(2002)。旅行的藝術。台北:先覺(原書: Alain de Botton [2002]. The art of travel. New York: Vintage.)。
葉光輝(譯)(2015)。性格心理學:理論與研究(二版)。台北市:雙葉書廊(原書:Lawrence A. Pervin & Daniel Cervone [2010]. Personality: Theory and Research [11 Edition])
葉怡矜、吳崇旗、王偉琴、顏伽如、林禹良(譯)(2005)。休閒遊憩概論:探索生命中的休閒。台北市:品度。(原書:Leisure in Your Life: An Exploration [6th edition])
葉建助(2010)。溯溪參與者休閒涉入、休閒效益與幸福感之研究。國立東華大學,體育學系碩士論文,未出版。
蔡幸蓉、郭進財、葉時碩(2014)。音樂與休閒舞蹈參與者的休閒涉入、流暢體驗、休閒效益與幸福感關係之研究。休閒觀光與運動健康學報,4(3),41-60。
蔡瑋娟、王慶田、盧廷峻、黃孟立(2009)。台南縣國小教師休閒涉入,休閒效益及幸福感相關之研究。休閒運動健康評論,1(1)10-22。
蔡穎卿(2016)。旅行思想:謝謝天地接納我。台北市:遠見天下文化。
戴玉珊(2015)。人格特質、攝影需求滿足感、攝影能力對旅行攝影涉入之影響研究。大葉大學休閒事業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化。
戴有德、陳冠仰、李素馨(2008)。遊憩涉入、場所依賴與場所認同因果關係之研究-以東豐綠色走廊遊憩自行車使用者為例。戶外遊憩研究,21(4),27-57。
謝淑芬(2006)。人格五因素模式與休閒態度、休閒參與的關聯性研究─以技術學院學生之戶外休閒參與為例,景文學報,16(2),147-166。
鍾佩玉(2018)。日本親子旅遊之目的地意象對休閒效益之影響-知覺風險、流暢體驗為中介效果。大葉大學休閒事業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化。
鍾政偉、商家瑜、王盛文與蔡宜婷(2015)。認真性休閒、遊憩專門化、心流體驗與幸福感關係之研究。運動休閒管理學報,12(1),1-20。
聶喬齡(2000)。不同性別、運動項目、經驗長短及特質性焦慮在運動流暢經驗上的差異。中華體育季刊,14(2),116-123。
魏春娥(2016)。足球運動參與者涉入程度、流暢體驗與幸福感之研究。運動休閒管理學報,13(4),1-17。
籃文彬(2012)。大學生完美主義、心流傾向與心理幸福感之結構方程模式分析。國立臺中教育大學諮商與應用心理學系碩士論文,臺中市。

二、英文文獻
Alén, E., Losada, N., & de Carlos, P. (2017). Profiling the segments of senior tourists throughout motivation and travel characteristics. Current Issues in Tourism, 20(14), 1454-1469.
Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.
Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social Indicators of Well-Being. New York and London: Plenum.
Argyle, M. (1987). The psychology of happiness. New York: Routledge.

Argyle, M. (2013). The psychology of happiness. Second Edition New York: Routledge.
Balomenou, N., & Garrod, B. (2019). Photographs in tourism research: Prejudice, power, performance and participant-generated images. Tourism Management, 70, 201-217.
Bærenholdt, J. O., Haldrup, M., Larsen, J. & Urry, J. (2004). Performing tourist places. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Beatty, S. E., & Smith, S. M. (1987). External search effort: An investigation across several product categories. Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (1), 83-95.
Berger, B. C., & McInman, A. (1993). Exercise and the quality of life, In R. N. Singer, M. Murpuh, & Tennant, L. K. (Eds), Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology (pp729- 760). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Carr, A. (2004). Positive psychology: The science of happiness and human strengths. New York: Brunner-Routledge.

Chadwick, R. (1987). Concept, definitions and measures used in travel and tourism research, in J. R. Brent Ritchie and C. Goeldner(Eds.). Travel, Tourism and Hospitality Research: A Handbook for Managers and Researchers, New York: Wiley.
Chalfen, R. M. (1979). Photograph's role in tourism: Some unexplored relationships. Annals of Tourism Research, 6(4), 435-447.
Chen, H. (2000). Exploring web users’ on-line optimal flow experiences. New York: Syracuse University, Syracuse.
Chen, H., Wigand, R. T., & Nilan, M. S. (1999). Optimal experience of web activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(5), 585-608.
Clawson, M., & Knetsch, J. L. (1966). Economics of Outdoor Recreation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Costa, P. T., & McRae, R. R. (1980). Somatic complaints in males as a function of age and neuroticism: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 3, 245-257.

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self- reports and spouse ratings on the NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 54(5), 853–863.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO-PI-R: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Costa, P.T. & McCrae, R. R. (2002). Looking backward: Changes in the mean levels of personality traits from 80 to 12. In D. Cervone & W. Mischel (Eds.), Advance in Personality Science (pp.219-237). New York: Guildford Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Collins.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. (1988). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
de Bloom, J., Ritter, S., Kühnel, J., Reinders, J., & Geurts, S. (2014). Vacation from work: A ‘ticket to creativity’?: The effects of recreational travel on cognitive flexibility and originality. Tourism Management, 44, 164-171.
DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197-229.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302.
Ellis, G. D., Voelkl, J. E., & Morris, C. (1998). Measure flow experience in daily life: An examination of the items used to measure challenge and skill. Journal of Leisure Research, 30 (3), 380-389.

Emmons, R. A., & Diener, E. (1985). Personality correlates of subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(1), 89-97.
Emmons, R. A. (1999). The psychology of ultimate concerns. New York: Guilford.
Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D. & Miniard, P. W. (1993), Consumer Behavior (7th), Orlando Florida: Dryden Press.
Etxeberria, I., Etxebarria, I., & Urdaneta, E. (2019). Subjective well-being among the oldest old: The role of personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 146, 209-216.
Fritz, B. S., & Avsec, A. (2007). The experience of flow and subjective well-being of music students. Horizons of Psychology, 16(2), 5-17.
Garlick, S. (2002). Revealing the unseen: Tourism, art and photography. Cultural Studies, 16(2), 289-305.
Ghani, J. A., Supnick, R., & Rooney, P. (1991). The experience of flow in computer-mediated and in face-to-face groups. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 229-237.
Gillet, S., Schmitz, P., & Mitas, O. (2016). The snap-happy tourist: The effects of photographing behavior on tourists’ happiness. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 40(1), 37-57.
Godbey, G. C. (1999). Leisure in your life: An exploration (5th ed.). State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
Gunter, B., & Gunter, N. (1980). Leisure styles: A conceptual framework for modern leisure. Sociological Quarterly, 2, 361-374.
Hahha, N. & Wozniak, R. (2001). Consumer behavior:an applied approach. New Jersy. Prentice-Hall.
Haldrup, M., & Larsen, J. (2009). Tourism, performance and the everyday: Consuming the orient. London. Routledge.
Hampson, S. E., & Goldberg, L. R. (2006). A first large cohort study of personality trait stability over the 40 years between elementary school and midlife. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 763.
Havitz, M. E. & Dimanche, F. (1990). Propositions for testing the involvement construct in recreational and tourism contexts. Leisure Sciences, 12 (2), 179-195. doi: 10.1080/01490409009513099
Havitz, M. E., & Dimanche, F. (1997). Leisure involvement revisited: Conceptual conundrums and measurement advance. Journal of Leisure Research, 29(3), 245-278.
Havitz, M. E. and Dimanche, F. (1999). Leisure involvement revisited: Diver propertiesand paradoxes. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(2), 122-149.
Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 731-739.

Hills, P., Argyle, M., & Reeves, R. (2000). Individual differences in leisure satisfactions: An investigation of four theories of leisure motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 28 (4), 763-779.
Hwang, S. N., Lee, C., & Chen, H. J. (2005). The relationship among tourists’ involvement, place attachment and interpretation satisfaction in Taiwan’s national parks. Tourism Management, 26(2), 143-156.
Jackson, S. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Flow in sports: The keys to optimal experiences and performances. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Jackson, S.A., & Marsh, H.W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The flow state scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 17-35.
Jani, D. (2014). Big five personality factors and travel curiosity: are they related? Anatolia: An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 25, 444–456. http://dx. doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2014.909366.
John, O. P. & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five: History, measurement, and development. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp.102-138). New York: Guildford.
Kapferer, J. N., & Laurent, G. (1985). Consumer involvement profiles: A new and practical approach to consumer involvement. Journal of Advertising Research, 25 (6), 48-56.
Kerstetter, D. I., & Kovich, G. M. (1997). The involvement profiles of divisions I women’s basketball spectators. Journal of Sport Management, 11(3), 234-249.
Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007-1022.

Kim, H. & Stepchenkova, S., (2015). Effect of tourist photographs on attitudes towards destination: Manifest and latent content. Tourism Management 49, 29-41.
Kim, S. S., Scott, D., & Crompton, J. L. (1997). An exploration of the relationships among social psychological involvement, behavior involvement, commitment, and future intentions in the context of birdwatching. Journal of Leisure Research, 29, 320-341.
Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R., & Bacon, J. (2003). An examination of the relationship between leisure activity involvement and place attachment among hikers along the Appalachian trail. Journal of Leisure Research, 35, 249-273.
Larsen, J. (2005). Families seen sightseeing: Performativity of tourist photography. Space and Culture, 8(4), 416-434.
Laurent, G., & Kapferer, J. N. (1985). Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(1), 41-53.
Lu, L., & Hu, C. H. (2005). Personality, leisure experiences and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(3), 325-342.
Lu, L., & Shih, J. B. (1997). Personality and happiness: Is mental health a mediator? Personality and Individual Differences, 22(2), 249-256.
Mannel, R. C., Zuzanek, J. & Larson, D. (1988). Leisure states and “flow” experiences: Testing perceived freedom and intrinsic motivation hypothesis. Journal of Leisure Research, 20, 289-304.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1985). Updating Norman's" adequacy taxonomy": Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 710.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1999). A five factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
McIntyre, N. (1989). The personal meaning of participation: Enduring involvement. Journal of Leisure Research, 21, 167-179.
McIntyre, N., & Pigram, J. J. (1992). Recreation specialization reexamined: The case of vehicle‐based campers. Leisure Sciences, 14(1), 3-15.
Munir, K. A., & Phillips, N. (2005). The birth of the 'Kodak Moment: Institutional entrepreneurship and the adoption of new technologies. Organization Studies, 26(11), 1665-1687.
Novak, T. P., & Hoffman, D. L. (1997). Measuring the flow experience among web users. Interval Research Corporation, 31(1), 1-35.
Omodei, M. M., & Wearing, A. J. (1990). Need satisfaction and invovement in personal projects: toward and integrative model of subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 762-769.
Pan, S., Lee, J., & Tsai, H. (2014). Travel photos: Motivations, image dimensions, and affective qualities of places. Tourism Management, 40, 59-69.
Pan, S. L., Wu, H., Morrison, A., Huang, M. T., & Huang, W. S. (2018). The relationships among leisure involvement, organizational commitment and well-being: Viewpoints from sport fans in Asia. Sustainability, 10(3), 740.
Phares, E. J., & Chaplin, W. F. (1997). Introduction to personality (4th Eds.). New York: Longman.
Rice, S., Winter, S. R., Doherty, S., & Milner, M. (2017). Advantages and disadvantages of using internet-based survey methods in aviation-related research. Journal of Aviation Technology and Engineering, 7(1), 5.
Richard, E., & Diener, E. (2009). Personality and subjective well-being. In The Science of Well-being (pp. 75-102). Springer, Dordrecht.
Rothschild, M. L. (1984). Perspectives on involvement: Current problems and future direction. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 216-217.
Røysamb, E., Harris, J. R., Magnus, P., Vittersø, J., & Tambs, K. (2002). Subjective well-being: Sex-specific effects of genetic and environmental factors. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(2), 211-223.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719-727.
Selin, S. W. and Howard, D. R. (1988). Ego involvement and leisure behavior: A conceptual specification. Journal of Leisure Research, 20(3), pp. 237-244.
Sherif, M. & Cantril, H. (1947). The psychology ego involvements, social attitudes and identifications. New York: Wiley.
Shih, J. B. (1999). Cultural, social and individual correlates of happiness in Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford Brookes.
Stone, R. N. (1984). The marketing characteristics of involvement, Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 210-215.
Urry, J., (1990). The Tourist Gaze. London: Sage.
Webster, J., Trevino, K., & Ryan, L. (1993). The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 9 (4), 411-426.
Whitty, Monica T., Doodson, James, Creese, Sadie and Hodges, Duncan. (2018). A picture tells a thousand words: What Facebook and Twitter images convey about our personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 133, 109-114.
Wiley, C. G., Shaw, S. M., & Havitz, M. E. (2000). Men's and women's involvement in sports: An examination of the gendered aspects of leisure involvement. Leisure Sciences, 22(1), 19-31.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 341-352. doi: 10.1086/208520
Zhang, W., Feng, Q., Lacanienta, J., Zhen, Z. (2017). Leisure participation and subjective well-being: Exploring gender differences among elderly in Shanghai, China. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 69, 45-54.

三、網路資料
交通部觀光局(2019)。觀光業務統計。2019年6月1日,取自https://admin.taiwan.net.tw/Handlers/FileHandler.ashx?fid=11f15ccb-e211-4cdd-8548-9b325ae2771a&type=4&no=1
攝影家手札(2019)。首頁。2019年1月19日,取自http://www.photosharp.com.tw/Photosharp/Index.aspx
藥師吉米部落格(2009)。常用攝影旅遊網站連結。2019年1月19日,取自http://drugs.pixnet.net/blog/post/30203816-%5B網站連結%5D常用攝影-旅遊網站連結
UNWTO (2018). UNWTO Annual Report 2017 Retrieved 31 Aug. 2018, from UNWTO. http://www2.unwto.org
The New York Times (2018). Yale’s Most Popular Class Ever: Happiness. January 26, 2018, Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/26/nyregion/at-yale-class-on-happiness-draws-huge-crowd-laurie-santos.html
UK Youth (2018). Young people spend more than six hours a day feeling stressed or worried. March 1, 2018, Retrieved from https://www.ukyouth.org/2018/03/01/keep-me-safe/
We Are Social (2019). Global Digital Report. Retrieved 1 July. 2019, Retrieved from We Are Social. https://wearesocial.com/blog/2018/01/global-digital-report-2018


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊