近年來減少二氧化碳排放量已逐漸成為全球趨勢，且2015年於巴黎舉辦的COP21會議之後各國提出「國家自定預期貢獻(Intended Nationally Determined Contribution, INDC)」，致使各國開始關注「能源轉型」這項議題。我國目前推行之能源轉型政策中，再生能源技術發展及裝置鋪設為重要政策，而太陽能電池為我國再生能源技術領域中最具競爭力之項目之ㄧ。
產學合作為我國近年再生能源技術研究發展政策主軸，因此太陽能電池技術領域之產官學合作關係變化趨勢分析就顯得重要。本研究以包含我國在內全球太陽能電池文獻量排名前八位之國家為研究對象，使用互資訊分析方法(Mutual Information)結合三螺旋理論來分析各國2010至2017年之產官學合作關係變化趨勢，並根據各國近年太陽能技術相關政策對產官學合作關係變化進行分析。
研究結果顯示，產官學三螺旋指標成長趨勢最佳者為美國，成長趨勢最緩慢者為印度，我國成長趨勢列於4、5名。考量三螺旋指標變化趨勢及產、官、學三者兩兩之間的合作關係變化可發現，美國呈現快速成長且並未因文獻數於近兩年下降而造成合作關係協同度下降；中國則因文獻量相對其他國家多，但其產官學三者兩兩之間的合作關係協同度並未與文獻量成正比，反而呈現持平的狀態。除中國外，近兩年全球太陽能電池文獻數呈現下滑趨勢，可合理推斷因太陽電池相關技術發展已漸趨成熟，使得研究主軸轉換，使三螺旋指標呈現數值上升、協同度及系統性下降之情況。我國則因文獻數不如研究規模較大之國家，導致數據計算上易誤判協同度不如其他國家，但實際上趨勢變化與國際間變化趨勢相符，並未偏離太多。
政策意涵方面，我國可參考政策及法規架構更完整之國家如美、日、韓等國，設計太陽能電池技術甚至再生能源技術研究相關激勵或優惠法規，輔助大型發展政策；另政府可加強其產學溝通平台之功能，以加速我國太陽能電池技術發展。

In recent years, reducing carbon dioxide emissions has gradually become a global trend. Countries began to focus on the issue of energy transition since they proposed their own “Intended Nationally Determined Contribution” (INDC) after UNFCCC Conference of Parties 21th in Paris in 2015.

Taiwan’s current policies in energy transition focus on the development and expansion of the technology of renewable energy. Also, Taiwan is one of the most competitive country in the field of solar cell technology. On the other hand, Taiwan’s policies focus on the industry-government-academic cooperation relation, so it’s important to analyze the variation of trend of industry-government-academic cooperation relation in the field of solar cell technology. Therefore, this study conducted the Triple Helix Index of eight countries including Taiwan which had most of research in the field of solar cell technology from 2010 to 2017. This research also analyzed the impact of policy on the trend variation of Triple Helix Index.

The results show that the United States has the fastest growing trend of Triple Helix Index and India’s speed of growing trend is the slowest. Taiwan’s average rank is around 4th to 5th. The results also show that the synergy of collaboration in the United States didn’t drop down due to the decline of numbers of research literature. Conversely, China’s synergy of collaboration didn’t grow as fast as it’s increasing on numbers of research literature. Taiwan’s trend variation of Triple Helix Index is similar to global trends.

In terms of policy implications, Taiwan may refer to countries with more complete policies and regulatory frameworks such as the United States, Japan, and South Korea, designing incentives or preferential regulations for solar cell or renewable energy technologies in order to support developing policies. In addition, the government can strengthen its function as a platform for industry-university communication to accelerate the development of solar cell technology in Taiwan.

中文摘要 I
英文延伸摘要 III
圖目錄 XII
表目錄 XIII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程及架構 3
第四節 研究限制與範圍 5
第二章 國際太陽能電池市場、技術現況及相關政策 7
第一節 國際太陽能電池技術簡介 7
第二節 國際太陽能電池市場現況 11
第三節 各國太陽能相關政策 13
第四節 本章小結 21
第三章 文獻回顧與研究方法 22
第一節 三螺旋理論相關文獻回顧 22
第二節 三螺旋理論應用相關文獻回顧 24
第三節 三螺旋理論與互資訊分析方法介紹 29
第四節 本章小結 34
第四章 資料蒐集與實證分析 35
第一節 文獻數據蒐集與處理 35
第二節 互資訊計算結果與分析 43
第三節 本章小結 53
第五章 結論與建議 55
第一節 結論 55
第二節 政策建議 56
第三節 後續研究建議 58
參考文獻 59
附錄A-H 68

中文部分
期刊論文
1.王孟傑(2018)，「2018年太陽光電產業趨勢與展望」，工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心。
2.李思恩(2016)，「美國太陽光電政策與法制研究」，國立台灣科技大學科技管理所碩士論文。
3.余曉雯及鍾宜興(2015)，「德國聯邦政府高等教育產學合作政策之探究」，教育研究集刊，第61卷，第3期，頁47-79。
4.馬公勉(2010)，「日本再生能源政策發展現況與趨勢」，臺灣經濟研究月刊，第33卷，第9期，頁76-82。
5.馬道(2010)，「美國太陽能產業現況及政策」，經濟前瞻，第131卷，頁83-92。
6.陳志榮(2009)，「產官學三螺旋互動對產業群聚影響之探討－以丹麥風力能源產業為例」，國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。
7.許芳瑜(2014)「韓國新及再生能源政策與法制研究」，國立台灣科技大學科技管理研究所碩士班碩士學位論文。
8.張仁家及游宗達(2014)，「德國雙軌技職教育對我國技職教育之啟示」，台灣國際研究季刊，第10卷，第3期，頁173-188。
9.張景淳(2017)，「南韓2017新政府之能源政策研析」，工業技術研究院綠能與環境研究所。
10.張瓊之(2017)，「德國新再生能源法(EEG 2017)」，工業技術研究院綠能與環境研究所。
11.楊凱婷(2011)，「新興產業之產官學共演化分析：以台灣太陽能產業為例」，國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
12.楊翔如(2017)，「太陽光電新興市場發展－印度、菲律賓、印尼」，工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心。
13.溫肇東及樊學良(2013)，「日本產學合作之理論研究及政策實踐歷程」，國立政治大學科技管理研究所。
14.趙文衡(2016)，「解析東南亞與印度綠能市場及我國合作策略」，台灣經濟研究院。
15.蔡力強、范佐麟、賴世雄、巫國琳及陳財能(2006)，「德國雙軌制職業訓練考察：台德菁英計畫技術移轉」，行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局。
16.鄭彤彤及魏麗嬌(2013)，「韓國低碳綠色增長基本法(2013 年修訂)」，南京工業大學學報，第12 卷，第3期，頁23-33。
政府、網頁資料
1.行政院(2016)，「太陽光電兩年推動計畫」，取自：https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/bdfa7b6a-f8b5-4a8e-ade7-d9dac49bf827
2.中國國務院(2012)，「中國的能源政策(2012)白皮書」，取自：http://www.scio.gov.cn/zfbps/ndhf/2012/Document/1233790/1233790.htm
3.能源局(2010)，「99年度年報」，取自：https://web3.moeaboe.gov.tw/ECW/populace/content/wHandMenuFile.ashx?file_id=686
4.能源局(2011)，「100年度年報」，取自：https://web3.moeaboe.gov.tw/ECW/populace/content/wHandMenuFile.ashx?file_id=616
5.能源局(2012)，「101年度年報」，取自：https://web3.moeaboe.gov.tw/ECW/populace/content/wHandMenuFile.ashx?file_id=511
6.能源局(2013)，「102年度年報」，取自：https://web3.moeaboe.gov.tw/ECW/populace/content/wHandMenuFile.ashx?file_id=289
7.能源局(2014)，「103年度年報」，取自：https://web3.moeaboe.gov.tw/ECW/populace/content/wHandMenuFile.ashx?file_id=129
8.能源局(2015)，「104年度年報」，取自：https://web3.moeaboe.gov.tw/ECW/populace/content/wHandMenuFile.ashx?file_id=21
9.能源局(2016)，「105年度年報」，取自：https://web3.moeaboe.gov.tw/ECW/populace/content/wHandMenuFile.ashx?file_id=4146
10.能源局(2016)，「能源產業技術白皮書」，取自：https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/001/administrator/10/relfile/5653/27478/2016%E5%B9%B4%E8%83%BD%E6%BA%90%E7%94%A2%E6%A5%AD%E6%8A%80%E8%A1%93%E7%99%BD%E7%9A%AE%E6%9B%B8%20(3).pdf
11.經濟部(2009)，「綠色能源產業旭昇方案」，取自：http://www.ey.gov.tw/Upload/RelFile/79/59280/99291971771.pdf
12.經濟部溫室氣體減量資訊網(2013)，「韓國節能減碳政策措施與對我國啟示」，取自：https://www.go-moea.tw/downloadmsg3.php?id=8
 
英文部分
期刊論文
1. Benner, M. and Sandström, U. (2000), “Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system, Research Policy, Vol. 29, Issue 2, pp. 291-301
2. Biese, M. and Stahl, H. (1999), “Public research and industrial innovations in Germany, Research Policy, Vol. 28, issue 4, 397-422.
3. Carayannis, E. G., Goletsis, Y. and Grigoroudis, E. (2018), “Composite innovation metrics: MCDA and the Quadruple Innovation Helix framework, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 131, pp. 4-17.
4. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (1995), “The triple helix---university-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development, EASST Review, Vol. 14, Issue 1, pp. 14-19.
5. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000), “The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations, Research Policy, Vol. 29, Issue 2, pp. 109-123
6. Etzkowitz, H., de Mello, J. M. C. and Almeida, M. (2005), “Towards “meta-innovation in Brazil: The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix, Research policy, Vol. 34, Issue 4, pp. 411-424.
7. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C. and Terra, B. R. C. (2000), “The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm, Research Policy, Vol. 29, Issue 2, pp. 313-330.
8. Gallagher, K. S., Grübler, A., Kuhl, L., Nemet, G. and Wilson, C. (2012), “The energy technology innovation system, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Vol. 37, pp. 137-162.
9. Green, M. A., Emery, K., Hishikawa, Y., Warta, W. and Dunlop, E. D. (2013), “Solar Cell Efficiency Tables (Version 42), Progress in Photovoltaics, Vol. 21, Issue 5, pp. 827-837.
10. Green, M. A., Emery, K., Hishikawa, Y., Warta, W. and Dunlop, E. D. (2014), “Solar Cell Efficiency Tables (Version 44) , Progress in Photovoltaics, Vol. 22, Issue 7, pp. 701-710.
11. Green, M. A., Emery, K., Hishikawa, Y., Warta, W. and Dunlop, E. D. (2015), “Solar Cell Efficiency Tables (Version 46) , Progress in Photovoltaics, Vol. 23, Issue 7, pp. 805-812.
12. Green, M. A., Emery, K., Hishikawa, Y., Warta, W. and Dunlop, E. D. (2016), “Solar Cell Efficiency Tables (Version 48) , Progress in Photovoltaics, Vol. 24, Issue 7, pp. 905-913.
13. Green, M. A., Hishikawa, Y., Dunlop, E. D. Levi, D. H., Anita, J. H. and Ho‐Baillie, W. Y. (2018), “Solar Cell Efficiency Tables (Version 51) , Progress in Photovoltaics, Vol. 26, Issue 1, pp. 3-12.
14. Green, M. A., Hishikawa, Y., Warta, W., Dunlop, E. D., Levi, D. H., Hohl‐Ebinger, J. and Ho‐Baillie, W. Y. (2017), “Solar Cell Efficiency Tables (Version 50) , Progress in Photovoltaics, Vol. 25, Issue 7, pp. 668-676.
15. Hu, R., Skea, J. and Hannon, M. J. (2018), “Measuring the energy innovation process: An indicator framework and a case study of wind energy in China, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 127, pp. 227-244.
16. Jäger-Waldau, A. (2017), “PV Status Report 2017, Publications Office of the European Union. doi: 10.2760/452611
17. Jia, F., Sun, H., and Koh, L., (2016), “Global solar photovoltaic industry: an overview and national competitiveness of Taiwan, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 126, pp. 550-562.
18. Klitkou, A. and Godoe, H. (2011), “The Norwegian PV manufacturing industry in a Triple Helix perspective, Energy Policy, Vol. 61, pp. 1586-1594.
19. Lee, Y. H. and Kim, Y. (2016), “Analyzing interaction in R＆D networks using the Triple Helix method: Evidence from industrial R＆D programs in Korean government, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 110, pp. 93-105.
20. Lengyel, B. and Leydesdorff, L. (2011), “Regional Innovation Systems in Hungary: The Failing Synergy at the National Level, Regional Studies, Vol. 45, issue 5, pp. 677-693.
21. Leydesdorff, L. (2003), “The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: An indicator of the Triple Helix dynamics, Scientometrics, Vol. 58, Issue 2, pp. 445–467.
22. McGill, W. J. (1954), “Multivariate information transmission, Psychometrika, Vol. 19, Issue 2, pp. 97–116.
23. Park, H. W. and Leydesdorff, L. (2010), “Longitudinal trends in networks of university‐industry‐government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives, Research Policy, Vol. 39, Issue 5, pp. 640–649.
24. Park, H. W., Hong, H. D. and Leydesdorff, L. (2005), “A Comparison of the Knowledge-Based Innovation Systems in the Economies of South Korea and The Netherlands Using Triple Helix Indicators, Scientometrics, Vol. 65, Issue 1, pp. 3-27.
25. Roberts, E. B. (2001), “Benchmarking global strategic management of technology, Research-Technology Management, Vol. 44, Issue 2, pp. 25-36.
26. Shannon, C. E. (1948), “A Mathematical Theory of Communication, The Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 27, Issue 3, pp. 379–423.
27. Urban, F. (2018), “China's rise: Challenging the North-South technology transfer paradigm for climate change mitigation and low carbon energy, Energy Policy, Vol. 113, pp. 320-330.
28. Vaivode, B. (2015), “Triple Helix Model of University–Industry–Government Cooperation in the Context of Uncertainties, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 213, pp. 1063-1067.
29. Ye, F. Y., Yu, S. S. and Leydesdorff, L. (2013), “The Triple Helix of university‐industry‐government relations at the country level and its dynamic evolution under the pressures of globalization, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 64, Issue 11, pp. 2317-2325.
30. Yoshida, T. and Fujikake, S. (2000), “Solar Cell Development Trends and Future Prospects, Fuji Electric Review, Vol. 49, Issue 2, pp. 45-48.
書籍
1. Afuah, A. (2000), “Innovation Management-Strategic, Implementation, and Profits, Oxford University Press, pp. 86.
2. Freeman, C. (1989), “Technology, policy, and economic performance, Pinter Publishers.
3. Martynovich, M. (2011), “On the Way to Developing the Triple Helix Indicator Contribution from Quantitative Empirical Studies, Department of Economic History, Lund University.
4. Nelson, R. R. (1993), “National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press.
5. Schilling, M. A. (2010), “Strategic Management of Technological Innovation, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, pp. 34, 36.
網頁資料
1. Earth Policy Institute (2013), “World Solar Photovoltaics Production, 1975–2012, Retrieved from: http://www.earth-policy.org/datacenter/xls/indicator12_2013_1.xlsx
2. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (2017), “Ready for the next phase of the energy transition, Retrieved from: https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/EN/Dossier/energy-transition.html
3. Fischer, M. (2018), “ITRPV 9th edition: 2018- report release ＆ key findings, ITRPV, Retrieved from: http://www.itrpv.net/.cm4all/uproc.php/0/ITRPV%20Ninth%20Edition%20Presentation%202018.pdf?cdp=a＆_=16223cd0ad8
4. Government of India Ministry of New ＆ Renewable Energy (2018), “National Wind-Solar Hybrid Policy, Retrieved from: https://mnre.gov.in/sites/default/files/webform/notices/National-Wind-Solar-Hybrid-Policy.pdf
5. Government of India Ministry of New And Renewable Energy(2011), “Strategic Plan For New And Renewable Energy Sector For The Period 2011-17, Retrieved from:
http://mnre.gov.in/file-manager/UserFiles/strategic_plan_mnre_2011_17.pdf
6. Government of Republic of Korea Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy(2016), “Introduction, Retrieved from: http://english.motie.go.kr/en/am/introduction/introduction.jsp
7. Government of UK Department for Business, Energy ＆ Industrial Strategy(2017), “The Clean Growth Strategy, Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/700496/clean-growth-strategy-correction-april-2018.pdf
8. Government of UK Department of Energy ＆ Climate Change(2013), “UK Solar PV Strategy Part 1: Roadmap to a Brighter Future, Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/249277/UK_Solar_PV_Strategy_Part_1_Roadmap_to_a_Brighter_Future_08.10.pdf
9. Loet Leydesdorff: scientometrics, knowledge-based economy, innovation, sociology of communication, triple helix(2016), “th.exe, Retrieved from: https://www.leydesdorff.net/th2/index.htm
10. Lundvall, B. (2010), “National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Anthem Press. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1gxp7cs
11. Yeung, R. W. (2008), “Information Theory and Network Coding, Springer Science ＆ Business Media. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-79234-7