跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.172) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/03/17 00:15
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:林芷伃
研究生(外文):LIN,CHIH-YU
論文名稱:廣告訴求、訊息框架與涉入程度對寵物認養的幸福感與認養意願之影響
論文名稱(外文):Effects Of Advertisement Appeal, Message Framing And Involvement On The Well-being And Adoption Willingness Of Pet Adoption
指導教授:林雲燦林雲燦引用關係
指導教授(外文):LIN,YUN-TSAN
口試委員:陳細鈿林政憲
口試委員(外文):CHEN,HSI-TIENLIN,CHEN-HSIEN
口試日期:2019-06-14
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立勤益科技大學
系所名稱:專案管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:82
中文關鍵詞:寵物認養廣告訴求訊息框架涉入程度幸福感認養意願行為計劃理論
外文關鍵詞:pet adoptionadvertisement appealmessage framinginvolvementwell-beingadoption willingnesstheory of planned behavior
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:274
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:3
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
自古以來就有人類飼養寵物之行為,現代人將寵物視為家人,作為情感依附之對象,但面臨社會變遷與都市化發展,飼主受到許多環境限制而棄養寵物,加上零撲殺政策,進而衍生出收容所爆籠與資源不足之情況。過去並無寵物認養相關文獻,大多探討收容所狀況或寵物可影響飼主生理、心理與醫療等方面之研究,因此,本研究使用2×2×2的組間實驗設計法以廣告訴求(理性訴求/感性訴求)、訊息框架(正向訊息/負向訊息)及涉入程度(高涉入/低涉入)為自變數,探討受測者對寵物認養的幸福感與認養意願之影響,受測對象為240位大學生。研究結果顯示:廣告訴求、訊息框架及涉入程度對幸福感與認養意願無顯著的主效果影響,但三者之交互作用對受測者的幸福感與認養意願有顯著之影響,在正向訊息且涉入程度較高的情況下,感性訴求的幸福感與認養意願較好;在負向訊息且涉入程度較高的情況下,理性訴求的幸福感與認養意願較好。希望本研究結果可以提供給任何公私立的收容所與政府實務上的建議且能作為後續研究者之參考依據。
Since ancient times, there have been human behaviors of keeping pets. Modern people keep their pets like families as someone of emotional attachment, but in the face of social changes and urbanization, the owners are subject to many environmental restrictions and abandon pets, plus zero culling policy, which leads to the outbreak of shelters and resources. In the past, there was no literature on pet adoption, and most of the research on the status of shelters or pets can affect the physiological, psychological and medical aspects of the diet. This study used the 2×2×2 inter-group experiment design method for advertisement appeals (rational appeal/emotional appeal), message framing (positive message/negative message), and involvement (high involvement/low involvement) as variable and discusses the influence of the tester's well-being and willingness of pet adoption. The testers are 240 university students. The results of the study show that the advertising appeal, the message framing and the involvement have no significant effect on the well-being and the willingness of pet adoption, but the interaction between the three has a significant impact on the testers' well-being and pet adoption willingness. When the message is positive and the degree of involvement is high, the happiness of the rational appeal and the willingness to pet adoption are better. In the case of a negative message and a high degree of involvement, the sense of well-being and the willingness to pat adoption rational appeal are better. It is hoped that the results of this study can be provided to any public and private shelters and government practice recommendations and can be used as a reference for follow-up researchers.
摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝 iv
目錄 v
表目錄 viii
圖目錄 ix
第壹章 緒論 1
1.1研究背景與動機 1
1.2研究目的 3
第貳章 文獻探討與研究假說 5
2.1寵物認養 5
2.2廣告訴求 7
2.3訊息框架 8
2.4涉入程度 10
2.5幸福感 11
2.6認養意願 12
2.7廣告訴求與幸福感、認養意願之關係 14
2.8訊息框架與幸福感、認養意願之關係 15
2.9涉入程度與幸福感、認養意願之關係 16
2.10廣告訴求、訊息框架與涉入程度對幸福感及認養意願之關係 17
第參章 研究方法 21
3.1研究架構 21
3.2變數的操作性定義與衡量 22
3.2.1廣告訴求(理性訴求/感性訴求) 22
3.2.2訊息框架(正向訊息/負向訊息) 23
3.2.3涉入程度(高涉入/低涉入) 23
3.2.4幸福感 24
3.2.5認養意願 26
3.3.1研究對象與蒐集資料 28
3.3.2前測實驗設計 28
3.4前測結果 30
3.4.1廣告訴求操弄之結果 30
3.4.2訊息框架操弄之結果 30
3.4.3涉入程度操弄之結果 31
3.5正式實驗 31
第肆章 研究結果 33
4.1人口統計變項分析 33
4.2信度分析 34
4.2.1幸福感之信度分析 34
4.2.2認養意願之信度分析 35
4.3效度分析 36
4.4廣告訴求、訊息框架與涉入程度對幸福感之影響 36
4.4.1廣告訴求對幸福感之影響 36
4.4.2訊息框架對幸福感之影響 37
4.4.3涉入程度對幸福感之影響 37
4.4.4廣告訴求、訊息框架與涉入程度對幸福感之影響 38
4.5廣告訴求、訊息框架與涉入程度對認養意願之影響 42
4.5.1廣告訴求對認養意願之影響 42
4.5.2訊息框架對認養意願之影響 42
4.5.3涉入程度對認養意願之影響 43
4.5.4廣告訴求、訊息框架與涉入程度對認養意願之影響 44
第伍章 結論與建議 48
5.1研究結論 48
5.2管理意涵與研究建議 49
5.3研究限制與未來建議 51
參考文獻 52
中文文獻 52
英文文獻 58
附錄一、理性訴求之前測問卷 67
附錄二、感性訴求之前測問卷 68
附錄三、正向之前測問卷 69
附錄四、負向之前測問卷 70
附錄五、高涉入程度之前測問卷 71
附錄六、低涉入程度之前測問卷 72
附錄七、正式實驗 73


中文文獻
1.動保網https://animal.coa.gov.tw/html/index_06_1_Y106.html
2.中時電子報(2009)。網址:http://marketing.chinatiw.
3.葉明理(2005)。來喜的小把戲—談臺灣動物輔助治療的發展,護理雜誌,52(4),23-30。
4.林新沛、吳明峰(2008)。高雄市民飼、棄養外來種寵物的認知與行為之研究,特有生物研究,10(2),41-52。
5.台灣動物新聞網(2016)http://www.tanews.org.tw/info/9912
6.陳穎芃(2010)。影響民眾到公立動物收容所認養犬隻之因素。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所,高雄市。
7.吳怡伶(2006)。動物溝通:寵物作為人際互動的中介。世新大學口語傳播研究所,台北市。
8.鄭和萍(2000)。健康狀態相關之生活品質與養有寵物間的關聯性。國立台灣大學流行病學研究所,台北市。
9.陳欽雨、呂博裕、陳琰如(2017)。生活壓力、寂寞感及情感依附對寵物飼養意願之影響。運動休閒餐旅研究,12(4),1-19。
10.張力、吳婉綺、林翠溶(2014)。依附關係、生活壓力、休閒效益與寵物飼養 行為之關聯性研究。績效與策略研究,11(2),19-44。
11.林新沛、吳明峰(2010)。寵物認養網站會員認養寵物意向之研究。戶外遊憩研究,23(3),39-60。
12.林銘輝(2002)。飼主帶家犬絕育之行為意向模式。中山大學公共事務管理研究所,高雄市。
13.鄭靜婷(2009)。以計畫行為理論探討寵物飼養之持續意圖。東吳大學企業管理學系研究所,台北市。
14.丁瑞華、張育瑄(2016)。企業形象、廣告訴求和消費者屬性對消費者購買意願影響之研究。天主教輔仁大學民生學院織品服裝學系研究所,新北市。
15.王秀君(2017)。運用調節焦點理論探討環保旅館廣告訴求對住宿意願之影響。國立勤益科技大學休閒產業管理系專案管理研究所,台中市。
16.李育哲(1994)。廣告活動個案研究。台北:五南。
17.王忠孝(1998)。廣告學精粹。台北:千華。
18.劉典嚴(2008)。廣告學。台北:滄海。
19.徐達光(2003)。消費者心理學-消費者行為的科學研究。台北。東華。
20.祝鳳岡(1996)。廣告理性訴求策略之策略分析。廣告學研究,8,1-26。
21.丁源宏(2000)。不同媒介特性、廣告訴求與產品涉入度對於廣告效果影響之探討:比較平面媒體與網際網路。國立中山大學傳播管理研究所,高雄市。
22.劉秀雯、林育理、吳芳軒(2017)。社群媒體分析:代言人類型與廣告訴求對顧客參與成效之影響。管理評論,36(3),69-84。
23.朱國明(2008)。以網路的資訊豐富環境與訊息框架探討網路行為之前因與後果模型研究。中國管理評論國際學報,11(4)。
24.李俊融(2016)。探討圖文配置、正負向訊息框架之訊息模式對於大腸直腸癌篩檢意願之影響-以訊息鮮明程度為中介變項。中國醫藥大學醫務管理學研究所,台中市。
25.徐達光、陳中蓮、鍾幸樺(2006)。訴求類型、訊息呈現方式與消費者涉入程度對餐廳平面廣告購買意願之研究。餐旅暨家政學刊,3(2),269-287。
26.徐偉哲(2013)。廣告訊息呈現形式對知覺健康食品效果之影響。中興大學行銷學系研究所,台中市。
27.沈宗奇、蘇副強(2014)。購物網站促銷訊息設計對消費者購物行為之影響:框架效果、調節焦點與促銷時機之整合模式,行銷評論,11(4),367-389。
28.林春豪、張少熙、張良漢(2008)。高齡婦女晨間休閒運動涉入與身心健康之研究。運動休閒管理學報,5(1),121-135。
29.呂敏昌(1992)。國中生的生活壓力、因應方式與心理社會幸福感之關係。文化大學兒童福利學系研究所,台北市。
30.吳珩潔(2002)。大台北地區民眾休閒滿意度與幸福感之研究。國立臺灣師範大學運動休閒與管理研究所,台北市。
31.郭哲君(2010)。體育志工社會支持、工作滿意對幸福感之影響研究—以 2010 年全國大專校院運動會志工為例(未出版碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,臺北市。
32.鄭博真(2012)。大學生學習投入與幸福感之相關研究。屏東教育大學學報,38,127-164。
33.黃中興、張少熙、黃國恩(2016)。學生休閒運動心理需求、生活壓力與幸福感之研究-以國立臺灣大學為例。大體育學報,30,23-32。
34.李素菁(2001)。青年家庭支持與幸福感之相關研究-以台中市立國中生為例以台中市立國中生為例。靜宜大學青少年兒童福利學系,台中市。
35.謝明華(2002)。國小學童之父親參與、幸福感及學業成就之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所,彰化縣。
36.徐靜芬(2003)。研究生生活壓力、社會支持與身心健康之關係研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所,高雄市。
37.顏映馨(1999)。大學生的生活風格,人際親密和幸福感關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所,高雄市。
38.李清茵(2003)。家庭互動行為、心理需求滿足、關係滿意度與幸福感之相關研究。國立屏東師範大學教育心理與輔導學系研究所,屏東市。
39.陸洛(2001)。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,8(1),155-137。
40.何名娟(2004)。國小高年級學童氣質、情緒致力與幸福感之研究。國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所,嘉義市。
41.單小琳(1987)。國中導師職業倦怠與工作壓力社會支持調適的相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所,台北市。
42.甘朝有、齊善鴻(1998)。 旅遊心理學。天津:南開大學。
43.王桂蘭(2002)。國民中小學教師教師知識分享態度、虛擬社群參與意願即參與程度之關係研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所,高雄市。
44.羅友志(2016)大學生日本海外實習參與動機、阻礙因素對參與意願之影響。休閒觀光與運動健康學報,6(3),72-91。
45.林瑞欽(1990)。師範生任教職志之理論與實徵研究。休閒事業研究,9(4),26-46。
46.謝淑閔、林宗賢、郭真如(2014)。國小教師生態旅遊環境意識、旅遊決策因素與戶外教學意願之研究。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊,13(2),23-34。
47.黃坤祥、游皓瑋 (2006)。高屏澎東地區原住民參與職業訓練就 業輔導行為意向之探討。公共行政學報,21,1-37。
48.黃銘章、孫詩蘋(2008)。產品之是涉入程度對處方藥藥商廣告效果之影響。行銷評論,5(1),81-103。
49.李坤遠(1996)。訊息涉入、廣告主可信度、廣告訴求方式與廣告溝通效果關係之研究。交通大學管理科學研究所,新竹市。
50.黃論語(1997)。超媒體特性對網路行銷廣告效果之研究。長庚大學管理科學系研究所,桃園市。
51.孔方正、張超銘(2012)。消費者產品涉入產品知識對購買意願之影響-以替代能源車為例。休閒與社會研究,(5),37-50。
52.林隆儀、林岳民(2005)。廣告比較策略與廣告訴求方式對廣告效果之影響。東吳大學經濟商學學報,35,75-106。
53.林建煌(1991)。廣告聲譽、廣告訊息正反性對廣告效果之影響。管理科學學報,8(2),169-180。
54.陳慧玲、林安庭(2011)。登山運動參與者涉入程度、流暢體驗與幸福感之相關研究。臺灣體育運動管理學報,11(1),25-50。
55.陳嘉雯、陳慧如、黃純德(2006)。登山健行活動之登山客持續涉入、休閒效益與幸福感關係之研究。中華觀光管理學會暨臺灣休閒遊憩學會聯合學術研討會論文集,383-397。
56.戴有德、許惠玲、紀欽舜(2008)。參與登山健行之高齡者其休閒涉入、休閒效益及幸福感關係之研究-以高雄縣市郊山為例。中華觀光管理學會暨臺灣休閒與遊憩學會聯合學術研討會,臺南縣。
57.蔣嘉陽(2005)。信服幸福-廣告訴求對不同幸福感程度消費者之廣告效果研究。國立中正大學行銷管理研究所,高雄市。
58.王微茹(2007)。大學生之休閒需求、參與、滿意度及幸福感之研究-幸福感之需求滿足理論驗證。世新大學觀光研究所,台北市。

英文文獻
1.Aaker D. A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity, New York: The Free Press.
2.Ajzen, I. and Driver, B. L. (1991). Prediction of leisure participation from behavior, normative and control beliefs: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sciences, 13, 185-204.
3.Allen, K. M., Blascovich, J., & Mendes, W. B. (2002). Cardiovascular reactivity and the presence of pets, friends and spouses: The truth about cats and dogs, Psychosomatic Medicine, 64, 727-739.
4.Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1994).Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum.
5.Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471-499.
6.Barker, S. B., & Barker, R. T. (1998). The human-canine bond: closer than family ties? Journal of Health Counseling, 10(1), 46-56.
7.Belch, G. E., & Belch, M. A. (2003). Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective. New York: The McGraw-Hill.
8.Belch, G. E., & Belch, M. A. (1998). Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated Marketing, Communication Perspective, 4th ed., US: McGraw-Hill.
9.Bettman, J. R., & Sujan, M. (1987).Effects of framing on evaluation of comparable and noncomparable alternatives by expert and novice consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(2), 141-154.
10.Brian Mullen & Craig Johnson (1990).The Psychology of Consumer Behavior.
11.Buss, D. M. (2000).The evolution of happiness. American Psychologist , 55 , 15-23
12.Casarett, D., &Ross, L. F. (1997). Overriding a patient’s refusal of treatment after an iatrogenic complication. Journal of Medicine, 366(26),1908-1910.
13.Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1988). The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of consumer research, 15(2), 210-224.
14.Choi, Y. and Thorson, E. (1983).Memory for factual, emotional and balanced ads under two instructional sets. In: A. D. Fletcher (ed.), Proceedings of the 1983 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, Knoxville: University of Tennessee,160-164.
15.Cole, K. M., Gawlinski, A. (1995). Animals-assisted therapy in the intensive care unit. Nursing Clinical of North America, 30(3), 529-537.
16.Cox, A. D., Cox D., & Zimet, G. (2006).Understanding consumer responses to product risk information. Journal of Marketing, 70(1),79-91.
17.Devellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276-303.
19.Dinner, E. (1984), Subjective Well-Being, Psychological Bulletin, 95(3),542-575.
20.Dodds, W. B.,Monroe, K. B.,& Grewal, D.(1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of marketing research, 28(3), 307-319.
21.Eagly, A. H. &Chaiken, S.,(1993). The psychology of Attitudes, Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
22.Ellen, G., & Mark, J. S. (1999).The Different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. Journal of Marketing, 63, 70-87.
23.Goldberg, M. E. and Gorn, G. J. (1987).Happy and sad TV programs: how they affect reactions to commercials. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(4), 387-403.
24.Hahha, N., & Wozniak, R. (2001). Consumer Behavior: an approach, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25.Hevey, D., & Dolan, M., (2013). Approach/avoidance motivation, message framing and skin cancer prevention: A test of the congruency hypothesis. J Health Psychol, 19(8),1003-1012.
26.Hirchman, E. C. (1994). Consumers and their animal companion. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 616-632.
27.Howard, J. A. & Sheth, J. N.(1969). The Theory of Buyer Behavior, New York: John Wiley.
28.Jorgenson, J. (1997). Therapeutic use of companion animal in health care. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 29(3), 249-254.
29.Kolter, P. (1991). Marking management: Analysis, planning and control, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
30.Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing Management (millennium ed.), New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
31.Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing Management(11thed) New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
32.Kotler, P. (2011). Marketing Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International.
33.Krugman H. E. (1965). The impact of television advertising: learning without involvement, Public Opinion Quarterly, 29 (Fall), 349-356.
34.Laurent, G., & Kapferer, J. N. (1985). Measuring Consumer Involvement Profiles. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 41-53.
35.Lepper, M., Kass, P. H., & Hart, L. A. (2002).Prediction of adoption versus euthanasia among dogs and cats in a California animal shelter. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 5(1), 29-42.
36.Levin, I. & Gaeth, G. E. (1988). How consumers are Affected by the Framing of Attribute information Before and After Consuming the Product. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(Dec), 374-378.
37.Levin, I. & Gaeth, G.E. (1988). How consumers are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information Before and After Consuming the Product, Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 374-378.
38.Levin, I. P. & Gaeth, G.J. (1988). How consumers are affected by framing attribute information before and after consuming the product? Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 374-378.
39.Levin, I. P., Schneider, S.L., & Gaeth, G.J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2),149-188.
40.Lutz, R. J., MacKenzie, S. B., and Belch,G. E.(1983).Attitude toward the ad as a mediator ofadvertising effectiveness: Determinants and consequences. Advances in consumer research, 10(1),532-539.
41.Mattila A. S. (1999). Do emotional appeals work for services? International Journal of Service Industry Management, 10(3), 292-306.
42.Mattila, A. S. (1999). Do emotional appeals work for services? International Journal of Service Industry Management, 10(3), 292-306.
43.McIntyre, N., & Pigram, J. J. (1992). Recreation specialization reexamined: The case of vehicle-based campers. Leisure Sciences, 14(1), 3-15.
44.Meyerowitz, B. E. & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes,intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 500-510.
45.Meyerowitz, B. E. & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of Message Framing on Breast Self-Examination Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Pyschology, 500-510.
46.Meyers-Levy, J., & Maheswaran, D. (1990). The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement, Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 361-367.
47.Meyers-Levy, J., & Maheswaran, D. (2004). Exploring message framing outcomes when systematic, heuristic, or both types of processing occur. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1-2), 159-167.
48.Millar, M. G. & Millar, K. U. (2000). Promoting safe driving behaviors: The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(4), 853-866.
49.O’connor, D. B., Ferguson, E., & O’connor, R. C. (2005). Intentions to use hormonal male contraception: The role of message framing, attitudes and stress appraisals. British Journal of Psychology, 96(3), 351-369.
50.Oh, H. J., Lauckner, C., Boehmer, J., Fewins-Bliss, R., and Li, K. (2013). Facebooking for Health: An Examination into the Solicitation and Effects of Health-Related Social Support on Social Networking Sites, Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 2072-2080.
51.Omodei, M. M., and Wearing, A. J. (1990). Need Satisfaction and Involvement in Personal Projects: Toward an Integrative Model of Subjective Well-Being, ournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 762-769.
52.Page, T. J., Thorson, E.and Heide, M. P.(1990).The memory impact of commercials varying in emotional appeal and produce involvement. In: S. J. Agres, J. A. Edell, and T. M. Dubitsky (eds.), Emotion in Advertising, NY: Quorum Books.
53.Pavey, L., & Churchill, S., (2014). Promoting the avoidance of high-calorie snacks: priming autonomy moderates message framing effect. PLoS One, 9(7), e103892.
54.Pedersen, E. R.(2006). Perceptions of Performance: How European Organisations Experience EMAS Registration. In Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(2), 61-120.
55.Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1996). Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
56.Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Psychological bulletin, 121(1),3-19.
57.Rothman, A. J., Kelly, K. M., Hertel, A. W., & Salovey, P. (2003). Message frames and illness representations: Implications for interventions to promote and sustain healthy behavior. In L. D. Cameron & H. Leventhal (Eds.). The self-regulation of health and illness behavior (pp.278-296). New York: Routledge.
58.Rothman, A. J., Salovey, P., Antone, C., Keough K., and Martin C. D. (1993).The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of experimental social psychology, 29(5), 408-433.
59.Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J. and Warshaw, P. R.(1998). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendation for modifications in future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 325-343.
60.Sherif, M., & Cantril, H. (1947). The Psychology of Ego-Involvements: Social attitudes and identifications. Muzafer Sherif and Hadley Cantril. New York: John Wiley & Sons,26(3),362-364
61.Shimp T. A. (1981). Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of consumer brand choice. Journal of Advertising, 10(2), 9-15.
62.Shiv, B., Edell Britton, J. A., & Payne, J. W. (2004). Does elaboration increase or decrease the effectiveness of negatively versus positively framed messages? Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 199-208.
63.Smith, G. E. (1996). Framing in advertising and the moderating impact of consumer education .Journal of Advertising Research, September/October, 49-64.
64.Solomon, M. R. (2004). Consumer Behavior are correlates. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(2), 97-113.
65.Soto, F. R. M., Ferreira, F., Pinheiro, S. R., Nogari, F., Risseto, M. R., Souza, O., & Amaku, M. (2005). Adoption of shelter dogs in a Brazilian community: Assessing the caretaker profile. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 8(2), 105-116.
66.Stafford, M. R., & Day, E. (1995). Retail service advertising: the effects of appeal, medium, and service. Journal of advertising, 24(1),57-71.
67.Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science, 211(4481), 453–458.
68.Veenhoven, R.(1989), Is Happienss Relative, In J. P. Forgas and J. M. Innes (Eds.), Recent Advance in Social Psychology: An International Perspective, North Holland: Elsevier.
69.Venkatesh, V. and Agarwal, R. (2006).Turning Visitors into Customers: A usability-centric perspective on purchase behavior in electronic channels. Management Science, 52(3), 367-382.
70.Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2000).A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
71.Wells, D. L. (1996). The welfare of dogs in an animal rescue shelter. PhD Thesis. School of Psychology. The Queen’s University of Belfast, UK.
72.Weng, H.Y., Kass, P. H., Hart, L. A., & Chomel B. B. (2006). Animal protection measures in Taiwan: Taiwanese attitudes toward the animal protection law and animal shelters. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 9, 315-326.
73.Zaichkowsky J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of consumer research, 6(1), 341-352.
74.Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1986).The emotional aspect of product involvement.Advances in Consumer Research,(14),32-35.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊