臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

Many of the anthropomorphism related literatures analyze the contrast between the appearance versus functionality to assess consumer's product preferences. Most of these literatures also use consumer product or other consumer acquisitions as anthropomorphism object and only a few of the anthropomorphism studies are researching the effect of time anthropomorphism. This study use time as the anthropomorphism priming. An entity that could be seen as a barrier to acquire something that individuals might want or need. This study wants to investigate the impact of time anthropomorphism on individuals' willingness to indulge. This study also uses construal level, self-concept and long-term orientation as its moderator. This research is an experimental study with 126 respondents that are recruited through Amazon Mechanical Turk. This study showed that time is also another subject that could be add to the anthropomorphism priming literatures because time is also contain a human-like feature which is a non-spatial continuum movement that can measured a succession of an events from past through present and the future. The findings also show that time anthropomorphism does affect individuals' willingness to indulge. When primed with time anthropomorphism, individuals who has low construal level, who are interdependent or long term oriented shows to have more willingness to indulge rather than when they are not primed with time anthropomorphism. Research implication and future research are also explained in this study.

ABSTRACT I
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS II
TABLE OF CONTENTS III
LIST OF TABLES V
LIST OF FIGURES VI
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background. 1
1.2 Research Gap and Research Objective. 4
1.3 Research Contribution. 6
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 7
2.1 Anthropomorphism, Time Anthropomorphism and Indulgence Behavior. 7
2.2 Construal Level Theory and Temporal Distance. 12
2.3 Self-Concept (Independent and Interdependent). 14
2.4 Long-Term Orientation. 16
CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 18
3.1 Conceptual Framework. 18
3.2 Summary of Hypotheses. 19
3.3 Definition of Variables. 19
3.4 Research Design and Procedures. 20
3.4.1 Experimental Design. 21
3.5 Construct Measurements. 26
3.5.1 Control Variables. 27
3.5.2 Demographic Measurements. 28
3.6 Data Analysis Procedure. 29
3.6.1 Descriptive Statistical Analysis. 29
3.6.2 Factor Analysis and Reliability Test. 29
3.6.3 Two-way Analysis of Variance (Two-way ANOVA). 29
CHAPTER FOUR RESEARCH RESULTS 31
4.1 Study Result. 31
4.1.1 Data Collection. 31
4.1.2 Respondents’ Characteristics. 32
4.1.3 Analysis of Descriptive Statistics. 33
4.1.4 Factor Analysis and Reliability Test. 35
4.1.5 Manipulation Check of Independent and Moderator Variables. 38
4.1.6 Hypothesis Testing. 39
4.2 Summary of Hypothesis Testing. 45
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 46
5.1 Study Discussion and Conclusion. 46
5.2 Theoretical and Managerial Implications. 48
5.2.1 Theoretical Implications. 48
5.2.2 Managerial Implications. 50
5.3 Limitations and Future Researches. 51
REFERENCES 53
APPENDICES 58
Appendix 1: Time Anthropomorphism Manipulation 58

Aggarwal, P., ＆ McGill, A. L. (2007). Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 468-479.
Aggarwal, P., ＆ McGill, A. L. (2011). When brands seem human, do humans act like brands? Automatic behavioral priming effects of brand anthropomorphism. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(2), 307-323.
Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. California: University of California Press.
Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(3), 258-290.
Barcelos, R. H., Dantas, D. C., ＆ Sénécal, S. (2018). Watch your tone: How a brand's tone of voice on social media influences consumer responses. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 41(0), 60-80.
Bauer, H. H., Sauer, N. E., ＆ Becker, C. (2006). Investigating the relationship between product involvement and consumer decision‐making styles. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5(4), 342-354.
Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. Paper presented at the 43rd National Conference of The American Marketing Association, Chicago, Illinois.
Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Yielding to temptation: Self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 670-676.
Bearden, W. O., Money, R. B., ＆ Nevins, J. L. (2006). A measure of long-term orientation: Development and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3), 456-467.
Belk, R. W., Ger, G., ＆ Askegaard, S. (1997). Consumer desire in three cultures: Results from projective research. ACR North American Advances, 24(0), 24-28.
Briley, D. A. (2009). Looking forward, looking back: Cultural differences and similarities in time orientation. New York: Psychology Press.
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., ＆ Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3-5.
Cacioppo, J. T., ＆ Patrick, W. (2008). Loneliness: Human nature and the need for social connection. New York: WW Norton ＆ Company.
Campbell, M. C., ＆ Goodstein, R. C. (2001). The moderating effect of perceived risk on consumers' evaluations of product incongruity: Preference for the norm. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 439-449.
Carver, C. S. (2005). Impulse and constraint: Perspectives from personality psychology, convergence with theory in other areas, and potential for integration. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(4), 312-333.
Cavanaugh, L. A. (2014). Because I (don't) deserve it: How relationship reminders and deservingness influence consumer indulgence. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(2), 218-232.
Choi, Y. K., Miracle, G. E., ＆ Biocca, F. (2001). The effects of anthropomorphic agents on advertising effectiveness and the mediating role of presence. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 2(1), 19-32.
Cousins, S. D. (1989). Culture and self-perception in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 124-131.
De Bondt, C., Van Kerckhove, A., ＆ Geuens, M. (2018). Look at that body! How anthropomorphic package shapes systematically appeal to consumers. International Journal of Advertising, 37(5), 1-20.
Delbaere, M., McQuarrie, E. F., ＆ Phillips, B. J. (2011). Personification in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 40(1), 121-130.
Dinev, T., ＆ Hart, P. (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61-80.
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., ＆ Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285-290.
English, T., ＆ Chen, S. (2007). Culture and self-concept stability: Consistency across and within contexts among Asian Americans and European Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 478-490.
Epley, N., Waytz, A., Akalis, S., ＆ Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Social Cognition, 26(2), 143-155.
Epley, N., Waytz, A., ＆ Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864-886.
Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(6), 889-906.
Fogg, B. J., ＆ Nass, C. (1997). Silicon sycophants: The effects of computers that flatter. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46(5), 551-561.
Freeman, J. B., ＆ Ambady, N. (2011). A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. Psychological Review, 118(2), 247-279.
Freitas, A. L., Gollwitzer, P., ＆ Trope, Y. (2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others' self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(6), 739-752.
Gilmore, G. W. (1919). Animism or thought currents of primitive peoples. Boston: Marshall Jones Company.
Gorn, G. J., Jiang, Y., ＆ Johar, G. V. (2008). Babyfaces, trait inferences, and company evaluations in a public relations crisis. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 36-49.
Gupta, B., Iyer, L. S., ＆ Weisskirch, R. S. (2010). Facilitating global e-commerce: A comparison of consumer's willingness to disclose personal information online in the US and in India. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 11(1), 41-52.
Hagtvedt, H., ＆ Patrick, V. M. (2014). Consumer response to overstyling: Balancing aesthetics and functionality in product design. Psychology ＆ Marketing, 31(7), 518-525.
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., ＆ Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 17). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Hart, P., ＆ Royne, M. B. (2017). Being human: How anthropomorphic presentations can enhance advertising effectiveness. Journal of Current Issues ＆ Research in Advertising, 38(2), 129-145.
Hernández, L. P. (2001). Metaphor-based cluster models and conceptual interaction: The case of 'time'. Atlantis, 23(2), 65-81.
Hoch, S. J., ＆ Loewenstein, G. F. (1991). Time-inconsistent preferences and consumer self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 492-507.
Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). California: Sage Publications.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. California: Sage Publications.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 8.
Hofstede, G., ＆ Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5-21.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., ＆ Minkov, M. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (Vol. 2). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hur, J. D., Koo, M., ＆ Hofmann, W. (2015). When temptations come alive: How anthropomorphism undermines self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(2), 340-358.
Kavanagh, D. J., Andrade, J., ＆ May, J. (2005). Imaginary relish and exquisite torture: The elaborated intrusion theory of desire. Psychological Review, 112(2), 446-467.
Kim, S., Chen, R. P., ＆ Zhang, K. (2016). Anthropomorphized helpers undermine autonomy and enjoyment in computer games. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(2), 282-302.
Kim, S., ＆ McGill, A. L. (2011). Gaming with Mr. Slot or gaming the slot machine? Power, anthropomorphism, and risk perception. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 94-107.
Kivetz, R., ＆ Simonson, I. (2002). Self-control for the righteous: Toward a theory of precommitment to indulgence. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 199-217.
Kwon, S., Ha, S., ＆ Kowal, C. (2017). How online self-customization creates identification: Antecedents and consequences of consumer-customized product identification and the role of product involvement. Computers in Human Behavior, 75(0), 1-13.
Lako, G., ＆ Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Laran, J. (2009). Choosing your future: Temporal distance and the balance between self-control and indulgence. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(6), 1002-1015.
Leigh, T. W., ＆ Summers, J. O. (2002). An initial evaluation of industrial buyers' impressions of salespersons' nonverbal cues. Journal of Personal Selling ＆ Sales Management, 22(1), 41-53.
Liberman, N., ＆ Förster, J. (2009). Distancing from experienced self: How global-versus-local perception affects estimation of psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 203-216.
Liberman, N., ＆ Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5-18.
Loewenstein, G. (1987). Anticipation and the valuation of delayed consumption. The Economic Journal, 97(387), 666-684.
Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 272-292.
Lytle, L. A., Seifert, S., Greenstein, J., ＆ McGovern, P. (2000). How do children's eating patterns and food choices change over time? Results from a cohort study. American Journal of Health Promotion, 14(4), 222-228.
Markus, H. R., ＆ Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.
May, F., ＆ Monga, A. (2013). When time has a will of its own, the powerless don't have the will to wait: Anthropomorphism of time can decrease patience. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 924-942.
McGill, A. L. (1998). Relative use of necessity and sufficiency information in causal judgments about natural categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 70-81.
Metcalfe, J., ＆ Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106(1), 3-19.
Mogilner, C. (2010). The pursuit of happiness: Time, money, and social connection. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1348-1354.
Morris, M. W., ＆ Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 67(6), 949-971.
Mourey, J. A., Olson, J. G., ＆ Yoon, C. (2017). Products as pals: Engaging with anthropomorphic products mitigates the effects of social exclusion. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(2), 414-431.
Nowlis, S. M., Mandel, N., ＆ McCabe, D. B. (2004). The effect of a delay between choice and consumption on consumption enjoyment. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 502-510.
Okada, E. M. (2005). Justification effects on consumer choice of hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(1), 43-53.
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., ＆ Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgement and Decision Making, 5(5), 411-419.
Porter, S., ten Brinke, L., ＆ Gustaw, C. (2010). Dangerous decisions: The impact of first impressions of trustworthiness on the evaluation of legal evidence and defendant culpability. Psychology, Crime ＆ Law, 16(6), 477-491.
Puzakova, M., ＆ Kwak, H. (2017). Should anthropomorphized brands engage customers? The impact of social crowding on brand preferences. Journal of Marketing, 81(6), 99-115.
Puzakova, M., Kwak, H., ＆ Rocereto, J. F. (2013). When humanizing brands goes wrong: The detrimental effect of brand anthropomorphization amid product wrongdoings. Journal of Marketing, 77(3), 81-100.
Romero, M., ＆ Craig, A. W. (2017). Costly curves: How human-like shapes can increase spending. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 80-98.
Schoefer, K., Wäppling, A., Heirati, N., ＆ Blut, M. (2019). The moderating effect of cultural value orientations on behavioral responses to dissatisfactory service experiences. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 48(0), 247-256.
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580-591.
Taylor, J. W. (1974). The role of risk in consumer behavior: A comprehensive and operational theory of risk taking in consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing, 38(2), 54-60.
Thaler, R. H., ＆ Shefrin, H. M. (1981). An economic theory of self-control. Journal of Political Economy, 89(2), 392-406.
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506-520.
Trinkaus, E. (2005). The adiposity paradox in the Middle Danubian Gravettian. Anthropologie, 43(2-3), 263-272.
Trope, Y., ＆ Fishbach, A. (2000). Counteractive self-control in overcoming temptation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 493-506.
Trope, Y., ＆ Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 876-889.
Trope, Y., ＆ Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403-421.
Trope, Y., ＆ Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463.
Trope, Y., Liberman, N., ＆ Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83-95.
Underwood, G., ＆ Swain, R. (1973). Selectivity of attention and the perception of duration. Perception, 2(1), 101-105.
Vallacher, R. R., ＆ Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94(1), 3-15.
Vallacher, R. R., ＆ Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 660-671.
Wan, E. W., Chen, R. P., ＆ Jin, L. (2017). Judging a book by its cover? The effect of anthropomorphism on product attribute processing and consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(6), 1008-1030.
Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., ＆ Epley, N. (2010). Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 219-232.
Waytz, A., Morewedge, C. K., Epley, N., Monteleone, G., Gao, J.-H., ＆ Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 410-435.
Wertenbroch, K. (1998). Consumption self-control by rationing purchase quantities of virtue and vice. Marketing Science, 17(4), 317-337.
Zhang, Y., Winterich, K. P., ＆ Mittal, V. (2010). Power distance belief and impulsive buying. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(5), 945-954.
Zhou, X., Kim, S., Wang, L., ＆ Aggarwal, P. (2018). Money helps when money feels: Money anthropomorphism increases charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 953-972.