跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.171) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/13 20:24
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:王延舜
研究生(外文):Yan-Shun Wang
論文名稱:直播中的關係賭局:觀眾是否甘願冒險?觀眾的風險傾向在不同領導風格直播主與彼此關係建立的調節作用
指導教授:李憶萱李憶萱引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中央大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:194
中文關鍵詞:網路直播領導風格關係風險傾向
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:387
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
常常會有很多人好奇為甚麼有人想要花時間去觀看網路直播,但在這個新興時代,網路直播已經成為一個常見的社會現象,直播未來的趨勢可能會逐漸傾向於直播加上垂直行業(例如:教育直播、電商直播等),或是直播相關顧問團隊也會因此興起,負責規劃直播的生態圈,因此「直播」值得我們更加深入地去探討。
本研究主要探討觀眾的「風險傾向」在直播主不同的「領導風格」下,「直播主與觀眾之間的關係」,本研究參考過去的文獻,並採取實驗法與問卷法來進行研究,以台灣直播主與其觀眾群為研究對象,觀眾在觀看直播時會不會因為個人不同的「風險傾向」,進而去調節「不同領導風格直播主與觀眾的關係」?
當雙方在建立關係時,直播主永遠不會知道這段關係最後會變成如何,這儼然就像是在一個賭局一樣,必須從不確定中去尋找答案。
研究結果顯示在實驗法下,觀眾的「風險傾向」會調節「直播主領導風格與觀眾的情感性關係和混和性關係」而觀眾的「風險傾向」不會調節「直播主領導風格與觀眾的工具性關係;在問卷法下,觀眾的「風險傾向」會調節「服務型領導風格與觀眾的混和性關係」,其餘則不會有調節效果。
本研究採用實驗法與問卷法兩種,希望能夠擴增網路直播相關研究,本研究將直播主與「領導風格」做結合,將人資的領導理論帶進直播的相關研究中,進而去探討其中的關連性,再來就是不同「領導風格」對不同的「直播主與觀眾的關係」確實會有影響,因此本研究所提出的「領導風格」與「直播主與觀眾的關係」的關聯性能夠提供未來直播相關研究基礎,再來就是以社會交換理論中,關係的互惠性來帶出風險傾向,探討觀眾的「風險傾向」在不同「領導風格」對不同的「直播主與觀眾的關係」是否有調節效果,本研究發現觀眾的「風險傾向」或多或少會去影響不同「領導風格」對不同的「直播主與觀眾的關係」,這對未來相關研究議題也提供了實證的基礎。
There are often many people wondering why some people want to spend time watching live streaming . In this emerging era, live streaming has become a common social phenomenon and the trend of live streaming may gradually turn to live streaming plus vertical industry(For example, live streaming of education, live streaming of Electronic Business , etc.) , or a team of live streaming consultants will rise up and be responsible for planning the live streaming system. Thus, "live streaming" deserves more in-depth discussion.
This research mainly explores the "risk propensity" of the audience under the different "leadership styles" of the live streamer , and "the relationship between the live streamer and the audience". This research refers to the past literature and adopts experimental methods and questionnaires to conduct research. Taking Taiwan's live streamers and their audiences as the research objects , will risk propensity of the audiences moderate the audience and steamer in different leadership styles?
When building a relationship, the live streamer will never know how this relationship will eventually become. This is like being in a gambling game, and streamer need to find answer under uncertainty.
The results of this research show that under the experimental method, the audience's "risk propensity" will moderate the " affective relationship and mixed relationship between the different leadership style and the audiences .And the audience's "risk propensity" will not moderate the instrumental relationship between the different leadership style and the audiences; under the questionnaire method, the audience's "risk propensity" will moderate the "mixed relationship between servant leadership style and the audiences", and the rest will not have moderating effects.
This research adopts experimental methods and questionnaires, and hopes to expand research about live streaming. This research combines the live streamer with different "leadership styles" to bring the leadership theory of human capital into the relevant research of live streaming, and then explore the relevance of this relationship.
Different "leadership styles" will have an impact on different " relationship between live streamer and audience". Therefore, the "leadership style" and the " relationship between live streamer and audience" proposed by this research is Relevant .It provides the basis for future live streaming research. In addition, the reciprocity of relationships from the social exchange theory brings out the risk propensity, and explores the risk propensity of the audiences moderate the audience and steamer in different leadership styles? This research discovered that the “risk propensity” of the audience will affect the different “leadership styles” and different “relationship between live streamer and audience”, which also provides basic evidence for future research topics.
目錄
摘要 ii
Abstract iv
致謝辭 vi
一、緒論 1
1-1 研究背景 1
1-2 研究目的 3
1-3 預期貢獻 7
二、文獻探討與研究假設 10
2-1 直播主與領導風格 10
2-1-1 直播主 10
2-1-2 魅力型領導 12
2-1-3 威權型領導 15
2-1-4 服務型領導 16
2-2 關係理論 19
2-3 「領導風格」與「觀眾與直播主的關係」 22
2-4 社會交換理論 30
2-5 風險傾向對「領導風格」與「觀眾與直播主的關 31
係」的調節效果 31
三、研究方法 36
3-1 研究對象與樣本發放 36
3-2 影片實驗法設計 36
3-2-1 實驗對象 36
3-2-2 實驗方法 37
3-2-3 魅力型領導(男直播主) 41
3-2-4 威權型領導(男直播主) 43
3-2-5 服務型領導(男直播主) 46
3-2-6 魅力型領導(女直播主) 48
3-2-7 威權型領導(女直播主) 50
3-2-8 服務型領導(女直播主) 53
3-3 實驗問卷設計 55
3-4 實驗問卷假設 56
3-5 問卷法問卷設計 57
3-6 變項衡量方式 58
3-6-1 直播主的領導風格 58
3-6-2 風險傾向 62
3-6-3 觀眾與直播主的關係 63
3-7 控制變數 66
3-8 分析方法 67
3-8-1 敘述統計與相關分析 67
3-8-2 因素分析 67
3-8-3 信度分析 68
3-8-4 效度分析 68
3-8-5 共同方法變異控制 69
3-8-6 變數之組內與組間變異成份分析 69
3-8-7 階層線性模型分析 70
四、資料分析與研究結果 71
4-1 實驗問卷 71
4-1-1 敘述性統計分析 71
4-1-2 相關分析 73
4-1-3 信度分析 76
4-1-4 效度分析的建構 76
4-1-5 實驗問卷結果 78
4-2 一般問卷 86
4-2-1 敘述性統計分析 86
4-2-2 相關分析 89
4-2-3 信度分析 92
4-2-4 效度分析的建構 92
4-2-5 變數之組內與組間變異成份分析 95
4-2-6 共同方法變異分析與因素分析 95
4-3 階層線性模型之假設分析結果 95
4-3-1 關係之虛無模型 96
4-3-2 直播主領導風格與工具性的關係 106
4-3-3 直播主領導風格與情感性的關係 107
4-3-4 直播主領導風格與混和性的關係 109
4-3-4 觀眾的風險傾向對直播主領導風格與工具性關係的 110
調節效果 110
4-3-4 觀眾的風險傾向對直播主領導風格與情感性關係的 112
調節效果 112
4-3-4 觀眾的風險傾向對直播主領導風格與混和性關係的 114
調節效果 114
五、結論與建議 117
5-1 實驗法研究結果 117
5-1-1 直播主領導風格與觀眾間的關係與觀眾的風險傾向對直播 117
主領導風格與觀眾間的關係的調節效果 117
5-2 問卷法研究結果 120
5-2-1 直播主領導風格如何影響與觀眾間的關係 120
5-1-2 觀眾的風險傾向對直播主領導風格與觀眾間的關係 127
的調節效果 127
5-2 研究貢獻 133
5-2-1 研究發現 133
5-2-2 理論貢獻 139
5-3 研究限制與後續建議 142
參考文獻 144
附錄 169
實驗問卷 169
一般問卷 173
參考文獻
中文參考文獻

鄭伯壎&周麗芳&樊景立(2000). 家長式領導:三元模式的建構與測量。本土心理學研究(13), 126-180.
余英時(1976).《史學與傳統》。台北:時報出版公司。
黃光國(1988a). 中國人的權力遊戲。教育與社會研究。
黃光國(1988b). 儒家思想與東亞現代化。教育與社會研究。
黃光國(2001). 儒家關係主義的理論建構及其方法論基礎。教育與社會研究。
陳順宇(2005). 多變量分析。台北 : 華泰。

英文參考文獻

Abela, A. V., & Murphy, P. E. (2008). Marketing with integrity: Ethics and the service-dominant logic for marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 39–53.
Anne, Jerslev. (2016). In the Time of the Microcelebrity: Celebrification and the YouTuber Zoella. International Journal of Communication, 10, 5233-5251
Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M., & Herrmann, A. (2005). The social influence of
brand community: Evidence from European car clubs. Journal of marketing,
69(3), 19-34.
Alpkan, L., Bulut, C., Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., & Kilic, K. (2010). Organizational support for intrapreneurship and its interaction with human capital to enhance innovative performance. Management Decision, 48, 732–755.
Anna, Fountain, Clark (2016). Toward an Entrepreneurial Public Sector: Using Social
Exchange Theory to Predict Public Employee Risk Perceptions. SAGE Journal,
45, 335-359.
Archer, J., Fernandez-Fuertes, A. A., & Thanzami, V. L. (2010). Does cost-benefit analysis or self-control predict involvement in two forms of aggression? Aggressive Behavior, 36, 292–304.
Arriaga, X.B., & Agnew, C.R. (2001). Being committed: Affective, cognitive, and conative components of relationship commitment.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1190–1203.
Athena, Xenikou. (2014). The Cognitive and Affective Components of Organizational Identification: The Role of Perceived Support Values and Charismatic Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12001.
Avolio, B. J., Yammarino, F. J., & Bass, B. M. (1991). Identifying common methods
variance with data collected from a single source: An unresolved sticky issue.
Journal of Management, 17(3), 571 587.
Avolio, BJ; Zhu, WC; Koh, W. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 951-968.
Balliet, D. (2010) Communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54, 39-57.
Barbuto, J. E, Jr, & Wheeler, D. W. (2006). Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership. Group and Organization Management, 31,
300–326.
Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(4), 573–590.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership performance beyond expectations.
New York: Academic Press.
Bechara,A.,Damasio, H.,Tranel,D., & Damasio,A.R.(1997).Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275,1293–1295. doi:10.1126/science.275.5304.1293.
Beckman, C. M. (2006). The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 741–758.
Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (2004). Marketing services: Competing through
quality: Simon and Schuster. Simon & Schuster Press.
Berryman, R., & Kavka, M. (2017). ‘I guess a lot of people see me as a big sister or a friend’: The role of intimacy in the celebrification of beauty vloggers. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 307–320.
Bishop, J.W., Scott, K.D., Goldsby, M.G., & Cropanzano, R. (2005). A construct validity study of commitment and perceived support variables. A multifoci approach across different team environments. Group & Organisation Management, 30(2),153–180.
Blanchard, A. L., & Markus, M. L. (2004). The experienced sense of a virtual
community: Characteristics and processes. ACM SIGMIS Data base: the
database for Advances in Information Systems, 35(1), 64-79.
Bolino, M. C., Varela, J. A., Bande, B., & Turnley, W. H. (2006). The impact of
impression‐management tactics on supervisor ratings of organizational
citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International
Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and
Behavior, 27(3), 281 297.
Bond, Bradley J. (2018). Parasocial Relationships with Media Personae: Why They Matter and How They Differ Among Heterosexual, Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Adolescents. Media Psychology, 457- 485.
Bono, J. E., & Ilies, R. (2006). Charisma, positive emotions, and mood contagion. Leadership Quarterly,17, 317-334.
Brandtzaeg, P. B. (2012). Social networking sites: their users and social implications – a longitudinal study. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 17(4), 467–488.
Busenitz, L.W. (1999). Entrepreneurial risk and strategic decision making: it's a matter of perspective [J]. J. Appl. Behav. Sci, 35 (3), 325–340.
Byrne, D. (1977). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
Byron, Reeves & Thomas, W. Malone & Tony, O'Driscoll. Leadership's Online Labs.
Harvard Business Review.
Campos-Freire, Francisco & Soengas-Perez, Xose & Rodriguez-Castro & Marta (2018). Assessment indicators for public broadcasters' news services.
DOI: 10.3145/epi.2018.mar.05.
Carnevale, Joel, B. & Huang, Lei & Paterson, Ted. (2019). LMX-differentiation strengthens the prosocial consequences of leader humility: An identification and social exchange perspective. Journal of Business Research, 287-296.
Carolina, Martínez & Tobias, Olsson (2019). Making sense of YouTubers: how Swedish children construct and negotiate the YouTuber Misslisibell as a girl celebrity.
Journal of Children and Media , 13, 36-52.
Cheng, Y., Yen, C., & Chen, L. H. (2012). Transformational leadership and job involvement: The moderation of emotional contagion. Military Psychology, 24,
382–396.
Chernyak-Hai, L., & Rabenu, E. (2018). The new era workplace relationships: Is social exchange theory still relevant? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 11(3), 456–481.
Chia-Chen Chen & Yi-Chen Lin (2017). What drives live-stream usage intention? The perspectives of flow , entertainment, social interaction, and endorsement.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.003.
Chiniara, Myriam & Bentein, Kathleen. (2018). The servant leadership advantage: When perceiving low differentiation in leader-member relationship quality influences team cohesion, team task performance and service OCB. Leadership Quarterly, 333-345.
Chittle, Laura & Horton, Sean & Dixon, Jess C. (2018). Relative age effects and academic timing in Canadian interuniversity football. High Ability Studies, 65-78.
Christian Licoppe , Julien More (2018). Visuality, text and talk, and the systematic organization of interaction in Periscope live video streams. SAGE Journal, 20,
637-665
Chung, D. S., & Yoo, C. Y. (2008). Audience motivations for using interactive features: distinguishing use of different types of interactivity on an online newspaper. Mass Communication and Society, 11(4), 375-397.
Clark, M. S.,&Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.
Clarke, Matthew; Sheridan, Lynn (2017).Heroes and villains: the insistence of the imaginary and the novice teacher's need to believe. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,194-206.
Cocker, H.L., Banister, E.N. & Piacentini, M.G. (2015) Producing and consuming celebrity identity myths: unpacking the classed identities of Cheryl Cole and Katie
Price. Journal of Marketing Management 31(5-6), 502-524.
Cohen, J (2004). Parasocial break-up from favorite television characters: The role of attachment styles and relationship intensity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 516-529.
Conger, Rabindra, Kanungo (1987). Toward a Behavioral Theory of Charismatic Leadership in Organizational Settings. The Academy of Management Review
, 12(4), 637-647.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 874–900.
Daft, R. L. (2008). New era of management. Mason, O.H., Thomson South-Western.
Daniel Recktenwald (2017).Toward a transcription and analysis of live streaming on Twitch. Journal of Pragmatics, 115, 68-81.
Dawes, R. M., McTavish, J., & Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a common dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 1-11.
Delia Baldassarri & Guy Grossman (2011). Centralized sanctioning and legitimate authority promote cooperation in humans. SAGE Journal, 20, 637-665.
Dennis, A. R., Pootheri, S. K., & Natarajan, V. L. (1998). Lessons from the early
adopters of web groupware . Journal of Management Information Systems,
14(4), 65-86.
Deutsch, M (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31,137-149.
Donghui, Li & Guozheng, Zhang & Zeng, Xu & Yong, Lan & Yongdong, Shi & Zhiyao, Liang & Haiwen, Chen (2018). Modelling the Roles of Cewebrity Trust and Platform Trust in Consumers’ Propensity of Live Streaming: An Extended TAM Method. Computers, Materials and Continua, 55(1), 137-150.
Driessens, O. (2012). The celebritization of society and culture: Understanding the structural dynamics of celebrity culture. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(6), 641–657.
Dyer, J. R., Johansson, A., Helbing, D., Couzin, I. D., & Krause, J. (2009). Leadership, consensus decision making and collective behaviour in humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society : Biological Sciences, 364, 781-789.
Eames, C. & Daley, D.& Hutchings, J. (2010).The impact of group leaders' behaviour on parents acquisition of key parenting skills during parent training. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2010.07.011.
Eberly, M. B., & Fong, C. T. (2013). Leading via the heart and mind: The roles of leader and follower emotions, attributions and interdependence. The Leadership
Quarterly, 24, 696–711.
Elise, Danielle, Thorburn. (2014).Social media, subjectivity, and surveillance: Moving on from occupy, the rise of live streaming video. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 11, 52-63.
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 161–186. Personality and domain-specific risk taking. J. Risk Res, 8 (2), 157–176.
Eltoukhy, Abdelrahman, E.E. & Wang, Z. X. & Chan, Felix T. S.(2018). Joint optimization using a leader-follower Stackelberg game for coordinated configuration of stochastic operational aircraft maintenance routing and maintenance staffing. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 46-68.
Elyria, Kemp, Kim, H. Williams & McDowell, Porter (2015). Hope across the seas: the role of emotions and risk propensity in medical tourism advertising. Journal
International Journal of Advertising, 34, 621-640.
Erez, A., Misangyi, V. F., Johnson, D. E., LePine, M. A., & Halverson, K. C. (2008). Stirring the hearts of followers: Charismatic leadership as the transferal of affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 602–615.
Eun, Yu & Chanyong, Jung & Hyungjin, Kim & Jaemin, Jung. (2018). Impact of viewer engagement on gift-giving in live video streaming. Telematics and Informatics
, 35, 1450-1460.
Fan, Y. (2002). Questioning guanxi: definition, classification and implications.
International business review, 11(5), 543 561.
Farh, J. L.& Cheng, B.S.& Chou, L.F., & Chu, X. P. (2006). ‘Authority and benevolence: employees’ responses to paternalistic leadership in China’. In A. S. Tsui, Y. Bian, & L. Cheng (Eds.), China’s domestic private firms: Multidisciplinary perspectives on management and performance (pp. 230–260). New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Farjam, Mike & Nikolaychuk, Olexandr & Bravo, Giangiacomo (2018). Does risk communication really decrease cooperation in climate change mitigation? Climatic change, 147-158.
Fieke, Harinck & Gemma, E.M., Steemers. (1997). From Game Theory to Real Life: How Social Value Orientation Affects Willingness to Sacrifice in Ongoing Close Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1330- 1344.
Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Derby, S.L., Keeney, R.L. (1981).
Acceptable Risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield.
Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1980). Resource theory: Interpersonal behavior as exchange. In K. J. Gergen & M. S., Greenberg & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research. New York: Plenum.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable
variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of marketing
research, 382-388.
Fournier, S. (1994). A person brand relationship framework for strategic brand
management. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
French, J. R., Jr., & Raven, B. H. (1968). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics (pp. 259-269). New York: Harper & Row.
Friedland, W. H. (1964) For a sociological concept of charisma. Social Forces, 43,
18-26.
Gary, G., Hamilton (1990). Patriarchy, patrimonialism, and filial piety: A comparison of China and Western Europe. The British Journal of Sociology, 41, 77-104.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Gorsky, Diane & Barker, James R. & MacLeod, Anna (2018). Servant and supervisor: contrasting discourses of care and coercion in senior medical school leadership roles. Studies in Higher Education, 43, 2238-2250.
Grabo, Allen & van, Vugt, Mark (2016). Charismatic leadership and the evolution of cooperation. Evolution and Human Behavior.
Graeme Horsman (2018). A forensic examination of the technical and legal challenges surrounding the investigation of child abuse on live streaming platforms: A case study on Periscope. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 42, 107-117.
Grandey, A. A., Tam, A. P., & Brauburger, A. L. (2002). Affective states and traits in the workplace: Diary and survey data from young workers. Motivation and Emotion, 26, 31-55.
Greenberg, J & Cohen, R.L. (1992). Why Justice? Normative and Instrumental interpretations. New York Academic Press,437-467.
Greenleaf, R.K. (1977). Servant Leadership: A journey into nature of legitimate power and greatness. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.
Gregor, McEwan & Carl, Gutwin (2017). A Case Study of How a Reduction in Explicit Leadership Changed an Online Game Community. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 26, 873–925.
Gribble, Karleen. (2018)."Someone's generosity has formed a bond between us": Interpersonal relationships in Internet-facilitated peer-to-peer milk sharing. Material and Child Nutrition.
Gros, D. & Wanner, B. & Hackenholt, A.& Zawadzki, P. & Knautz, K. (2017). World of streaming. motivation and gratification on twitch. International Conference on Social Computing and Social Media (pp. 44–57). Cham: Springer.
Groves, K. S. (2006). Leader emotional expressivity, visionary leadership, and organizational change. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27,
565-852.
Grzelak, J. L. (1982). Preferences and cognitive processes in interdependence situations: A theoretical analysis of cooperation. In V. Derlage & J. Grzelak (Eds.), Cooperation and helping behavior (pp. 95-122). New \brk: Academic Press.
Guerrero, Erick G. (2013). Workforce diversity in outpatient substance abuse treatment: The role of leaders' characteristics. Journal of substance abuse treatment, 208-215.
Hadida, A.L. & Paris, T. (2014). Managerial cognition and the value chain in the digital music industry [J]. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 83, 84–97.
Hafezalkotob, Ashkan & Khodabakhsh, Maryam & Saghaei, Abbas. (2018). Cooperation of advertising companies in social networks: A graph and game theory approaches. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 125, 212-220.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006).
Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6): Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice
Hall.
Han, Sangyeal &Yang, Heetae. (2015). Understanding adoption of intelligent personal assistants: A parasocial relationship perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 618-636.
Hamilton, W. A., Garretson, O., & Kerne, A. (2014). Streaming on twitch: fostering
participatory communities of play within live mixed media. In Proceedings of the
32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 1315-1324.
Heap, Shaun Hargreaves. (2016). Prisoners of Reason: Game Theory and Neoliberal Political Economy. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 54(4), 1392-1394.
Heaphy, E.D., & Dutton, J. E. (2008). Positive social interactions and the human body at work: Linking organizations and physiology. Academy of Management Review, 33, 137–162.
Helzer, J.E., Robins LN, McEvoy L. (1987). Post-traumatic stress disorder in the
general population. Findings of the epidemiologic catchment area survey. New England Journal of Medicine, 317-1630.
Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165-196.
Hoge, C.W. & Castro, C.A. & Messer, S.C. & McGurk, D. & Cotting, D.I. & Koffman R.L. (2004). Combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, mental health problems, and barriers to care. New England Journal of Medicine, 351, 13–22.
Holt, J., Steirer, G., & Petruska, K. (2016). Introduction: The expanding landscape of
connected viewing. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New
Media Technologies, 22(4), 341-347.
House, R. J. & Baetz, M. L. (1979). Leadership: Some empirical generalizations and new research directions. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1,pp. 399-401). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953) Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hsu, Y., & Huang, S. (2011). Top management team characteristics, decision-making style, and organizational performance. African Journal of Business Management, 5, 12099–12107.
Hu, M., Zhang, M., & Wang, Y. (2017). Why do audiences choose to keep watching
on live video streaming platforms? An explanation of dual identification framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 594-606.
Huang, Feng & Chen, Xiaojie & Wang, Long. (2018). Conditional punishment is a double-edged sword in promoting cooperation. Scientific Reports.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). An assessment of
within group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 306.
Jilei, Zhou & Jing, Zhou & Ying, Ding & Hansheng Wang (2018). A Social Interaction Perspective of Gift Sending on Live Streaming Platforms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 34, 100-815.
Jordan, B.K. & Schlenger, W.E. & Hough, R., Kulka, R.A., Weiss, D., Fairbank, J.A.,
et al. (1991). Lifetime and current prevalence of specific psychiatric disorders among Vietnam veterans and controls. Archives of General Psychiatry, 48.
Joshanloo, Mohsen (2019). Experience and Life Satisfaction: A Study in 147 Countries. Emotion, 629-636.
Judge (2018). Father Figures and Faction Leaders Identification Strategies and Monarchical Imagery among Ordinary Citizens of the Northern and Southern Low Countries, BMGN, 1780-1820.
Kaiser, Dagmar, Elaine & Dall,'Agnol & Clarice, Maria. (2017). Teaching and learning nursing management in the hospital context: an approach in the light of Pichon-Riviere. REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM.
Kannadhasan, M., & Nandagopal, R. (2010). Influence of decision makers’ characteristics on risk analysis in strategic investment decisions. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing,6, 38–44.
Katherine, Carl, Payne & Mark, J. & Keith, Ryan, Schuetzler, & Justin, Scott, Giboney (2017). Examining the Learning Effects of Live Streaming Video Game Instruction over Twitch. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 95-109.
Katharina, Rein & Tommaso, Venturini (2018). Ploughing digital landscapes:
How Facebook influences the evolution of live video streaming. SAGE Journal, 20, 3359-3380.
Keatlholetswe, Lesika & Malete, Leapetswe (2017). The Relationship among Coaching Efficacy, Leadership Styles and Team Outcomes in a Premier League Soccer Season in Botswana. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, s269-s270.
Kees (2012). Imaging tumor-stroma interactions during chemotherapy reveals contributions of the microenvironment to resistance.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.017.
Keil, M., Wallace, L., Turk, D., Dixon-Randall, G., Nulden, U. (2000).
An investigation of risk perception and risk propensity on the decision to
continue a software development project. J. Syst. Softw, 53 (2), 145–157.
Kirilova, S. (2017). Key components for successful personal branding online, THESEUS.
Koh, J., Kim, Y.G., & Kim, Y.G. (2003). Sense of virtual community: A conceptual
framework and empirical validation. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(2), 75-94.
Korgaonkar, P.K. and Wolin, L.D. (1999), “A multivariate analysis of web uses”, Journal of Advertising Research, 39, 53-68.
Kranabetter, Caroline & Niessen, Cornelia (2017). Managers as Role Models for Health: Moderators of the Relationship of Transformational Leadership with Employee Exhaustion and Cynicism. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 492-501.
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox – a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kristy, Beers, Fägersten. (2017). The role of swearing in creating an online persona: The case of YouTuber PewDiePie. Discourse, Context & Media.
Labrecque, Lauren, I. (2014). Fostering Consumer-Brand Relationships in Social Media Environments: The Role of Parasocial Interaction. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 134-148.
Lai, C. H., & Gwung, H. L. (2013). The effect of gender and Internet usage on
physical and cyber interpersonal relationships. Computers & Education, 69,
303-309.
Lapointe, Emilie & Vandenberghe, Christian. (2018). Examination of the Relationships Between Servant Leadership, Organizational Commitment, and Voice and Antisocial Behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 148, 99–115.
Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1987). Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 1-39.
Latorre-Martinez, Pilar & Orive-Serrano, Victor & Iniguez, David (2018). Measurement and analysis of the presence in Facebook and Twitter in the regional television broadcaster's context in Spain. PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 1061-1070.
Leana, C. R., & Barry, B. (2000). Stability and change as simultaneous experiences in organizational life. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 753–759.
Lessel, P., Mauderer, M., Wolff, C., & Krüger, A. (2017). Let's play my way: investigating audience influence in user-generated gaming live-streams. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video, ACM, 51-63.
Li, Chuan, Chu. (2014). The moderating role of authoritarian leadership on the relationship between the internalization of emotional regulation and the well-being
of employees. SAGE Journal, 10, 326-343.
Liman, man, waili & Takeshi, Hamamura & Glenn, Adams (2015). Relational Mobility Increases Social (but Not Other) Risk Propensity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(5).
Livingstone, S. (2002). Young people and new media. SAGE.
Liu, F. & Li, T. (2018). A clustering k-anonymity privacy-preserving method for wearable IoT devices. Security and Communication Networks, 1-8.
Loewenstein ,G. & Weber, E.U. & Hsee, C.K. & Welch, N.(2001). Risk as feelings.
Psychol. Bull, 127,267–286
Lord, R. G., Brown, D. J., & Freiberg, S. J. (1999). Understanding the dynamics of leadership: The role of follower self-concepts in the leader/follower relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 167−203.
Lovelock, M. (2017). ‘Is every YouTuber going to make a coming out video eventually?’: YouTube celebrity video bloggers and lesbian and gay identity. Celebrity Studies, 8(1), 87–103.
Maner, J. K. & Gailliot, M. T. & Butz, D. A. & Peruche, B. M. (2007). Power, risk, and the status quo: Does power promote riskier or more conservative decision making? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 451–462.
Mark, R, Johnson & Jamie, Woodcock. (2017). Fighting games and Go: Exploring the aesthetics of play in professional gaming. SAGE Journal, 138, 26-45.
Marwick, A. E., & boyd, D. (2011). To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence, 17(2),139–158.
Massey, Graham, R. & Wang, Paul, Z. & Kyngdon, Andrew, S. (2019). Conceptualizing and modeling interpersonal trust in exchange relationships: The effects of incomplete model specification. Industrial Marketing Management, 60-71.
Matthew, Rabin. (2014). Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics. The American Economic Review, 83(5), 1281-1302.
Meeker, B. F. (1971). Decisions and exchange. American Sociological Review, 36, 485-495.
Mellers, B. & Schwartz, A. & Ritov, I.(1999).Emotion-based choice. J. Exp.
Psychol. Gen, 128,332–345.
McQuarrie, E.F., Miller, J, & Phillips, B.J. (2013). The megaphone effect: Taste and
audience in fashion blogging. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), 136-158.
Michele, Martini. (2018). Online distant witnessing and live-streaming activism: Emerging differences in the activation of networked publics. SAGE Journal, 20,
4035-4055.
Moorman, C, Zaltman, G, Deshpande´ R. (1992). Relationship between providers and
users of marketing research: the dynamics of trust within and between organizations. J, Mark, Res, 29, 314– 28.
Mora, Jose-Domingo & Krider, Robert & Ho, Jason (2015). Who Decides What to Watch on TV at Home? Insights from People-Meter Data in Mexico Measuring Co-Viewing and Preference Influences to Help Broadcasters Promote Programming. Journal of Advertising Research, 22-36.
Morgan (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing
Relationship commitment and trust is central to successful relationship marketing.
Journal of Marketing, 58.
Mu, Hu & Mingli, Zhang & Yu, Wang (2017). Why do audiences choose to keep watching on live video streaming platforms? An explanation of dual identification framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 594-606.
Murstein, B. I., Cerreto, M., & MacDonald, M. G. (1977). A theory and investigation of the effect of exchange orientation on marriage and friendship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 543-548.
Nathan, Edge (2013). Evolution of the gaming experience: live video streaming and the emergence of a new web community. Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 4.
Navarro, S., Andreu, L., & Cervera, A. (2014). Value co-creation among hotels and disabled customers: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 67(5),
813–818.
Nazir, Sajjad & Qun, Wang & Hui, Li. (2018). Influence of Social Exchange Relationships on Affective Commitment and Innovative Behavior: Role of Perceived Organizational Support. SUSTAINABILITY, 4418.
Nicole, Carnt & Lisa, Keay & Mark, Willcox & Vicki, Evans & Fiona, Stapleton. (2011). Higher risk taking propensity of contact lens wearers is associated with less compliance. The journal of the British Contact Lens Association, 34(5).
Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hil.
Oh, S. K., & Choi, H. J. (2017). Broadcasting upon a shooting star: investigating the success of Afreeca TV's livestream personal broadcast model. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 13(2), 193-212.
Ostrem, L.M. (2006). Servant leadership and work-related outcomes: A multilevel
model. PhD thesis. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
Raney, Laura, M., Arpan, Kartik, Pashupati & Dale, A. Brill (2003). At the movies, on the Web: An investigation of the effects of entertaining and interactive Web content on site and brand evaluations. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17, 38-53.
Robert, C., Liden & Sandy, J., Wayne, Hao, Zhao & David, Henderson (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 161-177.
Slater, Michael, D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x.
Smith, T., Obrist, M., & Wright, P. (2013). Live streaming changes the (video) game.
Doi:10.1145/2465958.2465971.
Strahilevitz, L.J. (2003). Charismatic code, social norms, and the emergence of cooperation on the fileswapping networks. VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 505-595.
Park, S. B., & Chung, N. (2011). Mediating roles of self presentation desire in online
game community commitment and trust behavior of Massive Multiplayer Online Role Playing Games. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2372-2379.
Parris, D. L., & Peachey, J. W. (2013). A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(3),
377–393.
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2006). Research note: Individual differences in
perceptions of Internet communication. European Journal of Communication,
21(2), 213-226.
Price, M. E., & Van, Vugt, M. (2014). The evolution of leader–follower reciprocity: The theory of service-for-prestige. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 363.
Punamäki, R.-L., Wallenius, M., Nygård, C. H., Saarni, L., & Rimpelä, A. (2006). Use of information and communication technology (ICT) and adolescents’ perceived health: the role of sleeping habits and waking-time tiredness. Journal of Adolescence, 30(4), 569–585.
Raphael, Jackie & Lam, Celia. (2018). The function of hosts: enabling fan-celebrity interactions at pop culture conventions. CONTINUUM-JOURNAL OF MEDIA & CULTURAL STUDIES, 173-183.
Robbins, Stephen, P. dan, Judge, Timothy, A. (2008). Organizational Behaviour. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Rodriguez-Blanco, Veronica. (2016). Authorities: Conflicts, Cooperation and Transnational Legal Theories. Oxford University Press.
Rodriguez-Carvajal, Raquel & Herrero, Marta & van, Dierendonck, Dirk (2019). Servant Leadership and Goal Attainment Through Meaningful Life and Vitality: A Diary Study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20, 499–521.
Rojek, C. (2001) Celebrity. London: Reaktion Books.
Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi level and
cross level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7(1), 1 37.
Rubin, Z. (1973). Liking and loving: An invitation to social psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Russell Cropanzano, Marie S. Mitchell (2005). Social Exchange Theory:
An Interdisciplinary Review. SAGE Journal, 31, 874-900.
Saeki, Daisuke & Kohara, Shuto & Ishikawa, Aya. (2016). Temporal discounting of hypothetical monetary rewards in humans: Comparison between laboratory experiment and questionnaire. The Psychological Record, 2009, 59, 247–258.
Sears, D. O., Freedman, L., & Peplau, L. A. (1985) Social psychology (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Scientific Reportsvolume, 9, 2151.
Sendjaya, S., & Sarros, J.C. (2002). Servant leadership: Its origin, development, and
application in organisations. Journal of Leadership & Organisational Studies, 9(2),
57–65.
Schwepker, C. H., Jr. (2016). Servant leadership, distributive justice and commitment to customer value in the salesforce. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31(1), 70–82.
Shafir, E. & LeBoeuf, R. A. (2002). Rationality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 491-517.
Sheng, C., & Tian, Y. (2010). Relationships among teamwork behaviour, trust, perceived team support, and team commitment. Social Behaviour and Personality, 38(10),1297–1306.
Shore, L. M., Tetrick, L. E., & Barksdale, K. (2001). Social and economic exchanges as mediators of commitment and performance. Unpublished manuscript. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00046.x.
Smith, D. (2014). Charlie is so ‘English’-like: nationality and the branded celebrity
person in the age of YouTube. Celebrity studies, 5(3), 256-274.
Smith, D. (2016). Imagining others more complexly’: celebrity and the ideology of fame among YouTube’s ‘Nerdfighteria. Celebrity Studies, 7(3): 339-353.
Smith, R.J. (1994). China's cultural heritage. The Qing Dynasty,1644-1912. Colorado: Westview Press.
Stubb, Carolina & Colliander, Jonas (2019)."This is not sponsored content" - The effects of impartiality disclosure and e-commerce landing pages on consumer responses to social media influencer posts. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 210-222.
Sun, W. & Cai, Z. & Li, Y. & Liu, F. & Fang, F. (2018). Security and privacy in the medical internet of things: A review. Security and Communication Networks. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5978636.
Tarnovskaya, V. (2017). Successful Personal Branding on Social Media. Department of Business Administration.
Todd & Melancon. (2017). Gender and live-streaming: source credibility and motivation. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 12(3).
Toom, Auli. (2018). School culture, leadership and relationships matter. TEACHERS AND TEACHING,745-748.
Traczyk, J., & Zaleskiewicz, T. (2015). Implicit attitudes toward risk: the Construction and validation of the measurement method. J. Risk Res. 1–13.
Triana, Maria, Del, Carmen & Richard, Orlando, C. & Yucel, Ilhami. (2017). Status Incongruence and Supervisor Gender as Moderators of the Transformational Leadership to Subordinate Affective Organizational Commitment Relationship.
Personnel Psychology, 429-467.
Turner, G. (2004). Celebrity. SAGE.
Turner, G. (2010). Ordinary people and the media: The demotic turn. SAGE.
Van, Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228–1261.
Van, Miltenburg, Nynke & Przepiorka, Wojtek & Buskens, Vincent (2017). Consensual punishment does not promote cooperation in the six-person prisoner's dilemma game with noisy public monitoring. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188503.
Van, Knippenberg, D., & Sitkin, S. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? The Academy of Management Annals, 7, 1-60.
Van, Waeyenberg, Thomas & Decramer, Adelien & Desmidt, Sebastian (2017). The relationship between employee performance management and civil servants' turnover intentions: a test of the mediating roles of system satisfaction and affective commitment. Public Management Review, 747-764.
Vanesa, Pérez-Torres & Yolanda, Pastor-Ruiz & Sara, Abarrou, Ben-Boubaker (2018). YouTubers videos and the construction of adolescent identity. Media Education Research Journal, 26, 61-70.
Venus, M., Stam, D., & van, Knippenberg, D. (2013). Leader emotion as a catalyst of effective leader communication of visions, value-laden messages, and goals.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122, 53–68.
Wagar, B.M., & Dixon, M.(2006). Affective guidance in the Iowa gambling task. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6, 277–290.
Walumbwa, F.O. & Wang, P. & Lawler, J.J. (2004). The role of collective efficacy in the relations between transformational leadership and work outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 515-530.
Walster, E., Aronson, D., & Abrahams, D. (1966). On increasing the persuasiveness of a low prestige communicator. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2,
325-342.
Wang, An-Chih & Tsai, Chou-Yu & Dionne, Shelley, D.(2018). Benevolence-dominant, authoritarianism-dominant, and classical paternalistic leadership: Testing their relationships with subordinate performance. Leadership Quarterly, 686-697.
Wang, G., Oh, I., Courtright, S. H., & Colbert, A. E. (2011). Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: Ameta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group & Organization Management, 36, 223–270.
Wang, H., & Wellman, B. (2010). Social connectivity in America: change in adult friendship network size from 2002 to 2007. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(8), 1148–1169.
Watts, Logan L. & Steele, Logan M. & Mumford, Michael D.(2019). Making sense of pragmatic and charismatic leadership stories: Effects on vision formation. Leadership Quarterly, 243-259.
Weber, E.U., Blais, A.R.e., Betz, N.E., (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude
scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. J. Behav. Decis. Mak.
15 (4), 263–290.
Williams, R.L. & Cothrel, J. (2000). Four smart ways to run online communities. Sloan Management Review, 41(4), 81.
Willner, A. R. (1984). The spellbinders: Charismatic political leadership. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Wilkinson RG (1996) Unhealthy Societies. The Afflictions of Inequality. London: Routledge.
Wu, He. (2013). Examining students’online interaction in a live video streaming environment using data mining and text mining. Computers in Human Behavior,
29(1), 90-102.
Wulani, F., & Lindawati, T. (2018). The coworker’s impression management
, LMX and Interpersonal Deviance: The moderating effect of a fellow employee’s LMX. Journal of Organizational Culture, 22(1), 1-14.
Wu, TY, Hsu WL & Cheng, B.S. (2003) Expressing anger? Or suppressing anger? Subordinates’ anger responses to supervisors’ authoritarian leadershipistic behaviors in Chinese business. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies 18, 3–49.
Xiaoxing, Zhang, Yu, Xiang & Lei, Hao (2018). Virtual gifting on China’s live streaming platforms: hijacking the online gift economy. Chinese Journal of Communication.
Yongjun, Sung & Jooyoung, Kim (2010). Effects of brand personality on brand trust and brand affect. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20349.
Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285-305.
Zhang, H.& Cai, Z. & Liu, Q.& Xiao, Q & Li, Y. et al. (2018). A survey on security-aware measurement in SDN. Security and Communication Networks.
Zhang, H., & Perc, M. (2016). Evolution of conditional cooperation under multilevel selection. Scientific Reports.
Zhao, Q., Chen, C. D., Cheng, H. W. & Wang, J. L. (2018). Determinants of live streamers' continuance broadcasting intentions on Twitch: A self-determination theory perspective. Telematics and Informatics, 35, 406-420.
Zheng, Wei & Surgevil, Olca & Kark, Ronit (2018). Dancing on the Razor's Edge: How Top-Level Women Leaders Manage the Paradoxical Tensions between Agency and Communion. Sex Roles, 663-650.
Zorah, Hilvert-Bruce & James, T., Neill, Max , Juho, Hamari (2018).
Social motivations of live-streaming viewer engagement on Twitch. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 58-67.

網路資料
TRANSBIZ: 網路直播教學,讓品牌跟上行銷潮流的3個策略,取自: https://transbiz.com.tw/%E5%93%81%E7%89%8C%E7%B6%B2%E8%B7%AF%E7%9B%B4%E6%92%AD%E6%95%99%E5%AD%B8-brand-live-stream/
今日新聞網:夯直播/全世界都在瘋開直播 台灣的10大直播平台,取自:
https://www.nownews.com/news/20180712/2787310/
kk news: 2018中國十大直播平台排行榜,取自:
https://kknews.cc/zh-tw/other/arbe88x.html
關鍵評論:不只是拿起手機開始拍—認識直播的五大類別,取自:
https://www.thenewslens.com/article/78434
數位時代:你相信直播是未來嗎? 取自:
https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/41959/live-platforms-in-taiwan
台灣網路中心報告,取自:
https://www.twnic.net.tw/doc/twrp/201812e.pdf
自由時報: YouTube使用行為大調查:7成受訪者天天看,平均花2.5小時,
取自: https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/2551405
科技新報:17media專訪,取自:
https://technews.tw/2018/12/22/exclusive-interview-with-senior-vice-president-kevin-li-of-17-media/
數位時代: Shopee LIVE正式上線,蝦皮推直播轉型新媒體平台,取自:
https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/52627/shopee-live-launch
TVBS:虛擬直播主,取自: https://news.tvbs.com.tw/world/1049183
Twitch (2017a). Twitch: Social video for gamers. Retrieved from 30.
取自:https://www.twitch.tv/p/about/
Twitch (2017b). Audience. 取自: http://twitchadvertising.tv/audience/
Twitch (2017c). Twitch year in review 2016.
取自:http://www.twitch.tv/year/2016/index.html.
今周刊: 無敵網紅館長:就愛跟觀眾罵來罵去,取自:
https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/154769/post/201902130020
網路溫度計:Youtuber排行,取自: https://dailyview.tw/top100/topic/36
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊
 
1. 直播主技巧與直播效益的關係:商品類型與直播者性別、學歷及年資的交叉分析
2. 吃軟不吃硬:三種領導類型直播主如何影響觀眾忠誠度?以觀眾自我建構類型為調節
3. 網路直播:直播平台優勢、直播主吸引力、閱聽者個人動機、以及黏著度
4. 給予關愛還是銀兩? 獎勵對觀看的動機及觀眾與直播主之間關係的調節作用
5. 線上直播平台觀眾對直播主忠誠度影響因素之研究
6. 以直播主人格特質和觀眾人格特質探討網路直播知覺場景對觀眾投入之影響
7. 直播主與觀眾之間,直播主之個人品牌個性會導致什麼樣的關係?以觀眾之使用滿足感為中介變數
8. 網路直播共創者投入對價值共創影響程度-以直播主的雙面靈巧行為與觀眾的社會比較資訊注意程度為干擾變數
9. 以延伸整合型科技接受模式、直播主來源可信度及社會臨場感探討臉書直播觀眾的持續使用意圖-以五大人格特質為調節變項
10. 網紅直播主規劃與直播效果之研究—以浪Live直播APP為例
11. 探討電子遊戲直播平台的觀眾與直播主之關係
12. 臉書直播購物對消費者購買意願之研究-以直播主信任為中介變數
13. 大學生對於線上直播之直播知覺有用性、直播主風格與觀看者滿意度關係之研究
14. 越寂寞的人越離不開直播? 探索直播持續觀看意圖
15. 直播主特質與媒體製播特質對臉書直播拍賣影片態度及購買意願之影響