跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(98.82.140.17) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/08 08:30
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:鄭清寶日
研究生(外文):Trinh Thanh BaoNhut
論文名稱:以震動台試驗探討加勁邊坡動態行為- 輸入波形效應
論文名稱(外文):Shaking table tests on geosynthetic-reinforced slopes- Effects of input wave patterns
指導教授:黃景川黃景川引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ching-Chuan Huang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:土木工程學系
學門:工程學門
學類:土木工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:英文
論文頁數:146
外文關鍵詞:Geosynthetics- reinforced slopeWaveformsLaminar boxGeotextilesShaking table tests.
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:87
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
In this study, the effect of the different wave patterns on the reinforced soil wall were studied using a series of shaking table tests. Based on the different wave patterns, six reinforced soil wall models were constructed and loaded to failure using the same frequency and horizontal high peak acceleration.
The results obtained from the thesis are helpful to understand into the relative performance of geosynthetic-reinforced slopes under different waveforms used in the experiments. The results showed that the maximum horizontal slope displacement (Dmax) and HPGA curves are different with the wave patterns. The amplification factor (Am) indicated nonlinear decadence with horizontal peak ground acceleration (HPGA), this factor decreases with increasing HPGAs. Besides, the relationship of Amplification with HPGA can be used the logarithmic function lines. Normalized slope displacement (Dmax/v2maxHPGA) vs. ay/HPGA curves obtained this study have a different which based on the Newmark’s sliding theory.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT I
TABLE OF CONTENTS II
LIST OF TABLES VI
LIST OF FIGURES VII
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Introduction. 1
1.2 Shaking Table Test Set-up. 2
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 5
2.1 Newmark’s Method (1965). 5
2.2 Cai and Bathurst (1996b) Empirical Approaches. 6
2.3 Huang et al (2003) 921 Earthquake Investigation. 7
2.4 Chi Chi (921) Earthquake. 8
2.5 Chopra (1995) Decay of Free Vibration test. 8
2.6 Yazdandoust et al (2017) Research on the Retaining walls using Shaking table test. 9
CHAPTER THREE EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS 11
3.1 Backfill Soil. 11
3.2 Reinforcement Material. 11
3.3 Measurement Data Acquisition system. 11
3.3.1 Linear Displacement Meter. 11
3.3.2 Accelerometer. 12
3.3.3 Strain Gauge. 12
3.3.4 Modular Data Acquisition Control. 12
3.3.5 National Instruments Labview. 13
3.4 MTS system. 13
CHAPTER FOUR METHODOLOGY 21
4.1 The Effects of Boundary Conditions on the Model test. 21
4.2 Decay of Free vibration test. 22
4.3 White Noise test. 23
4.4 The Shaking Table test of the Reinforced Retaining wall. 23
4.5. The Experimental Wave patterns and the Results of wave simulation. 25
4.5.1 The Stepwise Intensified Sine waves. 25
4.5.2 The Sinusoidal Ellipse Wave. 25
4.5.3 The Chi-Chi Earthquake waves. 26
4.5.4 The Results of Wave simulation. 28
CHAPTER FIVE RESULTS 35
5.1 The Experimental Results of the Boundary Effect on the laminar sandbox. 35
5.2 Decay of Free Vibration test. 39
5.4 The Shaking Table Test Results of the retaining wall 47
5.5. The Results of Reinforcement wall displacement response 49
5.5.1 The relationship between Maximum lateral displacement (Dmax) and Horizontal peak ground acceleration (HPGA) 49
5.5.2 Normalized Slope Displacement. 52
5.5.3 The Model Wall deformation. 55
5.5.4 Horizontal Settlement of Backfill sand. 57
5.6 The Results of Reinforcement Wall acceration response. 58
5.6.1 The Wall Acceleration Response. 58
5.6.2 The Amplification Factor of the Reinforcement wall. 61
5.7 Reinforcement Forces and Failure Mechanisms. 66
5.7.1 Reinforcement Forces. 67
5.7.2 Dynamic Earth Pressure Coeficients. 70
5.8 Analysis of The Reinforced wall. 73
5.8.1 Arias Intensity 73
5.8.2 RMS Acceleraion 78
5.8.3 The Safety Factor. 88
5.8.4 Dynamic Earth Pressure Distribution. 93
CHAPTER SIX CONCLUSION 97
REFERENCES 99
APPENDIX 102
REFERENCES
ASTM D4595 Test methods for tensile properties of geotextiles by the wide-width strip method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.

Bathurs, R. J. and Cai, Z. (1995) “Pseudo-static seismic analysis of geosynthetic reinforced segmental retaining walls’’ Geosynthetics International, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp 789-832.

Cai, Z. and Bathurs, R. J. (1996) “Deterministic sliding block methods for
estimation seismic displacements of earth structures Soil Dynamic and
Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 255-268.

Chopra, A. K. (2001) “Dynamic of Structures Prentice Hall, 2th ed, Chapter 2,

Huang, C.-C., Chou, L.-H., and Tatsuoka, F. (2003) “Seismic displacements of geosynthetic-reinforced soil modular block walls Geosynthetics International,
Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 2-23.

Huang, C.-C. and Wu, S.-H. (2006) “Simplified approach for assessing seismic displacements of soil-retaining walls. Part I: geosynthetic-reinforced walls with modular block walls Geosynthetics International, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp 219-233.

Huang, C.-C., Horng, J.-C., Chang, Chueh, S.-Y., W.-J., Chiou, J.-S., and Chen, C.-H., (2010) “Dynamic behavior of reinforced slopes: horizontal acceleration response’’ Geosynthetics International, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp 207-219.
Huang, C.-C., Horng, J.-C., Chang, W.-J., Chiou, J.-S., and Chen, C.-H., (2011) “Dynamic behavior of reinforced walls – horizontal displacement response Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 29, pp. 257-267.

Huang, C.-C. (2015) “Settlement of footings at the crest of reinforced slopes
subjected to toe unloading’’ Geosynthetics International.

Huang, C.-C., Huang, B.-S., Chen, Y.-W. (2016) “Stability analyses for
geosynthetic-reinforced steep-faced slopes subjected to toe scouring’’ Journal of
GeoEngineering, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 123-132.

Huang, C.-C. (2016) “Model tests on the bearing capacity of reinforced saturated sand ground’’ Geosynthetics International.

Iai, S. (1988) “Similitude for shaking table tests on soil-structure-fluid model in
1g gravitational field

Idriss, I. M. (1990) “Response of soft soil sites during earthquakes Proceedings
H. Bolton Seed Memorial Symposium, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp 273-289.

Krishna, A. M. and Latha, G. M. (2007) “Seismic response of reinforced soil-
retaining wall models using shaking-table tests Geosynthetics International, Vol.
14, No. 6, pp.355-364.

Komak Panah, A., Yazdi, M., Galandarzadeh, A., (2018) “Shaking table tests on soil retaining walls reinforced by polymeric strips Geotextiles and Geomembranes 148-161

Matsuo, O., Tsutsumi, T., Yokoyama, K., and Saito, Y. (1998) “Shaking table tests and analyses of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls GeosyntheticsInternational, Vol. 5, No. 1-2, pp. 97-126.

Newmark, N. M. (1965) “Effect of earthquake on dams and embankments Geotechnique, Vol. 15, No 2, pp. 139-159.

Richardson, G. N. (1978) “Earthquake resistant reinforced earth walls Proceeding of the Symposium on Earth Rienforcement, ASCE, Pittsburgh, PA., pp. 664-683.

Sabermahani, M., Ghalandarzadeh, A., and Fakher, A. (2009) “Experimental study on seismic deformation modes of reinforced-soil walls Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 27, pp. 121-136.

Yazdandoust,M. (2018) “Laboratory evaluation of dynamic behavior of steel-strip mechanically stabilized earth walls Soil and Foundation, 58 264-276

Yang, K.H., Hung, W.Y., Kencana, E.Y., (2013) “Acceleration Amplified Responses of Geosynthetic-reinforced Soil Structures with a Wide Range of Input Ground Accelerationns Geo-Congress: Stability and Performance of Slopes and Embankment III

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top